On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:29:40AM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I actually hate the "new" behaviour in Qt... probably because I frequently
> want to test stuff in the preamble. And I haven't been able to find a
> shortcut for opening the preamble. "M-l d" gives me the document layout,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The attached patch does this making the xforms and Qt frontends similar in
> this respect. What do xforms users think?
>
I actually hate the "new" behaviour in Qt... probably because I frequently
want to test stuff in the preamble. And I haven't been
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I have sent emails to spl and received no reply. I have no idea
Angus> about what is going on.
That's strnage, indeed.
>> I did not manage either to send messages to the list. I think it is
>> a separate matter and should be seen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Well given that I can't even communicate with them, I don't see
> Angus> how they'll ever know ;-)
>
> Could you try to write a message to spl voicing our concerns?
I have sent emails to spl and r
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Well given that I can't even communicate with them, I don't see
Angus> how they'll ever know ;-)
Could you try to write a message to spl voicing our concerns?
I did not manage either to send messages to the list. I think it is a
s
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have to admit, I'm rather disenchanted with xforms at the moment for
> | two reasons:
> | 1. xforms development seems to have stopped (witness a grand total of 42
> | emails in 10 threads to the list in 2003, all of th
On Wed Mar 26 2003 16:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have _no_ confidence that the XForms project will wake up and move
> forward. IMHO as it stands now the only options is a "hostile" fork.
> That might jolt the current XForms people a bit...
i doubt that there an incentive to do such a thing
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have to admit, I'm rather disenchanted with xforms at the moment for two
| reasons:
| 1. xforms development seems to have stopped (witness a grand total of 42
| emails in 10 threads to the list in 2003, all of them user questions and
| answers rathe
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Trying this out, it appears that the OK button binding is
> Angus> ignored...
>
> Good.
>
> Angus> I'm not a heavy user of the preamble, but one real possible
> Angus> problem is that we cannot re
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Trying this out, it appears that the OK button binding is
Angus> ignored...
Good.
Angus> I'm not a heavy user of the preamble, but one real possible
Angus> problem is that we cannot resize the tabs when we resize the
Angus> dialog
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> The attached patch does this making the xforms and Qt frontends
> Angus> similar in this respect. What do xforms users think?
>
> Angus> (Note, I haven't culled the preamble dialog yet, just given
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The attached patch does this making the xforms and Qt frontends
Angus> similar in this respect. What do xforms users think?
Angus> (Note, I haven't culled the preamble dialog yet, just given the
Angus> document dialog a preamble ta
The attached patch does this making the xforms and Qt frontends similar in
this respect. What do xforms users think?
(Note, I haven't culled the preamble dialog yet, just given the document
dialog a preamble tab. If you like it, however, then I will remove the
preamble dialog entirely.)
--
An
13 matches
Mail list logo
