lyx 2.0.1: .tex import with use of .cls and .sty files

2014-02-03 Thread Jörg Kühne
Dear user list Is it generally possible to import a .tex with use of .cls and .sty files to Lyx? If I import the example.tex to Lyx, Lyx creates line breaks as follows: cventry{2011--2012} {Masters of Commerce}{The University of California}{Berkeley}{textit{GPA -- 8.0}}{First Class

Re: lyx 2.0.1: .tex import with use of .cls and .sty files

2014-02-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
of .cls and .sty files to Lyx? If I import the example.tex to Lyx, Lyx creates line breaks as follows: \cventry{2011--2012} {Masters of Commerce}{The University of California}{Berkeley}{\textit{GPA -- 8.0}}{First Class Honours} % Arguments not required can be left empty What can I do

lyx 2.0.1: .tex import with use of .cls and .sty files

2014-02-03 Thread Jörg Kühne
Dear user list Is it generally possible to import a .tex with use of .cls and .sty files to Lyx? If I import the example.tex to Lyx, Lyx creates line breaks as follows: cventry{2011--2012} {Masters of Commerce}{The University of California}{Berkeley}{textit{GPA -- 8.0}}{First Class

Re: lyx 2.0.1: .tex import with use of .cls and .sty files

2014-02-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
of .cls and .sty files to Lyx? If I import the example.tex to Lyx, Lyx creates line breaks as follows: \cventry{2011--2012} {Masters of Commerce}{The University of California}{Berkeley}{\textit{GPA -- 8.0}}{First Class Honours} % Arguments not required can be left empty What can I do

lyx 2.0.1: .tex import with use of .cls and .sty files

2014-02-03 Thread Jörg Kühne
Dear user list   Is it generally possible to import a .tex with use of .cls and .sty files to Lyx? If I import the example.tex to Lyx,  Lyx creates line breaks as follows:   \cventry{2011--2012}   {Masters of Commerce}{The University of California}{Berkeley}{\textit{GPA -- 8.0}}{First

Re: lyx 2.0.1: .tex import with use of .cls and .sty files

2014-02-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
possible to import a .tex with use of .cls and .sty files to > Lyx? > If I import the example.tex to Lyx, > Lyx creates line breaks as follows: > > > \cventry{2011--2012} > > > > {Masters of Commerce}{The University of California}{Berkeley}{\textit{GPA > > -- 8.0}}{Fi

Re: LyX not finding installed .sty files

2008-09-12 Thread rgheck
Sebastian Wild wrote: Nigel Ross wrote: I have installed some .sty files as required for my LyX document using MiKTeX but when I try to create a DVI to view the output I receive an error advising me of a Latex error. This error being that the .sty files could not be found. It would seem

Re: LyX not finding installed .sty files

2008-09-12 Thread rgheck
Sebastian Wild wrote: Nigel Ross wrote: I have installed some .sty files as required for my LyX document using MiKTeX but when I try to create a DVI to view the output I receive an error advising me of a Latex error. This error being that the .sty files could not be found. It would seem

Re: LyX not finding installed .sty files

2008-09-12 Thread rgheck
Sebastian Wild wrote: Nigel Ross wrote: I have installed some .sty files as required for my LyX document using MiKTeX but when I try to create a DVI to view the output I receive an error advising me of a Latex error. This error being that the .sty files could not be found. It would seem

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:45 -0500, Richard Heck wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=.:~/latex/styles//: and a sty file in that dir. I think this sets where

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
With help from #latex I have got my local latex environment set up, so that I can run pdflatex on a simple tex file which uses the custom style. When I try to use the style in a lyx doc though, by adding this to the preamble: \usepackage{StuS13} then C-X P gives the error --

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
Sorry everyone, please ignore this. My problems are to do with understanding the custom style (it does it's own thing about titles, and I shouldn't try to put one in the doc.) Jim On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 14:56 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With help from #latex I have got my local latex

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread rgheck
Jim Burton wrote: With help from #latex I have got my local latex environment set up, so that I can run pdflatex on a simple tex file which uses the custom style. When I try to use the style in a lyx doc though, by adding this to the preamble: \usepackage{StuS13} then C-X P gives the error

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:45 -0500, Richard Heck wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=.:~/latex/styles//: and a sty file in that dir. I think this sets where

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
With help from #latex I have got my local latex environment set up, so that I can run pdflatex on a simple tex file which uses the custom style. When I try to use the style in a lyx doc though, by adding this to the preamble: \usepackage{StuS13} then C-X P gives the error --

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
Sorry everyone, please ignore this. My problems are to do with understanding the custom style (it does it's own thing about titles, and I shouldn't try to put one in the doc.) Jim On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 14:56 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With help from #latex I have got my local latex

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread rgheck
Jim Burton wrote: With help from #latex I have got my local latex environment set up, so that I can run pdflatex on a simple tex file which uses the custom style. When I try to use the style in a lyx doc though, by adding this to the preamble: \usepackage{StuS13} then C-X P gives the error

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:45 -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the > > Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have > > > > export TEXINPUTS=".:~/latex/styles//:" > > > > and a sty file in that dir. > I think

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
With help from #latex I have got my local latex environment set up, so that I can run pdflatex on a simple tex file which uses the custom style. When I try to use the style in a lyx doc though, by adding this to the preamble: \usepackage{StuS13} then C-X P gives the error --

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread Jim Burton
Sorry everyone, please ignore this. My problems are to do with understanding the custom style (it does it's own thing about titles, and I shouldn't try to put one in the doc.) Jim On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 14:56 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With help from #latex I have got my local latex

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-19 Thread rgheck
Jim Burton wrote: With help from #latex I have got my local latex environment set up, so that I can run pdflatex on a simple tex file which uses the custom style. When I try to use the style in a lyx doc though, by adding this to the preamble: \usepackage{StuS13} then C-X P gives the error

Adding sty files to path

2007-12-11 Thread jb162
I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=.:~/latex/styles//: and a sty file in that dir. Lyx can't find it though. I get Latex error: can't find file StuS13.sty. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks,

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-11 Thread Richard Heck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=.:~/latex/styles//: and a sty file in that dir. I think this sets where TeX looks for source files. Lyx can't find it though. I get Latex

Adding sty files to path

2007-12-11 Thread jb162
I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=.:~/latex/styles//: and a sty file in that dir. Lyx can't find it though. I get Latex error: can't find file StuS13.sty. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks,

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-11 Thread Richard Heck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=.:~/latex/styles//: and a sty file in that dir. I think this sets where TeX looks for source files. Lyx can't find it though. I get Latex

Adding sty files to path

2007-12-11 Thread jb162
I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=".:~/latex/styles//:" and a sty file in that dir. Lyx can't find it though. I get "Latex error: can't find file StuS13.sty". Is there something else I need to do?

Re: Adding sty files to path

2007-12-11 Thread Richard Heck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a custom sty that I need to use and read about adding to the Latex search path. In my .bashrc I now have export TEXINPUTS=".:~/latex/styles//:" and a sty file in that dir. I think this sets where TeX looks for source files. Lyx can't find it though. I get

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} means that you load the documentclass article with the option 12pt and rfc. As the article class doesn't support the option rfc, you get this error. As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan wrote: As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is an extension to any document class and it can be loaded with the preamble line \usepackage{rfc} Right. I have that in the preamble, though. I get the feeling that I somehow need to load rfc before I tell it to use the

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: No, you always have to load the documentclass at first. Why do you think you need to load the package rfc before the class? What exactly is your problem? My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to be given

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan schrieb: My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to be given as an argument to the documentclass command. But it seems to be ignored if I do that. The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the actual LaTeX-version 2epsilon was Doh. I knew I was doing something stupid. Thanks. A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} means that you load the documentclass article with the option 12pt and rfc. As the article class doesn't support the option rfc, you get this error. As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan wrote: As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is an extension to any document class and it can be loaded with the preamble line \usepackage{rfc} Right. I have that in the preamble, though. I get the feeling that I somehow need to load rfc before I tell it to use the

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: No, you always have to load the documentclass at first. Why do you think you need to load the package rfc before the class? What exactly is your problem? My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to be given

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan schrieb: My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to be given as an argument to the documentclass command. But it seems to be ignored if I do that. The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the actual LaTeX-version 2epsilon was Doh. I knew I was doing something stupid. Thanks. A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} > means that you load the documentclass "article" with the option "12pt" > and "rfc". As the article class doesn't support the option "rfc", you > get this error. > As the rfc style is defined as

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan wrote: As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is an extension to any document class and it can be loaded with the preamble line \usepackage{rfc} Right. I have that in the preamble, though. I get the feeling that I somehow need to load rfc before I tell it to use the

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > No, you always have to load the documentclass at first. Why do you think > you need to load the package rfc before the class? What exactly is your > problem? My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to be

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan schrieb: My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to be given as an argument to the documentclass command. But it seems to be ignored if I do that. The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old LaTeX-version "2.09". In 1994, the

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-02 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old > LaTeX-version "2.09". In 1994, the actual LaTeX-version "2epsilon" was Doh. I knew I was doing something stupid. Thanks. A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan wrote: The rfc style is a modification to the article syle. It produces output that looks like IETF RFCs. You use it by calling it this way: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} When I try to use it, I get this in my log: LaTeX Warning: Unused global option(s): [rfc].

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan wrote: The rfc style is a modification to the article syle. It produces output that looks like IETF RFCs. You use it by calling it this way: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} When I try to use it, I get this in my log: LaTeX Warning: Unused global option(s): [rfc].

Re: Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-05-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Andrew Sullivan wrote: The rfc style is a modification to the article syle. It produces output that looks like IETF RFCs. You use it by calling it this way: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} When I try to use it, I get this in my log: LaTeX Warning: Unused global option(s): [rfc].

Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-04-29 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi all, I think I'm doing something stupid. The rfc style is a modification to the article syle. It produces output that looks like IETF RFCs. You use it by calling it this way: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} When I try to use it, I get this in my log: LaTeX Warning: Unused global

Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-04-29 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi all, I think I'm doing something stupid. The rfc style is a modification to the article syle. It produces output that looks like IETF RFCs. You use it by calling it this way: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} When I try to use it, I get this in my log: LaTeX Warning: Unused global

Using .sty files that extend a class

2005-04-29 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi all, I think I'm doing something stupid. The rfc style is a modification to the article syle. It produces output that looks like IETF RFCs. You use it by calling it this way: \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article} When I try to use it, I get this in my log: LaTeX Warning: Unused global

Re: latex .sty files

2002-03-05 Thread Herbert Voss
Giorgio Corani wrote: Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemsssty I've installed it without any problem running texhash My lyx document is a two column

Re: latex .sty files

2002-03-05 Thread Herbert Voss
Giorgio Corani wrote: Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemsssty I've installed it without any problem running texhash My lyx document is a two column

Re: latex .sty files

2002-03-05 Thread Herbert Voss
Giorgio Corani wrote: > Dear all, > i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. > The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex > style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem > running texhash. > My lyx document is a two

latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem running texhash. My lyx document is a two column article class, while the

latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem running texhash. My lyx document is a two column article class, while the

Re: latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
I've already tried it but the problems does not change:( Christopher M. Jones wrote: Just a guess: try \usepackage{iemss} not \usepackage{iemss.sty} Also sprach Giorgio Corani: Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be

latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem running texhash. My lyx document is a two column article class, while the

latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem running texhash. My lyx document is a two column article class, while the

Re: latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
I've already tried it but the problems does not change:( Christopher M. Jones wrote: Just a guess: try \usepackage{iemss} not \usepackage{iemss.sty} Also sprach Giorgio Corani: Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be

latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem running texhash. My lyx document is a two column article class, while the

latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
Dear all, i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. The paper has to be formatted according to the organizer supplied latex style, which is called iemss.sty. I've installed it without any problem running texhash. My lyx document is a two column article class, while the

Re: latex .sty files

2002-02-27 Thread Giorgio Corani
I've already tried it but the problems does not change:( "Christopher M. Jones" wrote: > > Just a guess: try > \usepackage{iemss} > not > \usepackage{iemss.sty} > > Also sprach Giorgio Corani: > > Dear all, > > i'm writing an english paper for an international conference. > > The paper

Re: importing latex files with additional .sty files

2002-02-11 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Nirmal Govind wrote: Hi, I'm trying to import a latex file which uses a couple of sty files - res.sty (used for resumes) and fancyhead.sty. LyX gives me an error saying that it can't import the file : Error while executing reLyX -f 'resume.tex' Please let me know

Re: importing latex files with additional .sty files

2002-02-11 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Nirmal Govind wrote: Hi, I'm trying to import a latex file which uses a couple of sty files - res.sty (used for resumes) and fancyhead.sty. LyX gives me an error saying that it can't import the file : Error while executing reLyX -f 'resume.tex' Please let me know

Re: importing latex files with additional .sty files

2002-02-11 Thread Allan Rae
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Nirmal Govind wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to import a latex file which uses a couple of sty files - > res.sty (used for resumes) and fancyhead.sty. LyX gives me an error saying > that it can't import the file : "Error while executing reLyX -f 'resume.tex

importing latex files with additional .sty files

2002-02-10 Thread Nirmal Govind
Hi, I'm trying to import a latex file which uses a couple of sty files - res.sty (used for resumes) and fancyhead.sty. LyX gives me an error saying that it can't import the file : Error while executing reLyX -f 'resume.tex' Please let me know if anyone knows of a fix to this problem. Thanks

importing latex files with additional .sty files

2002-02-10 Thread Nirmal Govind
Hi, I'm trying to import a latex file which uses a couple of sty files - res.sty (used for resumes) and fancyhead.sty. LyX gives me an error saying that it can't import the file : Error while executing reLyX -f 'resume.tex' Please let me know if anyone knows of a fix to this problem. Thanks

importing latex files with additional .sty files

2002-02-10 Thread Nirmal Govind
Hi, I'm trying to import a latex file which uses a couple of sty files - res.sty (used for resumes) and fancyhead.sty. LyX gives me an error saying that it can't import the file : "Error while executing reLyX -f 'resume.tex'" Please let me know if anyone knows of a fix to th

Solved - Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-12 Thread cmasters
Greetings Matej, I've cc'd this to the Lyx list. Although this ~should~ also be the default install on a debian system, the package maintainer (I assume) has moved the 'font' and some other .sty files into tetex-extra -- which itself is ~not~ installed in the default debian tetex install

Solved - Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-12 Thread cmasters
Greetings Matej, I've cc'd this to the Lyx list. Although this ~should~ also be the default install on a debian system, the package maintainer (I assume) has moved the 'font' and some other .sty files into tetex-extra -- which itself is ~not~ installed in the default debian tetex install

Solved - Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-12 Thread cmasters
Greetings Matej, I've cc'd this to the Lyx list. Although this ~should~ also be the default install on a debian system, the package maintainer (I assume) has moved the 'font' and some other .sty files into tetex-extra -- which itself is ~not~ installed in the default debian tetex install

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation. If this is the case, ~why~ is that not documented in the User Manual. It shouldn't be an Advanced Usage problem. It's standard practice to desire control over these variables

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation. If this is the case, ~why~ is that not documented in the User Manual. It shouldn't be an Advanced Usage problem. It's standard practice

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
(in addition to many as yet undiscovered ones) are UNSET in the default configuration! Although entries exist for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
that the options of font and line spacing (in addition to many as yet undiscovered ones) are UNSET in the default configuration! Although entries exist for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
Greetings Rod, Thank you ~very~ much. Your experiences and suggestions greatly helped. On 11-12-01, Rod Pinna wrote: I just checked my installation; doing locate helvet.sty showed the file in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/psnfss Originally, although I had this directory, it was

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
Greetings Rod, On 11-12-01, Rod Pinna wrote: Final note, If you are running stable, there is a package called task-tex, which should give you a working system. i.e. apt-get install task-tex This doesn't exist in the unstable branch. I suspect that's it ~this~ package which

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:51:51AM -0400, cmasters wrote: 1. Are these not automatically included in the Latex / Lyx distributions released for my system? I believe, that most the packages used by LyX are part of the tetex, which is the standard TeX distibution on Unixes. Try to file these two

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation. If this is the case, ~why~ is that not documented in the User Manual. It shouldn't be an Advanced Usage problem. It's standard practice to desire control over these variables

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation. If this is the case, ~why~ is that not documented in the User Manual. It shouldn't be an Advanced Usage problem. It's standard practice

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
(in addition to many as yet undiscovered ones) are UNSET in the default configuration! Although entries exist for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
that the options of font and line spacing (in addition to many as yet undiscovered ones) are UNSET in the default configuration! Although entries exist for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
Greetings Rod, Thank you ~very~ much. Your experiences and suggestions greatly helped. On 11-12-01, Rod Pinna wrote: I just checked my installation; doing locate helvet.sty showed the file in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/psnfss Originally, although I had this directory, it was

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
Greetings Rod, On 11-12-01, Rod Pinna wrote: Final note, If you are running stable, there is a package called task-tex, which should give you a working system. i.e. apt-get install task-tex This doesn't exist in the unstable branch. I suspect that's it ~this~ package which

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:51:51AM -0400, cmasters wrote: 1. Are these not automatically included in the Latex / Lyx distributions released for my system? I believe, that most the packages used by LyX are part of the tetex, which is the standard TeX distibution on Unixes. Try to file these two

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
fault configuration! Although entries exist for helvetica, uptopia, etc. and one-half and double spacing, the nackend command for those options reference '.sty' files that are not in my (or your) installation. If this is the case, ~why~ is that not documented in the User Manual. It shouldn't be an

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
r ftp install (the site ran on a 56K modem *grrr*, although > I have DSL), I still have the same problem. > > I suspect that the "options" of font and line spacing (in addition to many > as yet undiscovered ones) are UNSET in the default configuration! Although > entries exist

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
1 - 3.14159 - Kpathea ver 3.3.1 (1999) > > Lyx: 1.14fix3 (07 Apr 2000) > > > > After a 1 1/2 hour ftp install (the site ran on a 56K modem *grrr*, although > > I have DSL), I still have the same problem. > > > > I suspect that the "options" of font a

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Rod Pinna
es, and extras--is installed. To > > > enable version comparison, I installed this new teTeX in a different > > > directory; imagine my surprise to discover that ~I had always had the most > > > current version~ (now I have two). > > > >

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
Greetings Rod, Thank you ~very~ much. Your experiences and suggestions greatly helped. On 11-12-01, Rod Pinna wrote: > > I just checked my installation; doing > > locate helvet.sty showed the file in > > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/psnfss > Originally, although I had this directory, it was

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread cmasters
Greetings Rod, On 11-12-01, Rod Pinna wrote: > Final note, > > If you are running stable, there is a package called task-tex, which > should give you a working system. > > i.e. apt-get install task-tex > > This doesn't exist in the unstable branch. > I suspect that's it ~this~ package which

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:51:51AM -0400, cmasters wrote: > 1. Are these not automatically included in the Latex / Lyx distributions > released for my system? I believe, that most the packages used by LyX are part of the tetex, which is the standard TeX distibution on Unixes. Try to file these

Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread cmasters
Greetings, Brand new convert to Lyx here :-) I must say that I love the ease of getting the job done, but I've run into a few sangs. I'd appreciate any bones that can be thrown my way. I am running Debian, and installed Latex/Tetex and Lyx through the standard 'apt-get' method. All works well,

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread Herbert Voss
cmasters wrote: Greetings, Brand new convert to Lyx here :-) I must say that I love the ease of getting the job done, but I've run into a few sangs. I'd appreciate any bones that can be thrown my way. I am running Debian, and installed Latex/Tetex and Lyx through the standard

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread cmasters
they are included automatically, otherwise not. I beg to differ, but they are most ~definitely not~ included on my system. The point of my question was to determine whether these .sty files were part of the standard lyx / latex installation. Your answer is less than halpful. 2

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:37:00PM -0400, cmasters wrote: write in lyayout-preamble- \usepackage{the packagename} Again, thank you for the answer, but I did indicate ~new~ Lyx convert at the beginning of my original message. The above means very little to me. Is that a latex command,

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread Rod Pinna
included in the Latex / Lyx distributions released for my system? if they are supported by lyx than they are included automatically, otherwise not. I beg to differ, but they are most ~definitely not~ included on my system. The point of my question was to determine whether these .sty files

Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread cmasters
Greetings, Brand new convert to Lyx here :-) I must say that I love the ease of getting the job done, but I've run into a few sangs. I'd appreciate any bones that can be thrown my way. I am running Debian, and installed Latex/Tetex and Lyx through the standard 'apt-get' method. All works well,

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread Herbert Voss
cmasters wrote: Greetings, Brand new convert to Lyx here :-) I must say that I love the ease of getting the job done, but I've run into a few sangs. I'd appreciate any bones that can be thrown my way. I am running Debian, and installed Latex/Tetex and Lyx through the standard

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread cmasters
they are included automatically, otherwise not. I beg to differ, but they are most ~definitely not~ included on my system. The point of my question was to determine whether these .sty files were part of the standard lyx / latex installation. Your answer is less than halpful. 2

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:37:00PM -0400, cmasters wrote: write in lyayout-preamble- \usepackage{the packagename} Again, thank you for the answer, but I did indicate ~new~ Lyx convert at the beginning of my original message. The above means very little to me. Is that a latex command,

Re: Missing '.sty' files

2001-12-10 Thread Rod Pinna
included in the Latex / Lyx distributions released for my system? if they are supported by lyx than they are included automatically, otherwise not. I beg to differ, but they are most ~definitely not~ included on my system. The point of my question was to determine whether these .sty files

  1   2   >