Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-08-03 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Heck wrote: You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. Right, it's up to the user to create oolatex and friends with mk4ht.

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-08-03 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Richard Heck wrote: > > You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. > > However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer > the verbose command. Right, it's up to the user to create oolatex and friends with

[Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document Format (ODF) which could be read and processed by numerous programs:

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Tim Michelsen wrote: Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document Format (ODF) which could be read

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Ooops. I updated the wiki page: http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/LyX2OpenOffice and also the bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Tim Michelsen wrote: Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Are there any plans to include a export option to Open

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Pavel Sanda
You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. Should this be added to configure.py? isnt it already chceked ? tools - reconfigure found it for me. pavel

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. Should this be added to configure.py? Yes. Jürgen

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. Should this be added to configure.py? Yes. This would do it, preserving the

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the latex flag we don't need the needaux flag. The latex flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line --- error --- Can't find/open file

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the latex flag we don't need the needaux flag. The latex flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb: Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the latex flag we don't need the needaux flag. The latex flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line ---

[Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document Format (ODF) which could be read and processed by numerous programs:

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Tim Michelsen wrote: > Hello, > before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what > you think about this: There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 > Are there any plans to include a export option to Open Document Format > (ODF) which could be

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Ooops. I updated the wiki page: http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/LyX2OpenOffice and also the bugzilla entry: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Tim Michelsen wrote: Hello, before I enter a official request at bugzilla I'd like to ask you what you think about this: There's already a report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085 Are there any plans to include a export option to Open

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Pavel Sanda
> You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. > > Should this be added to configure.py? isnt it already chceked ? tools -> reconfigure found it for me. pavel

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. > Should this be added to configure.py? Yes. Jürgen

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: You can also just use `oolatex'---at least on Linux. However, TeXLive 2007 does not ship the oolatex script. Therefore I'd prefer the verbose command. Should this be added to configure.py? Yes. This would do it, preserving the

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that > since we have the "latex" flag we don't need the "needaux" flag. The "latex" flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line --- error --- Can't find/open

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the "latex" flag we don't need the "needaux" flag. The "latex" flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command

Re: [Feature request] export to openoffice

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Michelsen
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb: Richard Heck wrote: This would do it, preserving the simple oolatex call first. Note that since we have the "latex" flag we don't need the "needaux" flag. The "latex" flag doesn't work for me. I get the following error: --- warning --- Problem with command line

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-09 Thread Mark van Rossum
I found that the package 'snapshot' and 'bundledoc' produce dependency files and tar files for latex files. So 99% of the work is already done. I;m trying to get the converter to work correctly now. Often I want to send a complete manuscript to a co-author to edit it. Of course I send the

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-09 Thread Nirmal Govind
Hi.. you may want to take a look at a request I made some time back.. I think the idea is similar... there're also a couple of links to useful packages... http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303 nirmal Mark van Rossum wrote: I found that the package 'snapshot' and 'bundledoc' produce

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-09 Thread Mark van Rossum
I found that the package 'snapshot' and 'bundledoc' produce dependency files and tar files for latex files. So 99% of the work is already done. I;m trying to get the converter to work correctly now. > > Often I want to send a complete manuscript to a co-author to edit it. > Of course I send

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-09 Thread Nirmal Govind
Hi.. you may want to take a look at a request I made some time back.. I think the idea is similar... there're also a couple of links to useful packages... http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303 nirmal Mark van Rossum wrote: I found that the package 'snapshot' and 'bundledoc' produce

Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Mark van Rossum
Often I want to send a complete manuscript to a co-author to edit it. Of course I send the Lyx file, but in addition I need to send - figures - special styles files - biblio files. It would be convenient if there were an option to create a tar or zip archive with all files included. If there is

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:10:32AM +0100, Mark van Rossum wrote: Often I want to send a complete manuscript to a co-author to edit it. Of course I send the Lyx file, but in addition I need to send - figures - special styles files - biblio files. It would be convenient if there were an

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: If there is already a list of dependencies, it should be easy. If not, then it might be tricky Would it not be easy to create a shell/perl/python script that would simply look for all the external file references and create a list of full paths? Like: %

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:46:18PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: If there is already a list of dependencies, it should be easy. If not, then it might be tricky Would it not be easy to create a shell/perl/python script that would simply look for all the

Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Mark van Rossum
Often I want to send a complete manuscript to a co-author to edit it. Of course I send the Lyx file, but in addition I need to send - figures - special styles files - biblio files. It would be convenient if there were an option to create a tar or zip archive with all files included. If there is

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:10:32AM +0100, Mark van Rossum wrote: > > Often I want to send a complete manuscript to a co-author to edit it. > Of course I send the Lyx file, but in addition I need to send > - figures > - special styles files > - biblio files. > > It would be convenient if there

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: >> If there is already a list of dependencies, it should be easy. >> If not, then it might be tricky > > Would it not be easy to create a shell/perl/python script that would > simply look for all the external file references and create a list > of full paths? Like: >

Re: Feature request: export as

2003-10-08 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:46:18PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > >> If there is already a list of dependencies, it should be easy. > >> If not, then it might be tricky > > > > Would it not be easy to create a shell/perl/python script that would > > simply look for