On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 22:11, Ben Beeson wrote:
> Aloha,
>
> I am pondering SpamAssassin for my box. The volume I now get after
> becoming
> a moderator on a mailing list is pretty disgusting. I find it even more
> depressing that most of the UCE does not have opt-outs. Since I can't
>
Aloha,
I am pondering SpamAssassin for my box. The volume I now get after
becoming
a moderator on a mailing list is pretty disgusting. I find it even more
depressing that most of the UCE does not have opt-outs. Since I can't
opt-out, I need a better filter.
I read the fin
Warren Togami wrote:
Their redone site uses broken browser detection that redirects the user
to either a welcomeie.asp or welcomenetscape.asp page. Both display a
blank page in Konqueror 3.0.3. Can someone help me figure out why? The
bank seems responsive to fix requests but I need solid tech
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 20:43, Warren Togami wrote:
> http://fhbonline.fhb.com
>
> First Hawaiian Bank's website now works in Mozilla in Linux. As of
> earlier this week they redid their online banking website.
>
> Unfortunately due to some circumstance it seems to be broken in
> Konqueror while t
http://fhbonline.fhb.com
First Hawaiian Bank's website now works in Mozilla in Linux. As of
earlier this week they redid their online banking website.
Unfortunately due to some circumstance it seems to be broken in
Konqueror while the old site worked fine with a spoofed User Agent. I
intend on
This link has all the Compaq related software
restore and driver files. Its a vast database that is helpful to anyone
looking for Linux drivers also for their Compaqs.
Dan
http://cpnapp.compaq.com/pdf/us_con_pdf/tech/tech/index.html
Yuser wrote:
snip
Don't forget about POP,
it is no more secure/insecure then IMAP. Both will pass the plain text
password and plain textemail. If your already using POP and not concerned
about it, using IMAP
is not going to be lesssecure. Same with ftp and telnet. Like Eric said,
using I
--
vanilla imap is an insecure protocol, unless you only run it in secure
mode (imaps, port
993). If anyone sniffs your regular unencrypted imap
traffic they will not only be able to
intercept your email, but possibly
to login to your account
--
Don't forget about POP,
it is no mo
On 26 Sep 2002, Warren Togami wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:16, Eric Jeschke wrote:
> > I HIGHLY recommend that if you access imap to a login account over the
> > internet that you run it in secure mode, tunnel it over ssh, or in some
> > way secure it.
>
> Agreed. I personally always use IM
Warren Togami wrote:
snip
Do you folks have a key with Verisign, or do you run your own CA? I was
thinking about UH running a CA, free for Hawaii non-profit folks.
Anyone else interested in this?
I've long thought there needs to be some standard "CA" private key
that's publicly available
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:16, Eric Jeschke wrote:
> I HIGHLY recommend that if you access imap to a login account over the
> internet that you run it in secure mode, tunnel it over ssh, or in some
> way secure it.
Agreed. I personally always use IMAP through an SSH tunnel, even while
I am at home.
On Thursday 26 September 2002 07:18 am, Rodney Kanno wrote:
> currently office does a lot of email forwarding to other people in the
> office. When this happens, the forwarded email gets sent outside of the
> office to the ISP, and then comes back in. If I configure the linux machine
> to handle al
vanilla imap is an insecure protocol, unless you only run it in secure
mode (imaps, port 993). If anyone sniffs your regular unencrypted imap
traffic they will not only be able to intercept your email, but possibly
to login to your account (e.g. if you have ssh enabled and are only
requiring passw
On Thursday 26 September 2002 09:12 am, Erich S. wrote:
>
> -- Is it very complicated to set up IMAP to operate in a secure fashion?
> IE. be able to use Outlook Express from my work assigned laptop and have
> access to my mail folders remotely? (I an old skool PINEr myself when
> logged locally or
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Mike Ballon wrote:
> This doesn't look like a relay attempt but normal spam using an e-mail
> address generator destained for your domain and the user(s) didn't exist.
>
>
[snipped mail logs showing attempts to spamify me...sans rice]
Thanks Mike, Florian, et al. for the h
This doesn't look like a relay attempt but normal spam using an e-mail
address generator destained for your domain and the user(s) didn't exist.
- Original Message -
From: "Erich S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [luau
currently office does a lot of email forwarding to other people in the
office. When this happens, the forwarded email gets sent outside of the
office to the ISP, and then comes back in. If I configure the linux machine
to handle all incoming and outgoing email, is it possible to get it to
recognize
Why is RPM not very useful? Please be aware that the version numbers
from Red Hat may be a bit confusing because Red Hat does not upgrade
versions with these security updates. Instead they backport security
patches without bumping up the version number, so it may not be clear at
first glance if y
Dear All
Recently, my redhat linux 7.3 web server has
been infected by slapper worm so that I need to upgrade openssl and modssl.
Anybody did this job?
RPM form redhat is not very helpful, and I can not
figure out which executable file and directory should be upgraded for openssl
and
19 matches
Mail list logo
