Andreas == Andreas K [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Well, the problem is that as it is now (LyX 1.5.0beta2),
Andreas change tracking is available from the menu, but math is only
Andreas available from the toolbars, which are not shown by default.
Andreas Using LyX for the first time and
> "Andreas" == Andreas K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Well, the problem is that as it is now (LyX 1.5.0beta2),
Andreas> change tracking is available from the menu, but math is only
Andreas> available from the toolbars, which are not shown by default.
Andreas> Using LyX for the first
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
Put that as feature request on bugzilla
On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:22:20 +0200
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
delete the row - or
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:22:20 +0200
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
Bo Peng wrote:
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering
equations is
still much easier/more natural and the symbolic math is much more
complete.
Two big things:
1. computer algebraic system. Not a big deal but some people like it a
lot.
LyX have had that for
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
Put that as feature request on bugzilla
On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:02:12 +0200
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:22:20 +0200
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or
On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:21:48 +0200
Jan Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Guys, if you do this, LyX will always remain only for a limited class of
people
which would not even include high school math teachers. Do you really want
that?
LyX needs to avoid all special key combinations -
Jan Peters wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the
shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
Put that as
Jan Peters wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the
shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
Put that as
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
I am a strong believer in LyX and the concept WYSWIM. But the
breakthrough for LyX will ONLY come if we get a fair quota among first
time users. Two years ago, we required our masters students in CS545
to submit Latex typesetted homework. I
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:21:48 +0200
Jan Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LyX needs to avoid all special key combinations - right now it easier
to get started
with Word, so many people use it even knowing the alternative! LyX
needs more users in
Andreas == Andreas K [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Then they get frustrated, closes LyX and uninstalls it. It
Andreas is better to have the math toolbars visible from the
Andreas beginning, and then if somoen only want them to pop up when
Andreas they are needed, he could choose this
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:00:46PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering
equations is
still much easier/more natural and the symbolic math is much more
complete.
Two big things:
1. computer algebraic system. Not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas == Andreas K [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Then they get frustrated, closes LyX and uninstalls it. It
Andreas is better to have the math toolbars visible from the
Andreas beginning, and then if somoen only want them to pop up
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
> Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
> keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
> delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
Put that as feature request on
On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:22:20 +0200
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
> > Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
> > keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
> > delete the
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:22:20 +0200
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
Bo Peng wrote:
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering
equations is
still much easier/more natural and the symbolic math is much more
complete.
Two big things:
1. computer algebraic system. Not a big deal but some people like it a
lot.
LyX have had that for
>> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
>>> Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the shift-cursor
>>> keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
>>> delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
>> Put that as feature
On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:02:12 +0200
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 May 2007 08:22:20 +0200
> > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
> >>> Also selecting the row with the
On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:21:48 +0200
Jan Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Guys, if you do this, LyX will always remain only for a limited class of
> people
> which would not even include high school math teachers. Do you really want
> that?
>
> LyX needs to avoid all special key
Jan Peters wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
>>> Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the
shift-cursor
>>> keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
>>> delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
>> Put
Jan Peters wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:55:03AM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
>>> Also selecting the row with the mouse cursor or using the
shift-cursor
>>> keys, and THEN pressing delete has no effect. That should always
>>> delete the row - or give an error message if impossible.
>> Put
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
I am a strong believer in LyX and the concept WYSWIM. But the
breakthrough for LyX will ONLY come if we get a fair quota among first
time users. Two years ago, we required our masters students in CS545
to submit Latex typesetted homework. I
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:21:48 +0200
> Jan Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > LyX needs to avoid all special key combinations - right now it easier
> > to get started
> > with Word, so many people use it even knowing the alternative! LyX
> > needs
> "Andreas" == Andreas K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Then they get frustrated, closes LyX and uninstalls it. It
Andreas> is better to have the math toolbars visible from the
Andreas> beginning, and then if somoen only want them to pop up when
Andreas> they are needed, he could
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:00:46PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
> >>Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering
> >>equations is
> >>still much easier/more natural and the symbolic math is much more
> >>complete.
> >
> >Two big things:
> >
> >1. computer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Andreas" == Andreas K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andreas> Then they get frustrated, closes LyX and uninstalls it. It
> Andreas> is better to have the math toolbars visible from the
> Andreas> beginning, and then if somoen only
... if I had any.
I have played around a lot with LyX 1.5.0 beta 2 on Windows XP, and although
there still are some shortcomings (as mentioned here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg116276.html) I am really
impressed.
LyX 1.5.0 is absolutely awesome! Especially the new
Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed both as
competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside academia/OSF
environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering equations is
still much easier/more natural
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering equations is
still much easier/more natural and the symbolic math is much more complete.
Two big things:
1. computer algebraic system. Not a big deal but some people like it a lot.
2. tex - word conversion. Essential for many
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed both
as competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside academia/OSF
environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
Right now, they also still have some big
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
... and the symbolic math is much more complete.
This is true, and this will stay so for a while I am afraid. It's a lot
of grunt work to be done in this area, especially if one wants to
Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed both
as competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside academia/OSF
environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering
equations is still much easier/more
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:03:18PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed
both as competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside
academia/OSF environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
Right now, they also still have some big
For me it does. Place the cursor in the first of #columns empty cells
and press 'Delete'. To clear a row, select it, dir 'Delete' to get empty
cell, press 'Delete' a second time to remove the row.
But isn't that exactly what you could say about unnatural?
To delete an empty row while being in
... if I had any.
I have played around a lot with LyX 1.5.0 beta 2 on Windows XP, and although
there still are some shortcomings (as mentioned here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg116276.html) I am really
impressed.
LyX 1.5.0 is absolutely awesome! Especially the new
Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed both as
competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside academia/OSF
environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering equations is
still much easier/more natural
Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering equations is
still much easier/more natural and the symbolic math is much more complete.
Two big things:
1. computer algebraic system. Not a big deal but some people like it a lot.
2. tex -> word conversion. Essential for
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
> Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed both
> as competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside academia/OSF
> environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
>
> Right now, they also still have some big
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
> > ... and the symbolic math is much more complete.
>
> This is true, and this will stay so for a while I am afraid. It's a lot
> of grunt work to be done in this area, especially if one
> Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed both
> as competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside academia/OSF
> environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
>
> Right now, they also still have some big advantages, e.g., entering
> equations is still much easier/more
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:03:18PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote:
> >> Remember, it should NOT be LyX goal to kill SWP as it is needed
> >> both as competition benchmark and in order to make ppl outside
> >> academia/OSF environments aware of the WYSWIM concept.
> >>
> >> Right now, they also still have
For me it does. Place the cursor in the first of #columns empty cells
and press 'Delete'. To clear a row, select it, dir 'Delete' to get empty
cell, press 'Delete' a second time to remove the row.
But isn't that exactly what you could say about unnatural?
To delete an empty row while being in
46 matches
Mail list logo
