ument limit: 50,000 documents is a lot for
a small company website.
Cheers,
bill
-Original Message-
From: jian chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 11:06 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: google mini? who needs it when Lucene is there
Overall, even if google
I wasn't sure where in this thread to reply so I'm replying to myself :)
What search appliances exist now?
I only found 3:
[1] Google
[2] Thunderstone
http://www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pages/Appliance.html
[3] IndexEngines (not out yet)
h
igine-
De : Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 28 janvier 2005 02:02
À : Lucene Users List
Objet : Re: rackmount lucene/nutch - Re: google mini? who needs it when
Lucene is there
I've often said that there is a business to be had in packaging up
Lucene (and now Nutch) i
>>Also need http://jcifs.samba.org/ so you can spider
>>windows file shares.
That project also has a very nice servlet filter that
is used to provide automatic authentication of Windows
clients using the NTLM protocol.
___
Xiaohong Yang (Sharon) wrote:
Hi,
I agree that Google mini is quite expensive. It might be similar to the desktop version in quality. Anyone knows google's ratio of index to text? Is it true that Lucene's index is about 500 times the original text size (not including image size)? I don't hav
first step would be to start developing good, reliable,
opensource extensions to Lucene which strive to solve some of these issues.
end rant.
- Original Message - From: "Otis Gospodnetic"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:40
Overall, even if google mini gives a lot of cool features compared to
a bare-born lucene project, what is good with the 50,000 documents
limit. It is useless with that limit. That is just their way of trying
to turn it into another cash cow.
Jian
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:45:03 -0800 (PST), Otis Go
p would be to start developing good, reliable,
opensource extensions to Lucene which strive to solve some of these issues.
end rant.
- Original Message -
From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:40 PM
Subjec
As they say, nothing lasts forever ;)
I like the idea. If a project like this gets going, I think I'd be
interested in helping.
The Google mini looks very well done (they have two demos on the web
page). For $5000, it's probably a very good solution for many
businesses. If the demos are accura
500 times the original data? Not true! :)
Otis
--- "Xiaohong Yang (Sharon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree that Google mini is quite expensive. It might be similar to
> the desktop version in quality. Anyone knows google's ratio of index
> to text? Is it true that Lucene's i
I discuss this with myself a lot inside my head... :)
Seriously, I agree with Erik. I think this is a business opportunity.
How many people are hating me now and going "shh"? Raise your
hands!
Otis
--- David Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This reminds me, has anyone every discuss
I've often said that there is a business to be had in packaging up
Lucene (and now Nutch) into a cute little box with user friendly
management software to search your intranet. SearchBlox is already
there (except they don't include the box).
I really hope that an application like SearchBlox/Zi
44 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: google mini? who needs it when Lucene is there
It seems to me that any small biz will be ripped off if they install
this google mini thing, compared to using Lucene to implement a easy
to use search software, which could search up to whatever number of
document
I think Google mini also includes crawling and a server wrapper. So it
is not entirely an 1-to-1 comparison.
Of couse extending lucene to have those features are not at all
difficult anyway.
-John
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:04:54 -0800 (PST), Xiaohong Yang (Sharon)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
This reminds me, has anyone every discussed something similar:
- rackmount server ( or for coolness factor, that mini mac)
- web i/f for config/control
- of course the server would have the following s/w:
-- web server
-- lucene / nutch
Part of the work here I think is having a decent web i/f to co
Hi,
I agree that Google mini is quite expensive. It might be similar to the
desktop version in quality. Anyone knows google's ratio of index to text? Is
it true that Lucene's index is about 500 times the original text size (not
including image size)? I don't have one installed, so I canno
Hi,
I was searching using google and just found that there was a new
feature called "google mini". Initially I thought it was another free
service for small companies. Then I realized that it costs quite some
money ($4,995) for the hardware and software. (I guess the proprietary
software costs a w
17 matches
Mail list logo
