On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
Now that floating figures and tables have been moved off into their own
submenu (Insert-Floats-Table), this isn't so big a deal anymore, but
then people will ask What's the difference between Insert-Table and
Insert-Floats-Table?.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> Now that floating figures and tables have been moved off into their own
> submenu (Insert->Floats->Table), this isn't so big a deal anymore, but
> then people will ask "What's the difference between Insert->Table and
>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And you won't have any ambiguity between Table Float and Table?
Nope.
Insert-Float-Table float
Insert-Table
Users are pretty used to hierarchical menus by now as long as they don't
go crazy ...
I'd prefere Table Float and
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And you won't have any ambiguity between Table Float and Table?
| Nope.
| Insert-Float-Table float
| Insert-Table
| Users are pretty used to hierarchical menus by now as long as they
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 4:50 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
From webster:
One entry found for tabular.
Main Entry: tab·u·lar
Pronunciation:'ta-by-lr
Function: adjective
Etymology:Latin tabularis of boards, from tabula board, tablet
Date: circa 1656
1 : having a flat
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And you won't have any ambiguity between "Table Float" and "Table"?
Nope.
Insert->Float->Table float
Insert->Table
Users are pretty used to hierarchical menus by now as long as they don't
go crazy ...
> I'd prefere "Table
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> And you won't have any ambiguity between "Table Float" and "Table"?
>
| Nope.
>
| Insert->Float->Table float
| Insert->Table
>
| Users are pretty used to hierarchical menus by now
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 4:50 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> From webster:
>
> One entry found for tabular.
> Main Entry: tab·u·lar
> Pronunciation:'ta-by&-l
> Function: adjective
> Etymology:Latin tabularis of boards, from tabula board, tablet
> Date: circa 1656
> 1 : having a
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
...
| For me again, the distinction between Table and Tabular is a bit too
| ambiguous. Adding Float to the menu name whenever a float is what we
| have, is both simple and semantically correct.
And you won't have any
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
...
> | For me again, the distinction between "Table" and "Tabular" is a bit too
> | ambiguous. Adding "Float" to the menu name whenever a float is what we
> | have, is both simple and semantically correct.
>
> And you won't
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, robin wrote:
John Levon wrote:
JMarc suggested I ask here about this terminology. My question is, what
is our justificatino for exposing the user to the unusual formulation
Tabular Material, or the even worse Tabular ?
Beats me.
This is another of those things that
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution
can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a
Insert-Floats-Table, one then needs to insert a Insert-Table into it.
That's a bit too ambiguous
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution
can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a
Insert-Floats-Table, one then needs to insert a
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, robin wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> >JMarc suggested I ask here about this terminology. My question is, what
> >is our justificatino for exposing the user to the unusual formulation
> >"Tabular Material", or the even worse "Tabular" ?
> >
> Beats me.
This is another of those
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution
> can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a
> Insert->Floats->Table, one then needs to insert a Insert->Table into it.
> That's a bit too
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
>
>> So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution
>> can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a
>> Insert->Floats->Table, one then needs to
16 matches
Mail list logo
