Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
4) Extend QFileDialog without hacking. Just create the beast, hunt
through the list of child widgets and layouts until you find something
appropriate, and add a new button as child widget there.
I'd say th
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >4) Extend QFileDialog without hacking. Just create the beast, hunt
> >through the list of child widgets and layouts until you find something
> >appropriate, and add a new button as child widget there.
>
> I'd say this is a hack
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I just had an interesting journey in QFileDialog implementation. The
functionality is all there but it's all private :-(
It looks very easy to add any button we'd like there.
Another option would
be to
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Abdelrazak> Bo Peng a écrit :
> >> Dear all, The document -> settings dialog is pretty well organized,
> >> and I could not find a good place for this opt
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I just had an interesting journey in QFileDialog implementation. The
> functionality is all there but it's all private :-(
> It looks very easy to add any button we'd like there.
>
> >Another option would
> >be to create our ow
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:26:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >>On windows, I think there's a public API for that kind of stuff yes. But
> >>I really prefer the simpler, faster, leaner ly
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On windows, I think there's a public API for that kind of stuff yes. But
I really prefer the simpler, faster, leaner lyx file dialog. I really
don't understand why people insist on using the native o
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, I think this is the easiest think to do now. Bo, do you still
>> have your patch at hand?
File-> Compressed or document->compressed?
I'd say Document>Compressed.
JMarc
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On windows, I think there's a public API for that kind of stuff yes. But
> I really prefer the simpler, faster, leaner lyx file dialog. I really
> don't understand why people insist on using the native ones for opening
> lyx f
> OK, I think this is the easiest think to do now. Bo, do you still have
> your patch at hand?
File->Compressed or document->compressed?
Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> You're misunderstanding. My idea was not to put it in the
Bennett> dialog, but in the *menu*. So if a user selects Document >
Bennett> Compressed, that menu line gets checked and if the user
Bennett> r
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> You're misunderstanding. My idea was not to put it in the
Bennett> dialog, but in the *menu*. So if a user selects Document >
Bennett> Compressed, that menu line gets checked and if the user
Bennett> reselects it, it gets uncheck
Bo Peng a écrit :
I think Bennet is talking about a checkable menu item in the Document
menu. That's not a bad idea actually.
I posted that patch long ago (File->compressed) ... JMarc suggested
Document->settings.
I won't position myself between you too ;-)
Abdel.
On Apr 27, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Why not make it an item under the Document menu, say just
Bennett> under Document Settings...? (If checked, the file is
Bennett> compressed; if not, it's not -- similar to Do
> I think Bennet is talking about a checkable menu item in the Document
> menu. That's not a bad idea actually.
I posted that patch long ago (File->compressed) ... JMarc suggested
Document->settings.
Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Why not make it an item under the Document menu, say just
Bennett> under Document Settings...? (If checked, the file is
Bennett> compressed; if not, it's not -- similar to Document -> Change
Bennett> T
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Why not make it an item under the Document menu, say just
Bennett> under Document Settings...? (If checked, the file is
Bennett> compressed; if not, it's not -- similar to Document -> Change
Bennett> Tracking -> Show Changes in O
On Apr 27, 2006, at 4:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Bo Peng a écrit :
Dear all, The document -> settings dialog is pretty well organized,
and I could not find a good place for this option. Any idea?
Abdelrazak>
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> Dear all, The document -> settings dialog is pretty well
Bo> organized, and I could not find a good place for this option. Any
Bo> idea?
Not really :(
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Leuven, E. a écrit :
On windows, I think there's a public API for that kind of stuff yes.
But I really prefer the simpler, faster, leaner lyx file dialog. I
really don't understand why people insist on using the native ones
for opening lyx files. But I agree that th
> Haven't looked at QFileDialog yet but the documentation seems to say
> that it is not up to the Q3 version feature wise. Another option would
> be to create our own dialog using QDirModel.
ok thanks
> PS: There seems to be a problem with your mailer, no line wrap.
the problem with my mailer i
Leuven, E. a écrit :
On windows, I think there's a public API for that kind of stuff yes. But
I really prefer the simpler, faster, leaner lyx file dialog. I really
don't understand why people insist on using the native ones for opening
lyx files. But I agree that the native dialog is useful whe
> On windows, I think there's a public API for that kind of stuff yes. But
>I really prefer the simpler, faster, leaner lyx file dialog. I really
>don't understand why people insist on using the native ones for opening
>lyx files. But I agree that the native dialog is useful when you want to
>i
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Bo Peng a écrit :
>> Dear all, The document -> settings dialog is pretty well organized,
>> and I could not find a good place for this option. Any idea?
Abdelrazak> I would put it in the File dialog instead. The idea
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Bo Peng a écrit :
Dear all, The document -> settings dialog is pretty well organized,
and I could not find a good place for this option. Any idea?
Abdelrazak> I would put it in the File d
Bo Peng a écrit :
Dear all,
The document -> settings dialog is pretty well organized, and I could
not find a good place for this option. Any idea?
I would put it in the File dialog instead. The idea is that this feature
is transparent for the user, right? In this case, lyx will only save in
Dear all,
The document -> settings dialog is pretty well organized, and I could
not find a good place for this option. Any idea?
Bo
27 matches
Mail list logo
