Richard Heck wrote:
This sounds fine to me. I'd be happy, myself, to have ALL panes
invisible on restart. Panes are no different from dialogs, and I don't
expect the citation dialog to still be there when I restart.
i think except AdvS only outliner and source panels are opened on restart.
Richard Heck wrote:
if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to
release 2.0.1 not that far into the future, since we already have some
pretty serious bugs fixed, and (b) these look like fairly minor bugs
that could wait for 2.0.2.
have you already gained po-updates
This sounds fine to me. I'd be happy, myself, to have ALL panes
invisible on restart. Panes are no different from dialogs, and I don't
expect the citation dialog to still be there when I restart.
I would get angry if I would have to open all panes over and over
again. So please save whether
Il 09/05/2011 05:32, LyX Ticket Tracker ha scritto:
#7217: performance issue with advanced find and replace dialog
--+-
Reporter: uwestoehr | Owner: tommaso
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Richard Heck wrote:
Can someone send me the password for editing
the lyx/git-devel page?
JMarc, ding ding dong dong :)
p
Pavel Sanda wrote:
also this page needs 1.6.10-2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
some script like
cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
ci do what you want.
I've done that (and sent Richard my script).
But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page
Il 09/05/2011 05:26, LyX Ticket Tracker ha scritto:
Comment(by rgheck):
Should we close this one (i.e., mark it fixedin*) and open a new bug, or
should we rewrite the description of this bug?
I would say that the original problem (as stated in the subject) has gone,
so now we are left with
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
also this page needs 1.6.10-2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
some script like
cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
ci do what you want.
I've done that (and sent Richard my script).
But the
Public release of LyX version 1.6.10
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.10. This is the 11th
and final maintenance release in the 1.6.x series.
LyX 1.6.10 concludes the successful 1.6 series, which has been our stable
series for the past two
Pavel Sanda wrote:
when the time comes ;) i already removed it from list on translation page
since its useful only before new major release - otherwise newbies can
easily get confused what to translate.
I commented out the link on the I18n page.
Jürgen
On 9-5-2011 8:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
also this page needs 1.6.10-2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
some script like
cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
ci do what you want.
I've done that (and
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page needs 2.0.0svn - 2.1.0svn
transision as well.
when the time comes ;)
I guess that will be my job by then :S.. Do you have a just as nice
script for me as Juergen had for Richard ??
i will send it. p
On 9-5-2011 8:36, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page needs 2.0.0svn - 2.1.0svn
transision as well.
when the time comes ;)
I guess that will be my job by then :S.. Do you have a just as nice
script for me as Juergen had for Richard
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On 9-5-2011 8:36, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
But the http://www.lyx.org/I18n-trunk page needs 2.0.0svn - 2.1.0svn
transision as well.
when the time comes ;)
I guess that will be my job by then :S.. Do you have a just as nice
Le 09/05/11 08:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Richard Heck wrote:
Can someone send me the password for editing
the lyx/git-devel page?
JMarc, ding ding dong dong :)
Sorry, I have to find the time to do that indeed. I once tried to grep
without success I'll do it again.
JMarc
On 08.05.2011 11:00, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Public release of LyX version 2.0.0
===
We are proud to announce the public release of LyX 2.0.0.
[...]
The LyX team.
http://www.lyx.org
Congratulations and many many thanks to the team !
BR,
Olivier
Il 09/05/2011 08:11, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
This sounds fine to me. I'd be happy, myself, to have ALL panes
invisible on restart. Panes are no different from dialogs, and I don't
expect the citation dialog to still be there when I restart.
I would get angry if I would have to open
in its prime time :/
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
in its prime time :/
as always ;-)
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
in its prime time :/
as always ;-)
i guess its related to the higher workload when people come to work on monday
and start reading various news...
ping still works so it most probably needs apache restart or so.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
i guess its related to the higher workload when people come to work on
monday and start reading various news... ping still works so it most
probably needs apache restart or so.
Additionally, I've added the new releases (2.0 and 1.6.10) to some software
sites today
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
i guess its related to the higher workload when people come to work on
monday and start reading various news... ping still works so it most
probably needs apache restart or so.
Additionally, I've added the new releases (2.0 and 1.6.10) to some
The patch looks pretty good now, so I'll put it in my testing tree.
I'm not completely sure of the red highlighting. Red is a
color for errors, I'll try green, yellow and maybe bold.
Moreover I want to add the rubber button.
I was thinking to use the FancyLineEdit widget of Qt Creator [1]
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
Anyway, I'll have a look at the patch later. For now, it looks good, and
of course we'll also need it for branch.
i applied this
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38655
ok for branch?
edwin
From: Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net
On 05/08/2011 10:55 AM, Jim Oldfield wrote:
So in principle, LyX should add packages to the preamble for commands used
only
in notes, but only when it is building a LaTeX document for instant
previews.
This could in principle be done
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
However, to finish the merging, the following things must/should be fixed:
if this really happens it would be one of 2.0 victories...
How do you install hunspell. I cannot find it in the installer code. I'm
interested because when LyX 2.0 is installed, I only get hunspell as
Am 09.05.2011 um 14:27 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
I have a technical questions:
How do you install hunspell. I cannot find it in the installer code. I'm
interested because when LyX 2.0 is installed, I only get hunspell as spell
engine. When I install LyX 2.0 with my installer I still only get
Am 09.05.2011 um 14:43 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
However, to finish the merging, the following things must/should be fixed:
if this really happens it would be one of 2.0 victories...
How do you install hunspell. I cannot find it in the installer code. I'm
interested because
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
in its prime time :/
Will some download stats be available later on?
Additionally, what would it take to upgrade the server? Perhaps we
should start a donate project?
Liviu
Am 09.05.2011 14:45, schrieb Stephan Witt:
Besides the question how to install hunspell I have a remark here.
Aspell in general is unable to remove words from the personal word list.
Yes, this is one of the major problems of Aspell.
That's why I've implemented the personal word list as a
Am 09.05.2011 14:43, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
However, to finish the merging, the following things must/should be fixed:
if this really happens it would be one of 2.0 victories...
This WILL happen! The problem with the old official installer was, that I was unable to fix bugs and
only Joost
From: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de
1. the installer doesn't recognize if Ghostscript is already installed
2. the installer doesn't recognize if Python is already installed
3. the installer doesn't recognize if Imagemagick is already installed
For computers where these are
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in other child document.
In both cases, I am able to
On 05/09/2011 02:13 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 09/05/2011 05:32, LyX Ticket Tracker ha scritto:
#7217: performance issue with advanced find and replace dialog
--+-
Reporter: uwestoehr | Owner: tommaso
On 05/09/2011 08:34 AM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
Anyway, I'll have a look at the patch later. For now, it looks good, and
of course we'll also need it for branch.
i applied this
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38655
ok for branch?
Yes, please.
Richard
On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in
The question now is that whether Lyx stores all the settings files in the
installation directory itself, and not use registry (for windows, etc).
Perhaps one of the developers could have answer to this more specific
question.
LyX uses the user directory by default and doesn't use the
On 05/08/2011 02:45 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The \input@path mechanism (already used by LyX) is not always sufficient
and there are cases where a file can be found by LaTeX and also by other
ancillary programs (such as dvi previewers) only if the document dir is
placed in the TEXINPUTS
On 9-5-2011 16:38, Diego Queiroz wrote:
The question now is that whether Lyx stores all the settings files in the
installation directory itself, and not use registry (for windows, etc).
Perhaps one of the developers could have answer to this more specific
question.
LyX uses the
On 05/09/2011 02:09 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to
release 2.0.1 not that far into the future, since we already have some
pretty serious bugs fixed, and (b) these look like fairly minor bugs
that could wait for
If you ask to compile just the child, then you are asking to compile it
as a standalone document, so it is no surprise that this does not work.
Exactly. :-)
If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document,
then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible
Richard Heck wrote:
Is there a reason not to commit such a script to development/tools/?
No. Except that I thought it would be of no use for anybody but me (and now
you).
Jürgen
On 05/09/2011 11:05 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document,
then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible from
DocumentSettings.
I was not aware of this feature. Thanks for the hint.
It's new in 2.0.0.
But it is also
On 05/09/2011 02:15 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
also this page needs 1.6.10-2.0.1 transition: http://www.lyx.org/I18n
some script like
cd po; make i18n.inc; cp i18n.inc ../../www/farm/cookbook/LyX/i18n.inc; svn
ci do what you want.
I've done that (and sent Richard my
Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
ok for branch?
Yes, please.
done:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38658
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote:
Ok, we can ask if ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} equals ${CMAKE_SRC_DIR}
Seems we've worked in parallel. But not a problem, mainly I
needed a test case for the one-feature-in-a-branch workflow.
...
I have found 1
On 05/08/2011 05:09 PM, for...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: forenr
Date: Sun May 8 23:09:38 2011
New Revision: 38646
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38646
Log:
MikTeX's kpsewhich doesn't mention kpathsea emulation anymore.
On Cygwin, the most reliable way to tell what is the right path
On 05/09/2011 11:22 AM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Richard Heck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
ok for branch?
Yes, please.
done:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38658
Thanks.
rh
On 05/08/2011 07:19 AM, b...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: baum
Date: Sun May 8 13:19:55 2011
New Revision: 38640
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38640
Log:
Fix bug #7511 by moving the old label instead of creating a new one.
For branch?
Richard
Modified:
On 05/09/2011 11:09 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Is there a reason not to commit such a script to development/tools/?
No. Except that I thought it would be of no use for anybody but me (and now
you).
I was more thinking about the next person. And where I could easily
Jim Oldfield wrote:
10. The last installer page should have an option to start LyX after
installing it, as in my installer. This behaviour is more or less a
standard
and many people expect that the program is opened after installing.
Actually, this is an anachronism, and I ask that
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
in its prime time :/
Will some download stats be available later on?
the ftp servers are not under our control.
even more, most of linux installs will never touch our servers
at all and will go through
Richard Heck wrote:
I was more thinking about the next person. And where I could easily
store this.
It's certainly good to have such stuff centralized. I was just trying to
excuse my laziness.
Jürgen
On 05/09/2011 12:08 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I was more thinking about the next person. And where I could easily
store this.
It's certainly good to have such stuff centralized. I was just trying to
excuse my laziness.
Isn't laziness the number 1 virtue of a hacker?
Hi:
In Windows version (XP), using LyX 2.0.0 (April 29) I get a crash when I
do this:
editing the attached file with outline on
click just in front of where it says Two
highlight from there to the end of the file, and delete
click on where it says stuff
Outline still shows Part II (even
Am 09.05.2011 um 15:22 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Am 09.05.2011 14:45, schrieb Stephan Witt:
Besides the question how to install hunspell I have a remark here.
Aspell in general is unable to remove words from the personal word list.
Yes, this is one of the major problems of Aspell.
That's
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, John Kennan jken...@ssc.wisc.edu wrote:
Hi:
In Windows version (XP), using LyX 2.0.0 (April 29) I get a crash when I do
this:
Confirmed on Xubuntu 10.04, with 2.0.0.
Liviu
editing the attached file with outline on
click just in front of where it says Two
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel:
What we could do, is convert development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt to a
something like TopLyx.cmake and include directly in the top-level
CMakeLists.txt. Also the add_subdirectory() calls in this TopLyx.cmake has
to be expanded with a second parameter, e.g.
But what if you really want to compile it as a standalone document?
People do this.
Richard
But if it was really a standalone document, I would have to unset master
document property, right?
Anyway, in my case, the problem is that my child document with the macros
also define
On May 9, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, John Kennan jken...@ssc.wisc.edu wrote:
Hi:
In Windows version (XP), using LyX 2.0.0 (April 29) I get a crash when I do
this:
Confirmed on Xubuntu 10.04, with 2.0.0.
Liviu
The same thing happens on Mac
Le 09/05/11 13:15, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
in its prime time :/
as always ;-)
i guess its related to the higher workload when people come to work on monday
and start reading various news...
ping still works so it most probably needs apache
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
as always ;-)
i guess its related to the higher workload when people come to work on
monday and start reading various news...
ping still works so it most probably needs apache restart or so.
Is there something that does not work right now? It seems OK to me.
On 09/05/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in other
So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
docs.
--
Julien
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you won't need to go after a workaround,
On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
docs.
--
Julien
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you
Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message
news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de...
the last days I tested your new installer. You have done a good job!: the
installer code is much more understandable and contains more comments to
be able to understand the code.
Thanks.
As we once agreed, we should
On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
docs.
--
Julien
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you
Jim Oldfield jim_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote in message
news:868476.20267...@web29206.mail.ird.yahoo.com...
Personally, am I happy to sacrifice 40MB of disk space if it means that
uninstalling other programs doesn't suddenly stop LyX from working. This
is the
Windows way sadly - since there is no
Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say
they work for me. No workaround necessary.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs.
I use a branch named child only, which is activated in child docs but
deactivated in
On 05/09/2011 12:03 PM, John Kennan wrote:
Hi:
In Windows version (XP), using LyX 2.0.0 (April 29) I get a crash when
I do this:
editing the attached file with outline on
click just in front of where it says Two
highlight from there to the end of the file, and delete
click on where it
Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message
news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de...
5. The latest version of the metafile2eps printer gives an error message
when it is first used: When I compile a LyX file containing a wmf-image,
I get the error message that the printer could not be successfully be
On 09/05/2011 2:23 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say
they work for me. No workaround necessary.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs.
I use a branch named child only, which
Il 09/05/2011 16:26, Richard Heck ha scritto:
* component: search = find/replace
what is the intended difference between these components ?
I somehow thought search was something different, but of course it's the
same. I'll change them back and make you owner of the search bugs.
Richard Heck wrote:
Both of those look fine to me.
OK, I'll put them in. The next po remerge will then create some new old
strings.
I'm going to look at the other mathed ones, too. It seems prima facie as
if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to
release 2.0.1
On 05/09/2011 02:41 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 09/05/2011 16:26, Richard Heck ha scritto:
* component: search = find/replace
what is the intended difference between these components ?
I somehow thought search was something different, but of course it's the
same. I'll change them
On 05/09/2011 02:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Both of those look fine to me.
OK, I'll put them in. The next po remerge will then create some new old
strings.
Thanks.
I'm going to look at the other mathed ones, too. It seems prima facie as
if they will be good for branch
Il 09/05/2011 20:23, Diego Queiroz ha scritto:
I've attached two files: the child and the master document.
I can't compile the child document. Can you try?
I can confirm the child doesn't compile as standalone,
despite the macro is correctly expanded on the screen.
T.
$\anymacro
$
The
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On 8-5-2011 22:39, b...@lyx.org wrote:
Log:
Forgot this (why did this file not show up in svn diff?)
Because you have to do 'svn add' first ?
No. I created that file with 'svn copy'. Meanwhile I found out that 'svn
diff' simply ignores copied files that were
On 09.05.2011 17:24, Kornel wrote:
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 07.05.2011 12:25, Kornel wrote:
Ok, we can ask if ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} equals ${CMAKE_SRC_DIR}
Seems we've worked in parallel. But not a problem, mainly I
needed a test case for the one-feature-in-a-branch
On 05/09/2011 02:38 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child
doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? But anyway, I
corrected it and still in 2.1.0svn the compilation of the child is
broken:
Undefined control sequence \anymacro
A
Hello Lyx people,
There is an annoying behavior in my Lyx spell checking utility (for French
language), I'd like to be able to change it or make a suggestion to developers.
This spell checking utility doesn't ignore words beginning with an upper case,
so all proper nouns are marked as
On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Kornel:
What we could do, is convert development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt to a
something like TopLyx.cmake and include directly in the top-level
CMakeLists.txt. Also the add_subdirectory() calls in this TopLyx.cmake has
to be
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Lagaffe Gaston
maboiteapourr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Lyx people,
There is an annoying behavior in my Lyx spell checking utility (for French
language), I'd like to be able to change it or make a suggestion to
developers.
This spell checking utility doesn't
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
Could you test attached patch? Would be simpler.
Peter
Works, but as you say, the binary directory has now this extra
development/cmake part.
The version I made is not so simple, yes, but works for all versions in the
same way.
Kornel
On 09.05.2011 21:56, Kornel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
Could you test attached patch? Would be simpler.
Peter
Works, but as you say, the binary directory has now this extra
development/cmake part.
The version I made is not so simple, yes, but works for all versions
On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote:
Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662)
+++ development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
include(LyXMacros)
On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Hi everyone,
As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll
- what features are a must in the next release;
- what work do you think you will be doing;
- what do you hope to see somebody else to do (please keep it realistic) ?
I will
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote:
Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662)
+++ development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote:
Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
===
--- development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt(Revision 38662)
+++
Would anyone object to my creating a new resolution in trac that we
could use instead of using the keyword fixedinbranch? I'd propose:
FixedForBranch, as the resolution.
Why? Well, (i) bugs fixed in branch are fixed and are only awaiting
release, so it's more convenient as far as queries go to
On 09.05.2011 22:39, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote:
Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
===
---
Richard Heck wrote:
release, so it's more convenient as far as queries go to treat them as
closed;
personally i'm fine with closing them completely. the whole fixedinbranch
keywording seems useless to me. if bug is closed with fixed in 2.0.3 why
anybody should not understand whats going on.
Discussion in the Math Macros in Child Documents thread has revealed a
problem with how we clone buffers with parents. The set up is this: You
have a master that defines a macro, and a child that uses it. If you try
to compile just the child, it works in 1.6 but not in 2.0. The reason is
that,
Am 09.05.2011 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Hi everyone,
As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll
- what features are a must in the next release;
- what work do you think you will be doing;
- what do you hope to see
On 09.05.2011 22:56, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 09.05.2011 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 04.05.2011 00:50, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Hi everyone,
As a typical start of a new release cycle I want to poll
- what features are a must in the next release;
- what work do you think you will be
On 05/09/2011 04:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
release, so it's more convenient as far as queries go to treat them as
closed;
personally i'm fine with closing them completely. the whole fixedinbranch
keywording seems useless to me. if bug is closed with fixed in 2.0.3 why
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 09.05.2011 22:39, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 09.05.2011 22:30, Kornel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2011 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
On 09.05.2011 18:28, Kornel wrote:
Index: development/cmake/CMakeLists.txt
Then our naming is bad.
Ignore it (second arguments points to the binary dir)
But your patch does not work on windows. Maybe more places to add
LYX_CMAKE_DIR. I'll have a look at it.
Attached your patch updated. (I wonder why you don't need the same changes)
And later we should just move
On 09.05.2011 23:04, Kornel wrote:
Peter, it works, if you include CMakeLists.txt. But if including say xy.cmake,
then
the calls have to be like
add_subdirectory(development/cmake/po ${TOP_BINARY_DIR}/po)
But that will be the second part of my patch.
1.)Rename
Richard Heck wrote:
Jurgen liked having the keyword because it made it easier to tell what
bugs had been fixed for the next release. I suppose your suggestion,
closing them with the milestone, probably serves the same purpose. So
I'd be happy to say we just close these bugs now, but make
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
