pedro-
Oh yes there si a solution and I personally love showing it off to all Windoze
centric buddys cus' it is a pain if even possible to do with windows. Channel bonding(
sometimes called agregated/trunking/ramping/etc,etc) is Ideal for this particular
problem, best of all teh linux kernel c
Is there a solution to this problem?
Could it be using parallell switches, or actually separating the servers into smaller networks and link them through another nic for the smaller services like file and printer sharing? Is it possible for Linux to have more NICs installed to have more cables link
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:06:56PM -0500, Derek Dresser wrote:
> Quoting Mohammad Ikhsan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I'm having trouble with my LTSP instalation.
> > I have 5 duron 800 LTSP clients connected to an AthlonXP 1800+ LTSP v
> > 3.0 server on Mandrake 8.2. I'm using a D-L
If you have a alot of heavy traffic going to the server( switch or no switch the
Server only has one nic) you can get collision problems cuasing a slow boot. I have
had this paticular problem in the past.
Evan
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:06:56 -0500
Derek Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoti
Quoting Mohammad Ikhsan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi All
>
> I'm having trouble with my LTSP instalation.
> I have 5 duron 800 LTSP clients connected to an AthlonXP 1800+ LTSP v
> 3.0 server on Mandrake 8.2. I'm using a D-Link 8 ports 10/100 switch.
> The clients and server use rtl8139 based NIC
>
sing, it kept shorting
> > out, which ultimately took the hub I was using and dumped it
>
> No reason to buy hubs today.
>
> > just my thoughts.. joey
>
> Thank you.
>
> Cheers, Andy!
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Andy Rabagliati <[EM
;
> To: LTSP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] very slow boot
>
>
> > I also observe this behaviour.
> >
> > I have a 512Meg server, two 8 port switches daisy-chained,
> > 8 identical client
> I had this problem as well, using two
> small switches ultimately gave me tons of problems, I ended up buying a
> 24port from netgear and all my problems went away.
I had a similar slow booting problem using 3c509's in the workstations
and a cheap, 8 port switch. When I replaced the 8 port swit
ust my thoughts.. joey
- Original Message -
From: Andy Rabagliati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LTSP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] very slow boot
> I also observe this behaviour.
>
> I have a 512Meg server, two 8 port s
I also observe this behaviour.
I have a 512Meg server, two 8 port switches daisy-chained,
8 identical client computers - with identical rtl8139 cards
with boot ROMs, 100Mbit all round.
DHCP comes from another small server, tftp comes from
the big one.
Usually, everything is fine.
But under some
For me, normally it take less than 10 second to boot and Xwindows login
screen. I'm not sure which part of your system take too long to boot.
maybe your server NIC have a problem, try to change with other NIC.
rtl8139 should work fine with 100MBit speed.
regards,
Kamil
Mohammad Ikhsan wrote:
Mohammad,
The boot process should only take between 20 and 30 seconds.
Can you describe for us, which portion of the booting is slow ?
There are several phases of the boot process.
During the tftp, you should see dots (.) streaming across the
screen. Do you see that ? If so, do they stream qu
Hi All
I'm having trouble with my LTSP instalation.
I have 5 duron 800 LTSP clients connected to an AthlonXP 1800+ LTSP v
3.0 server on Mandrake 8.2. I'm using a D-Link 8 ports 10/100 switch.
The clients and server use rtl8139 based NIC
My problem is those clients boot very slow. Each of them too
13 matches
Mail list logo
