Bennett Helm wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Am I right in thinking that settings from lyxrc.defaults and
Bennett preferences will overwrite the settings from lyxrc.dist?
Yes.
As I think about
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not sure what the appropriate solution is.
Georg But I am: The currently discussed auto-view patch by Bo. His
Georg solution is windows only currently, but once it is in it should
Georg not be difficult to extend that to OS X, too. The only thing
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Nevertheless, the fact that viewer and edito are noz part of the
format declaration itself is bad conceptually, since it means there is
no way to change the format without changing the helper programs. What
was the
Bennett Helm wrote:
> On May 2, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Bennett> Am I right in thinking that settings from lyxrc.defaults and
>> Bennett> preferences will overwrite the settings from lyxrc.dist?
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Not sure what the appropriate solution is.
Georg> But I am: The currently discussed auto-view patch by Bo. His
Georg> solution is windows only currently, but once it is in it should
Georg> not be difficult to extend that to OS X, too.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Nevertheless, the fact that viewer and edito are noz part of the
> format declaration itself is bad conceptually, since it means there is
> no way to change the format without changing the
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost It works fine on Windows. I'm currently working on a new
Joost Windows installer that I want to make available for other
Joost people to test, so please apply this to 1.4 soon.
This patch is in 1.4 and 1.5 now.
JMarc
On Apr 28, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others. No such file is
distributed by LyX currently, but it can
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Explain this a bit more. For Mac, I should provide lyxrc.dist
Bennett in the LyX.app bundle in place of the preferences file,
Bennett right?
Yes. Does this seems reasonable to you?
Bennett Am I right in thinking that settings from
On May 2, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett Explain this a bit more. For Mac, I should provide lyxrc.dist
Bennett in the LyX.app bundle in place of the preferences file,
Bennett right?
Yes. Does this seems reasonable to
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> It works fine on Windows. I'm currently working on a new
Joost> Windows installer that I want to make available for other
Joost> people to test, so please apply this to 1.4 soon.
This patch is in 1.4 and 1.5 now.
JMarc
On Apr 28, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others. No such file is
distributed by LyX currently, but it can
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Explain this a bit more. For Mac, I should provide lyxrc.dist
Bennett> in the LyX.app bundle in place of the preferences file,
Bennett> right?
Yes. Does this seems reasonable to you?
Bennett> Am I right in thinking that
On May 2, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Explain this a bit more. For Mac, I should provide lyxrc.dist
Bennett> in the LyX.app bundle in place of the preferences file,
Bennett> right?
Yes. Does this seems
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others. No such file is
distributed by LyX currently, but it can replace the preference file
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others. No such file is
distributed by LyX currently, but it can replace the preference file
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others. No such file is
distributed by LyX currently, but it can replace the preference file
bundled with the Mac version, and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others.
Comments? Is it enough to simplify packagers' job?
I think it is.
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus My understanding is that the Windows installer will continue to
Angus check for msys, python, ghostview et al., but only to generate
Angus a \path_prefix entry in lyxrc.dist.
Not for viewer, I think. We have other plans for them. As far as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am less sure about that. Is it really a gain to check for python in
configure.py?
Touché!
A.
This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
be read (if it exists) before all the others. No such file is
distributed by LyX currently, but it can replace the preference file
bundled with the Mac version, and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
> installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
> be read (if it exists) before all the others.
> Comments? Is it enough to simplify packagers' job?
I think it
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> My understanding is that the Windows installer will continue to
Angus> check for msys, python, ghostview et al., but only to generate
Angus> a \path_prefix entry in lyxrc.dist.
Not for viewer, I think. We have other plans for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am less sure about that. Is it really a gain to check for python in
> configure.py?
Touché!
A.
24 matches
Mail list logo