Re: [LyX/master] Further extend Info insets: * Add time type (time, modtime, fixtime) * Add "name-noext" buffer type (file name w/o extension)

Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2018, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Works nice. The localization is super. Thanks. I am glad to hear Qt localization works for you this time. Jürgen > > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [LyX/master] Further extend Info insets: * Add time type (time, modtime, fixtime) * Add "name-noext" buffer type (file name w/o extension)

Am Dienstag, 7. August 2018 12:19:31 CEST schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller : > commit 7efdf98fc8f0d4d78d4c9db0e268004a95f03a40 > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller > Date: Tue Aug 7 12:14:45 2018 +0200 > > Further extend Info insets: > * Add time type (time, modtime, fixtime)

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 09:25:53AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 06/05/2017 02:02, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Yes please revert. I remember there being some disagreement about the > > file formats patch. I could be wrong though. Please see my questions > > here: > > reverted, those 2

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On 06/05/2017 02:02, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Yes please revert. I remember there being some disagreement about the file formats patch. I could be wrong though. Please see my questions here: reverted, those 2 patches remain available in my tommaso features/2.3.0alpha branch, thanks.

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 12:55:02AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 06/05/2017 00:38, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > rebased and pushed to my feature branch features/2.3.0alpha > > my bad, No problem. > in pushing the release notes for gnuplot scripts, these > two also slipped along, I forgot

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On 06/05/2017 00:38, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: rebased and pushed to my feature branch features/2.3.0alpha my bad, in pushing the release notes for gnuplot scripts, these two also slipped along, I forgot my local master was temporarily "topped-up" ... shall we revert ? or, would you like to

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On 04/05/2017 17:54, Kornel Benko wrote: 2) commit cb7a69b1 Author: Tommaso Cucinotta Date: Wed Oct 19 11:18:10 2016 +0200 Tolerate formats that are not supported by lyx2lyx.> Yes. rebased and pushed to my feature branch features/2.3.0alpha 3) commit bf3cda7b

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ? (was: Re: Gnuplot format & converter script)

Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017 um 01:06:44, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of > which: > I'd really love to have 3)... > about 2) I'm stuck with recurring to Emacs-editing the first line of a .lyx > file every

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:29:49AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 04/05/2017 01:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I'd really love to have 3)... > > > > Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived > > discussion? > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5962 Thanks. I

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ?

On 04/05/2017 01:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote: I'd really love to have 3)... Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived discussion? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5962 thanks, T.

Re: further add-ons for 2.3.0 ? (was: Re: Gnuplot format & converter script)

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of > which: > I'd really love to have 3)... Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived discussion? > about 2) I'm stuck with

further add-ons for 2.3.0 ? (was: Re: Gnuplot format & converter script)

As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of which: I'd really love to have 3)... about 2) I'm stuck with recurring to Emacs-editing the first line of a .lyx file every time I face that issue :-)... just pushed 1), needs to be tried by someone guess 4) might

Re: [LyX/master] Further amendment to 72a488d7

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 03:46:59PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > Le 21/03/2017 à 00:04, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > commit 16d5c49b383841826d1bc563e2d392e12e497ed8 > > Author: Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> > > Date: Mon Mar 20 23:59:16 2017 +0100 >

Re: [LyX/master] Further amendment to 72a488d7

Le 21/03/2017 à 00:04, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : commit 16d5c49b383841826d1bc563e2d392e12e497ed8 Author: Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> Date: Mon Mar 20 23:59:16 2017 +0100 Further amendment to 72a488d7 Rephrase positively the check box for the output of en- and em-

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 18/04/13 05:35, Liviu Andronic wrote: Tommaso should know more about this, but this specific feature is already been discussed in a different thread on lyx-devel. Feel free to join there. Yes, and please have a look at this http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964 plus scan recent messages

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 18/04/13 05:35, Liviu Andronic wrote: > Tommaso should know more about this, but this specific feature is > already been discussed in a different thread on lyx-devel. Feel free > to join there. Yes, and please have a look at this http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964 plus scan recent

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

hello every one. i went through the project details of the task that requires us to make a chat /data sharing panel for lyx.I request someone to put me through to the mentor so that he can give insight on the way the project needs to be implemented .I have a decent knowledge of qt networking and

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Dear Akshay, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Akshay Nautiyal nautiaks...@gmail.com wrote: hello every one. i went through the project details of the task that requires us to make a chat /data sharing panel for lyx.I request someone to put me through to the mentor so that he can give insight

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> >> the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? >> > >> > I'm currently looking for

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

hello every one. i went through the project details of the task that requires us to make a chat /data sharing panel for lyx.I request someone to put me through to the mentor so that he can give insight on the way the project needs to be implemented .I have a decent knowledge of qt networking and

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Dear Akshay, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Akshay Nautiyal wrote: > hello every one. i went through the project details of the task that > requires us to make a chat /data sharing panel for lyx.I request someone to > put me through to the mentor so that he can give

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Liviu Andronic wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac project student at my uni. Excellent. Could you register on Google

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

Hi Pavel, I don't remember if there is a hard deadline for signing up as a mentor. However, it looks like we definitely are going to have many student applications, so we may get applications for all project proposals on the LyX wiki. This means we should have all the mentors who are listed

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Liviu Andronic wrote: > >> the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? > > > > I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac project student at my uni. > > > Excellent. Could you

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

Hi Pavel, I don't remember if there is a hard deadline for signing up as a mentor. However, it looks like we definitely are going to have many student applications, so we may get applications for all project proposals on the LyX wiki. This means we should have all the mentors who are listed

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 11/04/13 21:04, Liviu Andronic wrote: Sounds great. Would you mind registering on Google Melange? Done. I dropped a few of the proposed ideas on http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SummerOfCode2013Ideas#sDevel.SummerOfCode2013Ideas but of course I don't mean to mentor more than 1 project. Also,

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: I dropped a few of the proposed ideas on http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SummerOfCode2013Ideas#sDevel.SummerOfCode2013Ideas but of course I don't mean to mentor more than 1 project. Also, for the interactivity projects,

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 11/04/13 21:04, Liviu Andronic wrote: > Sounds great. Would you mind registering on Google Melange? Done. I dropped a few of the proposed ideas on http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SummerOfCode2013Ideas#sDevel.SummerOfCode2013Ideas but of course I don't mean to mentor more than 1 project. Also,

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > I dropped a few of the proposed ideas on > > > http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SummerOfCode2013Ideas#sDevel.SummerOfCode2013Ideas > > but of course I don't mean to mentor more than 1 project. Also, for the > interactivity

GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

of the functionality of LyX (notably the equation editor) within a reusable QLyX element, that can be used for building other applications, see 5). 5) LyX enhanced CHAT client. May be built as a stand-alone application, rather than having LyX grow with further/too-many functionality. A server would

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: 6) Enhance LyX with remotely interactive writing capabilities, namely allow multiple users to work remotely and interactively on the same document. Solve issues due to conflicting editing, having a way to avoid them from the ground up, or have a GUI to

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: 6) Enhance LyX with remotely interactive writing capabilities, namely allow multiple users to work remotely and interactively on the same document. Solve issues due to conflicting editing,

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Liviu Andronic wrote: the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac project student at my uni. P

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 11/04/13 20:00, Liviu Andronic wrote: This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing to mentor? Those interested please let me know (in private, if you prefer). Regards, I'd be happy to mentor, then, one of the ideas I dropped on the list! However, do you know

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Here's my (8), really my #1: 3-way diff/merge support.

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac project student at my uni. Excellent. Could you register on Google Melange? Thanks, Liviu

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 11/04/13 20:00, Liviu Andronic wrote: This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing to mentor? Those interested please let me know (in private, if you prefer). Regards, I'd be happy to

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

Le 11/04/13 21:27, Nico Williams a écrit : Here's my (8), really my #1: 3-way diff/merge support. Indeed. One could start by fine tuning normal diff to make it more usable. JMarc

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: On 11/04/13 20:00, Liviu Andronic wrote: This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing to mentor? Those

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta tomm...@lyx.org wrote: 3) improve Advanced FR, making it fast, usable, non-failing in corner cases, namely implement what is now there as a proof of concept. This can be done in 2 ways: 3.a) build a find engine within various insets,

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 11/04/13 23:34, stefano franchi wrote: My understanding is that the formal contract will be between Lyx---represented by the admins (Liviu and myself)---and the student(s). There is no formal contract involving the mentors. Good, then there should be no problems for me to mentor.

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing to mentor? 8) Someone goes through the whole sources and make finally some documentation for the key structures with nice pictures for all the metrics, cursor stuff and lfun processing structures etc similar to

GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

s. 4) isolate part of the functionality of LyX (notably the equation editor) within a reusable QLyX element, that can be used for building other applications, see 5). 5) LyX enhanced CHAT client. May be built as a stand-alone application, rather than having LyX grow with further/too-many functional

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > 6) Enhance LyX with remotely interactive writing capabilities, namely allow > multiple >users to work remotely and interactively on the same document. Solve > issues due to >conflicting editing, having a way to avoid them from the ground up, or > have a GUI >

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: >> 6) Enhance LyX with remotely interactive writing capabilities, namely allow >> multiple >>users to work remotely and interactively on the same document. Solve >> issues due to >>conflicting

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Liviu Andronic wrote: > the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac project student at my uni. P

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 11/04/13 20:00, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing to >> mentor? >> > Those interested please let me know (in private, if you prefer). Regards, I'd be happy to mentor, then, one of the ideas I dropped on the list! However, do you

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

Here's my (8), really my #1: 3-way diff/merge support.

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> the question is who else is willing to volunteer for a mentorship? > > I'm currently looking for ledpar/ledmac project student at my uni. > Excellent. Could you register on Google Melange? Thanks, Liviu

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 11/04/13 20:00, Liviu Andronic wrote: >>> This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing >>> to mentor? >>> >> Those interested please let me know (in private, if you prefer). Regards, > >

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

Le 11/04/13 21:27, Nico Williams a écrit : Here's my (8), really my #1: 3-way diff/merge support. Indeed. One could start by fine tuning normal diff to make it more usable. JMarc

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta > wrote: > > On 11/04/13 20:00, Liviu Andronic wrote: > >>> This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be > willing to mentor?

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals (was: Re: Interested in contributing in some project.)

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > 3) improve Advanced F, making it fast, usable, non-failing in corner > cases, namely >implement what is now there as a proof of concept. This can be done in > 2 ways: >3.a) build a find engine within various

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

On 11/04/13 23:34, stefano franchi wrote: > My understanding is that the formal contract will be between > Lyx---represented by the admins (Liviu and myself)---and the student(s). > There is no formal contract involving the mentors. Good, then there should be no problems for me to mentor. >

Re: GSoC (further) ideas proposals

This was actually asked so many times on the list... Would you be willing to mentor? 8) Someone goes through the whole sources and make finally some documentation for the key structures with nice pictures for all the metrics, cursor stuff and lfun processing structures etc similar to

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

ok, thanks for the info. unless Vincent put it in, i will do before beta goes out. I looked at the patch again and in the Qt Docs and I read: {{{ void QClipboard::dataChanged () [signal] This signal is emitted when the clipboard data is changed. On Mac OS X and with Qt version 4.3 or

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: John McCabe-Dansted wrote: the most problematic cases of our copypaste typically happen when middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno whether

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

> ok, thanks for the info. unless Vincent put it in, i will do before > beta goes out. > I looked at the patch again and in the Qt Docs and I read: {{{ void QClipboard::dataChanged () [signal] This signal is emitted when the clipboard data is changed. On Mac OS X and with Qt version 4.3 or

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > > > the most problematic cases of our copy typically happen when > > > middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another > > > applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno

Beta (status update #1, was: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs)

Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, status update #1, the most urgent bug is gone. 1) short resume for things we need before releasing beta - Richard has some pending work on lyx2lyx which will finish some JMarc work. - pending patch from Gregory Jefferis for CT, Vincent might have look on it.

Beta (status update #1, was: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs)

Pavel Sanda wrote: > hi, status update #1, the most urgent bug is gone. > 1) short resume for things we need before releasing beta > - Richard has some pending work on lyx2lyx which will finish some JMarc work. > - pending patch from Gregory Jefferis for CT, Vincent might have look on it.

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

John McCabe-Dansted wrote: the most problematic cases of our copypaste typically happen when middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno whether the patch affects these use cases... its very fragile stuff and

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I've lost track, I'm afraid, of which patch set is which. Here's what I've got. i have flagged this message from JMarc in case it makes the things more clear: I would like to have the newlineisparbreak part, which is important for sweave support

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my opinion before-beta stuff So I missed this post from you but cannot find it in the archives. What are these 4 bugs? thanks and regards Uwe

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my opinion before-beta stuff So I missed this post from you but cannot find it in the archives. What are these 4 bugs? the first point of this thread

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

On 10/17/2010 12:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I've lost track, I'm afraid, of which patch set is which. Here's what I've got. i have flagged this message from JMarc in case it makes the things more clear: I would like to have the

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Richard Heck wrote: Richard, was the last movement in lyx2lyx fixing this or we wait for something else? No, that was JMarc's other request. I'll have a look early next week at this bit. thanks, give me hint once its finished ;) pavel

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

to sum it up, beta is doable at the end of October or on the very beginning of November - now for real. Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation. regards Uwe

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Op 17-10-2010 20:31, Uwe Stöhr schreef: to sum it up, beta is doable at the end of October or on the very beginning of November - now for real. Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation.

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation. basically it is releasing beta which makes closure for new features. its not such big deal if there are bugs in beta1, everybody will

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am 17.10.2010 21:57, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Why would closing trunk for new features _assure_ getting a beta out ? This prevents us from introducing new bugs and regressions. (An example of a newly introduced regression is for example http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6943) At some

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > > the most problematic cases of our copy typically happen when > > middle button is used for getting, or puting stuff from/into another > > applications and when more lyx instances are used. dunno whether > > the patch affects these use cases... its very fragile stuff

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > > I've lost track, I'm afraid, of which patch set is which. Here's what I've > > got. > > i have flagged this message from JMarc in case it makes the things more clear: > > >I would like to have the newlineisparbreak part, which is important for >

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

> i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my opinion > before-beta stuff So I missed this post from you but cannot find it in the archives. What are these 4 bugs? thanks and regards Uwe

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my > opinion > > before-beta stuff > > So I missed this post from you but cannot find it in the archives. What are > these 4 bugs? the first point of this thread

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

On 10/17/2010 12:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: I've lost track, I'm afraid, of which patch set is which. Here's what I've got. i have flagged this message from JMarc in case it makes the things more clear: I would like to have the

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Richard Heck wrote: >> Richard, was the last movement in lyx2lyx fixing this or we wait for >> something else? >> >> > No, that was JMarc's other request. I'll have a look early next week at > this bit. thanks, give me hint once its finished ;) pavel

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

> to sum it up, beta is doable > at the end of October or on the very beginning of November - now for real. Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation. regards Uwe

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Op 17-10-2010 20:31, Uwe Stöhr schreef: > to sum it up, beta is doable > at the end of October or on the very beginning of November - now for real. Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation.

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Nice! But to assure that we achieve this can you close trunk for new > features soon? Trunk should only be open for bugfixes and documentation. basically it is releasing beta which makes closure for new features. its not such big deal if there are bugs in beta1, everybody will

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am 17.10.2010 21:57, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Why would closing trunk for new features _assure_ getting a beta out ? This prevents us from introducing new bugs and regressions. (An example of a newly introduced regression is for example http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6943) At some

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Uwe, I don't like the pressure you make. Sorry. I don't want to pressurize anybody. no problem, asked for feedback and got it :) your impulse closed many bug yesterday so good move anyway. i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my opinion

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, John McCabe-Dansted gma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, a patch for #6597 is sitting at:  http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6597/GuiClipboard.cpp.2.patch I'd like to get this patch in. We discussed the patch and agreed it looked pretty reasonable, but there

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

BH wrote: Would someone with MacOS X like to confirm that this patch doesn't break pasting into LyX from other applications? I've tested the patch on Mac OS 10.6, current svn of LyX trunk, and Qt-4.7. Cutting and pasting both from LyX to other programs and from other programs to LyX works

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: I've tested the patch on Mac OS 10.6, current svn of LyX trunk, and Qt-4.7. Cutting and pasting both from LyX to other programs and from other programs to LyX works fine from what I can see. the most problematic cases of our

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am 14.10.2010 um 17:19 schrieb BH: On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, John McCabe-Dansted gma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, a patch for #6597 is sitting at: http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6597/GuiClipboard.cpp.2.patch I'd like to get this patch in. We discussed the patch and agreed

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Uwe, I don't like the pressure you make. > > Sorry. I don't want to pressurize anybody. no problem, asked for feedback and got it :) your impulse closed many bug yesterday so good move anyway. i tried to be transparent and listed exactly 4 bugs which are in my opinion

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > Hi, a patch for #6597 is sitting at: >  http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6597/GuiClipboard.cpp.2.patch > > I'd like to get this patch in. We discussed the patch and agreed it > looked "pretty reasonable",

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

BH wrote: > > Would someone with MacOS X like to confirm that this patch doesn't > > break pasting into LyX from other applications? > > I've tested the patch on Mac OS 10.6, current svn of LyX trunk, and > Qt-4.7. Cutting and pasting both from LyX to other programs and from > other programs to

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> I've tested the patch on Mac OS 10.6, current svn of LyX trunk, and >> Qt-4.7. Cutting and pasting both from LyX to other programs and from >> other programs to LyX works fine from what I can see. > > the most problematic

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am 14.10.2010 um 17:19 schrieb BH: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, John McCabe-Dansted > wrote: >> Hi, a patch for #6597 is sitting at: >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6597/GuiClipboard.cpp.2.patch >> >> I'd like to get this patch in. We discussed the patch

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: We should and cannot rely on others. Linux distribution and all together only cover less than 10% of the whole PC market. of course we are not anybody's slave. but we can do things in more or less clever way as far as distros is concerned. thats why i want to have bugs solved

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Hi, a patch for #6597 is sitting at: http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6597/GuiClipboard.cpp.2.patch I'd like to get this patch in. We discussed the patch and agreed it looked pretty reasonable, but there was some theoretical discussion as to whether the patch would break cut-and-paste

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am 13.10.2010 um 15:16 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Uwe Stöhr wrote: We should and cannot rely on others. Linux distribution and all together only cover less than 10% of the whole PC market. of course we are not anybody's slave. but we can do things in more or less clever way as far as distros is

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Le 13 oct. 10 à 15:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit : i see. so the question becomes how it is with funding from lyx (JMarc?) and I have no idea about the funding. Lars knows, or maybe José. how many people would be interested in coming in nov/dec. (?) some weekend is possible for me when i know it

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > We should and cannot rely on others. Linux distribution and all together only > cover less than 10% of the whole PC market. of course we are not anybody's slave. but we can do things in more or less clever way as far as distros is concerned. thats why i want to have bugs solved

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Hi, a patch for #6597 is sitting at: http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6597/GuiClipboard.cpp.2.patch I'd like to get this patch in. We discussed the patch and agreed it looked "pretty reasonable", but there was some theoretical discussion as to whether the patch would break

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Am 13.10.2010 um 15:16 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> We should and cannot rely on others. Linux distribution and all together only >> cover less than 10% of the whole PC market. > > of course we are not anybody's slave. but we can do things in more or less > clever way as far as

Re: Some thoughts on further development process towards beta and RCs

Le 13 oct. 10 à 15:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit : i see. so the question becomes how it is with funding from lyx (JMarc?) and I have no idea about the funding. Lars knows, or maybe José. how many people would be interested in coming in nov/dec. (?) some weekend is possible for me when i know it

  1   2   3   4   5   >