On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 09:31, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Andy Rabagliati wrote:
> > > * IDE drives die around 10 concurrent users. Fast SCSI or FC drives are
> > >manditory for a large number of concurrent users. The faster the better.
> >
> > Can anyone else comment on t
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > * IDE drives die around 10 concurrent users. Fast SCSI or FC drives are
> > > >manditory for a large number of concurrent users. The faster the better.
> > > Can anyone else comment on the disk requirements ?
> > > What, exactly, is so great
visit
http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~lcc/presentaions/nilesh/pics/page_01.htm
for all u want to know
bye
i hope it will help u
ashvin
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>
>>> > > * IDE drives die around 10 concurrent users. Fast SCSI or FC
>>> drives are
>>> > >manditory for a l
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi
>
>> > > * IDE drives die around 10 concurrent users. Fast SCSI or FC drives are
>> > >manditory for a large number of concurrent users. The faster the better.
>> >
>> > Can anyone else comment on the disk requirements ?
>> >
>> > Does more RAM
Hi
> > > * IDE drives die around 10 concurrent users. Fast SCSI or FC drives are
> > >manditory for a large number of concurrent users. The faster the better.
> >
> > Can anyone else comment on the disk requirements ?
> >
> > Does more RAM help ?
> >
> > What, exactly, is so great about SCSI
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Timothy Frye wrote:
> What exactly do you mean by "as long as you divvy up your network for
> bandwidth"? Around here, I have no control over that (i.e. - I can't muck
> with routers/switches, nor can I control the network topography), so I'm not
> sure how I would do that. I
> -Original Message-
> From: Julius Szelagiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:56 PM
> Cc: LTSP List
> Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] server/user capacity
[snip]
> as long as you divvy up you network for bandwidth, you can just keep
adding
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Andy Rabagliati wrote:
> > * IDE drives die around 10 concurrent users. Fast SCSI or FC drives are
> >manditory for a large number of concurrent users. The faster the better.
>
> Can anyone else comment on the disk requirements ?
>
> Does more RAM help ?
>
> What, exactly,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Eric Harrison wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jason Greene wrote:
>
> I work with schools, which can be a "worst case" in terms of both apps and
> usage patterns.
>
> We have many labs that have 40+ terminals where everyone logs in at the
> same time, everyone runs the same a
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Timothy Frye wrote:
>> Has anyone gotten better performance or got around a performance issue by
>> using openmosix with a few other servers or perhaps on all of the clients?
>> Just a thought I had and wondered if anyone else h
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Timothy Frye wrote:
> Has anyone gotten better performance or got around a performance issue by
> using openmosix with a few other servers or perhaps on all of the clients?
> Just a thought I had and wondered if anyone else had done that.
>
Tim,
funny you should mention
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server/user capacity
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jason Greene wrote:
>
> >We are evaluating Linux in the Company I work for. We have over 60k
> >desktops
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jason Greene wrote:
> Well, they will use it as much as any average user...
> I'm just talking about and average user...
> Doc, spreadsheets, mail, browser, etc...
>
Jason,
this is very similar to the usage I have - all yours + a terminal
window. The biggest bottleneck
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jason Greene wrote:
>We are evaluating Linux in the Company I work for. We have over 60k desktops.
>
>I'm on the evaluation team and I'm really pushing the LTSP idea for call
>centers and the like.
>
>What I'd like to ask the LTSP team and all it s users is "What is the
>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:47:51PM -0500, Jason Greene wrote:
> We are evaluating Linux in the Company I work for. We have over 60k desktops.
>
> I'm on the evaluation team and I'm really pushing the LTSP idea for call
> centers and the like.
>
> What I'd like to ask the LTSP team and all it s
Well, they will use it as much as any average user...
I'm just talking about and average user...
Doc, spreadsheets, mail, browser, etc...
On Monday 18 August 2003 13:22, Peter Billson wrote:
> Jason,
> You left out the most important item: What will the users be doing?
> Running Mozilla take
Jason,
Before we can talk about hardware, you really need to tell
us more about the software.
What applications will the "average" users be using ?
Will they settle for a lightweight window manager like Icewm ?
One thing I can tell you is that we deployed a server that now
has 140 thin clients
Jason,
You left out the most important item: What will the users be doing?
Running Mozilla takes a lot more "oomph" then a term window! :-)
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Service, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
Jason Greene wrote:
>
> We are evaluating Lin
18 matches
Mail list logo