Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

Am 18. Januar 2016 09:33:17 MEZ, schrieb "Uwe Stöhr" : > > >  Original Message   >From: Peter Kümmel >Sent: Montag, 18. Januar 2016 03:49 >To: Uwe Stöhr; Scott Kostyshak; LyX Developers >Subject: Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s) > >Am 18. Januar 2016

Re: compilation problems with Qt 5.5.1 and MSVC 2010

Re: compilation problems with Qt 5.5.1 and MSVC 2010

Am 18. Januar 2016 09:17:01 MEZ, schrieb "Uwe Stöhr" : > > >From: Peter Kümmel > >Sent: Montag, 18. Januar 2016 03:18‎ > > >> Something is different on your system, there should be no problem >with finding Qt 5. How actual is your cmake installation? > > >Up to date (3.4.1). Qt

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 18. Januar 2016 09:20:32 MEZ, schrieb "Uwe Stöhr" : > > >From: Peter Kümmel > >Sent: Montag, 18. Januar 2016 03:26‎ > > >> Do you mean you have to specify the Qt pathes in the installer >script? > > >No, in CMake as I wrote. My Script works fine. > > >Regards Uwe Maybe there

Re: [LyX/master] UserGuide.lyx: describe the horizontal scrolling

Le 18/01/2016 00:25, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : commit f1a46bac7cb459cc0283e9dca8548e8be33f2b60 Author: Uwe Stöhr Date: Mon Jan 18 00:25:11 2016 +0100 UserGuide.lyx: describe the horizontal scrolling Thanks for that Uwe. It is a good description. JMarc

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

  Original Message   From: Peter Kümmel Sent: Montag, 18. Januar 2016 03:49 To: Uwe Stöhr; Scott Kostyshak; LyX Developers Subject: Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s) Am 18. Januar 2016 01:24:38 MEZ, schrieb "Uwe Stöhr" : >Am 17.01.2016 um 03:22

Re: why Babel with dvi3 (LuTeX)?

Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:59:16, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-01-12, Georg Baum wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> I strongly agree with Georg as for the good unit tests that we have. But > >> for our export tests and specifically our export tests known to be

Re: why Babel with dvi3 (LuTeX)?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > My objection to running the complete export test suite is > > * the tests are way too many and take very long I agree with this one. But if you view it in a different way, then really the tests take 20 seconds to run---Just start

Re: why Babel with dvi3 (LuTeX)?

On 2016-01-12, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> I strongly agree with Georg as for the good unit tests that we have. But >> for our export tests and specifically our export tests known to be >> unreliable, I understand Günter's objection that it could be just a lot >> of wasted time.

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:00:18PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/12/2016 06:53 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > What about a symbol like the attached one? It resembles a pilcrow with a > > left pointing arrow. > > That looks good to me, and of course we don't want to rely upon color, >

Re: Questions for Uwe once you are back

Am 18.01.2016 um 10:18 schrieb Peter Kümmel: Maybe there is still a Qt 4 qmake.exe in PATH. No, the solution are path changes: - Qt is installed here in C:\Qt\Qt5-5-1-2010\5.5\msvc2010\bin not in C:\Qt\Qt5.5.1-2010\5.5\msvc2010\bin (don't know why, I could change that if you prefer)

Re: [LyX/master] UserGuide.lyx: describe the horizontal scrolling

Am 18.01.2016 um 10:39 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: UserGuide.lyx: describe the horizontal scrolling Thanks for that Uwe. It is a good description. Thanks for the thanks. it was indeed not easy to find a good description. regards Uwe

what are the new DVI-PS Options in LyX preferences for?

While updating the UserGuide I noticed a new preferences setting under Outputs->General "DVI-PS Options" What feature of LyX is using this and where can I find a list of possible options? This new feature should be added to http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX22 if possible. thanks and regards

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

To summarize: After a very tiring trip abroad I invested almost all spare time‎ and hours of sleep to get ready for beta1. Although I don't know much about CMake and compilers I was able to overcome all corner cases. I reported the CMake bugs I found. I am able to build LyX with Qt 5.5.1 and

What does new module paralist do?

Hi Georg, you added a new module "paralist". What is this for? Do you have a documentation how to use this module? I would like to have at least a small example files in our examples folder. This assures that the module will be usable in future (e.g. at least before a new release all

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 18/01/2016 19:19, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:00:18PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: On 01/12/2016 06:53 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: What about a symbol like the attached one? It resembles a pilcrow with a left pointing arrow. That looks good to me, and of course

Re: Beta hopefully soon, only waiting on Windows installer(s)

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:10:22AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > To summarize: > > After a very tiring trip abroad I invested almost all spare time‎ and hours > of sleep to get ready for beta1. Please, do not sacrifice hours of sleep. No one here wants you to do this. We want LyX development to be

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > >>>

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

Am 18. Januar 2016 23:25:03 MEZ, schrieb Pavel Sanda : >Stephan Witt wrote: >> The attached patch fixes the broken detection of GIT version control. >> It seems so that Qt is caching the file meta data and fools the test >> of file emptiness. Perhaps this has changed with Qt5 and

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 19.01.2016 um 05:13 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : >>> >>> Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >>>

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

Am 19.01.2016 um 07:56 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > > Am 18. Januar 2016 23:25:03 MEZ, schrieb Pavel Sanda : > Stephan Witt wrote: > The attached patch fixes the broken detection of GIT version control. > It seems so that Qt is caching the file meta data and

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Scott, you might want to look over changes in LFUNs API in LyXAction.cpp > > during 2.2dev cycle if we meant this conversion seriously. > > Which conversion? I don't understand. What specifically should I look > at? I would say check git log -p LyXAction.cpp during 2.2

Re: fontforge files in source package?

Georg Baum wrote: > the existing one. I suggest to remove the existing one, since the .sfd files > are not used in our build and only needed in very rare cases, and they are > not small files. +1 P

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

Stephan Witt wrote: > The attached patch fixes the broken detection of GIT version control. > It seems so that Qt is caching the file meta data and fools the test > of file emptiness. Perhaps this has changed with Qt5 and didn???t happen > with Qt4??? Bad news, if your analysis is correct, we

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:45:58PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Scott, you might want to look over changes in LFUNs API in LyXAction.cpp > > > during 2.2dev cycle if we meant this conversion seriously. > > > > Which conversion? I don't understand. What specifically

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. >>> Is this to be

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

Richard Heck wrote: > And, as I think is said there, we've seen issues with this, when using > filesystems with > significant latency, e.g., over NFS. It'd be worth adding a comment to > isFileEmpty() so > this question doesn't keep arising. Committed. P

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. > Is this to be expected? I don't think so. All of the tex2lyx tests pass for me. > Where are the details to analyze it further? In the CMake build directory, look at

Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. Is this to be expected? Where are the details to analyze it further? Stephan $ (cd lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev;ctest -C debug ) ... 92% tests passed, 16 tests failed out of 202 Label Time Summary: cmplyx = 21.99 sec (14 tests)

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. > > Is this to be expected? > > I don't think so. All of the tex2lyx tests pass for me.