On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:16:15AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How difficult is implementing a mathed toolbar (like in klyx) ?
It's already implemented.
Toolbar
...
NewLine
Icon "math-insert \overleftrightarrow"
Icon "math-insert \grave"
Icon "math-insert \tilde"
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:22:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> In file included from ../../../src/graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.C:16:
> ../../../src/graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.h:18:10: #include expects "FILENAME" or
>
> ../../../src/graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.C:27:10: #include expects "FILENAM
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:03:14PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:45:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > What is that 'boundary' flag good for for instance?
>
> RTL.
It would be really great if you could add a short explanation of *what*
it does and *why* to lyxcurs
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:49:17PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> It would be cute if there were "scroll button" to scroll through symbol
> panels without having to selcet them one by one in that drop down list...
Not sure what you mean, but if you're referring to the fact that the
symbols don't
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:26:47PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> [...]
> > Another solution may be write a function find_end_of() which find the
> > correct end of the tabular. find_end_of() should be a generalization of
> > find_e
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:37:55PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:36:07AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > Now, if some psycho would manage to bolt lyx equation display onto vim
> > editing . . .
> That sounds a lot like David's preview-latex but with vim not emac
How difficult is implementing a mathed toolbar (like in klyx) ?
I am just unable to compile qt now... because of this:
In file included from ../../../src/graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.C:16:
../../../src/graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.h:18:10: #include expects "FILENAME" or
../../../src/graphics/GraphicsImageXPM.C:27:10: #include expects "FILENAME" or
This code:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:45:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> What is that 'boundary' flag good for for instance?
RTL.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I agree. Lars, it's just *naming*.
Nothing is "just naming".
What is in a name? Would a rose...
There is a lot of politics in a name, and by choosing latex centric
names you effectively put other output formats as less important and
put them in the bac
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:12:15PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
| > All I'm saying is: if something is LaTeX, then let's use the LaTeX name,
| > instead of hiding it behind another LyX name.
|
| This sounds sensible. It's not really nice to have three names
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:03:47AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Are you saying I should do something like:
>
> frnt::OriginType GUI_conversion(int const GUI_choiceItem)
> {
> switch (GUI_choiceItem) {
> case 11: return(frnt::RightBaseline);
> case 10: return(frnt::R
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:01:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>I say: keep the switches for the sake of localization per UI.
>>It's simple and straightforward.
>
>
> Than for ${DEITY}s sake, put that conversion into helper functions.
>
But that function will only be ca
I just had a look at the Qt math panel. Nice thing.
It would be cute if there were "scroll button" to scroll through symbol
panels without having to selcet them one by one in that drop down list...
Or even a "show my a huge window with all symbols" button...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to giv
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:01:13AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> I say: keep the switches for the sake of localization per UI.
> It's simple and straightforward.
Than for ${DEITY}s sake, put that conversion into helper functions.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secu
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:30:28AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
>>I did this, because we were continuously translating between the
>>GUI-keywords, the LyX-keywords, and the LaTeX keywords. This complicated
>>scheme is reduced to the commen GUI - LyX/LaTeX conversion, using a
>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:36:07AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> Now, if some psycho would manage to bolt lyx equation display onto vim
> editing . . .
That sounds a lot like David's preview-latex but with vim not emacs
> hawk, who freqeuntly has extra hjkl's running around his docume
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> There are two things worth mentioning:
> 1. XML,although a nicety, is almost useless for people who edit things in it.
> It pushes one to type so many unnecessary keystrokes for even the most
> trivial things, and eveything has to be
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:21:35PM +0100, Jos? Ab?lio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Friday 30 August 2002 16:02, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I really know nothing about xml, but if it loses any of the advantages
> > of a pure text file, we lose a lot . . .
> Although sometimes (always ?) more
On Friday 30 August 2002 16:02, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> I really know nothing about xml, but if it loses any of the advantages
> of a pure text file, we lose a lot . . .
Although sometimes (always ?) more verbose there are tools like xmldiff that
show the difference between both docu
This is from Aug 27 cvs.
The attached file numbers the first section with 5 rather than 1. The
printed output is correct.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinio
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:12:15PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Who is supposed to read the lyx file format? Users certainly not!
> The present format, but also XML, saves a lot of diskspace when
> gzipped. Interesting detail: the xml parser doesn't care whether
> the file is gzipped or not, it can
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> 1. XML, although a nicety, is almost useless for people who edit things
> in it.
I noticed that. But Lars seems to have a strong aversion against being
"LaTeX centric" so I doubt it is a good idea to openly discuss things like
that ;-)
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 9:16 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Do anyone have a problem with that?
>
> You want to do something important on Friday 13th?
No. He explicitly wanted to do nothing...
Andre'
--
Those who desire t
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 30 August 2002 3:21 pm, Marco Morandini wrote:
>
>>This draft patch should detect when a graphic file is changed,
>>and rebuild the cache.
>
>
> We can already detect that the file has changed in 1.3 cvs.
>
Great! Thanks, I'll look there.
Marco Morandini
On Friday 30 August 2002 3:21 pm, Marco Morandini wrote:
> This draft patch should detect when a graphic file is changed,
> and rebuild the cache.
We can already detect that the file has changed in 1.3 cvs.
I won't comment about the suitability of the patch for 1.2, but will leave
this for Jean
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 8:37 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | R. Lahaye wrote:
> | > None of the scripts in lib seem to have the x-bit set?
> | > Why is that?
> |
> | They where checked in wrong! Lars could you please set the
> | x-bit directly on
This draft patch should detect when a graphic file is changed,
and rebuild the cache.
A time_t variable (filemodtime_) is added to GraphicsCacheItem it is
set to the ModificationTime of the graphic file each time the
GraphicsCacheItem is modified. Each time insetgraphics performs a
setCache, it c
On Thursday 29 August 2002 19:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
[...]
> Another solution may be write a function find_end_of() which find the
> correct end of the tabular. find_end_of() should be a generalization of
> find_end_of_inset() which have two additional arguments: start token & end
> token (for find
On piÄ
tek 30 sierpieÅ 2002 08:24 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:16:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | I agree. Lars, it's just *naming*. You don't need to read a latex
> > | conspiracy into it.
> >
> > but I do...
>
> We know.
I think that this was discussed al
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 9:16 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Do anyone have a problem with that?
>
> You want to do something important on Friday 13th?
>
> (My birthday by the way.
Mine too (in May)
> I think 13 is a lucky
On Thursday 29 August 2002 9:16 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Do anyone have a problem with that?
You want to do something important on Friday 13th?
(My birthday by the way. I think 13 is a lucky number...)
Angus. Slowly trawling through 953 lyx messages...
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:45:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I wonder why there are all these coordinate members in lyxcursor anyway.
Me too (well apart from x_fix)
> Shouldn't it be posiible to determine the cursor's position only from
> the paragraph and position (using, maybe, some extra
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:36:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > If I have a displayed formula in a paragraph [I.e. type
> > 'foobarfoobar'] and I try to place the cursor in front of the
> > formula (after the first foobar, it is displayed at the beginning of the
> > line in front of the foobar. Pr
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:34:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> If I have a displayed formula in a paragraph [I.e. type
> 'foobarfoobar'] and I try to place the cursor in front of the
> formula (after the first foobar, it is displayed at the beginning of the
> line in front of the foobar. Pretty
If I have a displayed formula in a paragraph [I.e. type
'foobarfoobar'] and I try to place the cursor in front of the
formula (after the first foobar, it is displayed at the beginning of the
line in front of the foobar. Pretty annoying.
This is also present in 1.2.1, so I did not break that wit
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:16:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I agree. Lars, it's just *naming*. You don't need to read a latex
> | conspiracy into it.
>
> but I do...
We know.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deser
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:03:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Erm, implicit behaviour depending on the exact ordering and numbering of
> a particular widget is NOT a good enough. We most definitely SHOULD be
> explicit (for starters Qt will have to be because it's not
> pascal-numbered)
But not b
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:47:18PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Go, this is better than nothing and can be completed later.
Apparently it's mega controversial so I'll just leave it to Dekel or
whatever
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I agree. Lars, it's just *naming*. You don't need to read a latex
| conspiracy into it.
but I do...
--
Lgb
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:42:26AM +0200, Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
> - Added group boxes for better grouping to overall enhance usability,
> especially for the symbol area, where I think there should be a
> distinction between the label for the area and for the range
> selector
I don't agr
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:30:04PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >This sounds sensible. It's not really nice to have three names for a thing.
>
> The rotateOrigin was a good example of that. We were talking three
> languages:
> 1. the GUI-style, 2. the LyX-style, and 3. the LaTeX-style. For esampl
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:45:00AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> As enums could be explicitly converted to ints I don't think they are
> necessary.
Erm, implicit behaviour depending on the exact ordering and numbering of
a particular widget is NOT a good enough. We most definitely SHOULD be
exp
On Thursday 29 August 2002 23:39, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> | No, reducing the readability of the lyx file should not be an issue.
> | Eventually the lyx file will be saved via a zip filter and is then
> | unreadable anyway.
>
> I am not so sure about that...
Then to see the file use zless
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:10, John Levon wrote:
> This patch installs lyx2lyx into the path,and places the support .py
> into $DATADIR/lyx2lyx
>
> It does NOT fix using non-installed lyx.
I will fix that later, the same way we do for reLyX.
> Any comments ? the only change to the script i
Would it be possible to use a "special" unit for this?
UNIT_EMPTY or something?
--
Lgb
Hi John,
JL> Comments please. I'm not sure how this will fit into my "favourite
JL> icons" panel yet.
Variation screenshot attached.
Changes:
- Added group boxes for better grouping to overall enhance usability,
especially for the symbol area, where I think there should be a
distinction be
47 matches
Mail list logo
