Thanks, we've created http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LUDOC-69 to track
the fixes to the manual.
cliffw
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Christopher J.Walker c.j.wal...@qmul.ac.uk
wrote:
The configuring failover section in the Whamcloud release of the
Lustre manual seems rather out of date:
DuPont WA 98327 *bob.ha...@intel.com mallick.arigap...@intel.com*
** **
*From:* Cliff White [mailto:cli...@whamcloud.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:28 AM
*To:* Hayes, Bob
*Cc:* lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
*Subject:* Re: [Lustre-discuss] Seeking LNET
- An OSS really can't be a router, an OSS is an endpoint. Topologically,
it shouldn't work, you should re-think network layout.
- routing does place a load on the system, nodes doing routing should be
dedicated to routing.
- Load depends on traffic, basically you would have two hardware network
Or to put it another way, if your OSS systems can already 'see' both IB and
IPoIB networks the most cost
effective, high performance solution would be to add the necessary
interface and put your MDS/MGS on both networks also.
No need for routers, no performance impact.
cliffw
On Tue, Mar 13,
You should download from the Whamcloud download site, for a start:
http://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/
Typically, the Lustre server does nothing but run Lustre. For that reason
there is generally little risk
from using our current version on the server platforms. If your clients
require
You can do this, simply define networks for both devices.
Assuming ib0, and eth0, you would have
options lnet networks=tcp0(eth0),o2ib0(ib0)
The IB clients will mount using a @o2ib0 NID, and the ethernet clients will
mount using @tcp0 NIDs. Since you are explicitly specifying the network,
the hop
It means errors have occurred which are duplicates of the displayed
message, we limit messages in that case to reduce system log traffic. If a
different error occurs that message will be displayed.
cliffw
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lucia M. Walle lucia.wa...@cornell.eduwrote:
Hello,
I'm
If you are not using LDAP, etc, then the user's information must be in the
MDS's password files.
Users must be known to the MDS.
cliffw
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Barberi, Carl E carl.e.barb...@lmco.comwrote:
Thank you Kilian. However, I was just able to perform Lustre operations as
Sadly, it is not so much unsafe to continue as impossible - the patches that
failed were reverted,
so you don't have a properly patched source.
At this point, you would have to walk through the Lustre patches and fix
each place where there is a FAIL.
The fixes themselves are usually trivial, but
Well, this is why Lustre uses striping - however if your file is very small,
it will be located on
one stripe only, and at that point it's limited by hardware.
In current Lustre (1.8.6-wc1) you can enable caching on the OSS which may
help.
cliffw
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Michael Di
--writeconf will erase parameters set via lctl conf_param, and will erase
pools definitions.
It will also allow you to set rather silly parameters that can prevent your
filesystem from starting, such
as incorrect server NIDs or incorrect failover NIDs. For this reason (and
from a history of
This error message you are seeing is what Andreas was talking about - you
must use the
ext4-based version, as you will not need any option with your size LUNS. The
'must use force_over_8tb'
error is the key here, you most certainly want/need to *.ext4.rpm versions
of stuff.
cliffw
On Thu, Jul
The case=network part of obdfilter_survey has really been replaced by
lnet_selftest.
I don't think it's been maintained in awhile.
It would be best to repeat the network-only test with lnet_selftest, this is
likely an issue with
the script.
cliffw
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:04 PM, lior amar
Did you also install the correct e2fsprogs?
cliffw
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Mervini, Joseph A jame...@sandia.govwrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded our servers from RHEL 5.4 - RHEL 5.5 and went from lustre
1.8.3 to 1.8.5.
Now when I try to mount the OSTs I'm getting:
[root@aoss1 ~]# mount
It is called when truncating a file - afaik it is showing you the number of
truncates, more or less.
cliffw
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Mervini, Joseph A jame...@sandia.govwrote:
Hi,
I have been covertly trying for a long time to find out what punch means as
far a lustre llobdstat
It depends - are you using a combined MGS/MDS?
If so, you will have to update the mgsnid on all servers to reflect the
failover node,
plus change the client mount string to show the failover node.
otherwise, it's the same procedure as with an OST.
cliffw
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Jeff
between the two nodes.
On 6/14/11 12:12 PM, Cliff White wrote:
It depends - are you using a combined MGS/MDS?
If so, you will have to update the mgsnid on all servers to reflect the
failover node,
plus change the client mount string to show the failover node.
otherwise, it's the same
Actually, we have 2.6.18-238 in testing for Lustre 1.8.6 release, builds
fine,
you can get RPMS/SRPMS
here: http://newbuild.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b1_8/lastSuccessfulBuild/
including the server kernels.
or source from our git repo
cliffw
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Joe Landman
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:32 PM, David Noriega tsk...@my.utsa.edu wrote:
Reading up on LNET routing and have a question. Currently have nothing
special going on, simply specified tcp0(bond0) on the OSSs and MDS.
Same for all the clients as well, we have an internal network for our
cluster,
What is the underlying disk, did that hardware/RAID config change
when you switched hardware?
The 'still busy' message is a bug, may be fixed in 1.8.5
cliffw
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Thomas Roth t.r...@gsi.de wrote:
Hi all,
we are suffering from a sever metadata performance
You can't mount two MGS on the same node. The MGS NID has to be unique.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Andrus, Brian Contractor
bdand...@nps.eduwrote:
All,
We have a system that was grown from 3 separate lustre filesystems and I
would like to set it up so they share mgs/mdt services from
No, the algorithm is not purely random, it is weighted on QOS, space and a
few other things.
When a stripe is chosen on one OSS, we add a penalty to the other OSTs on
that OSS to prevent
IO bunching on one OSS.
cliffw
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jeremy Filizetti
jeremy.filize...@gmail.com
Historically, Linux software RAID had multiple issues, we did not advise
using it.
Those issues afaik were fixed long ago, and we changed the advice.
Sun/Oracle sold a product that was based on software RAID - there are no
unique issues
using soft RAID with Lustre.
Performance/reliability is a
Sadly, as far as I am aware, no.
cliffw
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Alvaro Aguilera
s2506...@inf.tu-dresden.de wrote:
Hello,
I've read the manual section about the selftest-Module and wonder if
someone here can point me to more detailed information about it.
For example some kind
Unfortunately, we've had lot's of reports of IB instability. It does appear
to happen
quite a bit, and generally is not a Lustre problem at all.
- Check all mechanical connections, cables, etc. - replace if need be - many
issues have been cable-related.
- Check firmware versions of all IB cards,
For clarity, Lustre does not replicate data. If you add an OST, it is
unique.
If you wish to do failover, this requires shared storage between two nodes.
We do not replicate storage.
If you wish to increase the size of your filesystem, you can add OSTs.
cliffw
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM,
Run 'lctl list_nids' on the client also.
Then you can
# lctl ping other nid
from both server and client to verify your LNET is functioning.
Also, use tunefs.lustre --print on your MDS/MGT and OST devices to verify
that mgsnid
is set correctly there.
cliffw
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:10 AM,
All the nodes have to run the same network type, so they can talk to one
another. If client is runnng
Infiniband, server must also run Infiniband, in most cases. See the Lustre
Manual for information on
Lustre Routing.
Clients and server can run different versions of Lustre.
You need to run a
You should not have to do the lfsck if the initial fsck's come back clean.
cliffw
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Joe Digilio jgd-lus...@metajoe.com wrote:
Last week we experienced a major hardware failure (disk controller)
that brought down our system hard. Now that I have the replacement
The MGS can be behind an lnet router. So, provided you have LNET routing set
up between
A and B, the MGS should be okay with only a subnet A address, clients on B
with proper
routing configuration should be fine.
The address on net C is thus immaterial.
cliffw
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:51 AM,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Thomas Roth t.r...@gsi.de wrote:
Hi all,
we have gotten new MDS hardware, and I've got two questions:
What are the recommendations for the RAID configuration and formatting
options?
I was following the recent discussion about these aspects on an OST:
chunk
On 12/10/2010 11:42 AM, Brock Palen wrote:
We have an lustre 1.6.x filesystem,
1.6 has been dead for well over a year. End Of Life.
4 OSS, 3 x4500 and 1 ddn s2a6620
Each oss has 4 1gig interfaces bonded, or 1 10gig interface.
I have a user who is running a few hundred serial jobs that are
On 12/08/2010 10:42 AM, James Robnett wrote:
Our clients have 2 or 3 different lustre filesystems mounted.
We're using Lustre 1.8.4 on RHEL 5.5.
On clients I'd like to be able to toggle via a script the extents
monitoring in /proc/fs/lustre/llite/lustre-XX/extents_stats
When you have
On 12/07/2010 06:51 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
We have 6 OSS, each with at least 8 OST. It sometimes happens that I
need to do maintenance on an OST, so to avoid hanging processes on the
client machines, I use lctl to disable access to that OST on active
client machines.
So, now, it may happen
On 12/06/2010 09:57 AM, Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
Hi.
We have pairs of OSS nodes hooked up to shared storage arrays
containing OSTs but we have not enabled any failover settings yet. Now
we need to perform maintenance work on an OSS and we would like to
minimize Lustre downtime. Can I use
The mount command will automatically load the modules on the client.
cliffw
On 09/03/2010 11:56 AM, Ronald K Long wrote:
We have installed lustre 1.8.2 and 1.8.4 client on Red hat 5. The lustre
modules are not loading during boot. In order to get the lustre file
system to mount we have to
On 08/19/2010 10:59 AM, David Noriega wrote:
I'm curious about the underlying framework of lustre in regards to failover.
When creating the filesystems, one can provide --failnode=x.x@tcp0
and even for the OSTs you can provide two nids for the MDS/MGS. What
do these options tell lustre
On 05/20/2010 08:03 PM, Tyler Hawes wrote:
Has there been any testing or conclusions regarding the use of virtualization
and Lustre, or is this even possible considering how Lustre is coded? I've
gotten used to the idea of virtualization for all our other servers, where it
is great to know
Brian Andrus wrote:
Ok, I inherited a lustre filesystem used on a cluster.
I am seeing an issue where on the frontend, I see all of /work
On nodes, however, I only see SOME of the user's directories.
That's rather odd. The directory structure is all on the MDS, so
it's usually either all
John White wrote:
I just wanted to confirm that the backup/restore procedure for MDTs apply
equally to MGTs. Can someone please confirm?
Actually, the only things kept on a dedicated MGT are config logs.
Should be a trivial task to backup. mount as ldiskfs and make a quick
tarball. You don't
Scott Barber wrote:
Background:
MDS and OSTs are all running CentOS 5.4 / x86_64 /
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5_lustre.1.8.1.1
2 types of clients
- CentOS 5.4 / x86_64 / 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5_lustre.1.8.1.1
- Ubuntu 8.04.1 / i686 / 2.6.22.19 patchless
A few days ago one of the OSSs hit an LBUG. The
Scott Barber wrote:
Background:
MDS and OSTs are all running CentOS 5.4 / x86_64 /
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5_lustre.1.8.1.1
2 types of clients
- CentOS 5.4 / x86_64 / 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5_lustre.1.8.1.1
- Ubuntu 8.04.1 / i686 / 2.6.22.19 patchless
A few days ago one of the OSSs hit an LBUG. The
Tero Hakala wrote:
Hi,
our MDS is temporarily missing IB connection and has only eth available.
However, OSS and clients have both IB and eth.
At the moment, it seems that all the traffic between clients-OSS goes
also through the slow eth connection. Is it possible to force them to
use
burlen wrote:
System limits are sometimes provided in a header, I wasn't sure if
Lustre adopted that approach. The llapi_* functions are great, I see how
to set the stripe count and size. I wasn't sure if there was also a
function to query about the configuration, eg number of OST's
Jake Maul wrote:
Greetings,
We've got a small Lustre network set up, and have rather suddenly run
into a bottleneck with a single gigabit link to certain OSS's.
http://wiki.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual18_HTML/Bonding.html#50638966_pgfId-1289000
Based on that page in the manual, it
Jagga Soorma wrote:
Hi Guys,
I would like to monitor the performance and usage of my Lustre
filesystem and was wondering what are the commonly used monitoring tools
for this? Cacti? Nagios? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
-Simran
LLNL's LMT tool is very good. It's
release has been tested with Lustre 1.6.6.
So, yup, seems a bit old. But might be worth looking into.
cliffw
jab
-Original Message-
From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org
[mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Cliff White
Sent: Wednesday, January 06
David Pratt wrote:
Hi. I am exploring possibilities for pooled storage for virtual
machines. Lustre looks quite interesting for both tolerance and speed. I
have a couple of basic questions:
1) Can Lustre present an iSCSI target
Lustre doesn't present target, we use targets, and we should
Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
It is very difficult to find relevant documentation for heartbeat 1/2. I just
finished configuring a heartbeat system and would not recommend it because of
the documentation. (They seem to have removed portions the heartbeat
documentation from the site.)
Jim Garlick wrote:
Hi,
OK I have posted it to https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20165
20165: scripts for heartbeat v1 integration
I added example config files from our test cluster. Probably best to
redirect questions/comments/criticisms to the bug and I'll respond there.
tao.a...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi, all,
I am evaluating Lustre with DRBD failover, and experiencing about 2
minutes in OSS failover time to switch to the secondary node. Has
anyone have the similar observation (so that we can conclude this should
be expected), or if there is some
Roger Spellman wrote:
I have an MDS that is crashing with out-of-memory.
Prior to the crash, I started collecting /proc/slabinfo. I see that
ldlm_locks is up to 4,500,000, and each one is 512 bytes, for a total of
2.2GB, which is more than half my RAM.
Is there a way to limit
Onane wrote:
Hello,
After installing lustre, how can I test it quickliy if it is installed
correctly ?
# modprobe -v lustre
If the modules load without error this is good.
# lctl network up
# lctl list_nids
This shows you that LNET can run.
Beyond that, create a filesystem. Examples at
is a output from strace for mount: http://www.heypasteit.com/clip/8WT
Any further debugging hints?
Thanks,
CS.
On 6/16/09, Cliff White cliff.wh...@sun.com wrote:
Carlos Santana wrote:
The '$ modprobe -l lustre*' did not show any module on a patchless
client. modprobe -v returns 'FATAL: Module
Michael Di Domenico wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Michael Di
Domenicomdidomeni...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a small lustre test cluster with eight OST's running. The
servers were shut off over the weekend, upon turning them back on and
trying to startup lustre I seem to have lost my
-discuss] Lustre installation and configuration problems
To: Carlos Santana neu...@gmail.com
Cc: Cliff White cliff.wh...@sun.com, lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 1:08 PM
Carlos -
The installation procedures for Lustre 1.6 and 1.8 are the
same. The manual's
And here is a output from strace for mount:
http://www.heypasteit.com/clip/8WT
Any further debugging hints?
Thanks,
CS.
On 6/16/09, Cliff White cliff.wh...@sun.com wrote:
Carlos Santana wrote:
The '$ modprobe -l lustre*' did not show any module on a patchless
client. modprobe -v returns 'FATAL
Carlos Santana wrote:
Thanks Kevin..
Please read:
http://manual.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual16_HTML/ConfiguringLustre.html#50401328_pgfId-1289529
Those instructions are identical for 1.6 and 1.8.
For current lustre, only two commands are used for configuration.
mkfs.lustre and mount.
, it's a network/name misconfiguration.
Run 'tunefs.lustre --print' on your servers, and verify that mgsnode=
is correct.
cliffw
Thanks,
CS.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Cliff White cliff.wh...@sun.com
mailto:cliff.wh...@sun.com wrote:
Carlos Santana wrote
the modprobe.
cliffw
--- ---
I tried lustre_rmmod and depmod commands and it did not return any error
messages. Any further clues? Reinstall patchless client again?
-
CS.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Cliff White cliff.wh...@sun.com
mailto:cliff.wh...@sun.com wrote:
Carlos
Tom.Wang wrote:
Hi
CMD evaluation will be available on lustre 2.0 alpha-5.0.
There are no more information yet except Wiki.
And btw, we always welcome any contributions to lustre documentation.
Use the wiki, and/or submit a bug against the Documentation product on
bugzilla.lustre.org.
Nick Jennings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
I was wondering if certain ext3 tweaks can be applied to a lustre
filesystem? Things like:
- - reclaiming some of the reserved 5% space for non-root filesystems
This one gets done quite often - 5% is a
set...@gmail.com wrote:
Does Lustre increase random access performance? I would like to know
this becauseI have a large random access file (a hash table). I have
striped this file across multiple OSTs. The file is 24 gigabytes, and
the stripe size was 1gig across 10 OSTs. I also tried a
Jordan Mendler wrote:
Hi all,
I deployed Lustre on some legacy hardware and as a result my (4) OSS's
each have 32GB of RAM. Our workflow is such that we are frequently
rereading the same 15GB indexes over and over again from Lustre (they
are striped across all OSS's) by all nodes on our
Mag Gam wrote:
I have added 2 volumes onto my existing filesystem.
mkfs.lustre --fsname lfs002 --ost --mgsnode=mg...@tcp /dev/lustrevg/lv03
mkfs.lustre --fsname lfs002 --ost --mgsnode=mg...@tcp /dev/lustrevg/lv04
I even managed to mount up the OSTS (each are 2TB)
However, on the clients
Rayentray Tappa wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:46 -0800, Evan Felix wrote:
Yes, while you are installing lustre you should probably have /sbin/ and
/usr/sbin in your path.
ok, so i'll add them
Check to see if /usr/sbin/mkfs.ext2 exists.
i checked and there's no such thing as
Jeffrey Alan Bennett wrote:
Hi,
What software are people using for MDS failover?
I have been using Heartbeat from Linux-HA but I am not absolutely happy with
its performance.
Is there anything better out there?
Are you using heartbeat V1 or V2?
I would like to hear more about the
Brock Palen wrote:
I am having servers LBUG on a regular basis, Clients are running
1.6.6 patchless on RHEL4, servers are running RHEL4 with 1.6.5.1
RPM's from the download page. All connection is over Ethernet,
Servers are x4600's.
This looks like bug 16496, which is fixed in 1.6.6.
for the insight!
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
Center for Advanced Computing
bro...@umich.edu
(734)936-1985
On Jan 14, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Cliff White wrote:
Brock Palen wrote:
I am having servers LBUG on a regular basis, Clients are running
1.6.6 patchless on RHEL4, servers
Brock Palen wrote:
How common is it for servers to go NOT HEALTHY? I feel it is
happening much more often than it should be with us. A few times a
month.
It should not happen at all, in the normal case. It indicates a problem.
If this happens, we reboot the servers. Should we do
Roger Spellman wrote:
Is writeconf needed to upgrade a filesystem from 1.6.5 to 1.6.6?
If so, is this run just on the MGS and MDT, or also on the OSTs?
If you are not changing any configuration or NIDS, no writeconf
is needed when upgrading Lustre from one point release to the next.
Major
Arden Wiebe wrote:
I've read it a zillion times but can't seem to find it again. Can a client
run on the same server as a MGS, MDT or OSS? Is a dedicated client machines
necessary?
You can run all of Lustre (clients and all servers) on one node, but
this is not supported for production
Arden Wiebe wrote:
Okay I'll rephrase the question? Given a limited deployment can I mount
the client on the MDT, MGS or OSS? Is the best choice to build a
dedicated client?
If you care about performance at all, a dedicated client is always best.
While you can run client/MDS somewhat
xiangyong ouyang wrote:
hi all,
I'm running collectl to get profiling information about lustre. I'm
using lustre 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5_lustre.1.6.4.3smp, and
collectl V3.1.1-5 (zlib:1.42,HiRes:1.86)
Basically I want to see the metadata information on both client and MDS.
On client
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 16:23 -0400, Roger Spellman wrote:
I am building a system with a redundant MDS, that is two MDS sharing a
set of disks, one being Active, the other Standby.
If I put the MGS and MDS on the same system, it appears that they must
be on the same
Papp Tamas wrote:
hi All,
Where can I download beta version of lustre?
Depends on what you mean.
Current Lustre is always available from the Sun Download site.
http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp
(free, of course)
We have pre-released versions availble via CVS.
Alex Lee wrote:
I been seeing something that looks like IB timeout errors lately after
upgrading to 1.6.5.1 using the supplied ofed kernel drivers.
From what I can tell there hasnt been any real network issues that was
apparent. Are these errors just typical if the network is busy?
Could
/KnowledgeBase.html#50544717_84403
The .pdf version I think has more details.
cliffw
TIA
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Cliff White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
We do a lot of fluid simulations at my university, but on a similar
note I would like to know what the Lustre
Cliff White wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
Also, what is the best way to test the backup? Other than really
remove my MGS and restore it. Is there a better way to test this?
If you really care about the backups, you need to be brave. If you can't
remove the MDS and restore it, then something
Mag Gam wrote:
We do a lot of fluid simulations at my university, but on a similar
note I would like to know what the Lustre experts will do in
particular simulated scenarios...
The environment is this:
30 Servers (All Linux)
1000+ Clients (All Linux)
30 Servers
1 MDS
30 OSTs each
Mag Gam wrote:
We are planning to deploy lustre on a large scale at my university,
and we were wondering if there are any health check utilities
available for OST, OSS, MDS and MDT. I know there is a SNMP module
avaliable, but I prefer a solid front end with SNMP as the backend. So
what tools
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2008 11:40:40 am Andreas Dilger wrote:
NYC == New York City? What
is SJC?
SJC == San Jose, California
That's why I thought, but if so, the following part loses me:
This is working in a test setup,
Thomas Roth wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still in trouble with numbers: the available, used and necessary
space on my MDT:
According to lfs df, I have now filled my file system with 115.3 TB.
All of these files are sized 5 MB. That should be roughly 24 million files.
For the MDT, lfs df reports
Canon, Richard Shane wrote:
I see that the download site has been moved and integrated into the Sun
site. It looks like this broke a few things. For one, I can’t get to
any of the 1.4 releases. Can this get fixed?
I'll see what can be done.
cliffw
Thanks,
--Shane
Canon, Richard Shane wrote:
I see that the download site has been moved and integrated into the Sun
site. It looks like this broke a few things. For one, I can’t get to
any of the 1.4 releases. Can this get fixed?
It looks like some links were recently mis-moved. Should be fixed
Cliff White wrote:
Canon, Richard Shane wrote:
I see that the download site has been moved and integrated into the Sun
site. It looks like this broke a few things. For one, I can’t get to
any of the 1.4 releases. Can this get fixed?
It looks like some links were recently mis-moved
Ali Algarrous wrote:
My name is Ali Algarrous and I'm doing a research about Lustre file
systesm.
I'm running Debian on my machine and after a long time I was able to
install Lustre on my machine. I was able to format devices and mount
clients and servers easily but I had to reinstall the
87 matches
Mail list logo
