Re: [Edmar Wienskoski Jr ] "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-10-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Edmar> Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX Edmar> a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here Edmar> at my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have Edmar> opportunity to use this feature. Hi Edmar, nice to hear from you again. Edmar> Anyway...

Re: [Edmar Wienskoski Jr ] "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX Lars> a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at Lars> my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have opportunity to Lars> use this featur

Re: "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote: > > > > I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten > > those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files > > to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked thei

Re: "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Sep-2000 Allan Rae wrote: > > I'm sure we've had more than occasion where contributors have forgotten > those new files simply because they expected diff would add the new files > to the patch for them. Sure they should have checked their patch and > noticed this but getting a patch and a

Re: "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > > > Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with > > the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that > > have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag. > > To be able to

Re: "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-15 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > Nothing, as I said above in the first case. The only problem comes with > the fact that new files are not included by the -N. Only new files that > have been added to cvs using `cvs add` are actually caught by the -N flag. > To be able to run `cvs add` you have to be given at least read-onl

Re: "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-14 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Allan Rae wrote: > > > So in summary: > > If you have cvs access but no new files use > > `cvs diff -p -N -u` > > > > if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs > > access but have added new files then get the modi

Re: "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-14 Thread Garst R. Reese
Allan Rae wrote: > So in summary: > If you have cvs access but no new files use > `cvs diff -p -N -u` > > if you have no cvs access (using snapshots or releases) _or_ have cvs > access but have added new files then get the modified diff and a script > called packcvs from the above site

"LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-14 Thread Allan Rae
My question is how we submit patches nowadays. I couldn't find the familiar script to diff two source trees... (Yeah, it's being a long time...) Makepatch doesn't exist anymore. Everyone is expected to use cvs to build patches against the latest cvs not against fix releases. Although if you

[Edmar Wienskoski Jr ] "LyX/Literate programming" bug report and fix

2000-09-14 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Hi Lars. I worked on the literate programming extension for LyX a while back (LyX-1.0.1). Unfortunately political trends here at my job shifted and it is a long time I don't have opportunity to use this feature. Then, on July one guy sent me email saying it was broken.  In fact it was, but it is