calling bv-unlockInset() and returning UNDISPATCHED inserts a space _in
front_ of the formula (and correctly so).
What was the trick again to get the space behind the formula?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Computer User,
I appreciate that your time is very valuable, so I will be brief, to save
money on your printer consumables, visit www.inkonline.co.uk
Many thanks,
Inkonline.
A short message regarding our emails...
Your email address has been passed to us as a user interested in
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
calling bv-unlockInset() and returning UNDISPATCHED inserts a space _in
front_ of the formula (and correctly so).
What was the trick again to get the space behind the formula?
If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
Jean-Marc!) we should change the call to bv-unlockInset() to
bv-unlockInset(HOW), then the above should work if you call
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
separately.
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and (more) people won't.
Jules
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre The attached patch intoduces a new LFUN (LFUN_MATH math).
No it does not. There is no patch.
And you fogot to add math_replace.* in your latest commit, methink.
JMarc
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
separately.
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least
Juergen Lars and Jean-Marc!)
I have to admit that I do not understand much about this inset locking
stuff (I which I would, but...). So all I can do is a vote to express
my
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
I will I increase the message size and thus make the net
Jules == Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jules More to the point, there is no consensus on polite behaviour:
Jules I, for one, find it polite when people *do* CC me on mailing
Jules list postings. I read my personal mail more frequently than the
Jules mailing list.
Actually, I also set up
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allan This looks okay compared to running LyX on screen :0.0 at the
Allan same breakpoint. Any ideas what else might be worth looking at
Allan in the Display struct? Take a look at Xlib.h for the
Allan definition.
I read a bit the xforms sources and
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:03:12AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
Well, it seems so ;-) Your message does include this header.
It should since I told mutt that this is a mailling list.
BTW, you should know that no emoticons are allowed on fridays, or
else my previous message would be full of
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
So please tell me how to setup mutt politely.
The doubled mails are mainly because the list is in the cc: and I am
answering juergen. Of course, I manually could put
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
So please tell me how to setup mutt politely.
in .muttrc add
subscribe lyx-
This will tell
Jose == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jose Once you set that, you reply with L and mutt knows that you
Jose are replying to a mailing list so it takes the necessary
Jose measures.
What are those measures? Do you still answer to people who are not
subscribed to the
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
The doubled mails are mainly because the list is in the cc: and I am
answering juergen. Of course, I manually could put in the list in the To:
and remove the Cc:, but that's a pai.
Well that's what I do every time!
Jug
--
On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and (more) people won't.
I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my private
messages answered to lyx-devel, when doing a reply!?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my private
messages answered to lyx-devel, when doing a reply!?
Would be fun, wouldn't it?
Andre'
PS: This serves as a test...
--
André Pönitz
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:53:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What are those measures? Do you still answer to people who are not
subscribed to the list?
In that case it is necessary to do a group reply, so that it replies
to the sender and the other people present in the other
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and (more) people won't.
I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my
Michael == Michael A Koziarski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael This is the last patch I'll be able to contribute till late
Michael next week some time. Hopefully there's nothing that can
Michael prevent it being applied.
A few comments/ideas (although I think this patch is definitely good).
any comments?
Herbert
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
any comments?
What about setting package options ?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:33:39PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I can reproduce this with xforms-0.88.1, linux-2.2.19, XFree86-4.0.3.
I also noticed an X-windows(?) warning message printed for every case
THere are people who would murder you for calling it X-windows !
below:
BadMatch
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
I will I increase the message size and thus make the net slower
because some people don't know how to use their MUA?
(this is an appropriate friday post, out
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:20:58PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
1) r
2) L
3) G
Since usually I only reply to one person, when not in
mailing-list-mode, this satisfy the principle of the least surprise.
So I must say that I want to reply to the mailing list, or
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:08:07AM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
I have again been urged to use vim for editing some
document on my archaic notebook (where I use M$-DOS and vim) and
I was against unpleasantly surprised, that LyX still does not
provide interoperability between LyX and LaTeX in
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jules == Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jules On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc:
me all mail separately.
Jules So
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
any comments?
What about setting package options ?
good idea!
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
calling bv->unlockInset() and returning "UNDISPATCHED" inserts a space _in
front_ of the formula (and correctly so).
What was the trick again to get the space behind the formula?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Computer User,
I appreciate that your time is very valuable, so I will be brief, to save
money on your printer consumables, visit www.inkonline.co.uk
Many thanks,
Inkonline.
A short message regarding our emails...
Your email address has been passed to us as a user interested in
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> calling bv->unlockInset() and returning "UNDISPATCHED" inserts a space _in
> front_ of the formula (and correctly so).
>
> What was the trick again to get the space behind the formula?
If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least Lars and
>> Jean-Marc!) we should change the call to bv->unlockInset() to
>> bv->unlockInset(HOW), then the above should work if you
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
> separately.
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and (more) people won't.
Jules
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> The attached patch intoduces a new LFUN (LFUN_MATH "math").
No it does not. There is no patch.
And you fogot to add math_replace.* in your latest commit, methink.
JMarc
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
> > separately.
>
> So configure your mailer to add the following header:
>
>
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> If people agree (I didn't still get agreement from at least
Juergen> Lars and Jean-Marc!)
I have to admit that I do not understand much about this inset locking
stuff (I which I would, but...). So all I can do is a vote to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> I will I increase the message size and thus make
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> More to the point, there is no consensus on polite behaviour:
Jules> I, for one, find it polite when people *do* CC me on mailing
Jules> list postings. I read my personal mail more frequently than the
Jules> mailing list.
Actually,
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> This looks okay compared to running LyX on screen :0.0 at the
Allan> same breakpoint. Any ideas what else might be worth looking at
Allan> in the Display struct? Take a look at Xlib.h for the
Allan> definition.
I read a bit the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:03:12AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> Well, it seems so ;-) Your message does include this header.
It should since I told mutt that this is a mailling list.
BTW, you should know that no emoticons are allowed on fridays, or
else my previous message would be full of
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
So please tell me how to setup mutt politely.
The doubled mails are mainly because the list is in the cc: and I am
answering juergen. Of course, I manually could
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> So please tell me how to setup mutt politely.
in .muttrc add
subscribe lyx-
This
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose> Once you set that, you reply with L and mutt knows that you
Jose> are replying to a mailing list so it takes the necessary
Jose> measures.
What are those measures? Do you still answer to people who are not
subscribed
On 16-Nov-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The doubled mails are mainly because the list is in the cc: and I am
> answering juergen. Of course, I manually could put in the list in the To:
> and remove the Cc:, but that's a pai.
Well that's what I do every time!
Jug
--
On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
> So configure your mailer to add the following header:
>
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ...and (more) people won't.
I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my private
messages answered to lyx-devel, when doing a reply!?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I then get all my private
> messages answered to lyx-devel, when doing a reply!?
Would be fun, wouldn't it?
Andre'
PS: This serves as a test...
--
André Pönitz
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:53:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What are those measures? Do you still answer to people who are not
> subscribed to the list?
In that case it is necessary to do a group reply, so that it replies
to the sender and the other people present in the other
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > So configure your mailer to add the following header:
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ...and (more) people won't.
>
> I'm not so expert in this does this mean that I
> "Michael" == Michael A Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> This is the last patch I'll be able to contribute till late
Michael> next week some time. Hopefully there's nothing that can
Michael> prevent it being applied.
A few comments/ideas (although I think this patch is
any comments?
Herbert
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> any comments?
What about setting package options ?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:33:39PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I can reproduce this with xforms-0.88.1, linux-2.2.19, XFree86-4.0.3.
> I also noticed an X-windows(?) warning message printed for every case
THere are people who would murder you for calling it "X-windows" !
> below:
>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> I will I increase the message size and thus make the net slower
> because some people don't know how to use their MUA?
>
> (this is an appropriate friday
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:20:58PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> 1) r
> 2) L
> 3) G
>
> Since usually I only reply to one person, when not in
> mailing-list-mode, this satisfy the principle of the least surprise.
>
> So I must say that I want to reply to the mailing
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:08:07AM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> I have again been urged to use vim for editing some
> document on my archaic notebook (where I use M$-DOS and vim) and
> I was against unpleasantly surprised, that LyX still does not
> provide interoperability between LyX and LaTeX in
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >> P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc:
> >> me all mail
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:36:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>any comments?
>>
>
>What about setting package options ?
>
good idea!
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
58 matches
Mail list logo
