Re: Math preview failure in UserGuide

2024-07-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 02.07.2024 um 15:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > 2/ can we avoid, when we see that dvipng failed (because there is no > dvi file?), to run these nonsensical epstopdf commands? If dvipng fails this does not necessarily mean that we have no dvi file, I think. Trying legacy

Math preview failure in UserGuide

2024-07-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
When I load UserGuide with previews enabled, I see a lot of errors on console: Warning: dvipng failed to generate images from lyxpreviewjVAhXp.dvi... fallback to legacy method Warning: epstopdf failed on page 1, file lyxpreviewjVAhXp.001 Warning: epstopdf failed on page 2, file lyxpreviewjVAhX

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
; export/doc/ja/Shortcuts_pdf5_systemF > > > export/doc/ja/Formula-numbering_pdf5_systemF > > > export/examples/ja/Modules/Multilingual_Captions_pdf5_systemF > > > export/doc/ja/Tutorial_pdf5_systemF > > > > Same here. > > > > > Perhaps

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-06 Thread Kornel Benko
s/Multilingual_Captions_pdf5_systemF > > export/doc/ja/Tutorial_pdf5_systemF > > Same here. > > > Perhaps my plan should be to wait a couple of weeks and see if the > > failure persists before spending time checking them out. > > +1 > > > Scott

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-05 Thread Kornel Benko
> > See: https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2024-May/050511.html > > > > Udi > > Thanks, Kornel and Udi. Indeed, after a new tlmgr update these tests > pass. Now the following tests fail for me: > > export/examples/ja/Modules/Braille_pdf5_systemF > e

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
t/examples/ja/Welcome_pdf5_systemF export/doc/ja/Shortcuts_pdf5_systemF export/doc/ja/Formula-numbering_pdf5_systemF export/examples/ja/Modules/Multilingual_Captions_pdf5_systemF export/doc/ja/Tutorial_pdf5_systemF Perhaps my plan should be to wait a couple of weeks and see if the failure persists before spending time checking them out. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-04 Thread Udicoudco
On Sat, May 4, 2024, 9:46 PM Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Fri, 3 May 2024 10:31:42 -0400 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > This is likely not a LyX issue so feel free to ignore. > > > > After a tlmgr update, the following tests now fail: > > > > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_dvi3_syste

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-04 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 3 May 2024 10:31:42 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > This is likely not a LyX issue so feel free to ignore. > > After a tlmgr update, the following tests now fail: > > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_dvi3_systemF (Failed) > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf4_

Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
This is likely not a LyX issue so feel free to ignore. After a tlmgr update, the following tests now fail: export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_dvi3_systemF (Failed) export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf4_systemF (Failed) export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf5_system

Failure to compile

2024-02-26 Thread José Matos
I get this at current git: /home/jamatos/lyx/lyx/src/insets/InsetBibtex.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void lyx::InsetBibtex::docbook(lyx::XMLStream&, const lyx::OutputParams&) const’: /home/jamatos/lyx/lyx/src/insets/InsetBibtex.cpp:1223:70: error: ‘class std::set >’ has no member named ‘contai

Re: Compilation failure with c++11 (string_view)

2023-01-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/4/23 21:39, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:30:27AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: With master, I cannot compile in c++11 mode: ../../master/src/mathed/InsetMathDecoration.cpp:191:22: error: ‘string_view’ has not been declared 191 | Attributes(bool o, string_view

Re: Compilation failure with c++11 (string_view)

2023-01-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:30:27AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > With master, I cannot compile in c++11 mode: > > ../../master/src/mathed/InsetMathDecoration.cpp:191:22: error: ‘string_view’ > has not been declared > 191 | Attributes(bool o, string_view entity) > |

Compilation failure with c++11 (string_view)

2023-01-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
With master, I cannot compile in c++11 mode: ../../master/src/mathed/InsetMathDecoration.cpp:191:22: error: ‘string_view’ has not been declared 191 | Attributes(bool o, string_view entity) | ^~~ Indeed, std::string_view is a c++17 thing. JMarc -- lyx-dev

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-05-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 03.02.2022 um 17:06 + schrieb José Abílio Matos: > The changes were minimal and already referred here. > > It was enough to patch two files. The equivalent patch is already > applied to the devel branch. Just to confirm: OpenSuse Tumbleweed pushed gcc 12 on me today. I got

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-02-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:04:29PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.09.09 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Except for that issue does it build with -Werror ? > > > > Scott > > For completeness sake, since this was answered before, it follows here an > example of th

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-02-03 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.04.12 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > Hi, > > we are at the time of year again. :-) > > > The gcc project will release version 12 and in Fedora we are rebuilding all > packages with it. The changes were minimal and already referred here. It was enough to patch

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-02-03 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.09.09 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Except for that issue does it build with -Werror ? > > Scott For completeness sake, since this was answered before, it follows here an example of the output that you can expect when building lyx with gcc-12. In this case I am st

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-31 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.52.56 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > José, what can you tell me about these messages? > annobin: Timeout.cpp: Warning: -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not defined > > We use _GLIBCXX_DEBUG currently. Should we switch to > _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS? I have not found the gcc docs

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 03:07:25PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.09.09 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Except for that issue does it build with -Werror ? > > > > Scott > > As Jean-Marc said the compilation has lots of warnings. Some of them are not > our fault,

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:22:18 + schrieb José Abílio Matos : > On Thursday, 27 January 2022 15.48.33 WET Kornel Benko wrote: > > This one may be needed for 2.4.0 version of lyxfind.cpp too. > > You are right but for some reason I got away without this fix, only the > cstring of the other threa

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 15.48.33 WET Kornel Benko wrote: > This one may be needed for 2.4.0 version of lyxfind.cpp too. You are right but for some reason I got away without this fix, only the cstring of the other thread. (BTW I am puzzled) The reason could be some change in the code between

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:05:34 + schrieb José Abílio Matos : > lyxfind.cpp:55:1: note: 'std::ostream_iterator' is defined in header > ''; did > you forget to '#include '? > >    54 | #include "support/regex.h" > >   +++ |+#include > >    55 | This one may be needed for 2.4.0 version of lyx

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.09.09 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Except for that issue does it build with -Werror ? > > Scott As Jean-Marc said the compilation has lots of warnings. Some of them are not our fault, so I am not sure if it is possible to filter system warnings from - Werror. :-)

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 13.52.56 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This one is a warning, but you cut part of it out. For complete sake the complete diagnose (warnings and errors) is here: make[4]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/lyx-2.3.6.1/src' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 27/01/2022 à 14:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:04:12PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: Hi, we are at the time of year again. :-) The gcc project will release version 12 and in Fedora we are rebuilding all packages with it. There is a failure to build 2.3.x (e.g

Re: Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:04:12PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > Hi, > we are at the time of year again. :-) > > The gcc project will release version 12 and in Fedora we are rebuilding all > packages with it. > > There is a failure to build 2.3.x (e.g

Failure to compile with gcc-12 (2.3.x)

2022-01-27 Thread José Abílio Matos
Hi, we are at the time of year again. :-) The gcc project will release version 12 and in Fedora we are rebuilding all packages with it. There is a failure to build 2.3.x (e.g. on x86-54): https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4412/81984412/build.log 73 | class MatchString

Re: Failure to make dist on Mac

2021-11-28 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 27.11.2021 um 18:36 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 09:47:36AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> 2. Step - make dist >> >> $ (cd lyx-build/LyX-2.3.6dev.build;make dist) >> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make dist-bzip2 >> dist-gzip am__post_remove_distdir='@

Re: Failure to make dist on Mac

2021-11-27 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 09:47:36AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > 2. Step - make dist > > $ (cd lyx-build/LyX-2.3.6dev.build;make dist) > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make dist-bzip2 dist-gzip > am__post_remove_distdir='@:' > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin

Failure to make dist on Mac

2021-11-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Hi all, I’ve tried to make a dist package to test it on one other machine. 1. Step - configure 2. Step - make dist $ (cd lyx-build/LyX-2.3.6dev.build;make dist) /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make dist-bzip2 dist-gzip am__post_remove_distdir='@:' /Applications/Xcode.app/Co

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-18 Thread Yu Jin
Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 21:51 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:01:29 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am Mo., 16. Nov. 2020 um 23:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko >: > > > > > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:16:22 +0100 > > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > ... > > > > >> In master it is called before

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:01:29 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mo., 16. Nov. 2020 um 23:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:16:22 +0100 > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > ... > > > >> In master it is called before the options, > > > >> while in branch it is called after the options specs.

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-17 Thread Yu Jin
Am Mo., 16. Nov. 2020 um 23:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:16:22 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > ... > > >> In master it is called before the options, > > >> while in branch it is called after the options specs. > > >> > > > > > > Yeah, thought so. I tried to move it behind the

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-16 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:16:22 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : ... > >> In master it is called before the options, > >> while in branch it is called after the options specs. > >> > > > > Yeah, thought so. I tried to move it behind the options which end at line > > 250 something. But then I get this error in

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-16 Thread Yu Jin
Am Mo., 16. Nov. 2020 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mo., 16. Nov. 2020 um 21:34 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > >> Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:45:15 +0100 >> schrieb Yu Jin : >> > Ok then, I guess I can try to make a patch, I just don't understand one >> > thing. In 2.3.x when I initially run configu

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-16 Thread Yu Jin
Am Mo., 16. Nov. 2020 um 21:34 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:45:15 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > Ok then, I guess I can try to make a patch, I just don't understand one > > thing. In 2.3.x when I initially run configure, it gives me an error that > > the GNUWIN32_DIR is missin

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-16 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:45:15 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 22:47 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:01:16 +0100 > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko > >: > > > > > > > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 20:16:49 +0100 >

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-16 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 22:47 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:01:16 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko >: > > > > > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 20:16:49 +0100 > > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 20:15 Uhr s

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:01:16 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 20:16:49 +0100 > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 20:15 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > I agree with CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH. I think that GNUWIN32

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 20:16:49 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 20:15 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > > > I agree with CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH. I think that GNUWIN32_DIR was a good > way > > > of handling that (I assume it was that

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 20:16:49 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 20:15 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < > > tcuvel...@lyx.org>: > > > >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 16:59, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> > >>> Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:47:36

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 20:15 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < > tcuvel...@lyx.org>: > >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 16:59, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >>> Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:47:36 +0100 >>> schrieb Yu Jin : >>> >>> > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:34

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < tcuvel...@lyx.org>: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 16:59, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:47:36 +0100 >> schrieb Yu Jin : >> >> > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : >> > >> > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:03

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 16:59, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:47:36 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko < > kor...@lyx.org>: > > > > > >> Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:08:43 +010

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:47:36 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > > > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > >> Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:08:43 +0100 > >> schrieb Yu Jin : > >> > >> > > You have to investigate the cmake module FomdPe

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:34:59 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:08:43 +0100 > > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > > > You have to investigate the cmake module FomdPerl.cmake. > > > > It may help, if you use HINTS, for instance fo

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > >> Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:08:43 +0100 >> schrieb Yu Jin : >> >> > > You have to investigate the cmake module FomdPerl.cmake. >> > > It may help, if you use HINTS, for instance for path

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:08:43 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > > You have to investigate the cmake module FomdPerl.cmake. > > > It may help, if you use HINTS, for instance for path D:\ > > > find_package(Perl REQUIRED PATHS "D:\\

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:08:43 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > > You have to investigate the cmake module FomdPerl.cmake. > > It may help, if you use HINTS, for instance for path D:\ > >         find_package(Perl REQUIRED PATHS "D:\\") > > > > At least, this one works on linux too. > > > Uhm, ist

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
Am So., 15. Nov. 2020 um 12:57 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:32:34 +0100 > schrieb Yu Jin : > > > I can not configure master with CMake currently, it says: > > > > CMake Error at C:/Program > > > Files/CMake/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:146 > >

Re: CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:32:34 +0100 schrieb Yu Jin : > I can not configure master with CMake currently, it says: > > CMake Error at C:/Program > Files/CMake/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:146 > (message): > Could NOT find Perl (missing: PERL_EXECUTABLE) > Call Stack

CMake: cofigure failure (Windows)

2020-11-15 Thread Yu Jin
I can not configure master with CMake currently, it says: CMake Error at C:/Program Files/CMake/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:146 (message): Could NOT find Perl (missing: PERL_EXECUTABLE) Call Stack (most recent call first): C:/Program Files/CMake/share/cmake-3.1

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-09 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 8/9/20 3:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 9 Aug 2020 02:48:03 -0400 > schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> Sorry, I omitted the cmake step. Here's what I did this time: >> >> mkdir build/ # from the LyX directory >> cd build/ >> cmake .. >> make >> sudo make install >> >> This used to work j

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-09 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 9 Aug 2020 02:48:03 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > Sorry, I omitted the cmake step. Here's what I did this time: > > mkdir build/ # from the LyX directory > cd build/ > cmake .. > make > sudo make install > > This used to work just fine but now doesn't. If instead I do: > > cma

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 8/8/20 7:18 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 18:59:43 -0400 > schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> On 8/8/20 3:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 07:31:44AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:33:47 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 18:59:43 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 8/8/20 3:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 07:31:44AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:33:47 -0400 > >> schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> > >>> On Linux: > >>> > >>> ./autogen

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 8/8/20 3:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 07:31:44AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:33:47 -0400 >> schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : >> >>> On Linux: >>> >>> ./autogen.sh >>> mkdir build >>> cd build >>> make -j4 >>> sudo make install >>> >>> CMake Error

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 07:31:44AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:33:47 -0400 > schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > > > On Linux: > > > > ./autogen.sh > > mkdir build > > cd build > > make -j4 > > sudo make install > > > > CMake Error at po/cmake_install.cmake:45 (file): > >  

Re: CMake Install Failure

2020-08-07 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:33:47 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On Linux: > > ./autogen.sh > mkdir build > cd build > make -j4 > sudo make install > > CMake Error at po/cmake_install.cmake:45 (file): >   file INSTALL cannot find "/cvs/lyx/lyx-pristine/build/po/ar.gmo": No such >   file or di

CMake Install Failure

2020-08-07 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On Linux: ./autogen.sh mkdir build cd build make -j4 sudo make install CMake Error at po/cmake_install.cmake:45 (file):   file INSTALL cannot find "/cvs/lyx/lyx-pristine/build/po/ar.gmo": No such   file or directory. The gmo files are not at /cvs/lyx/lyx-pristine/build/po/ but at /cvs/lyx/lyx-pr

Re: Failure to compile with boost 1.69

2019-01-28 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, 27 January 2019 12.52.44 WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This is fixed in 2.3.3dev at 3a123b90. > > JMarc Thank you Jean-Marc. :-) -- José Abílio

Re: Failure to compile with boost 1.69

2019-01-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 26/01/2019 à 23:54, José Abílio Matos a écrit : FWIW: While rebuilding lyx due the to update to boost 1.69 there was an error: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9306/32249306/build.log This is fixed in 2.3.3dev at 3a123b90. JMarc

Failure to compile with boost 1.69

2019-01-26 Thread José Abílio Matos
FWIW: While rebuilding lyx due the to update to boost 1.69 there was an error: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9306/32249306/build.log The culprit seems to be: make[5]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/lyx-2.3.2/src/support' BUILDSTDERR: FileName.cpp:77:64: error: wrong num

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
e, > > - if I cannot open them in LyX > - or if they become corrupted in a hidden way -- subtle changes that are > easily overlooked but may be fatal (missing content due to missing > characters or paragraphs, say). > > * Failure to export to an earlier LyX ver

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
> Warning: Malformed LyX document: Missing layout name on line 5101 > > This will not solve the test failure, but give a better diagnosis and > user-experience: LyX can open the file (it is broken but the parser replaces > the missing layout name with "Standard". > Th

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-17 Thread Guenter Milde
sing content due to missing characters or paragraphs, say). * Failure to export to an earlier LyX version is less severe, especially for really old versions. If everything else fails, I may try via LaTeX. This is reflected in the unconditional commitment to ensure old files work while back-convers

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-17 Thread Guenter Milde
, however, is: > Warning: Malformed LyX document: Can't find layout at line 5048 Yes, there is a *warning* which our ctests turn into a test failure. However, it is only a sign of something going wrong, not the reason. > But I only have your modernCV patch applied. I think you post

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2019 09:15:03 CET schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 14:20:37 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak > : > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:10:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 13:58:41 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > : > > > > On

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 14:20:37 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:10:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 13:58:41 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > : > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:55:43PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > > I don'

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:10:39PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 13:58:41 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak > : > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:55:43PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > I don't remember why we do not test for lyx20x. > > > > It is because of the \origin t

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-16 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 13:58:41 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:55:43PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > I don't remember why we do not test for lyx20x. > > It is because of the \origin tag (which was introduced later). I think > the test scripts rely on this tag

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:55:43PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > I don't remember why we do not test for lyx20x. It is because of the \origin tag (which was introduced later). I think the test scripts rely on this tag existing for dealing with the dependencies when copying to the temporary directo

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-16 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 13:25:02 CET schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:02:54PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > Dear LyX developers, > > > > On 2019-01-15, Guenter Milde wrote: > > > On 2019-01-15, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > It seems the problem with beamer export is

Re: Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:02:54PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear LyX developers, > > On 2019-01-15, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2019-01-15, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > It seems the problem with beamer export is still there: > > > The following tests FAILED: > > 3515 - export/examples/beam

Beamer example back-conversion failure

2019-01-16 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear LyX developers, On 2019-01-15, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2019-01-15, Kornel Benko wrote: > It seems the problem with beamer export is still there: > The following tests FAILED: > 3515 - export/examples/beamer_lyx16 (Failed) > Repeaded "hand-export" suggests there is a never-ending di

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 11:23:31AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Fine for stable, then. Committed. -- Enrico

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-12 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/12/19 6:33 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:46:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:55:42PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>> I'd guess maybe somehow we should store the full path to the 'right' >>> Python interpreter, but I'm far fr

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:46:51PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:55:42PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > I'd guess maybe somehow we should store the full path to the 'right' > > Python interpreter, but I'm far from sure about that. Maybe Enrico can > > help us

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-11 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:30:06PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 1/11/19 12:26 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > I added the missing call to replaceEnvironmentPath() at 472bdf59. > > Let's see whether this solves this kind of issues. > > Ok for stable? > > Yes, thank you. Done. -- Enr

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-11 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
properly. Please reconfigure again if needed."| >>>> | >>>> | >>>> |The problem seems to be the same as described in >>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27196811/lyx-system-reconfiguration-failure. >>>> The solution of Pete P (an

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-11 Thread Enrico Forestieri
> | > > > | > > > |The problem seems to be the same as described in > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27196811/lyx-system-reconfiguration-failure. > > > The solution of Pete P (answer from Nov 30, 2016) worked for me.| > > > | > > > | > >

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-09 Thread Enrico Forestieri
t an error "|The > > system reconfiguration has failed. Default textclass is used but LyX > > may not be able to work properly. Please reconfigure again if needed."| > > | > > | > > |The problem seems to be the same as described in > > https://stackoverflow.com/questi

Re: Reconfiguration Failure on Windows (Python conflict?)

2019-01-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
e able to work properly. Please reconfigure again if needed."| > | > | > |The problem seems to be the same as described in > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27196811/lyx-system-reconfiguration-failure. > The solution of Pete P (answer from Nov 30, 2016) worked for me.| > |

reconfiguration failure

2019-01-08 Thread Sivan Frenkel
he problem seems to be the same as described in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27196811/lyx-system-reconfiguration-failure. The solution of Pete P (answer from Nov 30, 2016) worked for me. Nevertheless, I am reporting it because I did not see it appear on the bug tracker. Best,Sivan

Re: lyx-cvs failure notice

2018-01-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 10.01.2018 um 09:57 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Change your git config, so your commiter name is not uwesto...@web.de but uwesto...@lyx.org . Many thanks Pavel. I did this now. I see that my lyx.org address is already subscribed to lyx-cvs. I see that all mails from lyx-cvs are automatically pus

Re: lyx-cvs failure notice

2018-01-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > What do others do? I mean I don't like to get a mail for every commit since Change your git config, so your commiter name is not uwesto...@web.de but uwesto...@lyx.org . https://help.github.com/articles/setting-your-commit-email-address-in-git/ Pavel

Re: lyx-cvs failure notice

2018-01-09 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2018-01-10, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > My PC broke and I jot a new one. Therefore I had to setup everything new > from scratch. I can commit but now I get for every commit this error > message: > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at thales.memphis.edu. > I'm afraid I wasn't able t

lyx-cvs failure notice

2018-01-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
My PC broke and I jot a new one. Therefore I had to setup everything new from scratch. I can commit but now I get for every commit this error message: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at thales.memphis.edu. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following add

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:11AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Helge Hafting: > > > > > > Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > > > Helge, can you please sti

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:11AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Helge Hafting: > > > > Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > > Helge, can you please still verify whether this fixes your problem? > > > > Yes, the patch fixes my

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Helge Hafting: > > Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > Helge, can you please still verify whether this fixes your problem? > > Yes, the patch fixes my problem. LyX 2.3 now used my format 60 > layout > file with no problems at all

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: Helge, can you please still verify whether this fixes your problem? Yes, the patch fixes my problem. LyX 2.3 now used my format 60 layout file with no problems at all. Helge Hafting

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, den 12.10.2017, 13:47 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > 2017-10-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Helge Hafting: > > If there is a problem in layout2layout, finding it may be useful > > before release? > > > > Yes. Can you try if the attached patch fixes the problem? I have pushed the patch to

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-12 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 um 13:47:09, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > 2017-10-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Helge Hafting: > > > If there is a problem in layout2layout, finding it may be useful before > > release? > > > > Yes. Can you try if the attached patch fixes the problem? > > Jürgen > > > >

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2017-10-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Helge Hafting: > If there is a problem in layout2layout, finding it may be useful before > release? > Yes. Can you try if the attached patch fixes the problem? Jürgen > > > Helge Hafting > > diff --git a/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py b/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py ind

LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-12 Thread Helge Hafting
I compiled lyx 2.3 this week (from git). Today, I opened a file using one of my own layouts, and got a failure to convet the layout file from version 60 to version 64. Assuming the format change is about new features (and not depreciation of old stuff), I simply changed the version number

Re: [patch] Fix lyx-2.3dev build failure in FreeBSD

2017-05-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:21:33PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 04:57:12PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:30:42AM +0200, Shankar Giri Venkita Giri wrote: > > > Thanks Pavel. > > > > > > I'll try to produce a patch for #1. Then both #1 and #

bigfoot failure with 2.2.3

2017-05-24 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Devel-List, I'm not sure if this is related to Biblatex/biber also going through an update cycle the last week or so, but I suspect it's more likely related to Lyx (as that was just released and the errors started afterwards). I have a fairly large, complex file that is failing on xelatex pdf

Re: [LyX/master] Fix compilation failure

2017-05-15 Thread Guillaume MM
Le 15/05/2017 à 10:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : commit 676ce147da9f5873b4177a0cc3dd706005dd0690 Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Mon May 15 10:29:09 2017 +0200 Fix compilation failure --- src/frontends/qt4/qt_helpers.h |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions

Re: [patch] Fix lyx-2.3dev build failure in FreeBSD

2017-03-12 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 04:57:12PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:30:42AM +0200, Shankar Giri Venkita Giri wrote: > > Thanks Pavel. > > > > I'll try to produce a patch for #1. Then both #1 and #2, after > > review, can go into master/branch. I play around in FreeBSD >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >