On Saturday 10 September 2005 17:56, Stephen P. Harris wrote:
> Well, I installed LyX with yum install lyx on FC4.
> But that installs 1.3.5 by default.
No it does not. :-)
The version available in extras is 1.3.6. There was some miscommunication
previously and that was why only 1.3.5 was
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
> > 2. yum install lyx.
>
> Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
> Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
> that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex
On Sunday 11 September 2005 05:38, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> My instructions didn't include enough information about this. You need
> Python 2.4. The subprocess module was introduced in that. I can
> rewrite the code using pre-2.4 tools if this causes enough people
> problems.
If you are proposing
On Saturday 03 September 2005 19:04, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
PD. I've read in list about the accents troubles in spanish language.
Currenlty, my desktop system is a SuSE 9.3 and the Lyx package provided by
SuSE/Novell have the same problem. I supose the problem is Qt library is
compiled
On Saturday 03 September 2005 19:04, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
PD. I've read in list about the accents troubles in spanish language.
Currenlty, my desktop system is a SuSE 9.3 and the Lyx package provided by
SuSE/Novell have the same problem. I supose the problem is Qt library is
compiled
On Saturday 03 September 2005 19:04, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> PD. I've read in list about the accents troubles in spanish language.
> Currenlty, my desktop system is a SuSE 9.3 and the Lyx package provided by
> SuSE/Novell have the same problem. I supose the problem is Qt library is
>
On Friday 02 September 2005 23:33, Jane McKean wrote:
To accomplish this as part of the build, I need a command line
equivalent (and it could be multiple command lines) for each of these
methods.
- The command-line equivalent for View PDF (dvipdfm)
- The command-line equivalent for View
On Friday 02 September 2005 23:33, Jane McKean wrote:
To accomplish this as part of the build, I need a command line
equivalent (and it could be multiple command lines) for each of these
methods.
- The command-line equivalent for View PDF (dvipdfm)
- The command-line equivalent for View
On Friday 02 September 2005 23:33, Jane McKean wrote:
> To accomplish this as part of the build, I need a command line
> equivalent (and it could be multiple command lines) for each of these
> methods.
>
> - The command-line equivalent for View > PDF (dvipdfm)
>
> - The command-line equivalent for
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 02:55, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
This appears to be fixed by placing standard text in between the
section header and the following Comments
Is that document? Required? It doesn't seem like it should break if a
Section header is followed by comments.
That is
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 02:55, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
This appears to be fixed by placing standard text in between the
section header and the following Comments
Is that document? Required? It doesn't seem like it should break if a
Section header is followed by comments.
That is
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 02:55, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> This appears to be fixed by placing "standard" text in between the
> section header and the following Comments
>
> Is that document? Required? It doesn't seem like it should break if a
> Section header is followed by comments.
That is
On Monday 22 August 2005 16:19, Paul Johnson wrote:
If you want the FC4 rpms, I can provide. Just say where to upload
FWIW lyx is in Fedora Extras, so if you have net access to install lyx
should be as simple as:
# yum install lyx
All the dependencies will be taken in account. That as
On Monday 22 August 2005 16:19, Paul Johnson wrote:
If you want the FC4 rpms, I can provide. Just say where to upload
FWIW lyx is in Fedora Extras, so if you have net access to install lyx
should be as simple as:
# yum install lyx
All the dependencies will be taken in account. That as
On Monday 22 August 2005 16:19, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> If you want the FC4 rpms, I can provide. Just say where to upload
FWIW lyx is in Fedora Extras, so if you have net access to install lyx
should be as simple as:
# yum install lyx
All the dependencies will be taken in account. That as
On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:12, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote:
Using UTF-8 doesn't improve things. I imported the text into Lyx (1.3.4/5)
as ASCII as paragraphs. How can I export the text so that the accented
characters appear properly in the final DVI?
You could use recode, as it understands
On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:12, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote:
Using UTF-8 doesn't improve things. I imported the text into Lyx (1.3.4/5)
as ASCII as paragraphs. How can I export the text so that the accented
characters appear properly in the final DVI?
You could use recode, as it understands
On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:12, José Luis Gómez Dans wrote:
> Using UTF-8 doesn't improve things. I imported the text into Lyx (1.3.4/5)
> as ASCII as paragraphs. How can I export the text so that the accented
> characters appear properly in the final DVI?
You could use recode, as it
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:05, Rich Shepard wrote:
This tool translates the header from .jpg to either .ps or .eps; I used
the latter. It keeps the compressed image data the same, just wraps the
header so it looks and feels like an encapsulated PostScript file. LyX
happily accepted it
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:51, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jose' Matos wrote:
Just as it happens with convert from ImageMagick and:
I thought that 'convert' would do it, but I could not find the list of
supported formats in the man page.
That is true, one problems
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:05, Rich Shepard wrote:
This tool translates the header from .jpg to either .ps or .eps; I used
the latter. It keeps the compressed image data the same, just wraps the
header so it looks and feels like an encapsulated PostScript file. LyX
happily accepted it
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:51, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jose' Matos wrote:
Just as it happens with convert from ImageMagick and:
I thought that 'convert' would do it, but I could not find the list of
supported formats in the man page.
That is true, one problems
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:05, Rich Shepard wrote:
> This tool translates the header from .jpg to either .ps or .eps; I used
> the latter. It keeps the compressed image data the same, just wraps the
> header so it looks and feels like an encapsulated PostScript file. LyX
> happily accepted
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:51, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Just as it happens with convert from ImageMagick and:
>
>I thought that 'convert' would do it, but I could not find the list of
> supported formats in the man page.
On Monday 08 August 2005 18:08, Derek Lamb wrote:
What do you get with the following command?
$ rpm -qa tetex*
tetex-afm-3.0-4
tetex-xdvi-3.0-4
tetex-fonts-3.0-4
tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-47
tetex-latex-3.0-4
tetex-3.0-4
tetex-dvips-3.0-4
This is OK. The next obvious task to try is to use
On Monday 08 August 2005 18:08, Derek Lamb wrote:
What do you get with the following command?
$ rpm -qa tetex*
tetex-afm-3.0-4
tetex-xdvi-3.0-4
tetex-fonts-3.0-4
tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-47
tetex-latex-3.0-4
tetex-3.0-4
tetex-dvips-3.0-4
This is OK. The next obvious task to try is to use
On Monday 08 August 2005 18:08, Derek Lamb wrote:
> > What do you get with the following command?
> >
> >$ rpm -qa "tetex*"
>
> tetex-afm-3.0-4
> tetex-xdvi-3.0-4
> tetex-fonts-3.0-4
> tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-47
> tetex-latex-3.0-4
> tetex-3.0-4
> tetex-dvips-3.0-4
This is OK. The next obvious task
On Monday 08 August 2005 16:53, Derek Lamb wrote:
So, I now have to agree with Paul that there is a problem with my LaTeX,
not with LyX. So this should get classified as a Fedora bug (big
surprise) rather than a LyX problem.
What do you get with the following command?
$ rpm -qa tetex*
On Monday 08 August 2005 16:53, Derek Lamb wrote:
So, I now have to agree with Paul that there is a problem with my LaTeX,
not with LyX. So this should get classified as a Fedora bug (big
surprise) rather than a LyX problem.
What do you get with the following command?
$ rpm -qa tetex*
On Monday 08 August 2005 16:53, Derek Lamb wrote:
> So, I now have to agree with Paul that there is a problem with my LaTeX,
> not with LyX. So this should get classified as a Fedora bug (big
> surprise) rather than a LyX problem.
What do you get with the following command?
$ rpm -qa
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One can add any
On Friday 22 July 2005 15:53, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
I copied the 1.4 *.py files in my 1.3.6 installation.
I get one minor error:
Warning: Malformed lyx file: Missing '\paperpackage'.
You can ignore this warning. I committed a patch to cvs removing it since
it is wrong.
Conversion
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
to you. One can add any
On Friday 22 July 2005 15:53, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
I copied the 1.4 *.py files in my 1.3.6 installation.
I get one minor error:
Warning: Malformed lyx file: Missing '\paperpackage'.
You can ignore this warning. I committed a patch to cvs removing it since
it is wrong.
Conversion
On Friday 22 July 2005 09:33, Axel Rasche wrote:
> What I like about LyX is that standard work (typing, structure, basic
> figures/floats, bibtex/references) is done by an easy editor (although
> not completely wysiwyG). At the same time the whole LaTeX world is open
> to you. One can add any
On Friday 22 July 2005 15:53, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
> I copied the 1.4 *.py files in my 1.3.6 installation.
> I get one minor error:
> Warning: Malformed lyx file: Missing '\paperpackage'.
You can ignore this warning. I committed a patch to cvs removing it since
it is wrong.
>
On Thursday 21 July 2005 14:12, Georg Baum wrote:
I don't know what happens exactly, but I don't care either because LyX
1.4 and tex2lyx are not supposed to read old .layout files (at least
until now - maybe we need a lay2layout converter).
This can be done easily. I will see what I can do.
On Thursday 21 July 2005 14:12, Georg Baum wrote:
I don't know what happens exactly, but I don't care either because LyX
1.4 and tex2lyx are not supposed to read old .layout files (at least
until now - maybe we need a lay2layout converter).
This can be done easily. I will see what I can do.
On Thursday 21 July 2005 14:12, Georg Baum wrote:
> I don't know what happens exactly, but I don't care either because LyX
> 1.4 and tex2lyx are not supposed to read old .layout files (at least
> until now - maybe we need a lay2layout converter).
This can be done easily. I will see what I can
On Monday 18 July 2005 19:46, Stefano Franchi wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to import a LaTeX file into LyX but I cannot convince LyX
to read the (many) accents in the original .tex file. Has anyone
encountered this problem before? I searched the list archives but
couldn't find anything.
On Monday 18 July 2005 19:46, Stefano Franchi wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to import a LaTeX file into LyX but I cannot convince LyX
to read the (many) accents in the original .tex file. Has anyone
encountered this problem before? I searched the list archives but
couldn't find anything.
On Monday 18 July 2005 19:46, Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to import a LaTeX file into LyX but I cannot convince LyX
> to read the (many) accents in the original .tex file. Has anyone
> encountered this problem before? I searched the list archives but
> couldn't find
On Sunday 03 July 2005 02:02, Elver Loho wrote:
Hi!
...
How can I get LyX to treat these chars properly on my laptop?
This bug will be fixed in 1.3.6 that will be released soon.
elver
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 03 July 2005 02:02, Elver Loho wrote:
Hi!
...
How can I get LyX to treat these chars properly on my laptop?
This bug will be fixed in 1.3.6 that will be released soon.
elver
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 03 July 2005 02:02, Elver Loho wrote:
> Hi!
>
...
> How can I get LyX to treat these chars properly on my laptop?
This bug will be fixed in 1.3.6 that will be released soon.
> elver
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 16 June 2005 07:33, Kimmo Elo wrote:
Hi,
since the KDE 3.4-3.4.1 update I have a problem with special characters
with Lyx 1.3.5 in SuSE 9.2. Before that I could easily write e.g. or
in Lyx, now there appear u and 'e instead. I have to use Lyx-code
(\{u}) to get this chars
On Thursday 16 June 2005 07:33, Kimmo Elo wrote:
Hi,
since the KDE 3.4-3.4.1 update I have a problem with special characters
with Lyx 1.3.5 in SuSE 9.2. Before that I could easily write e.g. or
in Lyx, now there appear u and 'e instead. I have to use Lyx-code
(\{u}) to get this chars
On Thursday 16 June 2005 07:33, Kimmo Elo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the KDE 3.4->3.4.1 update I have a problem with special characters
> with Lyx 1.3.5 in SuSE 9.2. Before that I could easily write e.g. ü or
> é in Lyx, now there appear "u and 'e instead. I have to use Lyx-code
> (\"{u}) to get this
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 20:45, Bennett Helm wrote:
Rich -
I agree with Bennett remarks. :-)
For example, from that file it's clear that \block requires using ERT
to put the block title in curly braces: {Title}.
Actually here only the brackets need to be in ERT. :-)
...
LyX should
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 20:45, Bennett Helm wrote:
Rich -
I agree with Bennett remarks. :-)
For example, from that file it's clear that \block requires using ERT
to put the block title in curly braces: {Title}.
Actually here only the brackets need to be in ERT. :-)
...
LyX should
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 20:45, Bennett Helm wrote:
>
> Rich -
I agree with Bennett remarks. :-)
> For example, from that file it's clear that \block requires using ERT
> to put the block title in curly braces: {Title}.
Actually here only the brackets need to be in ERT. :-)
...
LyX
On Friday 20 May 2005 10:04, G. Milde wrote:
To be a real package you need the __init__.py file also, I didn't saw
it there in your list. :-)
I can assure you that __init__.py is there.
I don't have any doubt about it, or else python would not work the way you
described. :-) I was
On Friday 20 May 2005 10:04, G. Milde wrote:
To be a real package you need the __init__.py file also, I didn't saw
it there in your list. :-)
I can assure you that __init__.py is there.
I don't have any doubt about it, or else python would not work the way you
described. :-) I was
On Friday 20 May 2005 10:04, G. Milde wrote:
> >
> > To be a real package you need the __init__.py file also, I didn't saw
> > it there in your list. :-)
>
> I can assure you that __init__.py is there.
I don't have any doubt about it, or else python would not work the way you
described. :-)
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
dump the python version packed
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the later
On Friday 13 May 2005 13:39, G. Milde wrote:
On 11.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
(This would need some more thoughts about the right place of
the files and incorporating with the python path.)
That was also my thought. :-)
One idea would be to transform LyX into a package instead
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
dump the python version packed
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the later
On Friday 13 May 2005 13:39, G. Milde wrote:
On 11.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
(This would need some more thoughts about the right place of
the files and incorporating with the python path.)
That was also my thought. :-)
One idea would be to transform LyX into a package instead
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:49, Luis Rivera wrote:
> In fact, the newer lyx2lyx packed with tex2lyx (binary) is incompatible
> with the python version packed by Ruurd: the newest version requires
> python 2.3 at least, and Ruurd packed python 2.2. So Angus was right:
> dump the python version
On Thursday 19 May 2005 10:02, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think that Luis is finding that Ruurd's stripped down python package
> doesn't include some of the modules that lyx2lyx makes use of.
That is fair. I was not sure if this was a problem with Ruurd's port or
with lyx2lyx itself, if the
On Friday 13 May 2005 13:39, G. Milde wrote:
> On 11.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > > (This would need some more thoughts about the right place of
> > > the files and incorporating with the python path.)
> >
> > That was also my thought. :-)
> &g
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:48, Luis Rivera wrote:
OK. So it might be that LyX is using some encoding at file storage level
and something else at display level.
No, that is not the problem I am reporting. The problem is the input not
the display. The lyx file format is encoding agnostic for
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:48, Luis Rivera wrote:
OK. So it might be that LyX is using some encoding at file storage level
and something else at display level.
No, that is not the problem I am reporting. The problem is the input not
the display. The lyx file format is encoding agnostic for
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:48, Luis Rivera wrote:
> OK. So it might be that LyX is using some encoding at file storage level
> and something else at display level.
No, that is not the problem I am reporting. The problem is the input not
the display. The lyx file format is encoding agnostic
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:59, Angus Leeming wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
The problem is that tracking changes in 1.3.x is not (officially)
maintained. Some problems have been fixed in the 1.4 development
version, some problems are still there.
Incidentally, Jürgen, will a
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:12, G. Milde wrote:
On 10.05.05, Serge Winitzki wrote:
...
the idea seems simple enough for a quick Python script, based on the
Python client class for the LyX server (which I found on the LyX wiki
site).
I am glad to hear that the python LyX package finds a
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that we should warn 1.3.x
change tracking users that the lyx2lyx doesn't revert the change
tracking from 1.4.x to 1.3.x since officially that support doesn't
exists. I don't know where to put this warning...
Why not make it an
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 00:36, Marcelo Acuf1a wrote:
1) When I invoke Find Replace I can't to type accented characters or
equals to the used for lyx in the text. This characters look equals but
are differents in code.
True, if you are using a utf-8 locale the characters inserted inside
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:59, Angus Leeming wrote:
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
The problem is that tracking changes in 1.3.x is not (officially)
maintained. Some problems have been fixed in the 1.4 development
version, some problems are still there.
Incidentally, Jürgen, will a
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:12, G. Milde wrote:
On 10.05.05, Serge Winitzki wrote:
...
the idea seems simple enough for a quick Python script, based on the
Python client class for the LyX server (which I found on the LyX wiki
site).
I am glad to hear that the python LyX package finds a
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that we should warn 1.3.x
change tracking users that the lyx2lyx doesn't revert the change
tracking from 1.4.x to 1.3.x since officially that support doesn't
exists. I don't know where to put this warning...
Why not make it an
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 00:36, Marcelo Acuf1a wrote:
1) When I invoke Find Replace I can't to type accented characters or
equals to the used for lyx in the text. This characters look equals but
are differents in code.
True, if you are using a utf-8 locale the characters inserted inside
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:59, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > The problem is that tracking changes in 1.3.x is not (officially)
> > maintained. Some problems have been fixed in the 1.4 development
> > version, some problems are still there.
>
> Incidentally, Jürgen, will a
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:12, G. Milde wrote:
> On 10.05.05, Serge Winitzki wrote:
...
> > the idea seems simple enough for a quick Python script, based on the
> > Python client class for the LyX server (which I found on the LyX wiki
> > site).
>
> I am glad to hear that the python LyX package
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think that we should warn 1.3.x
>
> > change tracking users that the lyx2lyx doesn't revert the change
> > tracking from 1.4.x to 1.3.x since officially that support doesn't
> > exists. I don't know where to put this warning...
>
> Why not
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 00:36, Marcelo AcuÃf1a wrote:
> 1) When I invoke Find & Replace I can't to type accented characters or Ã
> equals to the used for lyx in the text. This characters look equals but
> are differents in code.
True, if you are using a utf-8 locale the characters inserted
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 01:59, John O'Gorman wrote:
Hi
I've found the file lyxformat.dtd from the mail archives.
No reference to Part, Chapter, Section, Subsection, etc.
Are these to be instances of para?
Probably not instances but attributes. At least such as it is now, that
dtd AFAIR
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 01:59, John O'Gorman wrote:
Hi
I've found the file lyxformat.dtd from the mail archives.
No reference to Part, Chapter, Section, Subsection, etc.
Are these to be instances of para?
Probably not instances but attributes. At least such as it is now, that
dtd AFAIR
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 01:59, John O'Gorman wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've found the file lyxformat.dtd from the mail archives.
>
> No reference to Part, Chapter, Section, Subsection, etc.
>
> Are these to be instances of para?
Probably not instances but attributes. At least such as it is now, that
On Monday 02 May 2005 22:57, John O'Gorman wrote:
[...]
Is there a schema (or DTD) available for the XML that will be the new
source format of LyX?
There was some discussion about this in the developers list around last
October, use the mail archives to read the discussion as well as the main
On Monday 02 May 2005 22:57, John O'Gorman wrote:
[...]
Is there a schema (or DTD) available for the XML that will be the new
source format of LyX?
There was some discussion about this in the developers list around last
October, use the mail archives to read the discussion as well as the main
On Monday 02 May 2005 22:57, John O'Gorman wrote:
[...]
> Is there a schema (or DTD) available for the XML that will be the new
> source format of LyX?
There was some discussion about this in the developers list around last
October, use the mail archives to read the discussion as well as the
On Thursday 28 April 2005 18:14, Pupeno wrote:
Hello,
I'm moving from Docbook to Lyx, so I'm converting a documentation I
already wrote in Docbook to LyX to see how it works. What I find is that
Docbook tags seems to be much richier tha LyX's or that I can't find
LyX's 'tags'. These are the
On Thursday 28 April 2005 18:14, Pupeno wrote:
Hello,
I'm moving from Docbook to Lyx, so I'm converting a documentation I
already wrote in Docbook to LyX to see how it works. What I find is that
Docbook tags seems to be much richier tha LyX's or that I can't find
LyX's 'tags'. These are the
On Thursday 28 April 2005 18:14, Pupeno wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm moving from Docbook to Lyx, so I'm converting a documentation I
> already wrote in Docbook to LyX to see how it works. What I find is that
> Docbook tags seems to be much richier tha LyX's or that I can't find
> LyX's 'tags'. These are
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 17:15, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I installed xcolor 2.00 and pgf-0.65 and latex-beamer-3.01 from
latex-beamer.sf.net.
I have done this recently and I have used as example the one that comes
with beamer, I found it in the documentation for the package.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 17:15, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I installed xcolor 2.00 and pgf-0.65 and latex-beamer-3.01 from
latex-beamer.sf.net.
I have done this recently and I have used as example the one that comes
with beamer, I found it in the documentation for the package.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 17:15, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I installed xcolor 2.00 and pgf-0.65 and latex-beamer-3.01 from
> latex-beamer.sf.net.
I have done this recently and I have used as example the one that comes
with beamer, I found it in the documentation for the package.
--
José Abílio
On Friday 22 April 2005 14:36, Mark Carroll wrote:
True. (-: It'd be nice if the structure were documented somewhere, though
- whenever I want to write software that generates LyX files, I have to
reverse-engineer the format by inspecting various LyX files. At least, if
I'm using software
On Friday 22 April 2005 14:36, Mark Carroll wrote:
True. (-: It'd be nice if the structure were documented somewhere, though
- whenever I want to write software that generates LyX files, I have to
reverse-engineer the format by inspecting various LyX files. At least, if
I'm using software
On Friday 22 April 2005 14:36, Mark Carroll wrote:
>
> True. (-: It'd be nice if the structure were documented somewhere, though
> - whenever I want to write software that generates LyX files, I have to
> reverse-engineer the format by inspecting various LyX files. At least, if
> I'm using
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 15:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that this is something that I have already seen. If 1.1.x managed
to do something working with it, it would be nice to have lyx2lyx fix
the files (Jose' ?)
I am reluctant to
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 16:00, Rob S wrote:
Milos;
I'm pretty much there now (99%). A few ert boxes and an extra Style
added to the elsart layout file to define the \corauth LaTeX commannd
(same as footnote).
Do you care to share that change? We can add it to the next lyx
version. :-)
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 15:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that this is something that I have already seen. If 1.1.x managed
to do something working with it, it would be nice to have lyx2lyx fix
the files (Jose' ?)
I am reluctant to
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 16:00, Rob S wrote:
Milos;
I'm pretty much there now (99%). A few ert boxes and an extra Style
added to the elsart layout file to define the \corauth LaTeX commannd
(same as footnote).
Do you care to share that change? We can add it to the next lyx
version. :-)
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 15:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
> Note that this is something that I have already seen. If 1.1.x managed
> to do something working with it, it would be nice to have lyx2lyx fix
> the files (Jose' ?)
I am
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 16:00, Rob S wrote:
> Milos;
>
> I'm pretty much there now (99%). A few ert boxes and an extra Style
> added to the elsart layout file to define the \corauth LaTeX commannd
> (same as footnote).
Do you care to share that change? We can add it to the next lyx
version.
On Saturday 26 March 2005 15:35, Robert Orr wrote:
Hi -
I am trying to use the Docbook template on 1.3.5 under
Windows XP, but when I load it I'm getting a missing
TeX class docbook error.
Docbook is not latex. :-)
That is why you don't find it, the same applies to linuxdoc btw...
So
301 - 400 of 771 matches
Mail list logo
