Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-11 Thread Jon Murphy
Jim, Good point as to the joint. Someone else asked why one would need a joint if the neck were straight. There is a good answer to that if one has tried to find a good section of wood at a certain size. I turn wood for goblets and bowls, it is difficult to fine a long straight grain of a decent w

re: #1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Kenneth Be
In a message dated 12/10/2003 11:30:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Dear All: > There seems to be a very simple explanation for the bent-back pegbox: The > joint is more stable. The glue holds the pegbox in place but is not > subjected to upward pull -- as it would if the

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread James A Stimson
cc: Subject: Re: # 1 lute question 12/10/2003

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread timothy motz
>Yes, it acts like one half of a dovetail joint. Just don't loosen your strings! Tim > > > Original Message >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: # 1 lute question >Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:23:08 -0500 (EST) > >> >>

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Wayne Cripps
The glue holding my pegbox on has let go, but the pegbox is still pretty much in place, because of the shape of the joint. There is a little V which locks the pegbox in place, even without glue! Wayne

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Patrick H
While some guitar headstocks are glued on, most are one piece with the neck. Patrick Doctor Oakroot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howard Posner wrote: > James A Stimson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> There seems to be a very simple explanation for the bent-back pegbox: >> The >> joint is mo

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Doctor Oakroot
Howard Posner wrote: > James A Stimson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> There seems to be a very simple explanation for the bent-back pegbox: >> The >> joint is more stable. > > But isn't it the bent-back design that makes a joint necessary in the > first > place? I.e., if the pegbox were stra

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Vance Wood
= prolonging the warping of the neck. Vance Wood. - Original Message -=20 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:26 PM Subject: Re: # 1 lute question In a message dated 12/9/2003 4:48:59 PM Pacific Standard Time

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Howard Posner
James A Stimson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There seems to be a very simple explanation for the bent-back pegbox: The > joint is more stable. But isn't it the bent-back design that makes a joint necessary in the first place? I.e., if the pegbox were straight, couldn't it be made from the same

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Doctor Oakroot
James A Stimson wrote: > > > > > Dear All: > There seems to be a very simple explanation for the bent-back pegbox: The > joint is more stable. The glue holds the pegbox in place but is not > subjected to upward pull -- as it would if the pegbox were in line with > the > neck. > Yours, > Jim >

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread James A Stimson
Dear All: There seems to be a very simple explanation for the bent-back pegbox: The joint is more stable. The glue holds the pegbox in place but is not subjected to upward pull -- as it would if the pegbox were in line with the neck. Yours, Jim

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread Joe Mayes
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: # 1 lute question > > In a message dated 12/9/2003 4:48:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi James: > > I view it as an issue of balance. The peg box loaded is probably the single > most weighty portion of th

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-10 Thread DOMJAN,Gabor
e nut in case of bent pegbox. Best regards: Gabor Domjan - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:19 AM Subject: Re: # 1 lute question > Actually, James, in all seriousness I've noticed that it is much

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-09 Thread Jon Murphy
James, I hope this is neither silly nor cute, but there is also the question of the size of doors and people at the time. In 1947, at the age of twelve, I spent a summer at a farm in England owned by a schoolgirl friend of my mother. The house was over 400 years old and my room was on the second f

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-09 Thread KennethBeLute
Actually, James, in all seriousness I've noticed that it is much easier to tune and keep the tuning stable in lutes with bent back pegboxes than lutes with extended pegboxes and certainly more than baroque and renaissance guitars and vihuelas. Kenneth --

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-09 Thread JEdwardsMusic
In a message dated 12/9/2003 4:48:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi James: I view it as an issue of balance. The peg box loaded is probably the single most weighty portion of the Lute. Bent back as it is helps to distribute the weight more toward the center of the instru

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-09 Thread Vance Wood
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: Re: # 1 lute question > Hi to all, > > Whenever I perform on the lute the number one question from the audience > is, "Why is the head/pegbox bent at such a sharp angle&qu

Re: # 1 lute question

2003-12-09 Thread JEdwardsMusic
Hi to all, Whenever I perform on the lute the number one question from the audience is, "Why is the head/pegbox bent at such a sharp angle"? I'm guessing it's an engineering solution to the torque of all the strings on a very lightly built instrument, but I wish I could give a definitive ans