bug in mathed

when having the multline environment, lyx shows in all lines the #-character, but only the last line is numbered for the multline-env, the others can't! the alt-m-N has also to be disabled for the other lines. Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: bug in mathed

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:20:40PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > No, it does not matter which row contains the maximum number of columns. > > I know that, but I think we should restrict our support to "normal" use > of the latex commands. Actually I like to support as much as I can without extra

Re: Bug in LibFileSearch?

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:34:10PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >Would the following make sense? > > Yes. My mistake. You owe me a beer for that. This was an hour of searching ;-} Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deser

CVS generates empty Makefiles. Due to latest update in configure.in/acconfig.h?

Jean-Marc, I've seen that you removed some unnecessary code from configure.in and acconfig.h in CVS. Removed too much? Since today's update to CVS, my configure script generates only empty Makefiles. I reversed your changes in the two files mentioned above, but to no avail. What else have you c

Re: lyx-devel src/graphics/: Tag: BRANCH-1_2_X ChangeLog GraphicsC ...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > CVSROOT: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot > Module name: lyx-devel > Repository: lyx-devel/src/graphics/ > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/17 23:21:38 > > Modified files: > lyx-devel/src/graphics/: Tag: BRANCH-1_2_X ChangeLog >

Re: po/POTFILES.in

On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Allan Rae wrote: [...] > Again, I see no need for lyx.pot or POTFILES* to be in CVS. Please > enlighten me if I've missed something. > > (Although as I said in my last email srcdir!=builddir is now getting > to be a problem because the generated form_*.[Ch] files are in > bui

Re: Font loading messages

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:45:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The original idea was that the code in dispatch > if (!res.empty()) > owner->message(_(res)); > owner->updateMenubar(); > owner->updateToolbar(); > should be removed and go to verboseDispatch(

Re: Compiling qt2?

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:20:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I tried for fun to compile with qt2 frontend, and all I got is one day it will not just be fun :) > What can I do? Automake is 1.4-p5 Yes as Edwin said automake requirement has been 1.5 for quite some months ... regards j

Re: \citep and \citet of natbib

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:29:09PM -0600, Hai-Ru Chang wrote: > Hello, > Can you add \citep and \citet of natbib as options in your cite reference > popup panel. Thanks! \citep and \citet are already supported in lyx 1.2.0 (you need to enable the "Use natbib" button in the document dialog

Re: Compiling qt2?

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 11:20 pm, you wrote: > I tried for fun to compile with qt2 frontend, and all I got is > > make[6]: Entre dans le répertoire > `/home/lasgoutt/src/lyx/qtbuild/src/frontends/qt2/ui' > make[6]: *** Pas de règle pour fabriquer la cible `libqt2ui.la.c', > nécessaire pour `libq

\citep and \citet of natbib

Hello, Can you add \citep and \citet of natbib as options in your cite reference popup panel. Thanks! Dr. Hai-Ru Chang Duane Physics #D322 311-UCB Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Boulder, CO 80303 Tel: 303-492-0544

Compiling qt2?

I tried for fun to compile with qt2 frontend, and all I got is make[6]: Entre dans le répertoire `/home/lasgoutt/src/lyx/qtbuild/src/frontends/qt2/ui' make[6]: *** Pas de règle pour fabriquer la cible `libqt2ui.la.c', nécessaire pour `libqt2ui.la'. Arrêt. What it says is that it cannot find li

Re: bug in mathed

Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:11:50PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >>>Yes, but you have to read the 1st row in order to know the number of columns: >>> >>>\begin{align} >>>1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ >>>... >>>\end{align} >>> >>No, it does not matter which row contains the maximum number

Re: bug in mathed

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:11:50PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > Yes, but you have to read the 1st row in order to know the number of columns: > > > > \begin{align} > > 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ > > ... > > \end{align} > > No, it does not matter which row contains the maximum number of columns. I

Re: bug in mathed

Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > - insert->math->amsalign > > > - cursor into the box > > > - edit-math->add column > > > -> align environment -> switches

cvs compile

in src/graphics/Makefile.am are FileMonitor.[Ch] but not present as files Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: Font loading messages

> I think we're talking past each other. Yes :) > I am not proposing to remove this difference anywhere. > > Find a spot where : > > verboseDispatch(..., false); > > cannot be transformed into > > dispatch(...) > > instead. I am proposing this change, then make verboseDispatch a

Re: Bug in LibFileSearch?

Andre Poenitz wrote: > Would the following make sense? Yes. My mistake. JMarc

Re: lyx-devel : compile error with gcc3.1

geof wrote: > /usr/local/gcc-3.1/bin/c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src > -I../../../images -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ > -I../../../src/frontends/controllers -I../../../boost -isystem > /usr/X11R6/include -O0 -W -Wall -Winline -Winline -c FormFiledialog.C -MT > FormFile

lyx-devel : compile error with gcc3.1

/usr/local/gcc-3.1/bin/c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../images -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../../src/frontends/controllers -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -O0 -W -Wall -Winline -Winline -c FormFiledialog.C -MT FormFiledialog.lo -MD -MP -MF .

Re: [PATCH] graphics

Garst R. Reese wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > >>Well I don't imagine many people out there have a version of gs older than my >>venerable 5.50. >> >> > My problem was not with an old version of gs, but with people/software > that create Postscript V1.0 files such as Cadsoft Eagle. > http://w

Re: [PATCH] graphics

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 7:05 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Garst, who has not yet succeeded in unsubscribing. There should be a line in the header to this mail: List-Unsubscribe: Angus

Re: [PATCH] graphics

Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2002 6:36 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>Angus Leeming wrote: >> >>>It strikes me that we could further simplify the LyX code base by using >>>gs to ascertain the bounding box info in ControlGraphics. Your code here >>>is a valient attempt but gs is the m

Re: [PATCH] graphics

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 6:36 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > It strikes me that we could further simplify the LyX code base by using > > gs to ascertain the bounding box info in ControlGraphics. Your code here > > is a valient attempt but gs is the master here and it'd make mo

Re: [PATCH] graphics

Angus Leeming wrote: > It strikes me that we could further simplify the LyX code base by using gs to > ascertain the bounding box info in ControlGraphics. Your code here is a > valient attempt but gs is the master here and it'd make more sense to use it. > > What do you think? gs? use versio

Re: [PATCH] graphics

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 6:22 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 July 2002 6:07 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>please apply, also for 1.2.1 > > > > I love patches like this ;-) > > > > However, I note that PS support is not disabled in the xforms image > > loader. > >

Re: [PATCH] graphics

Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2002 6:07 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>please apply, also for 1.2.1 >> > > I love patches like this ;-) > > However, I note that PS support is not disabled in the xforms image loader. > > Would you like me to disable it? Garst disabled it in his tr

Re: [PATCH] graphics

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 6:07 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > please apply, also for 1.2.1 I love patches like this ;-) However, I note that PS support is not disabled in the xforms image loader. Would you like me to disable it? Angus

[PATCH] graphics

please apply, also for 1.2.1 Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/ Index: src/graphics/ChangeLog === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/graphics/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.98 diff -u -r1.98 ChangeLog --- src/gra

Re: Font loading messages

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:31:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Hmm, I am not sure we understand each other, and maybe is there > something I do not get. Anyway: I think we're talking past each other. > If you do M-c e in a buffer, you get something like > Font: EMphasis On, Paragraph

Bug in LibFileSearch?

Would the following make sense? Index: support/filetools.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/support/filetools.C,v retrieving revision 1.129 diff -u -p -r1.129 filetools.C --- support/filetools.C 17 Jul 2002 14:46:

Re: bug in mathed

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > - insert->math->amsalign > > - cursor into the box > > - edit-math->add column > > -> align environment -> switches to alignat > >it should be still align! > > Do

Re: bug in mathed

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>- insert->math->amsalign >>- cursor into the box >>- edit-math->add column >>-> align environment -> switches to alignat >> it should be still align! >> > > Does align handle more than 2 columns? sure,

Re: bug in mathed

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > - insert->math->amsalign > - cursor into the box > - edit-math->add column > -> align environment -> switches to alignat >it should be still align! Does align handle more than 2 columns? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up F

bug in mathed

- insert->math->amsalign - cursor into the box - edit-math->add column -> align environment -> switches to alignat it should be still align! Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: Font loading messages

> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Read the 3rd verboseDispatch(). As I said, if it's false, all it John> does is add a ' '. John> I see if you call the void LyXFunc::verboseDispatch(string const John> & s, bool show_sc) with show_sc == false, /there/ is the John> diffe

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Why does this annoy you? > > Andre> Bloat? > Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this > font-state, You got it. > then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I > think Lars likes to

Re: CVS: XFormsView.C:205: no matching function for call to `MiniBuffer::message (int)'

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:03:36PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > You've committed a new XFormsView to CVS. > Is it due to that commit that CVS does not compile anymore here: Yeaargh ! Sorry. I'm on it .. john -- "i am sorey I cant reads yuor emale because my emale box has filtar on it whitch say

Re: Font loading messages

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:56:59AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Why should we display the Layout we have that information already. Yes. > But the more I follow this discussion the more it seems Jean-Marc is > right with his "configurable" message-bar. Possibly, but we still have to have a nic

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:52:38PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >Ok, this could be solved by copying/linking the correct one to > >.lyx/scripts/foo2bar, couldn't it? > > > so I ask again: where is the sense of $$s? The whole converting > stuff works works as expected and with a LibScriptSearch y

Re: Font loading messages

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:25:31AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > John> o what use is show_sc param to verboseDispatch() ? If it is > John> false, all it will do is add a ' ', iff there is no dispatch > John> result message. Can I remove it ? > > when it is true, the keyboard shortcut for

Re: tie break

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>Andre> See attachment. >> >>I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not make >>the converter stuff look into scripts/ too when trying to run any >>program? >> > >>I added a few mo

Re: Making personal lyx.mo files with 1.2.0

> "Philipp" == Philipp Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Philipp> Hello, (sorry I didn't find where this is documented ...) Philipp> I'm used to applying lots of changes to my po/xx.po file Philipp> before building lyx. But as with 1.2.0 the changes are Philipp> ignored. It seems, the xx.gmo

Re: keyboard BUG

> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Wednesday 17 July 2002 12:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I added new shortcuts like M-p asterisk 1 for Section*. José> Thanks, now it makes sense. :-) What remains to be seen is how practical this binding rea

Re: tie break

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: See attachment. >> I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not >> make the converter stuff look into scripts/ too when trying to run >

Re: mathed styles

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > is it intended that for inline formulas the lyx-view of a > fraction is not changed when switching to displaystyle > scriptscriptstale,... ? Not really. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> See attachment. > > I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not make > the converter stuff look into scripts/ too when trying to run any > program? > I added a few month ago a command LibScriptSearc

Re: keyboard BUG

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 12:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I added new shortcuts like M-p asterisk 1 for Section*. Thanks, now it makes sense. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: tie break

Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2002 4:22 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > >>>when developpers have no real new ideas or tired of >>>bughunting, then they beautify the code ... >>> >>And it often is high time for it... >> > > This is: > * old code that must soon be split into a Controller

mathed styles

is it intended that for inline formulas the lyx-view of a fraction is not changed when switching to displaystyle scriptscriptstale,... ? Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:22:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > And it often is high time for it... In this case it really was not. The code was ok... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: tie break

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: >> But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go? Andre> See attachment. I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not make the

Re: tie break

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 4:22 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > when developpers have no real new ideas or tired of > > bughunting, then they beautify the code ... > > And it often is high time for it... This is: * old code that must soon be split into a Controller and a View if GUI-I is to be finis

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:19:14PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > when developpers have no real new ideas or tired of > bughunting, then they beautify the code ... The most important aspect of code beautifying is that one can change one's mind and revert all changes a week later. And there are obv

Re: tie break

David Kastrup wrote: > Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Angus Leeming wrote: >> >> > ? I find this more readable as I do not have to scroll down to learn that str is no further modified and it might save a copy as well. >>>Go ahead. >>>Angus >>> >>> >> >>when de

Re: tie break

Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > >>? I find this more readable as I do not have to scroll down to learn that > >>str is no further modified and it might save a copy as well. > >> > > Go ahead. > > Angus > > > > > when developpers have no real new ideas or t

Re: tie break

Angus Leeming wrote: >> string str; >> if (...) { >> str = ... >> } else if (...) { >> str =... >> } >> return str; >> >>to >> >> if (...) >> return ... >> if (...) >> return ... >> return string(); >> >>? I find this more readable as I do not have to scroll down to learn that >>str is no

Re: lib/symbol

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:54:48PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > my question is if > $a\lyxnegspace b$ is allowed or not? Officially not, and officially you do not even have to know it ;-) It's allowed only in the second cell of a macro definition. If used anywhere else one should put a \def\lyxne

Re: tie break

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 4:03 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > You should add a note to the user of the preferences dialog: > > Ok. > > But as I have this file in the editor now: Would anybody mind me changing > things like > > string

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > You should add a note to the user of the preferences dialog: Ok. But as I have this file in the editor now: Would anybody mind me changing things like string str; if (...) { str = ... } else if (...) { str =... } return

Re: lib/symbol

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>so they are not visible for latex?? >> > > They are in general, but they should be used only in places where they > aren't, i.e. the second box of the macro definition. my question is if $a\lyxnegspace b$

Re: tie break

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 3:44 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go? > > See attachment. Oh, very neat. You should add a note to the user of the preferences dialog: FormP

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:41:50AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I had to make several passes at compiling 3.1 to get LyX-1.2 to compile. > The things I added as I went along were objc, --enable-cpp, and > --enable-threads Don't know which did the trick. The interesting part would be why it did

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go? See attachment. [I don't like the 'extern' stuff, but it is used in othre places too, so I guess it does not matter much] Andre' -- Those who desire to give up

Re: lib/symbol

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > so they are not visible for latex?? They are in general, but they should be used only in places where they aren't, i.e. the second box of the macro definition. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Securit

Re: lib/symbol

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>there are a lyxnegspace and a lyxposspace in the list >>but they are not defined >> > > But used ;-) > > They are _really_ invisible spaces to tweak appearance of macros on screen. > i.e. there is 2 pix sp

Re: lib/symbol

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > there are a lyxnegspace and a lyxposspace in the list > but they are not defined But used ;-) They are _really_ invisible spaces to tweak appearance of macros on screen. i.e. there is 2 pix space between math symbols which don't sho

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:38:42AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ > xforms-0.89)? Such patches should not be necessary. But theory and praxis are only theoretical the same. So what goes wrong if you try that cobination? Andre' -

Re: buglist

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:31:27PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > I disagree. > Although the amsmath documentation does not say that an odd number of > columns is forbidden, it appears that the normal behavior is to have an > even number of columns. > As for Herbert's example, he can always leave the

lib/symbol

there are a lyxnegspace and a lyxposspace in the list but they are not defined Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go? I'll have a look... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

> "Kuba" == Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kuba> Hi, Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under Kuba> gcc-3.1 (+ xforms-0.89)? Cheers, Kuba Ober Can you be more precise on the kind of problems you encouter? JMarc

Re: lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

Kuba Ober wrote: > Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ > xforms-0.89)? what patches do you need? I have 3.1 running and can compile 1.2.1cvs Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: buglist

Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:36:33PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:35:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: >> >>>LyX should support things which are still allowed >>>in a legal way, and that is a one-column step. >>> >>Fine with me. I'll change it then.

lyx 1.2.0 + gcc 3.1

Hi, Does anybody have patches for lyx to cleanly compile under gcc-3.1 (+ xforms-0.89)? Cheers, Kuba Ober

Re: buglist

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:36:33PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:35:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > LyX should support things which are still allowed > > in a legal way, and that is a one-column step. > > Fine with me. I'll change it then. I disagree. Although the

Re: overriding default converters

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:02:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > The question is: what is the syntax that should be used to REMOVE a converter > that is defined in lyxrc.defaults? > > lyxrc.C outputs changed converters so: > > // New/modifed converters > for (Conver

Re: tie break

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 2:00 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Remember that I suggested adding a $$lyxlib variable, analogous to $$i, > > $$o that would be expanded to the right thing? > > It looks fine. > > > Nobody seemed that intere

Re: tie break

Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>Should I attach a '.sh' suffix for shell scripts in lib/scripts or not? >> >>Angus: Is there a way do specify in the .lyx/preferences' converters >>section that a converter from /lib/scripts should be >>used? >>

Re: tie break

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Remember that I suggested adding a $$lyxlib variable, analogous to $$i, $$o > that would be expanded to the right thing? It looks fine. > Nobody seemed that interested, so > I didn't persue the matter. Nobody rejected the propos

Re: tie break

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Should I attach a '.sh' suffix for shell scripts in lib/scripts or not? > > Angus: Is there a way do specify in the .lyx/preferences' converters > section that a converter from /lib/scripts should be > used? Remember that I suggested add

Re: buglist

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:35:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>>So should I just add one column at a time? >>>Would mean to remove a line or two... >>> >> >>LyX should support things which are still allowed >> > > Aehm... So what goes in the place of the ? in > > \be

Re: buglist

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:35:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >So should I just add one column at a time? > >Would mean to remove a line or two... > > > LyX should support things which are still allowed Aehm... So what goes in the place of the ? in \begin{xalignat}{?} 1 & 2 & 3 \end{xalig

Re: buglist

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:35:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > LyX should support things which are still allowed > in a legal way, and that is a one-column step. Fine with me. I'll change it then. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do t

Re: buglist

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:22:20PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > >>no! depends to what I want with this environment. >> >>with three columns f.ex. I'm able to write commets >>right alligned. >> > > So should I just add one column at a time? > Would mean to remove a line o

Re: [PATCH]Re: problem with xfig import

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>"Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > > Herbert> attached a patch, also for deleting _all_ files when exit. > > Could you elaborate on the deletion thing? Is this related to some > known problem? unzip works in the global tempdir, so

Re: buglist

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:22:20PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > no! depends to what I want with this environment. > > with three columns f.ex. I'm able to write commets > right alligned. So should I just add one column at a time? Would mean to remove a line or two... Andre' -- Those who desi

tie break

Should I attach a '.sh' suffix for shell scripts in lib/scripts or not? Angus: Is there a way do specify in the .lyx/preferences' converters section that a converter from /lib/scripts should be used? How is the lyxpreview2ppm.sh script found? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in

Re: [PATCH]Re: problem with xfig import

> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Herbert> attached a patch, also for deleting _all_ files when exit. Could you elaborate on the deletion thing? Is this related to some known problem? JMarc

Re: overriding default converters

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 1:09 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:35:54AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > How do I override some global default \converter setting (like > > .fig->.eps) in my .lyx/preferences? > > > > The only method I found is to comment it out in the global > > ly

Re: buglist

Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>>mathed: >>>\align \alignat \ >>>when doing a edit->math->append column >>>lyx always inserts TWO columns instead of one >>> >>Was meant as a feature. I thought they have to appear in pairs? >

Re: overriding default converters

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:09:09PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:35:54AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > How do I override some global default \converter setting (like .fig->.eps) > > in my .lyx/preferences? > > > > The only method I found is to comment it out in the

Re: buglist

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > mathed: > > \align \alignat \ > > when doing a edit->math->append column > > lyx always inserts TWO columns instead of one > > Was meant as a feature. I thought they have to appear in pairs? Correct.

Re: using .fig with lyx

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > FormPreferences simply removes the converter from the list of converters > available to this session. It cannot, therefore, write this info to file. I > understand that converter supports "none". If, instead of erasing the entry

Re: [PATCH]Re: problem with xfig import

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>"Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > > Herbert> Osvaldo Fornaro wrote: > >>>I have a problem to import xfig files with lyx 1.2.0. The error >>>message is that file.eps is not found, so i think that the filter >>>for import is not well

Re: overriding default converters

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:35:54AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > How do I override some global default \converter setting (like .fig->.eps) > in my .lyx/preferences? > > The only method I found is to comment it out in the global lyxrc.defaults, > which is not exactly nice if you don't have wri

Re: using .fig with lyx

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 12:03 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:17:01AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > As for your scripts: > > 1. Don't use bash, use sh. > > Fine with me. Does standard sh have `...` expansion? Yes. > > 2. I personally prefer scripts to end .sh. > > Well,

Re: 12x back ports

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:59:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Hm.. the xxalign stuff is ok in 1.2.1. I broke this only > Andre> recently... > > One less to fix :) And the only one I actually fixed (apart from the \bf stuff which I won't touch as the font handling has changed a l

Re: 12x back ports

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Hm.. the xxalign stuff is ok in 1.2.1. I broke this only Andre> recently... One less to fix :) JMarc

Re: using .fig with lyx

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 12:06 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > You can "delete" but you cannot save this deletion because the syntax > > does not exist to represent it. Hence: > > > > I believe that it's impossible to delete the global preferences as > > there's no fig2eps disa

  1   2   >