Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:52:26, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 19:11:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter

RE: #9529: copy / pasting only works first time Lyx 2.1.3 windows 8

Skostysh, after installing Ubuntu I had no further problems with that issue. Actually now I am running Windows 10 and haven't encountered it either (although I also went from 2gb to 8gb of ram, so I wonder if that helped). -Original Message- From: LyX Ticket Tracker

Re: #9627: Make the document name available to preview insets

On 1/11/2015 4:55 p.m., LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: #9627: Make the document name available to preview insets ---+- Reporter: aparsloe | Owner: lasgouttes Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: normal |

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:55:47, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:52:26, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 19:11:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at

Re: Upgrade to boost 1.59?

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:08:51PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am 25.10.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> >On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> > >> >>I have it documented

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:36:53PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > >>On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak

Re: Upgrade to boost 1.59?

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:08:51PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 25.10.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > >>I have it documented somewhere. Should I put it in development.lyx ? > > > >If you are able to find it

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:13:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:55:47, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 11:52:26, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 19:11:10, schrieb Scott

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > >>On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >>>The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master > >[1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx files to > >2.1.x format. So this is in some

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master [1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx files to 2.1.x format. So this is in some sense a compilation test of roundtrip lyx2lyx. Is what this shows just

Re: Upgrade to boost 1.59?

Using bcp from older boost releases also works, so the one from your package manager should be enough. Peter Am 1. November 2015 17:42:51 MEZ, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : >On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Kostyshak >wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at

Re: When to court Qt 5.6?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I was wrong---Qt 5.6 beta has now been delayed to 12 November. You can > read the short discussion regarding the delay here: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.releasing/1826 > We have a few options as to what we should do about LyX 2.2.0 alpha: > > 1. Wait a

Re: status update on the export tests

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:46:00, schrieb Georg Baum > >> >> We have a chicken and egg problem here. I started to work on the language >> nesting stuff, and fixing this without introducing regressions is >> impossible without

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 11/01/2015 01:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 01:36:53PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On

Re: Changebar module file

Le 01/11/2015 23:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 01/11/15 23:48, Guillaume Munch a écrit : List, is the attached correct? I'd say yes. I do not like much the extra redefinition, but the only other solution is plain \def. BTW, as it is implemented here, if it works reliably, this looks

Re: Changebar module file

Le 01/11/2015 23:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 01/11/15 23:48, Guillaume Munch a écrit : List, is the attached correct? I'd say yes. I do not like much the extra redefinition, but the only other solution is plain \def. BTW, as it is implemented here, if it works reliably, this looks

Re: [LyX/master] Add warning message if we do no conversion.

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 08:04:28PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/01/2015 07:54 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Richard Heck wrote: > >>commit 4c16c61579d37f00c252ace8cf79d0573ca626bb > >>Author: Richard Heck > >>Date: Sun Nov 1

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:48:28PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-11-01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Most of these tests were working some time ago. > > Many of them "by chance": not failing but with incorrect output (Missing > characters, wrong characters) or "fragile" (working, but would

Plan for the current testing situation

Thanks to all of those participating in the discussions about tests. I have learned a lot the last couple of weeks. Thank you also to those who have tried to run the tests. This to me is a great step forward. I know that the export tests are sloppy cheap tests, but I appreciate that some of you

Re: [LyX/master] Add warning message if we do no conversion.

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Richard Heck wrote: > commit 4c16c61579d37f00c252ace8cf79d0573ca626bb > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Sun Nov 1 16:32:52 2015 -0500 > > Add warning message if we do no conversion. Why have a warning? We do not have a warning for:

Re: [LyX/master] Add warning message if we do no conversion.

On 11/01/2015 07:54 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Richard Heck wrote: commit 4c16c61579d37f00c252ace8cf79d0573ca626bb Author: Richard Heck Date: Sun Nov 1 16:32:52 2015 -0500 Add warning message if we do no conversion. Why have a

Re: When to court Qt 5.6?

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:37:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I was wrong---Qt 5.6 beta has now been delayed to 12 November. You can > > read the short discussion regarding the delay here: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.releasing/1826 > > We have a

Re: #9785: lstinline in footnotes

Dear Uwe, Le 27/10/2015 00:40, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 26.10.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Guillaume Munch: The user reported two valid use cases that are exceptions to this behaviour: \lstinline and \usepackage{bigfoot}. This used to work before ⇒ regression. As I wrote, I don't agree. We had a

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> >Since you brought it up though, Kornel and I have discussed comparing > >> >the

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > Could we introduce a new status "suspended" - meaning just skip the test > > until a known bug is solved as we know the result is

Re: [patch] use setProcessEnvironment, not shell escape (cmd / env)

Hi Enrico, thank you for your response. I hope the others will help us resolve this too. I propose another simple test, it will show you that env variables do get set by setProcessEnvironment(). Attaching the modified files. Hope you'll trust me now ;) There is nothing to trust but

Re: [patch] use setProcessEnvironment, not shell escape (cmd / env)

Hi Enrico, thank you for your response. I hope the others will help us resolve this too. I propose another simple test, it will show you that env variables do get set by setProcessEnvironment(). Attaching the modified files. Hope you'll trust me now ;) There is nothing to trust but

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 11/01/2015 08:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Since you brought it up though, Kornel and I have

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:14:53PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Solving all issues that arise from this combination is diverting attention > > and ressources from

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:39:24PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > I have to be convinced. Fair. I think that whenever tests fail the burden is on those who wish to invert or temporarily ignore the tests. I am not proud to be on the dark side of wanting to invert the tests, but I think that is

Re: #9785: lstinline in footnotes

Le 26/10/2015 20:52, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Dear Uwe, Keywords regression removed Status changed from assigned to closed Resolution set to wontfix Milestone 2.2.0 deleted I don't think that we should support things that break compilation with the default settings.

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:31:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-11-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> >

Any alpha blockers?

Does anyone have an issue that they think should be considered as an alpha blocker? I have tried to follow most discussions and have done a full first sweep through the 2.2.0 trac tickets, but would not be surprised if I missed something or misinterpreted the seriousness of something. Note that

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 10:07:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Does it mean 'delay 2.2 alpha'? > > I don't think so. 2.1 has language nesting bugs as well, and the more simple > cases do work. But we should probably mention that there are known language > nesting bugs

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:05:06PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > My argument is not that they do not belong into the set of reverted, but I'd > like them > to be checked first. > They will be included with the appropriate comment. +1 Scott

Re: status update on the export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test cases. > > Too many to be helpfull. I don't

Re: status update on the export tests

Kornel Benko wrote: > Optimist (I mean 'usable state'). > I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is > really babel/polyglossia conflict. > There are already too many tests inverted, no one cares anymore. We have a chicken and egg problem here. I started to work

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:46:00, schrieb Georg Baum > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Optimist (I mean 'usable state'). > > I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is > > really babel/polyglossia conflict. > > There are already

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> >Since you brought it up though, Kornel and I have discussed comparing >> >the .tex files. While we understand that the .lyx files are not expected >>

Re: status update on the export tests

On 2015-11-01, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: >> Optimist (I mean 'usable state'). >> I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is >> really babel/polyglossia conflict. >> There are already too many tests inverted, no one cares anymore. > We have a chicken

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:48:28, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2015-11-01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > > ... > > >> > Besides we have ATM

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On 11/01/2015 11:37 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 10/31/2015 05:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: The list of tests at the bottom of this message pass on current master [1] but do not pass on current master after exporting the .lyx

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 15:00:25, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > >

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 21:27:11, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2015-11-01, Georg Baum wrote: > > Kornel Benko wrote: > > >> Optimist (I mean 'usable state'). > >> I am strongly against such policy. First one has to check if the reason is > >> really babel/polyglossia

Re: status update on the export tests

Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> > On

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Peter Kümmel wrote: > For iconv and hunspell one can find some CMakeLists.txt at github, not > ready for MSVC but usable as starting point. AFAIk zlib already ships > with cmake files. > > Would it be an option to add tripped down iconv, hunspell and zlib sources > to lyx and to build them as

Re: status update on the export tests

On 2015-11-01, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. November 2015 um 19:37:41, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: ... >> > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test cases. ... >> How many of these are for the obscure combination of Xetex

Re: Changebar module file

Le 01/11/15 23:48, Guillaume Munch a écrit : List, is the attached correct? I'd say yes. I do not like much the extra redefinition, but the only other solution is plain \def. BTW, as it is implemented here, if it works reliably, this looks like something that is easy to add natively in LyX.

Re: status update on the export tests

On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> > On 2015-10-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:33:22PM +, Guenter Milde

Re: [LyX/master] Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".

Dear Scott, thanks for the patch. On 2015-10-31, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:21:15PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > Does the attached patch look good? It looks like a step in the right direction.

Re: status update on the export tests

On 2015-11-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:37:41PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2015-10-30, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015 um 19:23:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >> > >> > Besides we have ATM about 200 failing export test

Re: Changebar module file

List, is the attached correct? >From 7879b81f3cd9fccdaa2dd16caa2e4e145753fd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillaume Munch Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 22:30:38 + Subject: [PATCH] Module for the changebar package Author: Paul A. Rubin (ru...@msu.edu), based on code proposed by

Re: lyx2lyx bugs from export tests

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:30:31PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > The problem is that EmbeddedObjects.lyx was already format 498, and lyx2lyx > seems to do the wrong thing when asked to convert it to the format it > already is, i.e., to convert to 498. > > I've committed a patch that simply does

Re: [patch] use setProcessEnvironment, not shell escape (cmd / env)

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:47:42PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote: > > I hope you all (developers) understand we're grateful users who are paying > it forward by helping you (or trying ourselves to) make LyX better. I don't think there's any doubt about this. Thank you for your time and effort,

Re: Compiling LyX on Windows with more recent Visual Studio versions

Am 01.11.2015 um 22:02 schrieb Georg Baum: Peter Kümmel wrote: For iconv and hunspell one can find some CMakeLists.txt at github, not ready for MSVC but usable as starting point. AFAIk zlib already ships with cmake files. Would it be an option to add tripped down iconv, hunspell and zlib