Angus Leeming wrote:
Why don't we (you) just remove this cruft from src/insets
(insettheorem too). They no longer compile, they aren't ver y complex
anyway and can always be retrieved from the Attic.
There are no soonish plans for them? What is the use of the EXTRA_DIST
variable in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
But can this really happen, or is it just a theoretical question?
Angus (Aside: as a mathematician, I though you found
Huaiyu Duan wrote:
Hi,
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of
latex code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting
papers to journals. The equation part of the latex code exported
Shall I just remove it, given that
1. Nobody uses it.
2. It will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and shouldn't
replicate system tools for no good reason.
--
Angus
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 09:46, Helge Hafting wrote:
I've had one problem that forced me to not use temp dirs:
Latex code (in ERT or in the preamble or in the preamble/textstyles
of a custom document layout) may use \input, \includegraphics, or
some other command that opens a
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 11:57, Angus Leeming wrote:
Shall I just remove it, given that
1. Nobody uses it.
2. It will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and shouldn't
Jose' Matos wrote:
On the other way most of your work has been in the direction of
making the dialog unnecessary. ;-)
Unfortunately, we still use system a lot, invoking chktex, when
converting the lyx document to another format, in the version control
code.
Nonetheless, we do fork a
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Shall I just remove it, given that 1. Nobody uses it. 2. It
Angus will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
Angus I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Angus Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and
- Original Message -
From: Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Huaiyu Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
Huaiyu Duan wrote:
Hi,
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
Huaiyu == Huaiyu Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Huaiyu Hi, I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write
Huaiyu short technical notes. It really saves time for me againts
Huaiyu checking the grammar of latex code. However, there is a
Huaiyu problem when it comes to submiting papers to
This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time last
week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a bug on
some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
Things that remain to be done:
-
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time
last week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a
bug on some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4.
I would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time
last week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a
bug on
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg When I asked some time ago the only bug that somebody (you?)
Georg mentioned was dvi export. Bugzilla has bugs 643 and 1405 about
Georg html export.
I am sorry I have not been more specific at the time.
Georg I thought that the run in
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:01:07AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Why don't we (you) just remove this cruft from src/insets
(insettheorem too). They no longer compile, they aren't ver y complex
anyway and can always be retrieved from the Attic.
There are no
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time last
week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a bug on
some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
Can
The patch tries to fix (the rest of) bug 1146
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1146
It always opens the find dialog if a new citation inset is being inserted (and
thus saves a few annoying keypresses).
Can some kind soul please review?
It works nicely, except for one thing: after applying
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks a lot Angus. Here is the ANNOUNCE that I plan to commit soon.
I'd appreciate if you could take a quick look at it and maybe make it
sexier.
This is no sexier, but I think it explains the LyX/Mac changes more
accurately.
--
Ronald Florencewww.18james.com
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Can anyone reproduce the spellchecker crashes I reported this week?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-develm=107652026519348w=2
Would be nice if it could be fixed for 1.3.4
I saw crashes when spellchecking multiple documents when I was using
Aspell 0.50.4.1 with
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks a lot Angus. Here is the ANNOUNCE that I plan to commit soon.
I'd appreciate if you could take a quick look at it and maybe make
it sexier.
I don't understand what the part after the semi-colon means. Is it
just noise?
* support for old files from LyX
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
It works nicely, except for one thing: after applying (pressing
apply, not ok) the find dialog is also opened (which is o.k.), but
the bc().valid() call is not recognized: the buttons stay disabled.
Any idea on this?
When you press Apply, you execute this code. So,
Ronald Florence wrote:
I believe cocoAspell is based on an earlier version of aspell than the
one I had been using, which leads me to suspect that the LyX crash
problems are with some versions of aspell-0.50.x.
Hmm, yes, the backtrace also indicates that the spellchecker (i.e. aspell) has
Angus Leeming wrote:
When you press Apply, you execute this code. So, I think that the
behaviour you describe is to be expected.
I see. Anything I can do about that?
Incidentally, I don't understand why the find dialog is opened when
the user presses Apply in the main dialog. That feels very
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Incidentally, I don't understand why the find dialog is opened when
the user presses Apply in the main dialog. That feels very ugly to
me.
It is because it also creates a new citation inset
No it doesn't. You can Apply to an existing inset.
What it does do is
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:04:03PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Ronald Florence wrote:
I believe cocoAspell is based on an earlier version of aspell than the
one I had been using, which leads me to suspect that the LyX crash
problems are with some versions of aspell-0.50.x.
Hmm,
Angus Leeming wrote:
No it doesn't. You can Apply to an existing inset.
What it does do is disconnect from any existing inset so subsequently
pressing Apply will create a new inset.
Yes, that's what I meant.
IMO this behaviour is ok because you have to open
that dialog anyway (the add
John Levon wrote:
Juergen, the spell code should be relatively debuggable. Where is the
lyx crash happening ?
All I have is the backtrace I have posted. But this seems pretty clear:
#0 ControlSpellchecker::checkAlive() (this=0x876cbb4)
at ../../../boost/boost/scoped_ptr.hpp:77
#1
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
He has. He has selected one or more new entries from the database.
But he cannot apply them, although they show up in the selected
browser. That's the problem. (I agree that the more elegant solution
would be not to open find after apply. But I don't know how that
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 10:46 schrieb Helge Hafting:
I've had one problem that forced me to not use temp dirs:
Latex code (in ERT or in the preamble or in the preamble/textstyles
of a custom document layout) may use \input, \includegraphics, or
some other command that opens a
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 18:09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I am sorry I have not been more specific at the time.
Never mind, fortunately it does not change anything fundamental, at least I
hope so ;-)
Georg I thought that the run in original dir flag was used for html
Georg
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:28:50PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
John Levon wrote:
Juergen, the spell code should be relatively debuggable. Where is the
lyx crash happening ?
All I have is the backtrace I have posted. But this seems pretty clear:
#0
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Huaiyu Duan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:40:50 +0100
I think that there are a lot of small things we could do to improve
the output of equations. However, we will never be able to do
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:24:14PM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of latex
code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting papers to
journals. The
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:15:03AM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
I did and got the same result. It is a little bit wierd. Latex is
more or less like a programming language, but no one writes a
beautifying script for it.
I guess that's simply because (La)TeX syntax is highly convoluted if not
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Why don't we (you) just remove this cruft from src/insets
> (insettheorem too). They no longer compile, they aren't ver y complex
> anyway and can always be retrieved from the Attic.
There are no soonish plans for them? What is the use of the EXTRA_DIST
variable in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
But can this really happen, or is it just a theoretical question?
Angus> (Aside: as a mathematician, I though you
Huaiyu Duan wrote:
Hi,
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of
latex code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting
papers to journals. The equation part of the latex code exported
Shall I just remove it, given that
1. Nobody uses it.
2. It will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and shouldn't
replicate system tools for no good reason.
--
Angus
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 09:46, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> I've had one problem that forced me to not use temp dirs:
>
> Latex code (in ERT or in the preamble or in the preamble/textstyles
> of a custom document layout) may use \input, \includegraphics, or
> some other command that opens a
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 11:57, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Shall I just remove it, given that
>
> 1. Nobody uses it.
> 2. It will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
> I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
> Executive summary: we have ps and kill for that and shouldn't
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On the other way most of your work has been in the direction of
> making the dialog unnecessary. ;-)
Unfortunately, we still use system a lot, invoking chktex, when
converting the lyx document to another format, in the version control
code.
Nonetheless, we do fork a
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Shall I just remove it, given that 1. Nobody uses it. 2. It
Angus> will not be implemented in the Qt frontend.
Angus> I understand the reasoning for (2) and probably agree with it.
Angus> Executive summary: we have ps and kill for
- Original Message -
From: "Helge Hafting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Huaiyu Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
> Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write
> "Huaiyu" == Huaiyu Duan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Huaiyu> Hi, I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write
Huaiyu> short technical notes. It really saves time for me againts
Huaiyu> checking the grammar of latex code. However, there is a
Huaiyu> problem when it comes to submiting
This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time last
week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a bug on
some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
Things that remain to be done:
-
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
> would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time
> last week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a
> bug on some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4.
>> I would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time
>> last week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> When I asked some time ago the only bug that somebody (you?)
Georg> mentioned was dvi export. Bugzilla has bugs 643 and 1405 about
Georg> html export.
I am sorry I have not been more specific at the time.
Georg> I thought that the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:01:07AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Why don't we (you) just remove this cruft from src/insets
> > (insettheorem too). They no longer compile, they aren't ver y complex
> > anyway and can always be retrieved from the Attic.
>
> There
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This is the second and hopefully last status update for LyX 1.3.4. I
> would really like to release it this week. We lost a lot of time last
> week chasing the german locale bug (which turned out to be a bug on
> some xforms patch), but now I think everything is OK.
The patch tries to fix (the rest of) bug 1146
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1146
It always opens the find dialog if a new citation inset is being inserted (and
thus saves a few annoying keypresses).
Can some kind soul please review?
It works nicely, except for one thing: after applying
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thanks a lot Angus. Here is the ANNOUNCE that I plan to commit soon.
I'd appreciate if you could take a quick look at it and maybe make it
sexier.
This is no sexier, but I think it explains the LyX/Mac changes more
accurately.
--
Ronald Florencewww.18james.com
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Can anyone reproduce the spellchecker crashes I reported this week?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel=107652026519348=2
Would be nice if it could be fixed for 1.3.4
I saw crashes when spellchecking multiple documents when I was using
Aspell 0.50.4.1 with
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks a lot Angus. Here is the ANNOUNCE that I plan to commit soon.
> I'd appreciate if you could take a quick look at it and maybe make
> it sexier.
I don't understand what the part after the semi-colon means. Is it
just noise?
* support for old files from LyX
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> It works nicely, except for one thing: after applying (pressing
> apply, not ok) the find dialog is also opened (which is o.k.), but
> the bc().valid() call is not recognized: the buttons stay disabled.
> Any idea on this?
When you press Apply, you execute this code.
Ronald Florence wrote:
> I believe cocoAspell is based on an earlier version of aspell than the
> one I had been using, which leads me to suspect that the LyX crash
> problems are with some versions of aspell-0.50.x.
Hmm, yes, the backtrace also indicates that the spellchecker (i.e. aspell) has
Angus Leeming wrote:
> When you press Apply, you execute this code. So, I think that the
> behaviour you describe is to be expected.
I see. Anything I can do about that?
> Incidentally, I don't understand why the find dialog is opened when
> the user presses Apply in the main dialog. That feels
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Incidentally, I don't understand why the find dialog is opened when
>> the user presses Apply in the main dialog. That feels very ugly to
>> me.
>
> It is because it also creates a new citation inset
No it doesn't. You can Apply to an existing inset.
What it does
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:04:03PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Ronald Florence wrote:
> > I believe cocoAspell is based on an earlier version of aspell than the
> > one I had been using, which leads me to suspect that the LyX crash
> > problems are with some versions of aspell-0.50.x.
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> No it doesn't. You can Apply to an existing inset.
>
> What it does do is disconnect from any existing inset so subsequently
> pressing Apply will create a new inset.
Yes, that's what I meant.
> > IMO this behaviour is ok because you have to open
> > that dialog anyway
John Levon wrote:
> Juergen, the spell code should be relatively debuggable. Where is the
> lyx crash happening ?
All I have is the backtrace I have posted. But this seems pretty clear:
#0 ControlSpellchecker::checkAlive() (this=0x876cbb4)
at ../../../boost/boost/scoped_ptr.hpp:77
#1
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> He has. He has selected one or more new entries from the database.
> But he cannot apply them, although they show up in the "selected"
> browser. That's the problem. (I agree that the more elegant solution
> would be not to open find after apply. But I don't know how
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 10:46 schrieb Helge Hafting:
> I've had one problem that forced me to not use temp dirs:
>
> Latex code (in ERT or in the preamble or in the preamble/textstyles
> of a custom document layout) may use \input, \includegraphics, or
> some other command that opens a
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 18:09 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> I am sorry I have not been more specific at the time.
Never mind, fortunately it does not change anything fundamental, at least I
hope so ;-)
> Georg> I thought that the "run in original dir" flag was used for html
> Georg>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:28:50PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > Juergen, the spell code should be relatively debuggable. Where is the
> > lyx crash happening ?
>
> All I have is the backtrace I have posted. But this seems pretty clear:
>
> #0
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Huaiyu Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:40:50 +0100
I think that there are a lot of small things we could do to improve
the output of equations. However, we will never be able
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:24:14PM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
> notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of latex
> code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting papers to
> journals.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:15:03AM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> I did and got the same result. It is a little bit wierd. Latex is
> more or less like a programming language, but no one writes a
> beautifying script for it.
I guess that's simply because (La)TeX syntax is highly convoluted if not
68 matches
Mail list logo
