Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus not be such a beast? Angus, feel free

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus not

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 1:43 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus The only outstanding reLyX patch for 1.3.x is the 'recognise m Angus columns in tabulars' one. Have you formed an opinion about it Angus yet? Since nobody else complained about it, I think you can apply it. What kind of plans do you have

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus The only outstanding reLyX patch for 1.3.x is the 'recognise m Angus columns in tabulars' one. Have you formed an opinion about it Angus yet? Since nobody else complained about it, I think you can apply

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus To slow down ;-) But I do intend to keep going with the bug Angus fixes and support for things like insetgraphics is probably Angus easy too. That's what I was about to suggest. Angus I've decided that I will not bother upgrading the

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus> well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus> not be such a beast?

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be > Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss > Angus> well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 1:43 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> The only outstanding reLyX patch for 1.3.x is the 'recognise m Angus> columns in tabulars' one. Have you formed an opinion about it Angus> yet? Since nobody else complained about it, I think you can apply it. What kind of plans

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> The only outstanding reLyX patch for 1.3.x is the 'recognise m > Angus> columns in tabulars' one. Have you formed an opinion about it > Angus> yet? > > Since nobody else complained about it, I

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> To slow down ;-) But I do intend to keep going with the bug Angus> fixes and support for things like insetgraphics is probably Angus> easy too. That's what I was about to suggest. Angus> I've decided that I will not bother

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast? I think, \ss simply is

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast? I

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:58:11AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus not be such a beast? I tested the

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus not be such a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andre On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre wrote: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus not

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:58:11AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:32:33PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Maybe I should read the code to understand your problem. I certainly see \ss as proper glyph in my xforms-LyX and I enter it as Compose-s-s and it is stored as a single char in the .lyx. No. You see a glyph that you entered as

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread José Matos
On Monday 10 February 2003 16:28, Andre Poenitz wrote: So why doesn't reLyX convert \ss{} in that single char I see in my .lyx? Because the user can be using an encoding that is not latin1 or latin15? Andre' -- José Abílio

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:32:33PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Maybe I should read the code to understand your problem. I certainly see \ss as proper glyph in my xforms-LyX and I enter it as Compose-s-s and it is stored as a single char in the .lyx. No. You see a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus My patch attempts to turn LaTeX '\ss{}' into something Angus recognised by LyX. I supposed that all that would be needed was Angus to tell reLyX that '\ss{}' is a valid LaTeX macro and that it Angus should export this macro as a LyX

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:43:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: So, you are proposing a LyX file format who's contents depend on the locale in which it is read. Doesn't sound too clever to me. What if I wanted to read your document with a locale set to non-latin1? I don't know. What happens

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:43:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: I think \ss{} should be stored as a single char without any accent inset or other wrapper. So, you are proposing a LyX file format who's contents depend on the locale in which it is read. Doesn't sound too clever to me. What

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as > insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a limitation > of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast? I think, \ss simply

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as >> insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a >> limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:58:11AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as > >> insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus> well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss Angus> not be such a beast? I

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be > Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss > Angus> well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss > Angus> not be

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss Angus> well. Is

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all > be Angus> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss > Angus> well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:58:11AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Andre Poenitz wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:01:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> >> This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be >> >> output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:32:33PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Maybe I should read the code to understand your problem. I certainly > > see \ss as proper glyph in my xforms-LyX and I enter it as > > Compose-s-s and it is stored as a single char in the .lyx. > > No. You see a glyph that you

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread José Matos
On Monday 10 February 2003 16:28, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > So why doesn't reLyX convert \ss{} in that single char I see in my .lyx? Because the user can be using an encoding that is not latin1 or latin15? > Andre' -- José Abílio

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:32:33PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> > Maybe I should read the code to understand your problem. I >> > certainly see \ss as proper glyph in my xforms-LyX and I enter it >> > as Compose-s-s and it is stored as a single char in the .lyx. >> >>

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> My patch attempts to turn LaTeX '\ss{}' into something Angus> recognised by LyX. I supposed that all that would be needed was Angus> to tell reLyX that '\ss{}' is a valid LaTeX macro and that it Angus> should export this macro as a

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:43:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > So, you are proposing a LyX file format who's contents depend on the > locale in which it is read. Doesn't sound too clever to me. What if I > wanted to read your document with a locale set to non-latin1? I don't know. What

Re: reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:43:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I think \ss{} should be stored as a single char without any accent > > inset or other wrapper. > > So, you are proposing a LyX file format who's contents depend on the > locale in which it is read. Doesn't sound too clever to me.

reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Leeming
This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast? -- Angus Index: lib/ChangeLog

reLyX support for \i, \j, \l, \L, \ss

2003-02-07 Thread Angus Leeming
This patch enables reLyX to recognise that these should all be output as insetLatexAccents. LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a limitation of insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast? -- Angus Index: lib/ChangeLog