As far as I know, there was no servlet that came with SearchBean.
SearchBean is basically deprecated at this point - the new sorting
features do sorting much nicer.
SearchBean is still in the jakarta-lucene-sandbox CVS under
contributions/searchbean directory.
Erik
On Nov 3, 2004, at
I mailed on this a while back, but am still at a loss.
Has anyone had any luck using lucene's built in sort functions to sort
first by the lucene hit score and secondarily by a Field in each
document indexed as Keyword and in integer form?
I can only get it to sort by one or the other... but when
I developed a
Filter that restricts search results to documents that has terms in specific
fields
(because currently we can't search with
lucene documents with this kind of feature (a document with present/absent of
values in specific fields)
nicolas
package org.apache.lucene.search;
Hi all,
where can i find the servlet for the searchbean
classes?
thé directory on cvs is now empty
ciao
miro
___
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden:
http://ma
Did anyone tried this class ?
I tried this class but I can't make it to work I indexed a field as new
Field("description", description,true,true,true,true); but when I call
TokenSources.getTokenStream(_indexReader,i,"description"); I get
ClassCastException
In this class the line TermPositionVect
Besides full text indexing, I need a database that represent a large
dictionary like:
(key1, key2) -> docid
I am considering between building a home grown solution and using
Berkeley DB. Then I think I was using Lucene anyway, wouldn't it make
sense use it as my database too? Just make key1 and
1) Open index with IndexReader.open()
2) Check that (for example) numDocs = 10, hasDeletions = false
3) Delete one document
4) Close IndexReader with IndexReader.close()
5) Open index with IndexReader.open()
6) Check that (for example) numDocs = 9, hasDeletions = true
7) Iterate with IndexReader.t
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dr. Daniel Taurat
Senior Consultant
VIP ENTERPRISE 8 | THE POWER OF CONTENT AT WORK
Gauss Interprise AG Phone:
On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Checked with Luke on the string
dash\-123\-01
and got
dash
123
01
with germanAnalyzer and standardAnalyzer
and
dash
with all the other, except for whitespaceAnalyser, of course.
This makes me think that an escaped dash is never a minus, somehow.
No
> Give me an example of a string and how you'd like it to be tokenized.
> But first, give the AnalyzerUtils (from my java.net article) a try and
> get a feel for what different analyzers do.
>
> Keep in mind that it can be tricky (see the AnalysisParalysis page on
> the wiki and my java.net arti
Hi,
(First of all : what is the plurial of index in english ; indexes or indices ?)
I want to search into several indexes (indices ?).
For that, I parse a new query using QueryParser or MultiFieldQueryParser.
Then I search my indexes using the MultiSearcher class.
Ok, but the problem comes whe
On Nov 3, 2004, at 8:51 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Now my only question is, why the tokenizing works differently for
strings with numerical components, or if there is a way to make the
standardAnalyzer treat those dashed mixed-characters strings similar to
plain letter-strings.
Give me an example of
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 13:39
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: Re: jaspq: dashed numerical values tokenized differently
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:03 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
> >> Query parser was changed
On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:03 AM, Daniel Taurat wrote:
Query parser was changed to treat '-' within words as part of the
word.
Before that change a query 'dash-test' was parsed as 'dash AND NOT
test'.
Now QP reads one word 'dash-test' which is analyzed. If the analyzer
splits that to more than one token
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 2. November 2004 09:21
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: jaspq: dashed numerical values tokenized differently
>Daniel Taurat writes:
>> Hi,
>> I have just another stupid parser question:
>> There seems to
On Nov 2, 2004, at 11:15 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
If the Search Word 'kid' is suppose to return me kid ,
kid's ,
kidoos, children
1) Do I need to use Combination of more then one Analysers ???
, If
so How.
2) Any Alternate modification to be done for the simple Searcher
Bill Janssen wrote:
Thanks to Bill Tschumy, who points out that Lucene 1.4.21 *breaks* the
API exported by 1.4 by removing a parameter from
QueryParser.getFieldQuery(). That means that my
NewMultiFieldQueryParser also breaks, since it overrides that method.
To fix, just remove the Analyzer paramet
17 matches
Mail list logo
