Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 23:20:35, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:44:27PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 14:41:04, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > > > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 00:47:57, schrieb

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:32:15AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 16.01.2016 um 16:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >Uwe, I know you do not have much time but are you willing to make both > >installers? It seems there is help available for both the MSVC and mingw > >if you get stuck. > > To repeat,

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 16.01.2016 um 16:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Uwe, I know you do not have much time but are you willing to make both installers? It seems there is help available for both the MSVC and mingw if you get stuck. To repeat, the installer is completely independent of the compiler! So if you fear

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 16.01.2016 um 16:21 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: We need to figure out the MSVC vs. mingw issue before releasing beta. What for an issue? I am using the MSVC2010 build now for many hours writing a scientific paper and to work on the docs. I cannot see a special problem. don't think it

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 18. Januar 2016 01:32:15 MEZ, schrieb "Uwe Stöhr" : >Am 16.01.2016 um 16:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> Uwe, I know you do not have much time but are you willing to make >both >> installers? It seems there is help available for both the MSVC and >mingw >> if you get stuck. >

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

We could also release both, one as the main and the other as backup. JMarc Le 16 janvier 2016 16:21:15 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >We need to figure out the MSVC vs. mingw issue before releasing beta. I >don't think it would be a good idea to release one and then

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:10:06AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.01.2016 um 03:39 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>Give me another day to test but I think that I am basically ready for beta1. > > > >Sounds good to me. > > I tested it a lot today on different PCs and from my point of view it is >

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 04:56:01PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could also release both, one as the main and the other as backup. +1 Uwe, I know you do not have much time but are you willing to make both installers? It seems there is help available for both the MSVC and mingw if you

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 15.01.2016 um 03:39 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Give me another day to test but I think that I am basically ready for beta1. Sounds good to me. I tested it a lot today on different PCs and from my point of view it is stable. So I am ready for beta1. regards Uwe

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:10:45AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.01.2016 um 02:33 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > >I also prepared an installer to test it further:... > > I found some issues that I already fixed. This new installer passes my > tests: >

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 14.01.2016 um 02:33 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I also prepared an installer to test it further:... I found some issues that I already fixed. This new installer passes my tests: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0-test/LyX-220git-14-01-2016-Installer-1.exe Give me another day to test but I think that

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 13.01.2016 um 02:06 schrieb Richard Heck : > > On 01/12/2016 06:32 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows >> compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. >> >> My opinion is that we should release it with

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 14:41:04, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 00:47:57, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:32:11PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > There is a question of whether

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 00:47:57, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:32:11PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows > > compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. > > > >

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:44:27PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 14:41:04, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2016 um 00:47:57, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > > > > > I am not aware of any significant issues with 5.5.1

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 13.01.2016 um 00:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. Hi Scott and Peter, as the consensus is to use 5.5.1 I worked on that. I could compile LyX 2.2git with Qt 5.5.1 and MSVC 2010

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 13.01.2016 um 09:43 schrieb Stephan Witt: What do others think? Under these conditions I’d prefer the use of Qt 5.5.1 over a 5.6.0 too. OK, I updated the batch script to use Qt 5.5.1. Perhaps one relevant point here is that we have often released a new minor version pretty quickly.

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 13. Januar 2016 01:46:35 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:31:59AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am 13. Januar 2016 00:32:11 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >: >> >Dear all, >> > >> >There is a question of whether we should release our

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On 01/12/2016 06:32 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows > compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. > > My opinion is that we should release it with 5.5.1, unless there is a > known, significant issue that affects LyX for

Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Dear all, There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. My opinion is that we should release it with 5.5.1, unless there is a known, significant issue that affects LyX for 5.5.1 *on Windows* and that would be solved with 5.6.0. There

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:32:11PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows > compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. > > My opinion is that we should release it with 5.5.1, unless there is a > known, significant issue that

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

Am 13. Januar 2016 00:32:11 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >Dear all, > >There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows >compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. > It is not very complicated to switch between these two versions. So just let see how the

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:31:59AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 13. Januar 2016 00:32:11 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >Dear all, > > > >There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows > >compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. > > > > It is not very