On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:42:09 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John == John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John That was 1.3.5cvs... Maybe I shouldn't report this 'cause it is
John not garanteed to work.
Err, things in the stable 1.3.x branch are supposed
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:42:09 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "John" == John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> That was 1.3.5cvs... Maybe I shouldn't report this 'cause it is
> John> not garante
Hello people.
When loading a lyx-document, I see:
LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
on the terminal. Though I cannot detect any later problems, I'd like to
eliminate this. What is the cause?
(I've checked the .lyx file - no word 'normal' is present. Is this a
template problem or
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:33:24 -0300
John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello people.
When loading a lyx-document, I see:
LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
on the terminal. Though I cannot detect any later problems, I'd like to
eliminate this. What is the cause?
Ok... I'm
Hello people.
When loading a lyx-document, I see:
LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
on the terminal. Though I cannot detect any later problems, I'd like to
eliminate this. What is the cause?
(I've checked the .lyx file - no word 'normal' is present. Is this a
template problem or
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:33:24 -0300
John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello people.
When loading a lyx-document, I see:
LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
on the terminal. Though I cannot detect any later problems, I'd like to
eliminate this. What is the cause?
Ok... I'm
Hello people.
When loading a lyx-document, I see:
LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
on the terminal. Though I cannot detect any later problems, I'd like to
eliminate this. What is the cause?
(I've checked the .lyx file - no word 'normal' is present. Is this a
template problem or
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:33:24 -0300
John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello people.
>
> When loading a lyx-document, I see:
>
> LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
>
> on the terminal. Though I cannot detect any later problems, I'd like to
> eli
Hello people.
For the first time, I was trying out the index feature of LyX. I've marked
tens of works for inclusion, and added the index at the end of the doc.
No index appeared. I exported Latex, and ran Latex and makeindex manually.
That worked fine, and now the index also appeared from LyX
Hello people.
For the first time, I was trying out the index feature of LyX. I've marked
tens of works for inclusion, and added the index at the end of the doc.
No index appeared. I exported Latex, and ran Latex and makeindex manually.
That worked fine, and now the index also appeared from LyX
Hello people.
For the first time, I was trying out the index feature of LyX. I've marked
tens of works for inclusion, and added the index at the end of the doc.
No index appeared. I exported Latex, and ran Latex and makeindex manually.
That worked fine, and now the index also appeared from LyX
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:10:35 -0600 (MDT)
PAGRATIS KOSTAS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a powerbook titanium with gs 8.1.4 and LyX 1.3.4 and eps inline
figures cannot be displayed. It gives me a box of where the image is
supposed to be and shows the following error: error loading to loadable
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:10:35 -0600 (MDT)
PAGRATIS KOSTAS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a powerbook titanium with gs 8.1.4 and LyX 1.3.4 and eps inline
figures cannot be displayed. It gives me a box of where the image is
supposed to be and shows the following error: error loading to loadable
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:10:35 -0600 (MDT)
PAGRATIS KOSTAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a powerbook titanium with gs 8.1.4 and LyX 1.3.4 and eps inline
> figures cannot be displayed. It gives me a box of where the image is
> supposed to be and shows the following error: error loading to
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:52:52 +0200
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confirmed. My results are:
- display in lyx is ok if the bounding box is 0 0 454 454 and the
%%DocumentMedia: line removed, regardless of the clip setting.
- ps output is likewise
- pdf output is likewise if dvipdfm
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:52:52 +0200
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confirmed. My results are:
- display in lyx is ok if the bounding box is 0 0 454 454 and the
%%DocumentMedia: line removed, regardless of the clip setting.
- ps output is likewise
- pdf output is likewise if dvipdfm
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:52:52 +0200
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Confirmed. My results are:
>
> - display in lyx is ok if the bounding box is 0 0 454 454 and the
> %%DocumentMedia: line removed, regardless of the clip setting.
> - ps output is likewise
> - pdf output is likewise if
Hi all
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4 - I don't know if that is the motive
for the errors, but here they are:
In file included from ../../boost/boost/format.hpp:50,
from ../../src/BoostFormat.h:9,
from formulamacro.C:43:
Hi all.
I've spent a good while experimenting with EPS figures. I wrote a program
using GnomePrint, which produces PS files. These seem to include a few
commands which do not allow using the bounding box. I've noticed many
threads on the EPS theme, but have not been able to find a solution
Hi all
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4 - I don't know if that is the motive
for the errors, but here they are:
In file included from ../../boost/boost/format.hpp:50,
from ../../src/BoostFormat.h:9,
from formulamacro.C:43:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:31:34 +0200
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not ignore the bounding box. Your bounding box does include all
the whitespace. If you change
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 596 842
to
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 454 454
Hello Georg
Thanks for the reply. It doesn't work
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:23:07 +0100
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4
Hi, John.
A bunch of fixes have been checked into the 1.3.x branch so that it will
compile with gcc 3.4. (Why are you compiling with this compiler
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:40:43 +0100
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is g++ 3.4 ABI compatible with g++ 3.3? If so, then all would be well,
but this has not been the case in the past.
A quick search showed comments they are not compatible.
Thanks,
John
Hi all
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4 - I don't know if that is the motive
for the errors, but here they are:
In file included from ../../boost/boost/format.hpp:50,
from ../../src/BoostFormat.h:9,
from formulamacro.C:43:
Hi all.
I've spent a good while experimenting with EPS figures. I wrote a program
using GnomePrint, which produces PS files. These seem to include a few
commands which do not allow using the bounding box. I've noticed many
threads on the EPS theme, but have not been able to find a solution
Hi all
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4 - I don't know if that is the motive
for the errors, but here they are:
In file included from ../../boost/boost/format.hpp:50,
from ../../src/BoostFormat.h:9,
from formulamacro.C:43:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:31:34 +0200
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not ignore the bounding box. Your bounding box does include all
the whitespace. If you change
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 596 842
to
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 454 454
Hello Georg
Thanks for the reply. It doesn't work
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:23:07 +0100
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4
Hi, John.
A bunch of fixes have been checked into the 1.3.x branch so that it will
compile with gcc 3.4. (Why are you compiling with this compiler
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:40:43 +0100
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is g++ 3.4 ABI compatible with g++ 3.3? If so, then all would be well,
but this has not been the case in the past.
A quick search showed comments they are not compatible.
Thanks,
John
Hi all
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4 - I don't know if that is the motive
for the errors, but here they are:
In file included from ../../boost/boost/format.hpp:50,
from ../../src/BoostFormat.h:9,
from formulamacro.C:43:
Hi all.
I've spent a good while experimenting with EPS figures. I wrote a program
using GnomePrint, which produces PS files. These seem to include a few
commands which do not allow using the bounding box. I've noticed many
threads on the EPS theme, but have not been able to find a solution
Hi all
I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4 - I don't know if that is the motive
for the errors, but here they are:
In file included from ../../boost/boost/format.hpp:50,
from ../../src/BoostFormat.h:9,
from formulamacro.C:43:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:31:34 +0200
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It does not ignore the bounding box. Your bounding box does include all
> the whitespace. If you change
>
> %%BoundingBox: 0 0 596 842
> to
> %%BoundingBox: 0 0 454 454
Hello Georg
Thanks for the reply. It doesn't
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:23:07 +0100
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Coppens wrote:
> > I tried to compile 1.3.4 with gcc 3.4
>
> Hi, John.
>
> A bunch of fixes have been checked into the 1.3.x branch so that it will
> compile with g
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:40:43 +0100
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is g++ 3.4 ABI compatible with g++ 3.3? If so, then all would be well,
> but this has not been the case in the past.
>
A quick search showed comments they are not compatible.
Thanks,
John
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:01:41 +0200
Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I try to print a pnm or eps figure in lyx at the highest reasonable
solution with a 600*600dpi printer, it shows only a fourth of the figure
on the printpage. It is as if one pixel is printed in 4 pixels. gif
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:01:41 +0200
Wolfgang Engelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I try to print a pnm or eps figure in lyx at the highest reasonable
solution with a 600*600dpi printer, it shows only a fourth of the figure
on the printpage. It is as if one pixel is printed in 4 pixels. gif
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:01:41 +0200
Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I try to print a pnm or eps figure in lyx at the highest reasonable
> solution with a 600*600dpi printer, it shows only a fourth of the figure
> on the printpage. It is as if one pixel is printed in 4 pixels.
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Beny Spira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I understand that the document _did_ show correctly at your home,
but was modified when you sent it back to your work. Is that correct?
Or was it already missing characters when you worked on it at home?
If
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Beny Spira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I understand that the document _did_ show correctly at your home,
but was modified when you sent it back to your work. Is that correct?
Or was it already missing characters when you worked on it at home?
If
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Beny Spira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > So, I understand that the document _did_ show correctly at your home,
> > but was modified when you sent it back to your work. Is that correct?
> > Or was it already missing characters when you worked on it at
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:55:24 +0200
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reuben Thomas wrote:
First, in most programs, Text is a file type listed on the save
dialog, not under Export, which tends to be reserved for
non-editable formats such as PDF. This is certainly the case in most
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:49:21 -0300
Beny Spira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you post a (short) example lyx document that works on your home
machine and not on your work one.
Sure, but first i would like to make something clear. The original
document was written at work (with the ABTN2
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Beny Spira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I understand that the document _did_ show correctly at your home,
but was modified when you sent it back to your work. Is that correct?
Or was it already missing characters when you worked on it at home?
If
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:55:24 +0200
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reuben Thomas wrote:
First, in most programs, Text is a file type listed on the save
dialog, not under Export, which tends to be reserved for
non-editable formats such as PDF. This is certainly the case in most
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:49:21 -0300
Beny Spira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you post a (short) example lyx document that works on your home
machine and not on your work one.
Sure, but first i would like to make something clear. The original
document was written at work (with the ABTN2
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Beny Spira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I understand that the document _did_ show correctly at your home,
but was modified when you sent it back to your work. Is that correct?
Or was it already missing characters when you worked on it at home?
If
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:55:24 +0200
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > First, in most programs, "Text" is a file type listed on the save
> > dialog, not under "Export", which tends to be reserved for
> > non-editable formats such as PDF. This is certainly the case
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:49:21 -0300
Beny Spira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could you post a (short) example lyx document that works on your home
> > machine and not on your work one.
>
>
> Sure, but first i would like to make something clear. The original
> document was written at work (with
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:49:06 -0300
Beny Spira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > So, I understand that the document _did_ show correctly at your home,
> > but was modified when you sent it back to your work. Is that correct?
> > Or was it already missing characters when you worked on it at
Hello all.
Maybe it's so easy it isn't mentioned, but I could not find a reference
anywhere. And sorry - it is only indirectly LyX related:
Is there any tool to cut a large size PS image into several panels, print
them separately (then glue them together)? Preferably with optional
reference
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:13:14 -0300
John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any tool to cut a large size PS image into several panels,
print them separately (then glue them together)? Preferably with
optional reference marks added?
Answering my own mail... I had been looking
Hello all.
Maybe it's so easy it isn't mentioned, but I could not find a reference
anywhere. And sorry - it is only indirectly LyX related:
Is there any tool to cut a large size PS image into several panels, print
them separately (then glue them together)? Preferably with optional
reference
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:13:14 -0300
John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any tool to cut a large size PS image into several panels,
print them separately (then glue them together)? Preferably with
optional reference marks added?
Answering my own mail... I had been looking
Hello all.
Maybe it's so easy it isn't mentioned, but I could not find a reference
anywhere. And sorry - it is only indirectly LyX related:
Is there any tool to cut a large size PS image into several panels, print
them separately (then glue them together)? Preferably with optional
reference
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:13:14 -0300
John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any tool to cut a large size PS image into several panels,
> print them separately (then glue them together)? Preferably with
> optional reference marks added?
Answering my own mail... I h
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:58:26 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
Hi all...
After some guesswork and a huge amount of luck, I found that the
font problem could be solved inverting the font dirs in
/usr/X11/lib/X11/XftConfig... Go figure
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:36:19 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
What route are you taking to generate the pdf? Are you going
* lyx-latex-(latex)-dvi-(dvips)-ps-(ps2pdf)-pdf
which requires that the png image is converted to eps format, or
are you using
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:58:26 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
Hi all...
After some guesswork and a huge amount of luck, I found that the
font problem could be solved inverting the font dirs in
/usr/X11/lib/X11/XftConfig... Go figure
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:36:19 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
What route are you taking to generate the pdf? Are you going
* lyx-latex-(latex)-dvi-(dvips)-ps-(ps2pdf)-pdf
which requires that the png image is converted to eps format, or
are you using
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:58:26 +
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Coppens wrote:
>
> > Hi all...
> >
> > After some guesswork and a huge amount of luck, I found that the
> > font problem could be solved inverting the font dirs in
> &g
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:36:19 +
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Coppens wrote:
> >> What route are you taking to generate the pdf? Are you going
> >> * lyx->latex-(latex)->dvi-(dvips)->ps-(ps2pdf)->pdf
> >> which requir
Hi all
It started quite innocently with a broken font, but I somehow got into a
mess... I think these are different issues:
1) Opening a document I get: LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
I have no idea where this comes from. The document has only PNGs in it -
nothing else (no fonts).
to PDF (latex). I've saved
this PNG if someone is interested. I rotated the image, saved it again,
and all was well.
John
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:37:39 -0300
John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
It started quite innocently with a broken font, but I somehow got into a
mess... I think
Hi all
It started quite innocently with a broken font, but I somehow got into a
mess... I think these are different issues:
1) Opening a document I get: LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
I have no idea where this comes from. The document has only PNGs in it -
nothing else (no fonts).
to PDF (latex). I've saved
this PNG if someone is interested. I rotated the image, saved it again,
and all was well.
John
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:37:39 -0300
John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
It started quite innocently with a broken font, but I somehow got into a
mess... I think
Hi all
It started quite innocently with a broken font, but I somehow got into a
mess... I think these are different issues:
1) Opening a document I get: LyXFont::setLyXShape: Unknown shape `normal'
I have no idea where this comes from. The document has only PNGs in it -
nothing else (no fonts).
to PDF (latex). I've saved
this PNG if someone is interested. I rotated the image, saved it again,
and all was well.
John
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:37:39 -0300
John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> It started quite innocently with a broken font, but I somehow got int
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:06:57 +0100
Olivier Ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
May I suggest going to 1.3 or 1.3.1? I had the same problem, and it
disappeared when upgrading.
I did a lot on investigating on the why, but never found a solution
why 1.2.3. didn't do
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:06:57 +0100
Olivier Ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coppens wrote:
May I suggest going to 1.3 or 1.3.1? I had the same problem, and it
disappeared when upgrading.
I did a lot on investigating on the why, but never found a solution
why 1.2.3. didn't do
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:06:57 +0100
Olivier Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Coppens wrote:
>
> >
> > May I suggest going to 1.3 or 1.3.1? I had the same problem, and it
> > disappeared when upgrading.
> >
> > I did a lot on investigating on t
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:54:16 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Hi all,
I have just upgraded my Mandrake 9.0 to a 9.1 yesterday, and have
noticed that in LyX menus and popups (and Enlightenment by the way),
the accentuated (french locale) characters
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:54:16 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Hi all,
I have just upgraded my Mandrake 9.0 to a 9.1 yesterday, and have
noticed that in LyX menus and popups (and Enlightenment by the way),
the accentuated (french locale) characters
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:54:16 +
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olivier Ripoll wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just upgraded my Mandrake 9.0 to a 9.1 yesterday, and have
> > noticed that in LyX menus and popups (and Enlightenment by the way),
> > the accentuated (french
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:48:42 +0100
Janine C.Buorditez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I heard this was possible, but have no idea how.
Could anybody point me in the right direction?
Thanks.
--janine
You have to recompile. As far as I've seen, no packages are available
compiled with
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:48:42 +0100
Janine C.Buorditez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I heard this was possible, but have no idea how.
Could anybody point me in the right direction?
Thanks.
--janine
You have to recompile. As far as I've seen, no packages are available
compiled with
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:48:42 +0100
Janine C.Buorditez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I heard this was possible, but have no idea how.
>
> Could anybody point me in the right direction?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --janine
You have to recompile. As far as I've seen, no packages are available
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:50:46 +0100
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:39:15AM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
I'm not sure I'm capable of modifying the code and getting it to work.
But maybe it wouldn't be bad to warn people of the state it's in,
instead of giving
I'm proud to say that my freshly compiled LyX doesn't have that
problem. That's Qt2. Maybe the problem is with Qt3?
Just trying to identify...
John
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:50:46 +0100
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:39:15AM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
I'm not sure I'm capable of modifying the code and getting it to work.
But maybe it wouldn't be bad to warn people of the state it's in,
instead of giving
I'm proud to say that my freshly compiled LyX doesn't have that
problem. That's Qt2. Maybe the problem is with Qt3?
Just trying to identify...
John
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:50:46 +0100
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:39:15AM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
> > I'm not sure I'm capable of modifying the code and getting it to work.
> > But maybe it wouldn't be bad to warn people of the state
I'm proud to say that my freshly compiled LyX doesn't have that
problem. That's Qt2. Maybe the problem is with Qt3?
Just trying to identify...
John
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 03:34:27 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand how this can happen. Are you sure that you do a
make distclean after fiddling with the configuration ?
That was it. I only did a 'make clean'. I did mention that before somewhere,
I believe.
I
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:38:52 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:25:03PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
I appreciate your help, John. I've also learned a few things from the other
comments. LyX is now working fine with Qt2. Later, I'll have a go compiling
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 03:34:27 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand how this can happen. Are you sure that you do a
make distclean after fiddling with the configuration ?
That was it. I only did a 'make clean'. I did mention that before somewhere,
I believe.
I
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:38:52 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:25:03PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
I appreciate your help, John. I've also learned a few things from the other
comments. LyX is now working fine with Qt2. Later, I'll have a go compiling
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 03:34:27 +
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not understand how this can happen. Are you sure that you do a
> "make distclean" after fiddling with the configuration ?
That was it. I only did a 'make clean'. I did mention that before somewhere,
I believe.
I
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:38:52 +
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:25:03PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
>
> > I appreciate your help, John. I've also learned a few things from the other
> > comments. LyX is now working fine with Qt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:02:45AM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
I'm trying to compile LyX CVS with the --with-frontend=qt option.
Configure goes quite well, but compilation fails at the end with a
long list of messages about missing references.
Now, configure
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:23:31 -0500
Paul Tremblay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea what is going on here?
Thanks
Paul
Did you try to re-install Acrobat on the Windows machine? Even if you
can open other pdfs, the executable or libraries can be damaged or
incomplete.
John
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:33:30 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:09:20PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
QTDIR is pointing to the 3.0.4 version, which is logical, because its
the latest. But LyX internally has quite a few hardwired links to the
qt2 directories
Hi John.
I didn't notice the first time around this reply was turned down
by the lyx mail server (happened before):
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:17:38 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:11:57PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
Where are the Qt 3.0.4 headers on your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:02:45AM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
I'm trying to compile LyX CVS with the --with-frontend=qt option.
Configure goes quite well, but compilation fails at the end with a
long list of messages about missing references.
Now, configure
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:23:31 -0500
Paul Tremblay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea what is going on here?
Thanks
Paul
Did you try to re-install Acrobat on the Windows machine? Even if you
can open other pdfs, the executable or libraries can be damaged or
incomplete.
John
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:33:30 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:09:20PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
QTDIR is pointing to the 3.0.4 version, which is logical, because its
the latest. But LyX internally has quite a few hardwired links to the
qt2 directories
Hi John.
I didn't notice the first time around this reply was turned down
by the lyx mail server (happened before):
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:17:38 +
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:11:57PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
Where are the Qt 3.0.4 headers on your
000
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:02:45AM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to compile LyX CVS with the --with-frontend=qt option.
> > Configure goes quite well, but compilation fails at the end with a
> > long lis
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:23:31 -0500
Paul Tremblay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea what is going on here?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
Did you try to re-install Acrobat on the Windows machine? Even if you
can open other pdfs, the executable or libraries can be damaged or
incomplete.
John
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:33:30 +
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:09:20PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
>
> > QTDIR is pointing to the 3.0.4 version, which is logical, because its
> > the latest. But LyX internally has quite a few hardwi
301 - 400 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
