Hi,
is there any document detailing the internal working of LyX? I am
particualrly interested in adding another language package (which
actually uses a preprocessor in LaTeX) to LyX, Something like the
Arabian LyX.
Amitabh
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:27:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
I'm fairly sure one of the first changes I had rejected by the LyX team
was trying to fix up Qt namespace pollution by
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:13:09PM +0530, Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
Hi,
is there any document detailing the internal working of LyX? I am
Not really no.
particualrly interested in adding another language package (which
actually uses a preprocessor in LaTeX) to LyX, Something like the
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Has everybody just gone quiet or what? I (and MARC) get no email...
Hello, hello.
--
Lgb
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I added the following to common.am to get the Cygwin compile
| to work.
| ndex: config/common.am
| ===
| RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/config/common.am,v
| retrieving revision 1.6
| diff
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Pretty well every single Qt dialog file has to #include debug.h
| before any of the Qt system headers or the compiler gets confused.
| Why? Because Qt in its wisdom defines a macro DEBUG that clashes with
| the DEBUG defined in support/debugstream.h that
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
| Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
I am with john... make two small .h files in the qt three and use
them in other files to workaround qt stuff.
Ah, well. It appears that Mate's
Georg Baum wrote:
I think this is a clean solution. However, I don't like the way how
the file overwriting prevention works:
- The cancel button is mislabelled: It does not cancel the export,
but does not copy the file. Any idea for a better name?
- There should be a fourth button that
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
| Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
I am with john... make two small .h files in the qt three and use
them in other files to workaround qt
Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
Hi,
We are starting a project to add Indian language support, starting
with
devanagari to LyX. LaTeX has a package called devnag for devanagari
output. There are some hindi fonts in X also. The idea is to give
powerful publishing support to devanagari publication
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:46:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Qt has a similar problem with its 'signals' macro and namespace
boost::signals. Actually, that one is a bit more insidious because we
#include boost/signals[1-9]*.hpp in lots of other header files, so
the pollution can pop up
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| #ifdef TEMPORARY_DEBUG_MACRO
| # define DEBUG TEMPORARY_DEBUG_MACRO
| # undef TEMPORARY_DEBUG_MACRO
| #endif
| I can see that this is nasty, but it does have the advantage of
| just working.
| The alternative, defining qt_debug.h, as a wrapper for debug.h is
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:46:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Qt has a similar problem with its 'signals' macro and namespace
boost::signals. Actually, that one is a bit more insidious because
we
#include boost/signals[1-9]*.hpp in lots of other header files, so
the
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:18:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Because I was trying to wrap the Qt code inside namespace
lyx::frontend and got offended by it all.
That's not too hard to do...
It wasn't me that added this comment:
// Dear Lord, deliver us from Evil,
// aka the Qt headers
Angus Leeming wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
I think this is a clean solution. However, I don't like the way how
the file overwriting prevention works:
- The cancel button is mislabelled: It does not cancel the export,
but does not copy the file. Any idea for a better name?
- There should
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I added the following to common.am to get the Cygwin compile
| to work.
| ndex: config/common.am
| ===
| RCS
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I added the following to common.am to get the Cygwin compile
| to work.
| ndex: config/common.am
|
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Kuba Ober wrote:
Hi,
An idea came to my mind so I feel compelled to share :)
Wouldn't it be nifty to hack the wiki enough to allow it to work on lyx files?
That way we could have wiki-ed lyx user's manual -- I don't think there
are any projects out there that
I'd rather just get rid of the whole file, it is unused.
If not fixed that way it should be fixed by adding the appropriate DIR
to the INCLUDES in the Makefile.ams in boost dirs. (that is how we
solved this for other subdirs).
Okay. This works for me too:
Index:
On Monday 24 May 2004 1:38 pm, Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
Hi Angus,
Good evening, Amitabh.
Let's take this back to the list. This is of general interest and
there's lots more expertise there than I can provide.
thanks. I have mailed Chang. Certainly, all available info is
available. I am also
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd rather just get rid of the whole file, it is unused.
If not fixed that way it should be fixed by adding the appropriate DIR
to the INCLUDES in the Makefile.ams in boost dirs. (that is how we
solved this for other subdirs).
| Okay. This
Hi,
is there any document detailing the internal working of LyX? I am
particualrly interested in adding another language package (which
actually uses a preprocessor in LaTeX) to LyX, Something like the
Arabian LyX.
Amitabh
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:27:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
> Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
I'm fairly sure one of the first changes I had rejected by the LyX team
was trying to fix up Qt namespace pollution
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:13:09PM +0530, Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
> Hi,
> is there any document detailing the internal working of LyX? I am
Not really no.
> particualrly interested in adding another language package (which
> actually uses a preprocessor in LaTeX) to LyX, Something like the
>
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Has everybody just gone quiet or what? I (and MARC) get no email...
Hello, hello.
--
Lgb
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I added the following to common.am to get the Cygwin compile
| to work.
>
| ndex: config/common.am
| ===
| RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/config/common.am,v
| retrieving revision 1.6
|
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Pretty well every single Qt dialog file has to #include "debug.h"
| before any of the Qt system headers or the compiler gets confused.
| Why? Because Qt in its wisdom defines a macro DEBUG that clashes with
| the DEBUG defined in support/debugstream.h
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
> | Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
>
> I am with john... make two small .h files in the qt three and use
> them in other files to workaround qt stuff.
Ah, well. It appears that Mate's
Georg Baum wrote:
>
> I think this is a clean solution. However, I don't like the way how
> the file overwriting prevention works:
>
> - The "cancel" button is mislabelled: It does not cancel the export,
> but does not copy the file. Any idea for a better name?
> - There should be a fourth
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Would it be Ok if I added these blocks around struct debug_trait?
>> | Maybe I'll make the macro name more polite ;-)
>>
>> I am with john... make two small .h files in the qt three and use
>> them in other files to
Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
> Hi,
> We are starting a project to add Indian language support, starting
> with
> devanagari to LyX. LaTeX has a package called devnag for devanagari
> output. There are some hindi fonts in X also. The idea is to give
> powerful publishing support to devanagari
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:46:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Qt has a similar problem with its 'signals' macro and namespace
> boost::signals. Actually, that one is a bit more insidious because we
> #include boost/signals[1-9]*.hpp in lots of other header files, so
> the pollution can pop
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | #ifdef TEMPORARY_DEBUG_MACRO
> | # define DEBUG TEMPORARY_DEBUG_MACRO
> | # undef TEMPORARY_DEBUG_MACRO
> | #endif
>>
> | I can see that this is nasty, but it does have the advantage of
> | just working.
>>
> | The alternative, defining qt_debug.h, as a wrapper for
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:46:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Qt has a similar problem with its 'signals' macro and namespace
>> boost::signals. Actually, that one is a bit more insidious because
>> we
>> #include boost/signals[1-9]*.hpp in lots of other header files,
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:18:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Because I was trying to wrap the Qt code inside namespace
> lyx::frontend and got offended by it all.
That's not too hard to do...
> It wasn't me that added this comment:
>
> // Dear Lord, deliver us from Evil,
> // aka the Qt
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
>>
>> I think this is a clean solution. However, I don't like the way how
>> the file overwriting prevention works:
>>
>> - The "cancel" button is mislabelled: It does not cancel the export,
>> but does not copy the file. Any idea for a better name?
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I added the following to common.am to get the Cygwin compile
> | to work.
> >
> | ndex: config/common.am
> |
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | I added the following to common.am to get the Cygwin compile
>> | to work.
>> >
>> | ndex: config/common.am
>> |
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Kuba Ober wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An idea came to my mind so I feel compelled to share :)
>
> Wouldn't it be nifty to hack the wiki enough to allow it to work on lyx files?
>
> That way we could have wiki-ed lyx user's manual -- I don't think there
> are any projects out there
>
> I'd rather just get rid of the whole file, it is unused.
>
> If not fixed that way it should be fixed by adding the appropriate DIR
> to the INCLUDES in the Makefile.ams in boost dirs. (that is how we
> solved this for other subdirs).
>
Okay. This works for me too:
Index:
On Monday 24 May 2004 1:38 pm, Amitabh Trehaan wrote:
> Hi Angus,
Good evening, Amitabh.
Let's take this back to the list. This is of general interest and
there's lots more expertise there than I can provide.
> thanks. I have mailed Chang. Certainly, all available info is
> available. I am
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I'd rather just get rid of the whole file, it is unused.
>>
>> If not fixed that way it should be fixed by adding the appropriate DIR
>> to the INCLUDES in the Makefile.ams in boost dirs. (that is how we
>> solved this for other subdirs).
>>
42 matches
Mail list logo