I use math a lot in lyx, and it would seem simpler to me to combine
the math toolbar and the math panel into a single, double-decker
toolbar. I find myself using the panel as much as the toolbar, and I
am not sure why they are separated.
One minor problem: When adding math to the end of a file
David Raymond wrote:
One minor problem: When adding math to the end of a file, the
automatic popup of the toolbar (which I like very much) partially
covers the math box until one starts typing math. If the math panel
is also activated, it completely covers the box. The box pops into
view
I use math a lot in lyx, and it would seem simpler to me to combine
the math toolbar and the math panel into a single, double-decker
toolbar. I find myself using the panel as much as the toolbar, and I
am not sure why they are separated.
One minor problem: When adding math to the end of a file
David Raymond wrote:
> One minor problem: When adding math to the end of a file, the
> automatic popup of the toolbar (which I like very much) partially
> covers the math box until one starts typing math. If the math panel
> is also activated, it completely covers the box.
perform like the preprocessor. It doesn't parse
included files, such that QT_VERSION is undefined, and doesn't
understand macros. In the check above, moc chooses randomly one
branch or another. See what I wrote in the thread tear-off math panel.
I think there are two solutions:
1) require
_VERSION_CHECK(4, 2, 0)
> >> +#if QT_VERSION >= QT_VERSION_CHECK(4, 2, 0) && !Q_WS_MACX
> >> #include
> >> #endif
> >
> > Edwin, moc doesn't perform like the preprocessor. It doesn't parse
> > included files, such that QT_VERSION is undefin
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3557
Pretty simple. OK to apply?
Jürgen
P.S.: Edwin, did you notice that the math panel items that use POPUP_MENU (the
first for in the toolbar) to not get unpressed correctly? E.g. activate
the spaces popup and then some the other ones in line. All
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3557
Pretty simple. OK to apply?
OK.
A/
On Sunday 24 June 2007 13:33:54 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pretty simple. OK to apply?
Jürgen
OK.
--
José Abílio
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3557
Pretty simple. OK to apply?
sure
P.S.: Edwin, did you notice that the math panel items that use POPUP_MENU (the
first for in the toolbar) to not get unpressed correctly? E.g. activate
the spaces popup and then some
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3557
Pretty simple. OK to apply?
Jürgen
P.S.: Edwin, did you notice that the math panel items that use POPUP_MENU (the
first for in the toolbar) to not get "unpressed" correctly? E.g. activate
the "spaces" popup and then some the oth
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3557
>
> Pretty simple. OK to apply?
OK.
A/
On Sunday 24 June 2007 13:33:54 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pretty simple. OK to apply?
>
> Jürgen
OK.
--
José Abílio
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3557
Pretty simple. OK to apply?
sure
P.S.: Edwin, did you notice that the math panel items that use POPUP_MENU (the
first for in the toolbar) to not get "unpressed" correctly? E.g. activate
the "spaces"
Alfredo wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
unless someone shouts out i am gonna put this in by noon tomorrow (thu 21)
(shouting) You have my ok :-)
enjoy:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18842
Alfredo wrote:
>> Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> unless someone shouts out i am gonna put this in by noon tomorrow (thu 21)
>
> (shouting) You have my ok :-)
enjoy:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18842
Bennett Helm wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear indication
from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and so people won't
likely try clicking there and discover the tear-off
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear
indication from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and
so people won't
Edwin Leuven wrote:
PING!
just for the record:
unless someone shouts out i am gonna put this in by noon tomorrow (thu 21)
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
PING!
just for the record:
unless someone shouts out i am gonna put this in by noon tomorrow (thu 21)
(shouting) You have my ok :-)
A/
Bennett Helm wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear indication
from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and so people won't
likely try clicking there and discover the tear-off
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear
indication from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and
so people won't
Edwin Leuven wrote:
PING!
just for the record:
unless someone shouts out i am gonna put this in by noon tomorrow (thu 21)
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> PING!
>
> just for the record:
>
> unless someone shouts out i am gonna put this in by noon tomorrow (thu 21)
(shouting) You have my ok :-)
A/
another approach:
here i use the old math panel (the one that works for everyone)
and draw a tear-off widget ourselves
works fine for me
so am seeking volunteers (esp mac and linux)!
any takers? ;-)
Index: src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.cpp
Leuven, E. wrote:
another approach:
here i use the old math panel (the one that works for everyone)
and draw a tear-off widget ourselves
works fine for me
so am seeking volunteers (esp mac and linux)!
any takers? ;-)
Works fine here (linux, qt 4.2.3).
Nice stuff.
A/
On Jun 19, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Leuven, E. wrote:
another approach:
here i use the old math panel (the one that works for everyone)
and draw a tear-off widget ourselves
works fine for me
so am seeking volunteers (esp mac and linux)!
any takers? ;-)
tearoff2.diff
It works on Mac, though
From: news on behalf of Alfredo Braunstein
Works fine here (linux, qt 4.2.3). Nice stuff.
great. so if now some mac people can chime in...
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
don't know what this means
The panel
that pops up has a wider border on the top with an extra horizontal
line, but nothing that looks like a title bar.
sounds like intended behavior: this is the regular popup
On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Leuven, E. wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
don't know what this means
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear
indication from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and so
Bennett Helm wrote:
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear indication
from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and so people won't
likely try clicking there and discover the tear-off feature. Is there
some other way to make this function more apparent?
i've
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:14:18PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
in summary:
- allow panels to tear off using only qt 4.1 functionality
- reported to work on windows, linux and mac
seeking 2 ok's
Edwin, I really appreciate your effort for trying to provide this
feature with Qt 4.1. However,
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Edwin, I really appreciate your effort for trying to provide this
feature with Qt 4.1. However, I think that we should not jump through
hoops if something is hard to obtain with older Qt versions.
It suffices to let the thing compile, even with reduced functionality.
I
in summary:
- allow panels to tear off using only qt 4.1 functionality
- reported to work on windows, linux and mac
seeking 2 ok's
tearoff2.diff
works for me with latest svn, qt4.3.0 and mac os x.
andi
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
the attached patch has the advantage that it also allows tearoff panels
on the mac
i would be very surprised if this one doesn't work for you
You did it! Works like a charm.
A big thank you!
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
You did it! Works like a charm.
:)
A big thank you!
thanks for testing!
...
will collect 2 ok's tomorrow.
josé?
another approach:
here i use the old math panel (the one that works for everyone)
and draw a tear-off widget ourselves
works fine for me
so am seeking volunteers (esp mac and linux)!
any takers? ;-)
Index: src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.cpp
Leuven, E. wrote:
> another approach:
>
> here i use the old math panel (the one that works for everyone)
>
> and draw a tear-off widget ourselves
>
> works fine for me
>
> so am seeking volunteers (esp mac and linux)!
>
> any takers? ;-)
Works fine here (linux, qt 4.2.3).
Nice stuff.
A/
On Jun 19, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Leuven, E. wrote:
another approach:
here i use the old math panel (the one that works for everyone)
and draw a tear-off widget ourselves
works fine for me
so am seeking volunteers (esp mac and linux)!
any takers? ;-)
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious
From: news on behalf of Alfredo Braunstein
> Works fine here (linux, qt 4.2.3). Nice stuff.
great. so if now some mac people can chime in...
Bennett Helm wrote:
> It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
don't know what this means
> The panel
> that pops up has a wider border on the top with an extra horizontal
> line, but nothing that looks like a title bar.
sounds like intended behavior: this is the regular popup
On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Leuven, E. wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
It works on Mac, though it's not obvious that it should.
don't know what this means
What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear
indication from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and so
Bennett Helm wrote:
> What I meant is that when the panel pops up, there's no clear indication
> from its appearance that tearing it off can work, and so people won't
> likely try clicking there and discover the tear-off feature. Is there
> some other way to make this function more apparent?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:14:18PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> in summary:
>
> - allow panels to tear off using only qt 4.1 functionality
>
> - reported to work on windows, linux and mac
>
> seeking 2 ok's
Edwin, I really appreciate your effort for trying to provide this
feature with Qt 4.1.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Edwin, I really appreciate your effort for trying to provide this
feature with Qt 4.1. However, I think that we should not jump through
hoops if something is hard to obtain with older Qt versions.
It suffices to let the thing compile, even with reduced functionality.
I
in summary:
- allow panels to tear off using only qt 4.1 functionality
- reported to work on windows, linux and mac
seeking 2 ok's
works for me with latest svn, qt4.3.0 and mac os x.
andi
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> the attached patch has the advantage that it also allows tearoff panels
> on the mac
>
> i would be very surprised if this one doesn't work for you
You did it! Works like a charm.
A big thank you!
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
You did it! Works like a charm.
:)
A big thank you!
thanks for testing!
...
will collect 2 ok's tomorrow.
josé?
Hi,
I yesterday finally had the time to compile the latest SVN version
and give it a try, unfortunately I had a problem with the math toolbars:
After firing LyX up and turning on the math panel all the pop-up
windows (to select Greek letters for example or to select AMS
symbols
Andreas Neustifter wrote:
I yesterday finally had the time to compile the latest SVN version and
give it a try, unfortunately I had a problem with the math toolbars:
After firing LyX up and turning on the math panel all the pop-up windows
(to select Greek letters for example or to select
Am 18.06.2007 um 11:39 schrieb Leuven, E.:
Andreas Neustifter wrote:
I yesterday finally had the time to compile the latest SVN version
and
give it a try, unfortunately I had a problem with the math toolbars:
After firing LyX up and turning on the math panel all the pop-up
windows
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Yes, they are empty! I am also on Mac. Never use them though, so I never
noticed. This is a show stopper for mac.
well, then the tear-off version needs to be disabled for mac until someone
finds a solution.
would the attached do this?
Index:
It does not even compile:
#if QT_VERSION = 0x040200 !Q_WS_MACX
gives operator '!' has no right operand.
Stefan
Am 18.06.2007 um 12:06 schrieb Leuven, E.:
disabletearoff.diff
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
macros. In the check above, moc chooses randomly one
branch or another. See what I wrote in the thread tear-off math panel.
--
Enrico
, and doesn't
understand macros. In the check above, moc chooses randomly one
branch or another. See what I wrote in the thread tear-off math panel.
I think there are two solutions:
1) require Qt4.2
2) Modify the build system(s) to selectively compile
IconPalette_42.{h,cpp} when Qt = 4.2 is detected
perform like the preprocessor. It doesn't parse
included files, such that QT_VERSION is undefined, and doesn't
understand macros. In the check above, moc chooses randomly one
branch or another. See what I wrote in the thread tear-off math panel.
I think there are two solutions:
1) require
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think there are two solutions:
1) require Qt4.2
While tearing away math panels maybe a nice feature, it is not essential,
So are a lot of features of LyX :-). But I personally won't use that
can people try the attached?
it is another approach to tear off the panels: simply move the panel
this time only using 4.1 stuff ...
Index: src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.cpp
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.cpp (revision
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
can people try the attached?
it is another approach to tear off the panels: simply move the panel
this time only using 4.1 stuff ...
Works for me with both Qt 4.1.4 and 4.2.2. However, the panel disappears
after making a choice,
Leuven, E. wrote:
can people try the attached?
it is another approach to tear off the panels: simply move the panel
this time only using 4.1 stuff ...
Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well: the panel gets a
decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's already
Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well:
the panel gets a decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's already
detached)
, and moreover closes itself when clicking on a symbol.
no! no! no! ;-)
the idea is the following:
detaching makes the panel stay on top so that you
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:14:44PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
It does not even compile:
#if QT_VERSION = 0x040200 !Q_WS_MACX
gives operator '!' has no right operand.
Maybe !defined(Q_WS_MACX) is better.
Andre'
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
+ /* i didn't find a smarter way to find out
+ * whether a move was made by the user
+ * because we also move the widget ourselves
+ * to make it popup in the right position...
+ */
+ switch
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:20:07PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well:
the panel gets a decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's
already detached)
, and moreover closes itself when clicking on a symbol.
no! no! no! ;-)
the idea is
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:14:44PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
It does not even compile:
#if QT_VERSION = 0x040200 !Q_WS_MACX
gives operator '!' has no right operand.
Maybe !defined(Q_WS_MACX) is better.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
+/* i didn't find a smarter way to find out
+ * whether a move was made by the user
+ * because we also move the widget ourselves
+ * to make it popup in the right position...
+ */
+
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:58:32PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
+/* i didn't find a smarter way to find out
+ * whether a move was made by the user
+ * because we also move the widget ourselves
+
Leuven, E. wrote:
Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well:
the panel gets a decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's
already detached)
, and moreover closes itself when clicking on a symbol.
no! no! no! ;-)
the idea is the following:
detaching makes the panel
Hi,
I yesterday finally had the time to compile the latest SVN version
and give it a try, unfortunately I had a problem with the math toolbars:
After firing LyX up and turning on the math panel all the pop-up
windows (to select Greek letters for example or to select AMS
symbols
Andreas Neustifter wrote:
> I yesterday finally had the time to compile the latest SVN version and
> give it a try, unfortunately I had a problem with the math toolbars:
>
> After firing LyX up and turning on the math panel all the pop-up windows
> (to select Greek lett
Am 18.06.2007 um 11:39 schrieb Leuven, E.:
Andreas Neustifter wrote:
I yesterday finally had the time to compile the latest SVN version
and
give it a try, unfortunately I had a problem with the math toolbars:
After firing LyX up and turning on the math panel all the pop-up
windows
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Yes, they are empty! I am also on Mac. Never use them though, so I never
> noticed. This is a show stopper for mac.
well, then the tear-off version needs to be disabled for mac until someone
finds a solution.
would the attached do this?
Index:
It does not even compile:
#if QT_VERSION >= 0x040200 && !Q_WS_MACX
gives "operator '!' has no right operand".
Stefan
Am 18.06.2007 um 12:06 schrieb Leuven, E.:
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
luded files, such that QT_VERSION is undefined, and doesn't
understand macros. In the check above, moc chooses randomly one
branch or another. See what I wrote in the thread "tear-off math panel".
--
Enrico
at QT_VERSION is undefined, and doesn't
understand macros. In the check above, moc chooses randomly one
branch or another. See what I wrote in the thread "tear-off math panel".
I think there are two solutions:
1) require Qt4.2
2) Modify the build system(s) to selectively compile
IconPalette_4
_VERSION_CHECK(4, 2, 0)
> >> +#if QT_VERSION >= QT_VERSION_CHECK(4, 2, 0) && !Q_WS_MACX
> >> #include
> >> #endif
> >
> > Edwin, moc doesn't perform like the preprocessor. It doesn't parse
> > included files, such that QT_VERSION is undefin
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think there are two solutions:
1) require Qt4.2
While tearing away math panels maybe a nice feature, it is not essential,
So are a lot of features of LyX :-). But I personally won't use that
can people try the attached?
it is another approach to tear off the panels: simply move the panel
this time only using 4.1 stuff ...
Index: src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.cpp
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/IconPalette.cpp (revision
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> can people try the attached?
>
> it is another approach to tear off the panels: simply move the panel
>
> this time only using 4.1 stuff ...
Works for me with both Qt 4.1.4 and 4.2.2. However, the panel disappears
after making a
Leuven, E. wrote:
> can people try the attached?
>
> it is another approach to tear off the panels: simply move the panel
>
> this time only using 4.1 stuff ...
Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well: the panel gets a
decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's already
> Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well:
> the panel gets a decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's already
> detached)
>, and moreover closes itself when clicking on a symbol.
no! no! no! ;-)
the idea is the following:
"detaching" makes the panel stay on top so that
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:14:44PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> It does not even compile:
>
> #if QT_VERSION >= 0x040200 && !Q_WS_MACX
>
> gives "operator '!' has no right operand".
Maybe !defined(Q_WS_MACX) is better.
Andre'
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> + /* i didn't find a smarter way to find out
> + * whether a move was made by the user
> + * because we also move the widget ourselves
> + * to make it popup in the right position...
> + */
> + switch
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:20:07PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> > Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well:
> > the panel gets a decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's
> > already detached)
> >, and moreover closes itself when clicking on a symbol.
>
> no! no! no! ;-)
>
>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:14:44PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> > It does not even compile:
> >
> > #if QT_VERSION >= 0x040200 && !Q_WS_MACX
> >
> > gives "operator '!' has no right operand".
>
> Maybe !defined(Q_WS_MACX)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
>> +/* i didn't find a smarter way to find out
>> + * whether a move was made by the user
>> + * because we also move the widget ourselves
>> + * to make it popup in the right position...
>> + */
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:58:32PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> >> +/* i didn't find a smarter way to find out
> >> + * whether a move was made by the user
> >> + * because we also move the widget
Leuven, E. wrote:
>> Tried it (qt 4.2.3 here). Doesn't seem to work well:
>> the panel gets a decoration like normal windows when opened (so it's
>> already detached)
>>, and moreover closes itself when clicking on a symbol.
>
> no! no! no! ;-)
>
> the idea is the following:
>
> "detaching"
Leuven, E. wrote:
guys, any concencus on these icons?
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Leuven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/26/07 23:59
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: math panel icons
i stumbled on this site with math icons:
http://us.metamath.org/symbols/symbols.html
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:18:44PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
guys, any concencus on these icons?
Edwin, as nobody has complained, I would say put them in.
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Edwin, as nobody has complained, I would say put them in.
i was thinking the same thing...
josé?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 12:21:13 Leuven, E. wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Edwin, as nobody has complained, I would say put them in.
i was thinking the same thing...
josé?
Yes, no problem. :-)
--
José Abílio
Leuven, E. wrote:
guys, any concencus on these icons?
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Leuven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/26/07 23:59
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: math panel icons
i stumbled on this site with math icons:
http://us.metamath.org/symbols/symbols.html
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:18:44PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> guys, any concencus on these icons?
Edwin, as nobody has complained, I would say put them in.
--
Enrico
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Edwin, as nobody has complained, I would say put them in.
i was thinking the same thing...
josé?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 12:21:13 Leuven, E. wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Edwin, as nobody has complained, I would say put them in.
>
> i was thinking the same thing...
>
> josé?
Yes, no problem. :-)
--
José Abílio
guys, any concencus on these icons?
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Leuven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/26/07 23:59
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: math panel icons
i stumbled on this site with math icons:
http://us.metamath.org/symbols/symbols.html
the license
guys, any concencus on these icons?
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Leuven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/26/07 23:59
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: math panel icons
i stumbled on this site with math icons:
http://us.metamath.org/symbols/symbols.html
the license
Edwin Leuven wrote:
i stumbled on this site with math icons:
http://us.metamath.org/symbols/symbols.html
Nice.
the license of these files is the creative commons public domain dedication
they are uniform in style (unlike lyx's)
i have added some of my own, converted the png's to xpm's,
On Friday 27 April 2007 7:16:04 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I am in favour of putting them in but I think we should keep the orginal
format: no conversion to png. We must switch to png, really.
AFAIU this is a remnant of xforms inability to deal with png, right?
Any modern toolkit supports
1 - 100 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
