nice digest reply Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM: Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally snipped... for full context see the thread... SNIP Personally I don't think that's ever going to happen any more than I think anybody will ever offer a list server with a smart digest

nice digest reply Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM: Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally snipped... for full context see the thread... SNIP Personally I don't think that's ever going to happen any more than I think anybody will ever offer a list server with a smart digest

nice digest reply Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM: Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally "snipped"... for full context see the thread... Personally I don't think that's ever going to happen any more than I think anybody will ever offer a list server with a smart digest option

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info. I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read: They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user. (When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-). jon On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info. I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read: They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user. (When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-). jon On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info. I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read: They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user. (When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-). jon On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat

Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally snipped... for full context see the thread... It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread: there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing

Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally snipped... for full context see the thread... It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread: there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing

Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally "snipped"... for full context see the thread... It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread: > there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people > "this comes from the Lyx users list". It's very

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote: Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. But

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's also easy. Besides of the tag, you can skip messages from lyx

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client. In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC: field and sends any lyx-users@lists.lyx.org messages to a separate folder. But I don't want to

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! Julio Rojas wrote: Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Murray Eisenberg wrote, On 11/09/09 14:45: Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client. In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC: field and sends any lyx-users@lists.lyx.org

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

What I suggested was for Gmail not for any particular OS. Sorry for not being clear. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!

How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other Just to start the ball

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Given that it is free software and therefore nearly impossible to know what the user community size is, knowing the relative sizes of segments of the population seems to be a

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. 2009/9/11 Andrew Sullivan a...@shinkuro.com: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On 09/11/2009 03:06 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. You could get a decent sense of the Windows and Mac populations from download statistics, but not so much with

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote: Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. But

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's also easy. Besides of the tag, you can skip messages from lyx

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client. In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC: field and sends any lyx-users@lists.lyx.org messages to a separate folder. But I don't want to

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! Julio Rojas wrote: Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Murray Eisenberg wrote, On 11/09/09 14:45: Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client. In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC: field and sends any lyx-users@lists.lyx.org

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

What I suggested was for Gmail not for any particular OS. Sorry for not being clear. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!

How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other Just to start the ball

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Given that it is free software and therefore nearly impossible to know what the user community size is, knowing the relative sizes of segments of the population seems to be a

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. 2009/9/11 Andrew Sullivan a...@shinkuro.com: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On 09/11/2009 03:06 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. You could get a decent sense of the Windows and Mac populations from download statistics, but not so much with

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting wrote: > Murray Eisenberg wrote: > >> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily >> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, >> say, "[LyX]" prepended to the

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

>> > Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other > lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading "lyx > users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's also easy. Besides of the tag, you can skip messages from

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client. In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC: field and sends any "lyx-users@lists.lyx.org" messages to a separate folder. But I don't want

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! Julio Rojas wrote: Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading "lyx users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Murray Eisenberg wrote, On 11/09/09 14:45: Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client. In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC: field and sends any "lyx-users@lists.lyx.org"

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

What I suggested was for Gmail not for any particular OS. Sorry for not being clear. - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!

How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: > But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other Just to start the ball

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Given that it is free software and therefore nearly impossible to know what the user community size is, knowing the relative sizes of segments of the population seems to be

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. 2009/9/11 Andrew Sullivan : > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >> assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On 09/11/2009 03:06 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. You could get a decent sense of the Windows and Mac populations from download statistics, but not so much with

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. But we don't want that, so please don't wreck it on the server. If you want to see

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. But we don't want that, so please don't wreck it on the server. If you want to see

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject. But we don't want that, so please don't wreck it on the server. If you want to

Re: Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Pavel Sanda wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM: Christian Ridderström wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from

Re: Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Pavel Sanda wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM: Christian Ridderström wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from

Re: Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Pavel Sanda wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM: Christian Ridderström wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg : I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg: 1624001 http://www.manveru.pl

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg: 1624001 http://www.manveru.pl

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg: 1624001 http://www.manveru.pl

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Christian Ridderström wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Christian Ridderström wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Christian Ridderström wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: > >> 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg : >>> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily >>> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server >>> has, >>> say,

Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hello, Sorry if the subject was already and recurrently treated in the list. As I said, I'm new so I didn't know. In fact, I filter by the To field and it works perfectly with Yahoo webmail so my problem is solved. Once again I should have think a bit before sending my request on the list...

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:13:14PM +0200, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Le 03/09/2009 19:46, Andre Poenitz a écrit : I have 42 characters for the subject, given that most messages are marked with (at least one) 'Re: ', a '[LyX] ' prefix eats 15% of the available space, for useless 'information'. Especially since we need [LyX Devel], [LyX Users], etc. JMarc

Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hello, Sorry if the subject was already and recurrently treated in the list. As I said, I'm new so I didn't know. In fact, I filter by the To field and it works perfectly with Yahoo webmail so my problem is solved. Once again I should have think a bit before sending my request on the list...

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:13:14PM +0200, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Le 03/09/2009 19:46, Andre Poenitz a écrit : I have 42 characters for the subject, given that most messages are marked with (at least one) 'Re: ', a '[LyX] ' prefix eats 15% of the available space, for useless 'information'. Especially since we need [LyX Devel], [LyX Users], etc. JMarc

Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hello, Sorry if the subject was already and recurrently treated in the list. As I said, I'm new so I didn't know. In fact, I filter by the "To" field and it works perfectly with Yahoo webmail so my problem is solved. Once again I should have think a bit before sending my request on the list...

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:13:14PM +0200, Manveru wrote: > 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg : > > I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily > > fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, > > say, "[LyX]" prepended to

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Le 03/09/2009 19:46, Andre Poenitz a écrit : I have 42 characters for the subject, given that most messages are marked with (at least one) 'Re: ', a '[LyX] ' prefix eats 15% of the available space, for useless 'information'. Especially since we need [LyX Devel], [LyX Users], etc. JMarc

[Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently. In addition sometimes, mail

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

2009/9/2 Delta moins deltamo...@yahoo.fr: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the

Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

2009, 10h18mn 35s Objet : Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject 2009/9/2 Delta moins deltamo...@yahoo.fr: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header. Sam

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Your message has: From: Manveru manv...@manveru.pl which is not helpful. I'm currently sorting based on To: or Cc: having lyx-users@lists.lyx.org which sadly also selects messages that were emailed to me. I'll have to have my sorting rules like this: 1. sort all list-id mailing lists

offtopic Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* A B wrote, On 02/09/09 09:53: Your message has: From: Manveru manv...@manveru.pl which is not helpful. I'm currently sorting based on To: or Cc: having lyx-users@lists.lyx.org which sadly also selects messages that were emailed to me. I'll have to have my sorting rules like this: 1.

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott: * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header. It

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Kornel Benko wrote, On 02/09/09 10:33: Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott: * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Delta moins wrote: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. There are more who wants this, but also quite a few who don't want it. The mail can be sorted by other headers than Subject. Once the lyx mailing list

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:40:44 -0400, Sam Liddicott s...@liddicott.com wrote: Your message has: From: Manveru manv...@manveru.pl which is not helpful. I've been using Opera mail for a long time, which automatically sorts out mailing list mail. But I note the following headers:

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott: * Kornel Benko wrote, On 02/09/09 10:33: Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott: * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:11:26AM +, Delta moins wrote: that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently. Yes, you can. This is what List-*: headers are for. This very topic came up not a month ago on this list.

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote: The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not), Delivered-To: signifies something else, and my mail server does not support it.

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Andrew Sullivan wrote, On 02/09/09 14:10: On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote: The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not), Delivered-To: signifies something else, and my

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. Many other mailing lists do this. There should be no need for the subscribers to have to filter. Manveru

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. There is many voices in favour of such feature. But not a

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wednesday 02 September 2009 04:33:07 Sam Liddicott wrote: * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header.

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wednesday 02 September 2009 04:53:28 A B wrote: I thought it was an unwritte rule: reply to the list, not the list AND an explicit email adress (unless they ask to) Or have I got this completly wrong? You're somewhat wrong. On many mailing lists, the custom is to reply to the list and

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:44:00AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: I agree with you and have been saying so for years. But even the Mailman software suggest replies go to the individual instead of the list. So much for collaboration. Mailman might be relying on the faint hope that mail user agents

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Delta moins wrote: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently. In

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57: I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur). What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX: developerlist or whatever)? Will the list mailer (and

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Sam Liddicott wrote: * Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57: I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur). What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX: developerlist or whatever)? Will

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Delta moins wrote: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the mails

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote: 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject. There is many voices

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Sam Liddicott wrote: * Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57: I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur). What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX: developerlist

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. If you look at the details in the email you

[Lyx] explicit mail subject

Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently. In addition sometimes, mail

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

2009/9/2 Delta moins deltamo...@yahoo.fr: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing because you cannot filter the

Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

2009, 10h18mn 35s Objet : Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject 2009/9/2 Delta moins deltamo...@yahoo.fr: Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header. Sam

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Your message has: From: Manveru manv...@manveru.pl which is not helpful. I'm currently sorting based on To: or Cc: having lyx-users@lists.lyx.org which sadly also selects messages that were emailed to me. I'll have to have my sorting rules like this: 1. sort all list-id mailing lists

offtopic Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* A B wrote, On 02/09/09 09:53: Your message has: From: Manveru manv...@manveru.pl which is not helpful. I'm currently sorting based on To: or Cc: having lyx-users@lists.lyx.org which sadly also selects messages that were emailed to me. I'll have to have my sorting rules like this: 1.

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott: * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header. It

Re: Re : [Lyx] explicit mail subject

* Kornel Benko wrote, On 02/09/09 10:33: Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott: * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28: Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it. If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok. You're not the only one. I heartily

  1   2   >