On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Could you please test the attached patch? It limits the copied
paragraphs to 10 so the cost of copySelection is constant when
selecting large pieces of texts.
But Georg opposed to this:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3877#c4
And what is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more serious, why should we restrict Windows users from
functionality we appreciate elsewhere?
Please read the whole thread: because the feature isn't implemented correctly
and causes severe performance problems.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Could you please test the attached patch? It limits the copied
paragraphs to 10 so the cost of copySelection is constant when
selecting large pieces of texts.
But Georg opposed to this:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more serious, why should we restrict Windows users from
functionality we appreciate elsewhere?
Please read the whole thread: because the feature isn't implemented
correctly and causes severe performance problems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having said that, a preference that allows a user to trade this
functionality for performance would be fine by me for now.
A preference for switching a bug on? Nah...
Jürgen
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:24:45AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more serious, why should we restrict Windows users from
functionality we appreciate elsewhere?
Please read the whole thread: because the
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I did catch a reference to that bit, but I felt someone should argue
against things (roughly) like:
* Windows users don't need unixy stuff
So they don't need LyX? ;-)
Exactly ;-)
* No other Windows program does it like that
This is not true.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Could you please test the attached patch? It limits the copied
paragraphs to 10 so the cost of copySelection is constant when
selecting large pieces of texts.
But Georg opposed to this:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3877#c4
And what is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To be more serious, why should we restrict Windows users from
> functionality we appreciate elsewhere?
Please read the whole thread: because the feature isn't implemented correctly
and causes severe performance problems.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Could you please test the attached patch? It limits the copied
paragraphs to 10 so the cost of copySelection is constant when
selecting large pieces of texts.
But Georg opposed to this:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be more serious, why should we restrict Windows users from
functionality we appreciate elsewhere?
Please read the whole thread: because the feature isn't implemented
correctly and causes severe performance problems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Having said that, a preference that allows a user to trade this
> functionality for performance would be fine by me for now.
A preference for switching a bug on? Nah...
Jürgen
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:24:45AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> To be more serious, why should we restrict Windows users from
> >> functionality we appreciate elsewhere?
> >
> > Please read the whole thread:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I did catch a reference to that bit, but I felt someone should argue
against things (roughly) like:
* Windows users don't need "unixy" stuff
So they don't need LyX? ;-)
Exactly ;-)
* No other Windows program does it like that
This is not
14 matches
Mail list logo
