Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So first you don't need to send patches to the list
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:35:44AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Maybe, but it will be tested more then sending patches to the list
and one can also follow the development. One can test a branch
whenever he has time and people can develop on it with all the
features of cvs and maybe someone can
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We
still have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a
bit longer.
Andre There are a few things that
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly without
Andre these kind of change. One that annoyed me this morning is the
Andre Comment layout that of course loses information about the
Andre contained lists
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly
Andre without these kind of change. One that annoyed me this morning
Andre is the Comment layout that of course
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly
Andre without these kind of change.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Comment is dead. Cut and paste into a Note inset instead.
Huh? Is comment dead?
--
Lgb
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:37:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Comment is dead. Cut and paste into a Note inset instead.
Huh? Is comment dead?
It works as it used to work, i.e. it is almost useless for temporarily
commenting out
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Comment
Lars is dead. Cut and paste into a Note inset instead.
Lars Huh? Is comment dead?
I mean it should die as soon as note can output latex code.
JMarc
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:20:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We still
have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a bit longer.
There are a few things
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:26:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
And these bugs have existed for a very long time ... all development on
code this crufty is basically exchanging one known set of bugs for a new
set of unknown bugs. Until we reach the holy grail of reasonably
maintainable code, and
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>>I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
>>before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
>>changes there. So first you don't need to send patches to
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:35:44AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Maybe, but it will be tested more then sending patches to the list
> and one can also follow the development. One can test a branch
> whenever he has time and people can develop on it with all the
> features of cvs and maybe someone
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We
>> still have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a
>> bit longer.
Andre> There are
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly without
> Andre> these kind of change. One that annoyed me this morning is the
> Andre> "Comment" layout that "of course" loses information about the
> Andre>
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly
Andre> without these kind of change. One that annoyed me this morning
Andre> is the "Comment" layout
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote: There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly
> Andre> without these
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Comment is dead. Cut and paste into a Note inset instead.
Huh? Is comment dead?
--
Lgb
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:37:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Comment is dead. Cut and paste into a Note inset instead.
>
> Huh? Is comment dead?
It "works" as it used to "work", i.e. it is almost useless for temporarily
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Comment
Lars> is dead. Cut and paste into a Note inset instead.
Lars> Huh? Is comment dead?
I mean it should die as soon as note can output latex code.
JMarc
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:20:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We still
> > have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a bit longer.
>
> There are a few
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:26:49PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> And these bugs have existed for a very long time ... all development on
> code this crufty is basically exchanging one known set of bugs for a new
> set of unknown bugs. Until we reach the holy grail of reasonably
> maintainable code,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
without this kind of stuff?
That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
that ParagraphList stuff
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
without this kind of stuff?
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
| that ParagraphList stuff right now!
Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
input/display/output of lyx, but of course I do have bugs in my code..
(I am perfectly willing
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
| that ParagraphList stuff right now!
Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
input/display/output of lyx, but of course I do have
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We still
have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a bit longer.
There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly without these kind of
change. One that
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
No I do not tell you that. The ParagraphList stuff is patches I have
been working on for several months.
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So first you don't need to send patches to the list and
second we can
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
> is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
> without this kind of stuff?
That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
that ParagraphList
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
>> is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
>> without this kind of stuff?
>
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
> | that ParagraphList stuff right now!
>
> Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
> input/display/output of lyx, but of course I do have bugs in my code..
> (I am perfectly
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
>> | that ParagraphList stuff right now!
>> Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
>> input/display/output of lyx, but of course I
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We still
> have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a bit longer.
There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly without these kind of
change. One
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No I do not tell you that. The ParagraphList stuff is patches I have
> been working on for several months.
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
> before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
> changes there. So first you don't need to send patches to the list and
> second we can
36 matches
Mail list logo
