I'm by now an experienced Windows (Vista) user of LyX. Doubtless I'm
adding fuel to the flames rather than oil on troubled waters, but ...
On 2/07/2012 12:33 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 11:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
But then you don't get a full functional LyX. We cannot sur
On 07/01/2012 10:16 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The branch, master, has been updated.
- Log -
commit 00833efd10ab44385813a2a48cc8590ab1ca030d
Merge: e4018a3 555ae01
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Sun Jul 1 16:15:55 2012 +0200
Merge bra
Am 28.06.2012 12:30, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
Here's my proposal for a compromise:
- Have the installer default to 'Install on the fly', making it by
default tailored to inexperienced users
- Have an Advanced tab where this can be changed, while each option is
clearly explained, and stern and hum
Am 28.06.2012 11:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
If I remember your only remaining complain was that I set MiKTeX to install
missing packages
silently. I several times explained in detail why this is necessary. I accept
that you are an
expert in many fields but the average user is not. We
Am 28.06.2012 11:04, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
If such users need to choose
(or actually choose) something other than 'Install packages on the
fly', LyX is effectively broken for them.
I don't get this sentence.
I guess he means that then they don't have all packages needed by LyX. Soo
Am 28.06.2012 00:20, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
made about 50 times a decision. The installer is the first thing a new user
sees and he cannot know anything at this state.
I concur...
If such users need to choose
(or actually choose) something other than 'Install packages on the
fly', LyX is effe
Am 01.07.2012 20:11, schrieb Georg Baum:
Because we already do the same for the babel languages. I'm not sure why
we do this but think that it might be a reason of not using directly the
languages file - which is the best solution indeed. I could not reach
Georg but will propose a patch accordin
2012/7/1 Georg Baum:
> Wrong. I can be reached, and I already answered on monday, but I really
> dislike the latest tex2lyx developments: A special quick-fix gets committed,
> often hardly tested, in at least one case even uncompilable code, and
> afterwards several developers react and try to impr
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 30.06.2012 15:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>
>> BTW I still don't get why you have all these lists about polyglossia
>> languages when we have all the information accessible in languages.
This was needed as long as tex2lyx could produce a different file format
than the
2012/7/1 Uwe Stöhr:
> Yes, many thanks for the implementation. Could you please add this to
> tex2lyx's TODO.txt?
Yes.
> Btw., is branch now compilable for you?
Yes, thanks for this.
Jürgen
> regards Uwe
Am 01.07.2012 11:42, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
And one further information we could re-use in tex2lyx instead of
hardcoding it there.
Yes, many thanks for the implementation. Could you please add this to tex2lyx's
TODO.txt?
Btw., is branch now compilable for you?
regards Uwe
Am 01.07.2012 11:13, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
I believe that your latest patch works for all examples, but that was not the
point I wanted to
made. In theory, one should be able to know what a function does without
looking at the
implementation.
Sure, but sometimes it is not that obvi
2012/7/1 Pavel Sanda :
>> Set the appropriate quote style when switching the main language
>
> Nice! P
And one further information we could re-use in tex2lyx instead of
hardcoding it there.
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> commit 11f7efe2eb000620ad32c3db594d13cf118b6c27
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sun Jul 1 11:27:42 2012 +0200
>
> Set the appropriate quote style when switching the main language
Nice! P
Op 1-7-2012 2:12, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Verb is such an exceptional case that it might deserve its own
function in which this exception is
made instead of adding more if-clauses. Verb is special in that it
treats the backslash as a normal
character; outside verb this exception should not be acti
On 2012-06-30, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 30-6-2012 15:17, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
>> Am 30.06.2012 11:04, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>>> 1. This must be next_next_token()
>> I also thought this first. But as "\" is not found .asCharacter so
>> that we have in case of "+\+"
>> +
16 matches
Mail list logo
