Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 3.4.2013 19:20, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Hello developers! I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: Ribbon Menus. The actual look of lyx makes duplicate functions in text menus and icon menus, besides there is a lot of space wasted by allocating the icon

Howto avoid cygwin/python import problems

Just in case someone hits the same problem as me: I had lots of problems importing files in Windows, getting errors like LyX: Document formmat failure C: ... Buffer_convertLyXFormat.Xd9288 is not a readable Lyx document It took me a while to figure out that if you are calling a native LyX exe

Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org commit 36da271b74784b77b54bfe2f0bc62624f9ce0345 Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu Apr 4 06:28:53 2013 -0400 Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed) This test passes here. No new

Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org commit 60ed90f0aea7baf582e246616991688ce559dff4 Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu Apr 4 06:58:42 2013 -0400 Add another test for #7673 (currently fails) This does not fail either

Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org commit 36da271b74784b77b54bfe2f0bc62624f9ce0345 Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu Apr 4 06:28:53 2013 -0400 Add

Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org commit 60ed90f0aea7baf582e246616991688ce559dff4 Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu Apr 4 06:58:42 2013 -0400 Add

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org commit 36da271b74784b77b54bfe2f0bc62624f9ce0345

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:20:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org commit 60ed90f0aea7baf582e246616991688ce559dff4

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:20:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak

Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:38:55, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko

Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:38:55, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak

Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:04:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org I guess this means that the time it takes to remove the previous core is just enough to make it sometimes fail. With the Sleep it failes all the time (tried 10 times) OK. I haven't looked at the code but

Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:04:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org I guess this means that the time it takes to remove the previous core is just enough to make it sometimes fail. With the Sleep it failes

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:57:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org This one works too (for this test) TestEnd test ! -e ../bug-8370.lyx.emergency because we are always removing ../bug-8370.lyx.emergency prior to test. That looks good and safe. I wonder if that

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:57:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org This one works too (for this test) TestEnd test ! -e ../bug-8370.lyx.emergency because we are always removing

Xfig external file import bug.

I've found something that seems to me a bug in the External Material import resource when loading a XFig figure into lyx. My .fig figures reside inside a path that contains both spaces and accented characters. When that's the case, instant preview is not able to create the eps. As soon as the

Re: [PATCH] fr/EmbeddedObjects.lyx: default output set to pdf2

On 2013-04-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote: ... , or use a to-be-included file with only ASCII characters (i.e. compatible with all latin-* encodings and utf-8). I sent an email to the French list and got no response for

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

On 04/04/13 00:57, Pavel Sanda wrote: File !exists we are in repo (more exactly within dir structure where .git can be found in ancestors) - we offer to check it out from archive (your bug) File !exists we are not in repo - just create new file I work a lot creating new files locally in a

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

Pavel Sanda wrote: The problem is that such behaviour is intentional i guess, my understanding is File exists is in repo - we load with git support File exists not in repo- ?? porcelain case, we don't load with VCS support File !exists we are in repo (more exactly within dir structure

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Hi, I just noticed that GIT::findFile() doesn't seem to work, namely if I open with git any file within the lyx sources tree, it always asks me whether I want to retrieve the file from the VCS (which in turn causes all test cases in autotests to fail, but it's

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

Georg Baum wrote: case a file does not exist in git, but this is not an error here. Do you know whether this behaviour (output something on stdout only if the file is know) is as stable as the --porcelain optin for other commands? From stability point of view it might be better to check that

Re: feature request: ribbon menus

On 3.4.2013 19:20, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > Hello developers! > > I have a feature request if this is not already requested to you: Ribbon > Menus. > > The actual look of lyx makes duplicate functions in text menus and icon > menus, besides there is a lot of space wasted by allocating the

Howto avoid cygwin/python import problems

Just in case someone hits the same problem as me: I had lots of problems importing files in Windows, getting errors like LyX: Document formmat failure C: ... Buffer_convertLyXFormat.Xd9288 is not a readable Lyx document It took me a while to figure out that if you are calling a native LyX exe

Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > commit 36da271b74784b77b54bfe2f0bc62624f9ce0345 > Author: Scott Kostyshak > Date: Thu Apr 4 06:28:53 2013 -0400 > > Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed) > This test passes here. No

Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > commit 60ed90f0aea7baf582e246616991688ce559dff4 > Author: Scott Kostyshak > Date: Thu Apr 4 06:58:42 2013 -0400 > > Add another test for #7673 (currently fails) > This does not

Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> > >> commit 36da271b74784b77b54bfe2f0bc62624f9ce0345 > >> Author: Scott Kostyshak > >> Date: Thu Apr 4 06:28:53

Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> > >> commit 60ed90f0aea7baf582e246616991688ce559dff4 > >> Author: Scott Kostyshak > >> Date: Thu Apr 4 06:58:42

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > >> > > > >> commit

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:20:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > >> > > > >> commit

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add another test for #7673 (currently fails)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:20:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:59:49, schrieb Scott

Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 12:32:19, schrieb Scott

Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:38:55, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Kornel

Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:38:55, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 07:13:35, schrieb Scott

Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:04:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > I guess this means that the time it takes to remove the previous core > is just enough to make it sometimes fail. > > > With the Sleep it failes all the time (tried 10 times) > > OK. I haven't looked at the

Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:04:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> I guess this means that the time it takes to remove the previous core > >> is just enough to make it sometimes fail. > >> > >> > With

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:57:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > This one works too (for this test) > > > > TestEnd test ! -e ../bug-8370.lyx.emergency > > > > > > > > because we are always removing ../bug-8370.lyx.emergency prior to test. > > That looks good and safe. I

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] Add test for #8370 (not yet fixed)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 um 08:57:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >> > This one works too (for this test) > >> > > >> > TestEnd test ! -e ../bug-8370.lyx.emergency > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > because we

Xfig external file import bug.

I've found something that seems to me a bug in the External Material import resource when loading a XFig figure into lyx. My .fig figures reside inside a path that contains both spaces and accented characters. When that's the case, instant preview is not able to create the eps. As soon as the

Re: [PATCH] fr/EmbeddedObjects.lyx: default output set to pdf2

On 2013-04-02, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: ... >> , or use a to-be-included file with >> only ASCII characters (i.e. compatible with all latin-* encodings and >> utf-8). > I sent an email to the French list and got no

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

On 04/04/13 00:57, Pavel Sanda wrote: > File !exists& we are in repo (more exactly within dir structure where .git > can be found in ancestors) -> we offer to check it out from archive (your > "bug") > File !exists& we are not in repo -> just create new file I work a lot creating new files

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

Pavel Sanda wrote: > The problem is that such behaviour is intentional i guess, my > understanding is File exists & is in repo -> we load with git support > File exists & not in repo-> ?? porcelain case, we don't load with VCS > support File !exists& we are in repo (more exactly within dir

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that GIT::findFile() doesn't seem to work, namely if I open > with git any file within the lyx sources tree, it always asks me whether I > want to retrieve the file from the VCS (which in turn causes all test > cases in autotests to fail, but

Re: GIT::findFile() fix

Georg Baum wrote: > case a file does not exist in git, but this is not an error here. Do you > know whether this behaviour (output something on stdout only if the file is > know) is as stable as the --porcelain optin for other commands? >From stability point of view it might be better to check