Actually, the more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that
your approach mixes at least two different concepts which should be
separated:
I. Insets that show/hide parts of the document
- i.e. Branch, Comment, Note, Greyedout
- Can contain very large contents up to a complete
Michael Schmitt wrote:
I am a bit confused. I thought we agreed that each branch/note inset
should have two properties that correspond to I. and II. above. That
means, in the document dialog, you can both activate/deactive an inset
_and_ define its position (or, more general, its appearance)
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that
your approach mixes at least two different concepts which should be
separated:
I. Insets that show/hide parts of the document
-> i.e. Branch, Comment, Note, Greyedout
-> Can contain very large contents up to a complete
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I am a bit confused. I thought we agreed that each branch/note inset
> should have two properties that correspond to I. and II. above. That
> means, in the document dialog, you can both activate/deactive an inset
> _and_ define its position (or, more general, its
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:45:30AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
...
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that
your approach mixes at least two different concepts which should be
separated:
I. Insets that show/hide parts of the document
-
Martin Vermeer wrote:
You have a point. Actually I think I'll drop petite for now (I don't
seem to find a LaTeX env of that name -- I did see one somewhere).
I just had a look. There is relsize.sty, but this seems only to change the
fontsize of standard environments (could be used to make
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:28:22PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Ia: Note, Comment, Greyedout -- insetnote
Ib: Branch -- insetbranch (new).
What would your preference be?
It sounds logical to me, since (intention-wise) an annotation (Ia) is a
completely different thing than
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:13:20PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
...
Or couldn't we have a branch editor in the Document Settings dialog
where the user can name branches, and set the eventual effect of each
named branch ?
Nah. That's what we need your character styles for :-)
Do one
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:45:30AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
>
...
> Actually, the more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that
> your approach mixes at least two different concepts which should be
> separated:
>
> I. Insets that show/hide parts of the document
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> You have a point. Actually I think I'll drop petite for now (I don't
> seem to find a LaTeX env of that name -- I did see one somewhere).
I just had a look. There is relsize.sty, but this seems only to change the
fontsize of standard environments (could be used to make
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:28:22PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Ia: Note, Comment, Greyedout <--> insetnote
> >
> > Ib: Branch <--> insetbranch (new).
> >
> > What would your preference be?
>
> It sounds logical to me, since (intention-wise) an annotation (Ia) is a
> completely
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:13:20PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
...
> Or couldn't we have a branch editor in the Document Settings dialog
> where the user can name branches, and set the eventual effect of each
> named branch ?
Nah. That's what we need your "character styles" for :-)
Do one
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Ah. That's not right. Perhaps we should continue to call it Note,
not blind. What would be most suitable name? I think this string is
defined in factory.C line 74. You could try changing it.
I think Note is best. People are used to it. But the complete inset (i.e.
the
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Ah. That's not right. Perhaps we should continue to call it "Note",
> not "blind". What would be most suitable name? I think this string is
> defined in factory.C line 74. You could try changing it.
I think "Note" is best. People are used to it. But the complete inset
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:11:19PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Here it is... working and all -- for me at least.
Can you send an updated patch, please? It does not apply cleanly anymore.
Thanks,
Juergen
OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch (I do not
Martin Vermeer wrote:
OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
Thanks, Martin. Compiling now (though I don't know if I can test much this
week).
Juergen.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:09:57PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
Is this something that should go into CVS at some time or just some
'private add-on'?
If the former I have some minor nitpicks:
Index: bufferparams.C
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:11:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
+ branch_sel = ;
This is not needed.
Sure?
Sure. branch_sel is a std::string.
+ } else if ((tmptok == Note) || (tmptok == comment)
+ || (tmptok ==blind) ||
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:23:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:11:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Should not be needed if all branches end in 'return'.
gcc doesn't seem to think so :-(
I think it does.
Otherwise we'd get much more warnings in
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:24:26PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Don't you think I've tried?
Not too hard, actually.
Currently I have
switch (cmd.action) {
case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY:
{
InsetNoteParams params;
InsetNoteMailer::string2params(cmd.argument,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:04:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:24:26PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Don't you think I've tried?
Not too hard, actually.
Currently I have
switch (cmd.action) {
case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY:
{
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:32:00PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Is it OK to substitute return UNDISPATCHED here?
The safe way would be to call localDispatch in the base (like the default
branch), but it shouldn't make much of a difference in this case.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
Martin Vermeer wrote:
OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
From a first glance (without looking at the source):
- What's the Note state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
- The branch input field does not get enabled after switching the combo to
branch. I have
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
From a first glance (without looking at the source):
- What's the Note state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
Sorry to be a pain Martin, but can I get up to date screenshots (for
Qt ?)
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 15:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Also, you should get rid of the comment environment and hassle José to let
lyx2lyx convert comment environments to comment insets.
Drop me a note when this code is ready to cvs, it should be easy to
translate it. :-)
Apart from
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:54:30PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
From a first glance (without looking at the source):
- What's the Note state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
From a first glance (without looking at the source):
- What's the Note state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
? I
Martin Vermeer wrote:
- What's the Note state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
? I think I called it blind note. Of course names are not fixed yet,
just working titles (disabled?, post-it?)
Yes, there is a blind note that works analogous to the old Note. But
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:42:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/branch7.jpeg
Thanks. I don't like the Note dialog (apart from the branch list issue
mentioned already). The Type thing seems unclear and non-obvious.
I haven't thought through a nicer UI yet. It may just
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:10:32PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:42:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/branch7.jpeg
Thanks. I don't like the Note dialog (apart from the branch list issue
mentioned already). The Type thing seems
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
- What's the Note state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
? I think I called it blind note. Of course names are not fixed yet,
just working titles
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:11:19PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Here it is... working and all -- for me at least.
>
> Can you send an updated patch, please? It does not apply cleanly anymore.
>
> Thanks,
> Juergen
OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
Thanks, Martin. Compiling now (though I don't know if I can test much this
week).
Juergen.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:09:57PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
Is this something that should go into CVS at some time or just some
'private add-on'?
If the former I have some minor nitpicks:
> Index: bufferparams.C
>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:11:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > + branch_sel = "";
> >
> > This is not needed.
>
> Sure?
Sure. branch_sel is a std::string.
> > > + } else if ((tmptok == "Note") || (tmptok == "comment")
> > > + || (tmptok
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:23:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:11:08PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Should not be needed if all branches end in 'return'.
> >
> > gcc doesn't seem to think so :-(
>
> I think it does.
>
> Otherwise we'd get much more
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:24:26PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Don't you think I've tried?
Not too hard, actually.
> Currently I have
>
> switch (cmd.action) {
> case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY:
> {
> InsetNoteParams params;
>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:04:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:24:26PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Don't you think I've tried?
>
> Not too hard, actually.
>
> > Currently I have
> >
> > switch (cmd.action) {
> > case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY:
> >
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:32:00PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Is it OK to substitute "return UNDISPATCHED" here?
The safe way would be to call localDispatch in the base (like the default
branch), but it shouldn't make much of a difference in this case.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
From a first glance (without looking at the source):
- What's the "Note" state for which is used by default and does not do
anything obviously?
- The "branch" input field does not get enabled after switching the combo to
"branch". I
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> From a first glance (without looking at the source):
>
> - What's the "Note" state for which is used by default and does not do
> anything obviously?
Sorry to be a pain Martin, but can I get up to date screenshots (for
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 15:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Also, you should get rid of the comment environment and hassle José to let
> lyx2lyx convert comment environments to comment insets.
Drop me a note when this code is ready to cvs, it should be easy to
translate it. :-)
> Apart
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:54:30PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> > From a first glance (without looking at the source):
> >
> > - What's the "Note" state for which is used by default and does not do
> > anything
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > OK Jürgen, here is the updated patch
>
> From a first glance (without looking at the source):
>
> - What's the "Note" state for which is used by default and does not do
> anything
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > - What's the "Note" state for which is used by default and does not do
> > anything obviously?
>
> ? I think I called it "blind" note. Of course names are not fixed yet,
> just working titles ("disabled"?, "post-it"?)
Yes, there is a "blind" note that works analogous to
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:42:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/branch7.jpeg
Thanks. I don't like the Note dialog (apart from the branch list issue
mentioned already). The "Type" thing seems unclear and non-obvious.
I haven't thought through a nicer UI yet. It may
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:10:32PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:42:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/branch7.jpeg
>
> Thanks. I don't like the Note dialog (apart from the branch list issue
> mentioned already). The "Type" thing
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > - What's the "Note" state for which is used by default and does not do
> > > anything obviously?
> >
> > ? I think I called it "blind" note. Of course names are not fixed yet,
> > just
48 matches
Mail list logo
