Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-18 Thread Rolf-Werner Eilert
Hi Antoine, thanks for that input, it is just what I thought would be the reason. Am 16.05.2012 18:43, schrieb Antoine RODRIGUEZ: > The trouble that is specified all is more a kernel trouble. Not an LTSP > or Xorg trouble. > > The kernels in debians might not be compiled for the platforms that yo

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-16 Thread Rob Owens
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:27:34PM +0200, Gian Carlo Stagni wrote: > Il 16/05/2012 04:27, Quiliro Ordóñez ha scritto: > > > So LTSP does not work on Pentium III as a client? > I have a laboratory with a server running Squeeze and 20 _very_ > thin-clients... > - CPU: 400MHz Pentium II (Deschutes)

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-16 Thread Gian Carlo Stagni
Il 16/05/2012 04:27, Quiliro Ordóñez ha scritto: > So LTSP does not work on Pentium III as a client? I have a laboratory with a server running Squeeze and 20 _very_ thin-clients... - CPU: 400MHz Pentium II (Deschutes) - RAM 64MB As they are able to boot from lan but still have an unused 4GB hdis

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-16 Thread Rolf-Werner Eilert
Am 16.05.2012 06:18, schrieb Alkis Georgopoulos: > Στις 16/05/2012 05:27 πμ, ο/η Quiliro Ordóñez έγραψε: >> So LTSP does not work on Pentium III as a client? This would make LTSP >> non-viable for me. I thought only X worked on the clients. Is X that heavy? > > LTSP works fine on Pentium II with 12

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Roberts
On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote: > So LTSP does not work on Pentium III as a client? This would make LTSP > non-viable for me. I thought only X worked on the clients. Is X that heavy? I am not saying that, I am just saying that it was cheaper for me to spend £100 per client x 5 f

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-15 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Στις 16/05/2012 05:27 πμ, ο/η Quiliro Ordóñez έγραψε: > So LTSP does not work on Pentium III as a client? This would make LTSP > non-viable for me. I thought only X worked on the clients. Is X that heavy? LTSP works fine on Pentium II with 128 MB RAM. But some apps like firefox or openoffice make

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-15 Thread Quiliro Ordóñez
El 10/05/12 02:51, Chris Roberts escribió: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:59:18AM +0530, Dinesh Kumar wrote: >> �We have ltsp configured in debian and it servers around 15 thin >> clients.The issue is the clients complaining of frequent hanging issue.At >> the time of hanging problem,i ha

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Roberts
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:59:18AM +0530, Dinesh Kumar wrote: >�We have ltsp configured in debian and it servers around 15 thin >clients.The issue is the clients complaining of frequent hanging issue.At >the time of hanging problem,i have checked the load load average in server >its

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-10 Thread christoffer krakou
Hello Dinesh How meaty are your clients? The hanging could be because an application takes up all the client ram. Fiddling with the X_RAM_PERC option might help that Also, perhaps the network could be the bottleneck. Have you tried connecting a client directly to the server and see if that hel

[Ltsp-discuss] ltsp in debian

2012-05-09 Thread Dinesh Kumar
Hi all, We have ltsp configured in debian and it servers around 15 thin clients.The issue is the clients complaining of frequent hanging issue.At the time of hanging problem,i have checked the load load average in server its very normal 0.23 some thing like that. Memory consuption in server also