Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:03:35PM +0200, Torsten Bronger wrote: > Can anybody give ma a concise status of this plan? The plan is still there. Parts of the file format (tables) are already moved to a XML-like format. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secur

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:41:48AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Parts of the file format (tables) are already > moved to a XML-like format. Since we may as well have a flamewar, has anybody considered using XSLT for our output forms, when we have an XML .lyx file ? This would remov

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:11:55PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > Parts of the file format (tables) are already > > moved to a XML-like format. > > Since we may as well have a flamewar, has anybody considered using XSLT > for our output forms, when we have an XML .lyx fil

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 14 October 2002 13:11, John Levon wrote: > > Since we may as well have a flamewar, has anybody considered using XSLT > for our output forms, when we have an XML .lyx file ? This would remove > huge amounts of gook from all the inset files etc. That would replace a

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:59:12PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > That would replace all the latex, linuxdoc, docbook and ascii output > methods. Or am I wrong? Right. > I bring this since one the possible enhancements that we have discussed this > year at Porto was the

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:59:12PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > That would replace all the latex, linuxdoc, docbook and ascii output > methods. Or am I wrong? We would have one 'xml' (or 'write') method instead. So in an ideal world: yes. > I bring this since one the

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:56:02PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > That'd certainly be a massive improvement on the current ugliness, but > it still has the problems of C++ output, like inflexibity and > awkwardness (not to mention lots of extra code). The visitor pattern does not solve any problem,

Re: XML file format status

2002-10-14 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:41:48AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >> Parts of the file format (tables) are already >> moved to a XML-like format. > | Since we may as well have a flamewar, has anybody considered using XSLT | for o

XML file format status

2002-10-13 Thread Torsten Bronger
Halloechen! I've read that the LyX developer take into consideration to use an XML based file format for the documents. Can anybody give ma a concise status of this plan? Or is there already an internet reference? Thank you! Tschoe, Torsten.

XML file format status

2002-10-13 Thread Torsten Bronger
Halloechen! I've read that the LyX developer take into consideration to use an XML based file format for the documents. Can anybody give ma a concise status of this plan? Or is there already an internet reference? Thank you! Tschoe, Torsten.

Re: DocBook XML

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sunday 14 April 2002 15:58, John Levon wrote: Are there major difficulties in providing support for DocBook XML in lyx, or is it a simple matter of providing the export methods for everything ? Something like that. That is why I have proposed 1.3 for it. The LDP lists are discussing

Re: DocBook XML

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sunday 14 April 2002 15:58, John Levon wrote: > Are there major difficulties in providing support for DocBook XML in > lyx, or is it a "simple" matter of providing the export methods for > everything ? Something like that. That is why I have proposed 1.3 for i

DocBook XML

2002-04-14 Thread John Levon
Are there major difficulties in providing support for DocBook XML in lyx, or is it a simple matter of providing the export methods for everything ? The LDP lists are discussing GUI editors again. I'm mainly interested as I'm about to become an LDP author, and I got really sick of pissing

DocBook XML

2002-04-14 Thread John Levon
Are there major difficulties in providing support for DocBook XML in lyx, or is it a "simple" matter of providing the export methods for everything ? The LDP lists are discussing GUI editors again. I'm mainly interested as I'm about to become an LDP author, and I got really sick

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sunday 03 March 2002 23:31, ben wrote: Hello, [...] BG PS : Jose, you looked at db2lyx some time ago; have you improved the configuration process? Have you committed something somewhere? Not yet. I'm expecting for 1.2.0 to be released to insert it in cvs, and from there fix the

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jose == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PS : Jose, you looked at db2lyx some time ago; have you improved the configuration process? Have you committed something somewhere? Jose Not yet. I'm expecting for 1.2.0 to be released to insert it Jose in cvs, and from there fix

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 04 March 2002 09:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jose m4 is not my favorite language, you know? ;-) Feel free to ask me for some help. Thanks, I will do. :-) JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sunday 03 March 2002 23:31, ben wrote: > > Hello, > [...] > BG > > PS : Jose, you looked at db2lyx some time ago; have you improved the > configuration process? Have you committed something somewhere? Not yet. I'm expecting for 1.2.0 to be released to insert it in cvs, and from there fix

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> PS : Jose, you looked at db2lyx some time ago; have you improved >> the configuration process? Have you committed something somewhere? Jose> Not yet. I'm expecting for 1.2.0 to be released to insert it Jose> in cvs, and

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 04 March 2002 09:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Jose> m4 is not my favorite language, you know? ;-) > > Feel free to ask me for some help. Thanks, I will do. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-03 Thread ben
Adam Fowler a écrit : Hello all, [...] Hello, I just tried following the guidelines for adding DocBook XML support via db2lyx and it failed miserably. I finally got the thing to configure, then after restarting and re-configuring lyx and re-starting again, the import/export options were

Re: DocBook XML...

2002-03-03 Thread ben
Adam Fowler a écrit : > Hello all, [...] Hello, > I just tried following the guidelines for adding DocBook XML support via > db2lyx and it failed miserably. I finally got the thing to configure, > then after restarting and re-configuring lyx and re-starting again, the > import

DocBook XML...

2002-02-28 Thread Adam Fowler
Hello all, I'm an administrator on the Tomcat-Book project (see sig) and am looking for an easy way to write DocBook XML documents. Also, certain parts of the DocBook to FO (And thus PDF) XSL stylesheets seem to be broken. I was wondering if you could answer a couple of questions:- I just tried

DocBook XML...

2002-02-28 Thread Adam Fowler
Hello all, I'm an administrator on the Tomcat-Book project (see sig) and am looking for an easy way to write DocBook XML documents. Also, certain parts of the DocBook to FO (And thus PDF) XSL stylesheets seem to be broken. I was wondering if you could answer a couple of questions:- I just tried

Export to XML

2002-02-10 Thread Ayose
Hello. I've seen that LyX can export their documents to DocBook using catalog files. I want to know if I can write my own DTD and use LyX to export .lyx to .myxml Best wishes! -- Ayose Cazorla León Debian GNU/Linux - setepo

Export to XML

2002-02-10 Thread Ayose
Hello. I've seen that LyX can export their documents to DocBook using catalog files. I want to know if I can write my own DTD and use LyX to export .lyx to .myxml Best wishes! -- Ayose Cazorla León Debian GNU/Linux - setepo

Re: XML configuration

2001-08-25 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:57:21AM +0200, ben wrote: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : [...] I will try to see how to use it to detect where the NW's DocBook XSLs are for the db2lyx config (same as the java catalog classes use). Good. I've written this small C program to

Re: XML configuration

2001-08-25 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : I've written this small C program to resolve ids from catalogs. It shows that with xml2/xslt we don't need any java stuff, for the configuration and for the running time. Ok, I have installed libxslt, I'll try it. :-) This is the catresolve program

Re: XML configuration

2001-08-25 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:57:21AM +0200, ben wrote: > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > > > [...] > > > > > I will try to see how to use it to detect where the NW's DocBook XSLs are for the > > > db2lyx config (same as the java catalog classes use). > > > > Good. > > I've written this

Re: XML configuration

2001-08-25 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > > I've written this small C program to resolve ids from catalogs. It shows that with > > xml2/xslt we don't need any java stuff, for the configuration and for the running >time. > > Ok, I have installed libxslt, I'll try it. :-) This is the catresolve

Re: XML configuration

2001-08-04 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : [...] I will try to see how to use it to detect where the NW's DocBook XSLs are for the db2lyx config (same as the java catalog classes use). Good. I've written this small C program to resolve ids from catalogs. It shows that with xml2/xslt we

Re: XML configuration

2001-08-04 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > [...] > > > I will try to see how to use it to detect where the NW's DocBook XSLs are for the > > db2lyx config (same as the java catalog classes use). > > Good. I've written this small C program to resolve ids from catalogs. It shows that with xml2/xslt

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:12:41PM +0200, ben wrote: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to keep java well installed and configured I will switch right now. :-) I've tried xsltproc (linked with

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-30 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:12:41PM +0200, ben wrote: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to keep java well installed and configured I will switch right now. :-)

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-30 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:12:41PM +0200, ben wrote: > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > > > [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to > > > > keep java well installed and configured I will switch right now. :-) > > I've tried xsltproc (linked with

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-30 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:12:41PM +0200, ben wrote: > > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > > > > > [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to > > > > > > keep java well installed and configured I will switch right

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-27 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to keep java well installed and configured I will switch right now. :-) I've tried xsltproc (linked with libxslt-0.14.0 and libxml2-2.4.1) running on the db2lyx stylesheets

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-27 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > [...] Did you try db2lyx with xlst from gnome. If that takes me the trouble to > > keep java well installed and configured I will switch right now. :-) I've tried xsltproc (linked with libxslt-0.14.0 and libxml2-2.4.1) running on the db2lyx stylesheets

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-26 Thread ben
is consistent with a full integrated XML/SGML solution, but practically it seems not so easy to have a good PDF output (non-mature FO tools, difficult to use and customize, no documentation available, etc.). That's why I appreciate the M. Goossens reply that is more pragmatic, since he wants to have things

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-26 Thread ben
ting was Michel Goossens reply. Yes, quite interesting; I think that theorically S. Rahtz is right, since his opinion is consistent with a full integrated XML/SGML solution, but practically it seems not so easy to have a good PDF output (non-mature FO tools, difficult to use and customize, no documentat

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-25 Thread ben
is that this method is 100% xml :-). The script is expected to be in the db2lyx package. I attach the db2lyx doc updated, that explains how to use it Ok, I'll have a look into it. Fine! I will soon release db2lyx that contains the script. Don't hesitate to make any remark. It is still

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-25 Thread ben
at it needs an extra java archive, the advantage is that this method > > is 100% xml :-). The script is expected to be in the db2lyx package. I > > attach the db2lyx doc updated, that explains how to use it > > Ok, I'll have a look into it. Fine! I will soon release db2lyx that con

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-24 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:05:04AM +0200, ben wrote: Hi, Jose, here is the config_xml script updated, that detects the available and needed things by using the catalog mechanisms. The constraint is that it needs an extra java archive, the advantage is that this method is 100% xml

Re: XML configuration

2001-07-24 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:05:04AM +0200, ben wrote: > Hi, > > Jose, here is the config_xml script updated, that detects the available > and needed things by using the catalog mechanisms. The constraint is > that it needs an extra java archive, the advantage is that this metho

XML configuration

2001-07-04 Thread ben
Hi, Jose, here is the config_xml script updated, that detects the available and needed things by using the catalog mechanisms. The constraint is that it needs an extra java archive, the advantage is that this method is 100% xml :-). The script is expected to be in the db2lyx package. I attach

XML configuration

2001-07-04 Thread ben
Hi, Jose, here is the config_xml script updated, that detects the available and needed things by using the catalog mechanisms. The constraint is that it needs an extra java archive, the advantage is that this method is 100% xml :-). The script is expected to be in the db2lyx package. I attach

[nicolas.marsgui@libertysurf.fr: Re: Looking for an XML ouput from Lyx/Latex]

2001-05-26 Thread Baruch Even
Now we only need to add a configure magic and we'll have DocBook XML output. (Obviously, we also need to commit this to CVS :) - Forwarded message from ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 01:34:09 +0200 From: ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: List Lyx users [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

[nicolas.marsgui@libertysurf.fr: Re: Looking for an XML ouput from Lyx/Latex]

2001-05-26 Thread Baruch Even
Now we only need to add a configure magic and we'll have DocBook XML output. (Obviously, we also need to commit this to CVS :) - Forwarded message from ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 01:34:09 +0200 From: ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: List Lyx users <[

XML was RE: lyx-1.1.6fix1 or so

2001-02-06 Thread Roland Krause
Excuse me interrupting :-) You forget one thing in your xml discussion: The importance of exchanging documents coupled with a way to agree on what the contents of these documents actually mean. Take a simple table as an example - the table format already is in XML, so what do you need

Re: XML was RE: lyx-1.1.6fix1 or so

2001-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Roland" == Roland Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roland Excuse me interrupting :-) You forget one thing in your xml Roland discussion: The importance of exchanging documents coupled Roland with a way to agree on what the contents of these documents Roland actually mean. You'

XML was RE: lyx-1.1.6fix1 or so

2001-02-06 Thread Roland Krause
Excuse me interrupting :-) You forget one thing in your xml discussion: The importance of exchanging documents coupled with a way to agree on what the contents of these documents actually mean. Take a simple table as an example - the table format already is in XML, so what do you need

Re: XML was RE: lyx-1.1.6fix1 or so

2001-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Roland" == Roland Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roland> Excuse me interrupting :-) You forget one thing in your xml Roland> discussion: The importance of exchanging documents coupled Roland> with a way to agree on what the contents of these

Re: Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Gaillard Pierre-Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote: | | | Because it is not finished yet. | | | So, what is your advice, should I work with NEW_INSETS defined or | without it ? I prefer to work with NEW_INSETS since the code is nicer, | but I am ready to work

Re: Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Gaillard Pierre-Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote: | > | | > Because it is not finished yet. | > | | So, what is your advice, should I work with NEW_INSETS defined or | without it ? I prefer to work with NEW_INSETS since the code is nicer, | but I am ready to

Re: Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Gaillard Pierre-Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello, | | I have currently reached the point where I can read back XML-Lyx data | (fonts, tables and a few simple things). | But it seems that there are many things I do not understand : | - why is NEW_INSETS not the default ? Because

Re: Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-26 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote: Because it is not finished yet. So, what is your advice, should I work with NEW_INSETS defined or without it ? I prefer to work with NEW_INSETS since the code is nicer, but I am ready to work on older code to make something that works. Also, is there a list

Re: Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Gaillard Pierre-Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | I have currently reached the point where I can read back XML-Lyx data | (fonts, tables and a few simple things). | But it seems that there are many things I do not understand : | - why is NEW_INSETS not the default ? B

Re: Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-26 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote: > > Because it is not finished yet. > So, what is your advice, should I work with NEW_INSETS defined or without it ? I prefer to work with NEW_INSETS since the code is nicer, but I am ready to work on older code to make something that works. Also, is there a

Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-24 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Hello, I have currently reached the point where I can read back XML-Lyx data (fonts, tables and a few simple things). But it seems that there are many things I do not understand : - why is NEW_INSETS not the default ? - when I define NEW_INSETS, I cannot create frames anymore

Current CVS 1.1.6, questions regarding NEW_INSETS and XML

2000-11-24 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Hello, I have currently reached the point where I can read back XML-Lyx data (fonts, tables and a few simple things). But it seems that there are many things I do not understand : - why is NEW_INSETS not the default ? - when I define NEW_INSETS, I cannot create frames anymore

Re: [Steven T. Hatton hattons@bellatlantic.net] XML, SGML, DSSSL, DocBook: Newbie suggestions

2000-11-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:44:48 -0400 From: "Steven T. Hatton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XML, SGML, DSSSL, DocBook: Newbie suggestions To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i6

Re: ["Steven T. Hatton" <hattons@bellatlantic.net>] XML, SGML, DSSSL, DocBook: Newbie suggestions

2000-11-15 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:44:48 -0400 > From: "Steven T. Hatton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: XML, SGML, DSSSL, DocBook: Newbie suggestions > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73

XML output style and other things

2000-10-23 Thread Jarmo . Ahonen
Hi all, I read the discussion regarding XML-output from the email archive. And the following message made me to post: From: Juergen Vigna Subject: RE: Writing to XML : sample output Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:21:52 -0700 On 12-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre

XML output style and other things

2000-10-23 Thread Jarmo . Ahonen
Hi all, I read the discussion regarding XML-output from the email archive. And the following message made me to post: > From: Juergen Vigna >Subject: RE: Writing to XML : sample output >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:21:52 -0700 > On 12-Oct-2

Re: Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-14 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Andre Poenitz wrote: I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this xxxsome option/xxx stuff couldn't that be handled with something like xxx value="some option", as this seems much nicer too me! This is precisely why this output is handled by a small function that I can redefine

Re: Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-14 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this some option > > stuff couldn't that be handled with something like , > > as this seems much nicer too me! > This is precisely why this output is handled by a small function that I can redefine at will. > I think

RE: Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-13 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 12-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote: Hello, Hello Pierre-Olivier! Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX copy. This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make pretty output, so I

Re: Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this xxxsome option/xxx stuff couldn't that be handled with something like xxx value="some option", as this seems much nicer too me! I think Pierre-Olivier got it right in general. It is some kind of religious debate on what goes in xxx.../xxx

RE: Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-13 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 12-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote: > Hello, Hello Pierre-Olivier! > > Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX > copy. > This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses > XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make

Re: Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-13 Thread Andre Poenitz
> I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this some option > stuff couldn't that be handled with something like , > as this seems much nicer too me! I think Pierre-Olivier got it right in general. It is some kind of religious debate on what goes in ... and what goes in "...". The best

Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-12 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Hello, Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX copy. This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make pretty output, so please bear with the poor formatting). I have added XMLWrite methods to classes

Writing to XML : sample output

2000-10-12 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Hello, Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX copy. This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make pretty output, so please bear with the poor formatting). I have added XMLWrite methods to classes

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
ne in Python? | | In Python dictionnaries (maps) are native, so you can write something | like : | xmlOut.startElement("LyxTabular", {"version" : "1.0", "option" : | "xml"}) | Also you don't need to manage your memory and you can put any typ

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Lars would know how to make this code | > | nicer in C++. | > | > How is it done in Python? | > | In Python dictionnaries (maps) are native, so you can write something | like : | xmlOut.startElement("LyxTabular", {"version" : "1.0", "option" : | &quo

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Dekel" == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dekel My patch adds a new feature (the languages file), but also Dekel contains several bug fixes, so it should go in. Here is an Dekel updated version of the patch (I've also moved the encodings Dekel definition to a text file). I'll apply it. I

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> My patch adds a new feature (the languages file), but also Dekel> contains several bug fixes, so it should go in. Here is an Dekel> updated version of the patch (I've also moved the encodings Dekel> definition to a text file). I'll

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 06-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote: Hello, the sources to the xml directory that I am using right now. It's currently VERY SMALL. But when we start using libxml to be more compliant with xml (unicode and so on) then we will have something much bigger to bundle in LyX. But I guess

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: Lars what do you think? Now or after 1.1.6? (I guess after we really should concentrate on removing the bugs we have and not continuing on introducing new stuff otherwise we won't get 1.1.6 out this year! (this applies also to

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-09 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
uld know how to make this code | nicer in C++. How is it done in Python? In Python dictionnaries (maps) are native, so you can write something like : xmlOut.startElement("LyxTabular", {"version" : "1.0", "option" : "xml"}) Also you don't need

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 06-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote: > Hello, the sources to the xml directory that I am using right now. It's > currently VERY SMALL. But when we start using libxml to be more > compliant with xml (unicode and so on) then we will have something much > bigger to bundle i

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Lars what do you think? Now or after 1.1.6? (I guess after we really > should concentrate on removing the bugs we have and not continuing on > introducing new stuff otherwise we won't get 1.1.6 out this year! > (this applies also to

Re: First attempt at using SAX for XML output.

2000-10-09 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
ython the > | code is even nicer, but maybe Lars would know how to make this code > | nicer in C++. > > How is it done in Python? > In Python dictionnaries (maps) are native, so you can write something like : xmlOut.startElement("LyxTabular", {"version" : &qu

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 25-Sep-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote: OK. Good! I'll apply this to the cvs tree. I'll just make one change and that is remove the write_attribute functions from the LyXTabular Class (you didn't send me the patch for tabular.h ;) as they are class-independent. I will probably

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML style

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Gaillard Pierre-Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello, | | I noticed that the change was both backward and forward compatible (I | did not need to change the methods for reading) so I did it. | | I have added 2 local methods to write attributes because using "" | would have been awkward :

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 26-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: It seems that you have not completetly grasped the concept with iostreams. It is perfectly possible to have this: ostream writeAttribute("version", 1); Should I change the function writeAttibute so that it returns a const char *? or should it

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 26-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | It seems that you have not completetly grasped the concept with | iostreams. It is perfectly possible to have this: | | ostream writeAttribute("version", 1); | | | Should I change the function

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 25-Sep-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote: > OK. > Good! I'll apply this to the cvs tree. I'll just make one change and that is remove the write_attribute functions from the LyXTabular Class (you didn't send me the patch for tabular.h ;) as they are class-independent. > I will probably

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML style

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Gaillard Pierre-Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | I noticed that the change was both backward and forward compatible (I | did not need to change the methods for reading) so I did it. | | I have added 2 local methods to write attributes because using "<<" | would have been

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-26 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 26-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > It seems that you have not completetly grasped the concept with > iostreams. It is perfectly possible to have this: > > ostream << writeAttribute("version", 1); > Should I change the function writeAttibute so that it returns a const char *? or

Re: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 26-Sep-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > It seems that you have not completetly grasped the concept with | > iostreams. It is perfectly possible to have this: | > | > ostream << writeAttribute("version", 1); | > | | Should I change the function

RE: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-25 Thread Juergen Vigna
would have been awkward : there would have been so many "\"" all around. Could you please resend this a a unified patch? (diff -u) I believe it would be nice to create a LyxOutputStream replacement for ostream that would contain such methods. This way we would make it easier to

RE: [PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML s

2000-09-25 Thread Juergen Vigna
utes because using "<<" > would have been awkward : there would have been so many "\"" all around. Could you please resend this a a unified patch? (diff -u) > > I believe it would be nice to create a LyxOutputStream replacement for > ostream that would contain such

[PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML style

2000-09-23 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
t; all around. I believe it would be nice to create a LyxOutputStream replacement for ostream that would contain such methods. This way we would make it easier to write XML-like everywhere in LyX. Then we could add methods like : - outputInset(char * buff) etc. And we should choose something similar fo

Re: Insets, changebars, XML

2000-09-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
3) I did not find command-line options to get lyx to print a document and exit without open any X display. How hard would that be to achieve ? Running LyX without X is still difficult. You might want to experiment with something like Xvfb :1 800x600x16 ; lyx -display :1 --export ps

[PATCH] small change to tabular to write attributes in XML style

2000-09-23 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
t;" all around. I believe it would be nice to create a LyxOutputStream replacement for ostream that would contain such methods. This way we would make it easier to write XML-like everywhere in LyX. Then we could add methods like : - outputInset(char * buff) etc. And we should choose somethin

Re: Insets, changebars, XML

2000-09-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
> 3) I did not find command-line options to get lyx to print a document > and exit without open any X display. >How hard would that be to achieve ? Running LyX without X is still difficult. You might want to experiment with something like Xvfb :1 800x600x16 ; lyx -display :1 --export ps

Insets, changebars, XML

2000-09-22 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
nice. Some parts are XML-like but there seems to be at least one mistake : LyXTabular version=1 rows=4 columns=4 should be LyXTabular version="1" rows="4" columns="4" The quotes are MANDATORY in XML, while they aren't in SGML/HTML. Please, could you change this befor

Insets, changebars, XML

2000-09-22 Thread Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
nice. Some parts are XML-like but there seems to be at least one mistake : should be The quotes are MANDATORY in XML, while they aren't in SGML/HTML. Please, could you change this before you release 1.1.6 ? Or may I make a patch and send it to Mr. Vigna ? 3) I did not find command-line options

XML = $$$ ?

2000-04-01 Thread Dekel Tsur
Check http://www.cosource.com/cgi-bin/cos.pl/wish/info/296 (it is a request for XML/docbook editor). I also found on this page two links to XML editors which might worth a look (to still ideas/code from :) http://www.morphon.com/ http://www.conglomerate.org

XML = $$$ ?

2000-04-01 Thread Dekel Tsur
Check http://www.cosource.com/cgi-bin/cos.pl/wish/info/296 (it is a request for XML/docbook editor). I also found on this page two links to XML editors which might worth a look (to still ideas/code from :) http://www.morphon.com/ http://www.conglomerate.org

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >