RE: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-22 Thread Charles Marcus
> From: Egan, Matt B. (Artco) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:07 PM > > ? Is my mail HTML? > > I use outlook and I know I've turned html sending off to > this address but still am unsure. > > THX and sorry in advance if its me I don't think it was you, Matt, but fyi, if

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-21 Thread Egan, Matt B. (Artco)
es Marcus; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL > > > On Friday 21 June 2002 04:05 am, Charles Marcus wrote: > > > > I automatically delete these without even reading them. > > > I don't care how desperate the writer is for help. > >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-21 Thread Ken Barber
On Friday 21 June 2002 04:05 am, Charles Marcus wrote: > > I automatically delete these without even reading them. > > I don't care how desperate the writer is for help. > > As would I, normally, but again, since I usually do want to read most of > the messages, I am forced to scroll past the pag

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-21 Thread jam
Charles, I'm the list manager. But, I don't have control over html being blocked. The list is hosted on SourceForge, using Mailman, and there is no ability to block the html mail. Sure, you complaining about it may stop 1 person from sending html email. But, there are about 100 new people a we

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-21 Thread Charles Marcus
> From: Ken Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:39:23 -0700 > >> If you are using any modern e-mail client, just tell it to >> do text only and most will "strip" the html part off. (at >> least my Kmail does) > I am also using KMail and I do that (as suggested above), > but it

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-21 Thread Charles Marcus
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:48:52 -0400 (EDT) > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Can we *please* stop the HTML Email hell >> >> This is ridiculous. >> >> >> Charles > Charles, > > HTML in email has be come a fact of life. > > Just do like I do. Ignore it. > > Complaining about it isn't gonna g

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-20 Thread Ken Barber
On Thursday 20 June 2002 06:25 pm, Mark Worstall wrote: > If you are using any modern e-mail client, just tell it to do text only and > most will "strip" the html part off. (at least my Kmail does) I am also using KMail and I do that (as suggested above), but it only works with "multipart" mess

Fwd: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-20 Thread Mark Worstall
oops, sent this the wrong place, sorry Jim. Here it is for the list -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 20:19:34 -0400 From: Mark Worstall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If you are using any m

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] HTML EMAIL HELL

2002-06-20 Thread jam
Charles, HTML in email has be come a fact of life. Just do like I do. Ignore it. Complaining about it isn't gonna get you anywhere. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Charles Marcus wrote: > Can we *please* stop the HTML Email hell > > This is ridiculous. > > > Ch