Re: [patch] Bug 898 - Jump back navigation

Pavel Sanda wrote: > hi, > > i got finally frustrated that i cant use temp bookmark similarly as `` do in > vim. > would be anybody opposed to adding new button for the back navigation into > the main > toolbar? > now with back-from-back jump too. pavel diff --git a/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc b/li

[patch] Bug 898 - Jump back navigation

hi, i got finally frustrated that i cant use temp bookmark similarly as `` do in vim. would be anybody opposed to adding new button for the back navigation into the main toolbar? pavel diff --git a/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc b/lib/ui/stdcontext.inc index 9d4d5fa..301608c 100644 --- a/lib/ui/stdcont

Re: Portable LyX File Format

> I found a thread from about a year ago here which may be what you're talking > about. There were several flame wars about embedding ... to a level that the whole lyx-devel mailinglist was hijacked and everyone involved was 2nd degree burned. The unfruitful discussions eventually leaded to my ret

Re: Portable LyX File Format

Hey Bo, thanks again for your responses. it does not seem to differ much from a previous bundling implementation... > It was due to a lot of technical and usage difficulties that that > implementation was reverted. > I found a thread from about a year ago here

RE: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Vincent wrote: > I know that you know what it means, but I can't work with a sorted list, > but maybe that is because I suck at coming up with good label keys. So > if we would sort the list by default I may learn that. i suppose we all have our habits. the best option would be if the sort butto

Re: Portable LyX File Format

> Thanks for your thoughts. I skimmed your pdf but I'll have to give it a > fuller read later. In the meantime I wanted to respond to your post. I skimmed your file and it does not seem to differ much from a previous bundling implementation. (I can be wrong here but the manifest file etc were th

Re: Portable LyX File Format

Apparently the file that I attached is interpreted (in my OS/browser) as a .bin file when I try to download it. I'm assuming that's because firefox is choking on it due to the lack of a file extension, or it's Linux and the file starts with a period and that's a magic number...? I've made a coupl

Re: Portable LyX File Format

Hello Bo - Thanks for your thoughts. I skimmed your pdf but I'll have to give it a fuller read later. In the meantime I wanted to respond to your post. The lossy .plyx -> .lyx -> .plyx conversion has been the center of all > discussions. > As I envision things, the actual conversion of .plyx -

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Edwin Leuven schreef: Unsorted means, sorted in order of appearance in the document... i know what it means, but i find it very difficult to use (and therefore always use the unsorted list) I know that you know what it means, but I can't work with a sorted list, but maybe that is beca

RE: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

> Unsorted means, sorted in order of appearance in the document... i know what it means, but i find it very difficult to use (and therefore always use the unsorted list)

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Edwin Leuven schreef: Vincent writes: It is certainly wrong that the list is sorted case-sensitive, but I don't know whether people want to ever sort it case-sensitive. I can't think of a reason I'd want to. i agree. as a corollary: i also never understood why (or when) people wou

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: rgheck writes: In that case, the patch is a lot simpler Yes :) Unless there are people out there that have purposely made labels that start with a capital, because they expect to often refer to these, which is more easy if they are on

RE: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Vincent writes: > It is certainly wrong that the list is sorted case-sensitive, but I > don't know whether people want to ever sort it > case-sensitive. I can't think of a reason I'd want to. i agree. as a corollary: i also never understood why (or when) people would like to have an unsorted

Re: Portable LyX File Format

> This allows for a > lossless .lyx -> .plyx -> .lyx conversion. Although .plyx -> .lyx -> .plyx > could be lossy, a script could be used to update the manifest of a new .plyx > file based on an old .plyx file to minimize the loss. The lossy .plyx -> .lyx -> .plyx conversion has been the center

RE: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

>rgheck writes: >> In that case, the patch is a lot simpler > >Yes :) > Unless there are people out there that have purposely made labels that start with a capital, because they expect to often refer to these, which is more easy if they are on top. Then we get complaints that it is a regres

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

rgheck writes: > In that case, the patch is a lot simpler Yes :)

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: It is certainly wrong that the list is sorted case-sensitive, but I don't know whether people want to ever sort it case-sensitive. I can't think of a reason I'd want to. +1 In that case, the patch is a lot simpler rh

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: > It is certainly wrong that the list is sorted case-sensitive, but I > don't know whether people want to ever sort it case-sensitive. I can't > think of a reason I'd want to. +1 JMarc

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

rgheck schreef: Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi developers, I'm attaching a patch created using 'svn diff' against the latest svn snapshot from within src/frontends/qt4. This feature doesn't (shouldn't) disturb existing lyx functionality. I have also attached a screenshot of the dialog as a

Re: patch for case-insensitive reference sorting

Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi developers, I'm attaching a patch created using 'svn diff' against the latest svn snapshot from within src/frontends/qt4. This feature doesn't (shouldn't) disturb existing lyx functionality. I have also attached a screenshot of the dialog as a PNG file. Thank

Re: Some work on tex2lyx and Modules

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheck writes: Well, sort of. But if you remove the #ifdef from ModuleList, then you run into include problems. In particular, we'd have to include LatexFeatures.h in the tex2lyx build, because ModuleList::isAvailable() calls LatexFeatures::isAvailable(). And then

Portable LyX File Format

Greetings all - I wanted to offer a suggestion about a portable LyX file format. This was recently brought up on the LyX-users mailing list and has been discussed previously (heatedly?) as documented here - http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/BundleSuggestions - and here - http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/BundleR

Re: Some work on tex2lyx and Modules

rgheck writes: > Well, sort of. But if you remove the #ifdef from ModuleList, then you > run into include problems. In particular, we'd have to include > LatexFeatures.h in the tex2lyx build, because > ModuleList::isAvailable() calls LatexFeatures::isAvailable(). And then > LatexFeatures.cpp pulls

Re: Some work on tex2lyx and Modules

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheck writes: I'm assuming the other test against TEX2LYX is OK (ModuleList.cpp, line 48). In this case, the point is that tex2lyx doesn't care whether the packages needed by various modules are available. It's just converting. If I'm wrong about that, let me kno

Re: [patch] fix bug 5772 for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > No this always triggers, see for example the attached file. I see. Put it in then. I take it that this is tested well. Jürgen

Re: [patch] fix bug 5772 for branch

> This only triggers if the caption is not in the first row, right? No this always triggers, see for example the attached file. regards Uwe newfile1.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: [patch] fix bug 5772 for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > OK for branch? This only triggers if the caption is not in the first row, right? If so, I'd like to postpone this to 1.6.3. We have already too much major changes in 1.6.2, I'd like to focus on the crashes and very straightforward changes now. > Is http://www.lyx.org/trac/chan

Re: Some work on tex2lyx and Modules

rgheck writes: > I'm assuming the other test against TEX2LYX is OK (ModuleList.cpp, > line 48). In this case, the point is that tex2lyx doesn't care whether > the packages needed by various modules are available. It's just > converting. If I'm wrong about that, let me know. I'd rather pass a bool

Re: today's tex2lyx (in cmake-build) not compilable

Am Thursday 12 February 2009 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Missing ModuleList.cpp > > its in. > pavel Thanx Pavel :) Kornel -- Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: today's tex2lyx (in cmake-build) not compilable

Kornel Benko wrote: > > Missing ModuleList.cpp its in. pavel

today's tex2lyx (in cmake-build) not compilable

Missing ModuleList.cpp Kornel -- Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de Index: development/cmake/src/tex2lyx/CMakeLists.txt === --- development/cmake/src/tex2lyx/CMakeLists.txt (revision 28464) +++ development/cmake/src/tex2lyx