Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread Miles Barr
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 22:11 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote: I've seen both of these types of procedures followed on Apache projects. It really just depends. Lucene's codebase is not being modified frequently, so it is not necessary to branch and merge back. Rather we simply develop off of the

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread Erik Hatcher
We can work the 1.x and 2.0 lines of code however we need to. We can branch (a branch or tag in Subversion is inexpensive and a constant time operation). How we want to manage both versions of Lucene is open for discussion. Nothing about Subversion changes how we manage this from how we'd

RE: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread Kevin L. Cobb
, February 02, 2005 7:50 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Subversion conversion Hello ALL, It might not be the right place for it but as we are talking about SCM, I have a quick question. First, I haven't used CVS/SVN on any project. I am a ClearCase/PVCS guy. I just would like to know WHICH

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-03 Thread John Haxby
Kevin L. Cobb wrote: We recently started using SVN for SCM, were using VSS. We're trying out approach A, branching off for each release. Development always develops on the trunk, except when a bug is discovered that needs to be patched to a previous version of the product. When that scenario comes

Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Hatcher
The conversion to Subversion is complete. The new repository is available to users read-only at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk Besides /trunk, there is also /branches and /tags. /tags contains all the CVS tags made so that you could grab a snapshot of a previous

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Paul Elschot
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:20, Erik Hatcher wrote: The conversion to Subversion is complete. The new repository is available to users read-only at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk Great. I just checked out the trunk: Checked out revision 151042. So much for

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread aurora
Subversion rocks! I have just setup the Windows svn client TortoiseSVN with my favourite file manager Total Commander 6.5. The svn status and commands are readily integrated with the file manager. Offline diff and revert are two things I really like from svn. The conversion to Subversion

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Chakra Yadavalli
http://jroller.com/page/cyblogue -Original Message- From: aurora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:25 PM To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Subversion conversion Subversion rocks! I have just setup the Windows svn client TortoiseSVN

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Hatcher
02, 2005 4:25 PM To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Subversion conversion Subversion rocks! I have just setup the Windows svn client TortoiseSVN with my favourite file manager Total Commander 6.5. The svn status and commands are readily integrated with the file manager. Offline diff

Re: Subversion conversion

2005-02-02 Thread Chris Lamprecht
Message- From: aurora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:25 PM To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Subversion conversion Subversion rocks! I have just setup the Windows svn client TortoiseSVN with my favourite file manager Total