On 29 May 2018 at 21:55, mn wrote:
> What is the status of the optional (external?) feature "grammar
> checking" and is their a plan to add proper support for this?
>
> The parts in question are here:
> https://github.com/gmatht/lyx-gc
> https://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/L
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:55:00PM +, mn wrote:
> What is the status of the optional (external?) feature "grammar
> checking" and is their a plan to add proper support for this?
To my knowledge, there has been no progress and no one is working on. I
think the only thing that
What is the status of the optional (external?) feature "grammar
checking" and is their a plan to add proper support for this?
The parts in question are here:
https://github.com/gmatht/lyx-gc
https://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/LyX-GrammarChecker
Trying to get lyx-gc working on macOS:
The wiki
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013 um 04:19:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
> ...
>
>> > - Binary .rpm:
>
>> > create : cpack -G RPM --config CPackConfig.cmake
>
>> > -list : rpm -qlp lyx-*.rpm
>
>> > -install: rpm
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013 um 04:19:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
...
> > - Binary .rpm:
> > create : cpack -G RPM --config CPackConfig.cmake
> > -list : rpm -qlp lyx-*.rpm
> > -install: rpm -U lyx-*.rpm
> > +list : rpm -qlp lyx-*.rpm
> > +insta
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> ---
> INSTALL.cmake | 114
> -
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/INSTALL.cmake b/INSTALL.cmake
> index caca807..cbd6512 100644
> --- a/INSTALL.cma
---
INSTALL.cmake | 114 -
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL.cmake b/INSTALL.cmake
index caca807..cbd6512 100644
--- a/INSTALL.cmake
+++ b/INSTALL.cmake
@@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ Building LyX with CMake
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 30/01/2013 06:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Can this go in?
>
>
> Please do.
It's in.
Thanks,
Scott
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 30/01/2013 06:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Can this go in?
>
>
> Sure.
It's in.
Thanks,
Scott
Le 30/01/2013 06:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Can this go in?
Please do.
JMarc
Le 30/01/2013 06:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Can this go in?
Sure.
JMarc
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> ---
> README.localization | 56
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/README.localization b/README.localization
> index c0e1a03..52280f9 100644
> ---
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> ---
> INSTALL | 32
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
> index 7ff59da..7ed8b1b 100644
> --- a/INSTALL
> +++ b/INSTALL
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ These four s
---
README.localization | 56 ++-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.localization b/README.localization
index c0e1a03..52280f9 100644
--- a/README.localization
+++ b/README.localization
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ and dial
---
INSTALL | 32
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
index 7ff59da..7ed8b1b 100644
--- a/INSTALL
+++ b/INSTALL
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ These four steps will compile, test and install LyX:
(for example, "--with-q
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Um... do you mean the wiki or the user's list? (The latter makes sense to
> > > me for getting testers...)
> >
> > I mean: Add a decription page on the wiki and a
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Um... do you mean the wiki or the user's list? (The latter makes sense to
> > me for getting testers...)
>
> I mean: Add a decription page on the wiki and announce it on the users list.
Which he just de... :-)
/C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Um... do you mean the wiki or the user's list? (The latter makes sense to
> me for getting testers...)
I mean: Add a decription page on the wiki and announce it on the users list.
Jürgen
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > I have decided to keep my grammar checker small, mostly just a wrapper
> > > around ChkTeX and JLanguageTool. Thus my code is likely to remain small
> > > enough to be included in LyX. H
Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I have decided to keep my grammar checker small, mostly just a wrapper
> > around ChkTeX and JLanguageTool. Thus my code is likely to remain small
> > enough to be included in LyX. However my prototype is easy to distribute
> > separately from LyX
John C. McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> I have decided to keep my grammar checker small, mostly just a wrapper
> around ChkTeX and JLanguageTool. Thus my code is likely to remain small
> enough to be included in LyX. However my prototype is easy to distribute
> separately from LyX and does
I have decided to keep my grammar checker small, mostly just a wrapper around
ChkTeX and JLanguageTool. Thus my code is likely to remain small enough to be
included in LyX. However my prototype is easy to distribute separately from
LyX and does not require any (re)compiling or installing. It
John C. McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2005 23:51, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
>> > John C. McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> >> I am working on a grammar checker for LyX. It outputs the errors
>> >> to LaTeX .log format s
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 23:51, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> > John C. McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> >> I am working on a grammar checker for LyX. It outputs the errors to
> >> LaTeX .log format so it can integrate itself into LyX without need
&
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> John C. McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> I am working on a grammar checker for LyX. It outputs the errors to
>> LaTeX .log format so it can integrate itself into LyX without need
>> for any modification to existing LyX binary.
Hi, John. This is really
John C. McCabe-Dansted wrote:
I am working on a grammar checker for LyX. It outputs the errors to LaTeX .log
format so it can integrate itself into LyX without need for any modification
to existing LyX binary.
Very interesting. I've talken a look at the code - although it's Perl,
I am working on a grammar checker for LyX. It outputs the errors to LaTeX .log
format so it can integrate itself into LyX without need for any modification
to existing LyX binary.
Three questions.
First, I understand that to tell LyX 1.3.6 that a converter generates errors
in a LaTeX .log
now I run diction on the exported latex file, which also works,
but it would be even nicer
if it would be possible to use it or some other grammar checking utility
inside LyX.
I now that the implementatation of diction is not the best, so if a nice
implementation is less straight
forward, perhaps
have been thinking about Jean-Marc's proposal to scrap InsetGraphics
entirely and use InsetExternal in its place. Essentially, he suggests
extending the ExternalTemplate grammar so that the dialog would have
extra widgets that 'appear by magic' if the template supports
scalin
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: Of course we could always pop up a message and say "You document
> contains grammar errors" and classify the few false positives as bug ;-)
There is no other possible good-ui design. Everything else would break the
least-surprise principle. ;-)
Alfredo
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 12:20:43PM +1030, Paul Medwell wrote:
> It's probably a lot of hassle, but are there any plans of implementing
> some kind of grammar checking in LyX? Having transferred from MS Word
> to LyX I have really missed this grammar checking function.
Which g
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 12:20:43PM +1030, Paul Medwell wrote:
> It's probably a lot of hassle, but are there any plans of implementing
> some kind of grammar checking in LyX? Having transferred from MS Word
> to LyX I have really missed this grammar checking function.
We
Hi guys,
It's probably a lot of hassle, but are there any plans of implementing
some kind of grammar checking in LyX? Having transferred from MS Word
to LyX I have really missed this grammar checking function.
Thanks,
Paul Medwell
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 03:07:32AM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there a complete LALR grammar description for TeX or LaTeX files?
a) I've never heard of one
b) I'm pretty sure it's not an LALR language. It's context dependent
and is
Hi everyone,
Is there a complete LALR grammar description for TeX or LaTeX files?
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc.| Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena
http
35 matches
Mail list logo
