have not yet encountered problems except of the next item.
>
> - If your existing LyX 1.6.x installation is no longer able to handle image
> files correctly after installing this test release, then open the
> preferences dialog of LyX 1.6.x and change the path for ImageMagick and
&g
Dear Windows users,
We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error, so I
would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
If you test, which installer did you test: the "bundl
right? So you can still use 2.3.x after installing it? Which one
is default? For example, if you double-click to open a .lyx file, does
it open with 2.3.x or with the newly installed Beta 5?
I'm going to meet with a friend who I might be able to convince to test
Beta 5, but I wanted to be able t
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 3:38 AM Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>
>
> On 12/09/2023 9:01 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > 2.4.0 Beta 5 was recently released (available here:
> > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/).
> >
> > Have any Windows users tested it yet? If so, has it gone smoothly?
Works great
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 04:21:00AM +0300, Udicoudco wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 3:38 AM Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/09/2023 9:01 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > 2.4.0 Beta 5 was recently released (available here:
> > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/).
> > >
> > > Have
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded a new snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows: LyX
1.6.0alpha2.
NOTE: LyX 1.6 is in alpha state! That means it is not stable enough for a beta
test release, so
expect crashes and inconsistencies. This preview release is build for
interested LyX
Seems to be working fine. But the new method for opening pdf files is a
bit of a pain when using Comodo Firewall with Defense+ malware filter.
Every time I view a document as pdf a temporary executable is created,
and every time the malware filter asks me permission for execution...
and of cou
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the first beta release of the upcoming LyX version
1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6 is in beta state! That means it is stable enough for a beta test release, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interested
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the third beta release of the upcoming LyX version
1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6 is in beta state! That means it is stable enough for a beta test
release, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interested
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fourth beta release of the upcoming LyX version
1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6 is in beta state! That means it is stable enough for a beta test
release, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the first release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc1 is not a stable release! That means it is stable enough for
testing, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interest
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the second release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc2 is not a stable release! That means it is stable enough for
testing, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interes
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the third release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc3 is not a stable release! That means it is stable enough for
testing, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interest
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fourth release candidate of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for
Windows. This release is for interested LyX users who want to check out the new features of LyX.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc4 is still not a stable release! So you might stumble over regressio
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fifth release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for
Windows. This release is for interested LyX users who want to check out the new
features of LyX.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc5 is still not a stable release! So you might stumble over
regressio
this is a test of sending email via nntp server. Please disregard.
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Yesterday I installed lyx 2.3.0 without any problems.
(Win 10)
Sergio
De: Scott Kostyshak
Enviado: martes, 27 de febrero de 2018 19:13
Para: LyX Users
Asunto: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?
Dear Windows users,
We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error
On 28/02/2018 11:12 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Dear Windows users,
We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error, so I
would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
If
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:05:43AM +, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I had no problems with the installation (windows 7, installer rather than
> bundle). I always install offline to avoid possible hassles with the
> interaction with MiKTeX, which I keep up to date independently.
Good to know, thanks
Windows users,
>
> We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error, so I
> would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
>
> Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
>
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
>
> If you test, which installer
to an error, so I
would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
<ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0>
If you test, which installer did you test: the "bundle" or the
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] Im Auftrag
von Scott
> Kostyshak
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2018 23:13
> An: LyX Users
> Betreff: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?
>
> Dear Windows
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:06:08AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> I had a big problem with the use of the new LyX 2.3 bundle.
>
> The installation by itself went fine, side by side with the current LyX
> 2.2.3 version, using my existing local Miktex 2.9 distribution. But the
> compilation with LyX
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:49:35AM +, a...@andreashegenbart.de wrote:
> I tested the installer, windows 7; pop up miktex 2.9: yes; updated miktex;
> continued as normal and finished successful.
> But opening lyx 2.3 showed the error-warning you´ll find attached; I
> confirmed "ok" and then lyx
announce the release.
>
> Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
>
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
>
> If you test, which installer did you test: the "bundle" or the
> "installer"?
>
> Did you get a popup from the MiKTeX package manger during the
I tried again to install LyX2.3 on my PC running on WINDOWS 8.1. This time
as you have suggested, I have disabled the virus scanner (windows defender)
and installed only for the current user.
The result is identical to the first installation attempt : neither LyX2.3
nor LyX2.2.3 document compilatio
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> I tried again to install LyX2.3 on my PC running on WINDOWS 8.1. This time
> as you have suggested, I have disabled the virus scanner (windows defender)
> and installed only for the current user.
> The result is identical to the firs
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> CONCLUSION
> The installation of LyX2.3 seems to corrupt the Miktex configuration. This
> is not due to an interaction with the anti-virus (disabled). Hopefully an
> upgrade of Miktex (if there is a new package to install) repairs
Am 01.03.2018 um 17:15 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
CONCLUSION
The installation of LyX2.3 seems to corrupt the Miktex configuration. This
is not due to an interaction with the anti-virus (disabled). Hopefully an
upgrade of Miktex (if there is a new package to install) repairs Miktex 2.9
and allows
I always use the bundle version of LyX for my installations (...LyX2.2.2,
LyX2.2.3, LyX2.3 RC1, LyX2.3RC2, LyX2.3) together with a local version of
Miktex and it is the first time I have this kind of problem.
2018-03-01 17:15 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:01:55PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> Scott, I tend to delay the public announce for LyX on Windows for some days.
OK.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I managed to have a successfull installation with the installer version of
LyX2.3, keeping the anti-virus «Windows Defender» active. So the problem is
well linked to the bundle and its interaction with Miktex 2.9.
2018-03-01 17:15 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:14:33AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> I managed to have a successfull installation with the installer version of
> LyX2.3, keeping the anti-virus «Windows Defender» active. So the problem is
> well linked to the bundle and its interaction with Miktex 2.9.
Good to know.
It's an old habit that probably goes back to the first versions of LyX on
Windows (I used to work with LyX on Cygwin before). It seems to me that the
bundle had been introduced so as not to have to worry about installing, at
the good version, a whole lot of accessory software like the image
convert
same.
We cannot do anything if virus programs detect false positives.
Nevertheless, I created a new installer that should avoid the LaTeX
problems reported by some users:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
Please test and report back also if your virus software (update its
virus de
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 05:50:57AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> It's an old habit that probably goes back to the first versions of LyX on
> Windows (I used to work with LyX on Cygwin before). It seems to me that the
> bundle had been introduced so as not to have to worry about installing, at
> th
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 03:13:32PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.03.2018 um 06:50 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:14:33AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> > > I managed to have a successfull installation with the installer
> > version of
> > > LyX2.3, keeping
Am 04.03.2018 um 16:13 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Please test and report back also if your virus software (update its
virus definitions before) again finds something.
Emile,
can you please do me the favor and:
1. uninstall MiKTeX
2. install MiKTeX using the latest MiKTeX installer:
http://ctan.space
Am 04.03.2018 um 16:52 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
One possibility could be that the previous MiKTeX installation was not
detected.
No, because then the bundle installer would install MiKTeX and this is
something you will see as user because you have to accept the
installation explicitly.
reg
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 03:59:49PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.03.2018 um 16:52 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > One possibility could be that the previous MiKTeX installation was not
> > detected.
>
> No, because then the bundle installer would install MiKTeX and this is
> something you will s
iKTeX installed there cannot be a difference. The configuration of MiKTeX
> is always the same.
> We cannot do anything if virus programs detect false positives.
>
> Nevertheless, I created a new installer that should avoid the LaTeX
> problems reported by some users:
> http://ftp
To test this new installation program, I let the Miktex update run. I have
no idea what has been updated, but what's for sure is that the compilations
with LyX don't work anymore now ! (messsage : pdflatex program ended with
error).
I did not disable the "Windows defender"
This time, the usual way of repairing Miktex by an upgrade didn't work:
"Sorry, but something went wrong : Invalid argument: path= "C:\Program
Data\ ".
So the things are going reallv worse !
2018-03-05 10:41 GMT+01:00 Emile Lunardon :
> To test this new installa
Am 05.03.2018 um 10:41 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
> This new bundle (v3) for LyX2.3 imposes *without giving the
possibility to decline the offer,* the update of Miktex. Is it really
what is wanted ?
Yes, because otherwise you can get this:
I have no idea what has been updated, but what's for s
Am 05.03.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
This time, the usual way of repairing Miktex by an upgrade didn't work:
So the things are going reallv worse !
No problem, everything is fine now. All you have to do is to install LyX
using version 3 of the installer. Please don't manually fiddle
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:08:33AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 05.03.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
>
> > This time, the usual way of repairing Miktex by an upgrade didn't work:
> > So the things are going reallv worse !
>
> No problem, everything is fine now. All you have to do is to ins
ually updated MiKTeX and that breaks it (as I explained due to a
bug in MiKTeX). Installing version 3 of the installer will fix this. I
asked him to test this since I am too very curious if this works.
Emile, what is the result?
regards Uwe
Am 07.03.2018 um 17:06 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
I certainly did not update manually Miktex during the bundle3
installation. Read again my messages,
You wrote
"To test this new installation program, I let the Miktex update run. I
have no idea what has been updated, but what's for su
Am 08.03.2018 um 11:56 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
How could I let the Miktex update happen? It's very simple, bundle3
displayed a window...
OK, so you didn't update MiKTeX manually.
I don't know if Miktex was really broken, but LyX was no more able to
launch the compilation of the documents. Th
I'm glad to see it all makes sense now. Thank you for everything you do on
LyX !
2018-03-08 18:04 GMT+01:00 Uwe Stöhr :
> Am 08.03.2018 um 11:56 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
>
> How could I let the Miktex update happen? It's very simple, bundle3
>> displayed a window...
>>
>
> OK, so you didn't update
atest changes in MiKTeX.
I therefore created the new installer version 4 that works for all of my
test cases:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
regards Uwe
now fixed and report
>> back).
>>
>
> This is now fixed but I had to change the update process internally to
> reflect the latest changes in MiKTeX.
>
> I therefore created the new installer version 4 that works for all of my
> test cases:
> http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
>
> regards Uwe
>
he latest changes in MiKTeX.
>>
>> I therefore created the new installer version 4 that works for all of my
>> test cases:
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
>>
>> regards Uwe
>>
>
>
Am 17.03.2018 um 13:07 schrieb emile lunardon:
What are the main evolutions from Bundle and Installer 4 to 5 ?
There was a bug in the installer so that existing 64bit MiKTeX
installations were not detected.
Meanwhile I released version 6:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
that has
Hello!
I'm just writing my thesis with this great program, but now I stumbled over a
style problem...
When I add a picture in a float this picture may be set as top on a side.
Unfortunately the caption has to be below the picture and is in the same style
as the "normal" text, so it's sometimes d
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded a first snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6 is in alpha state! That means it is not stable enough for a beta test release, so
expect crashes and inconsistencies. This preview release is build for interested LyX users who want
to
stable enough for a beta
test release, so
expect crashes and inconsistencies. This preview release is build for
interested LyX users who want
to check out the new features of LyX.
The new features of LyX are listed here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX16
! THIS LYX VERSION SHOULD NOT BE USED
On Thursday 24 April 2008 13:50:13 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Hello LyX testers,
>
> I uploaded a new snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows:
> LyX 1.6.0alpha2.
>
Could someone confirm for me: is the Linux 1.6.0 alpha 2 actually buildable
yet? I'm afraid that I've become a bit confused in
On Thursday 24 April 2008 14:06:50 killermike wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2008 13:50:13 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Hello LyX testers,
> >
> > I uploaded a new snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows:
> > LyX 1.6.0alpha2.
>
> Could someone confirm for me: is the Linux 1.6.0 alpha 2 actual
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded a new snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows:
LyX 1.6.0alpha2.
NOTE: LyX 1.6 is in alpha state! That means it is not stable enough for
a beta test release, so
expect crashes and inconsistencies. This preview release is build for
Juha Meriluoto schrieb:
Seems to be working fine. But the new method for opening pdf files is a
bit of a pain when using Comodo Firewall with Defense+ malware filter.
Every time I view a document as pdf a temporary executable is created,
and every time the malware filter asks me permission fo
Juha Meriluoto schrieb:
Seems to be working fine. But the new method for opening pdf files is a
bit of a pain when using Comodo Firewall with Defense+ malware filter.
This has been fixed now for the next release.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Juha Meriluoto schrieb:
Seems to be working fine. But the new method for opening pdf files is
a bit of a pain when using Comodo Firewall with Defense+ malware filter.
This has been fixed now for the next release.
regards Uwe
Thank you very much.
- Juha
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
It works fine here (no crash yet). As for the previous versions (svn1
and svn2), the installer detects that I have the dictionaries installed
(English and French), but spell checking fails complaining:
The Spellchecker could not be started
No words list can be found
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
It works fine here (no crash yet). As for the previous versions (svn1
and svn2), the installer detects that I have the dictionaries
installed (English and French), but spell checking fails complaining:
The Spellchecker could not be started
No words
> 1- I am not sure I fully understand how the full screen mode options are
> supposed to work (I read the wiki page for Lyx 1.6, but I am still not
> sure): As I understand it, the "Toggle" checkbox in the prefs (scrollbar,
> tabbar, toolbar) set them "off" when checked and "on" when unchecked
Pavel Sanda wrote:
1- I am not sure I fully understand how the full screen mode options are
supposed to work (I read the wiki page for Lyx 1.6, but I am still not
sure): As I understand it, the "Toggle" checkbox in the prefs (scrollbar,
tabbar, toolbar) set them "off" when checked and "on" whe
> So if this is what happens on all platforms, I would suggest to use the
> word "hide" instead of "toggle".
ok thats reasonable.
pavel
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
It works fine here (no crash yet). As for the previous versions (svn1
and svn2), the installer detects that I have the dictionaries
installed (English and French), but spell checking fails complaining:
The Spellchecker could no
> Hello LyX testers,
>
> ! THIS LYX VERSION SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANYTHING ELSE THAN TESTING !
take this warning seriously, this snapshost has dataloss bug wrt space insets.
pavel
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the second release candidate of the
upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows.
I've put in a day's work with it and no crashes or bugs spotted so far.
--
http://www.unmusic.co.uk Michael Reed -- technology, gender, and geek culture
Hello,
Just compiled lyx on Solaris 10 with QT 4.4.1, I get this (C locale)
QIconvCodec::convertToUnicode: using ASCII for conversion, iconv_open failed
At the first call, I got le lot of
X Error: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) 5
Major opcode: 17 (X_GetAtomName)
Resource id: 0x70757368
X
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fourth release candidate of the upcoming
LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows. This release is for interested LyX users
who want to check out the new features of LyX.
Hi Uwe,
Although I chose not to install for all users, it creat
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
Although I chose not to install for all users, it created an application
data folder in the administrator folder and for other users (all
administration related users... that's 4 on my machine). Is this
expected ?
This is a bug then. This should only happen when insta
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
Although I chose not to install for all users, it created an
application data folder in the administrator folder and for other
users (all administration related users... that's 4 on my machine). Is
this expected ?
This is a bug then. This should only
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
This is a bug then. This should only happen when installing for all
users.
I could reproduce it with RC3 too.
Me too, I'll fix this for the next release.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fifth release candidate of the upcoming
LyX version 1.6.0 for
Windows. This release is for interested LyX users who want to check out
the new features of LyX.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc5 is still not a stable release! So you might stum
After using this installer, LyX can't find imagemagick.
Thanks Uwe,
It works like a charm and I have installed the small version to be used with
TexLive2005.
I have a strange problem with RC5. I have a crash-test latex document of 150
pages with graphics and everything that I try to import in each new
candidate. RC3 is perfectly able to import it but
Eran Kaplinsky schrieb:
After using this installer, LyX can't find imagemagick.
How did you installed ImageMagick? What ImageMagick version do you use?
regards Uwe
I have tried to make a clean install of RC5: I have uninstalled RC5; I have
renamed my ApplicationData/Lyx16 folder to Lyx16old and erased the lyx keys
from the registry HKCU and HKLM. I have then reinstalled RC5 using Uwe's
installer. I cannot start Lyx anymore. I get the following error:
LyX : r
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
[...]
- fix bug that the installer ignored for some cases when LyX should only
installed for the current user
Hi Uwe,
The installer doesn't create the "lyx16" application data folder for all
users anymore (unless asked to of course).
However, it still c
Just to complete my preceding message. I have been able to restore to RC3
without any problem.
During the test of RC5, I have also observed that LyxLauncher was remaining
open in the background and I had to kill it manually after a long wait. I do
not know if this can hel you to locate the problem
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
[...]
- fix bug that the installer ignored for some cases when LyX should only
installed for the current user
Hi Uwe,
The installer doesn't create the "lyx16" application data folder for all
users anymore (unless asked to of cours
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
2- reconfigure does not work (which probably explains point 1 above):
an error window pops-up saying:
"The system reconfiguration has failed.
Default Textclass is used but LyX may not be able to work properly.
Please reconfigure again
Eran Kaplinsky wrote:
After using this installer, LyX can't find imagemagick.
Hi,
I had the same problem, and found that several python modules were missing.
For Imagemagick, what you need is to add functools.py, which you may
find for example at
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/lib/funct
Message-
From: Murat Yildizoglu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 09:52
To: Uwe Stöhr
Cc: LyX-Docs; LyX-Users; LyX-Devel
Subject: Re: [announce] preview test release of LyX 1.6.0rc5 for Windows
Thanks Uwe,
It works like a charm and I have installed the small version to be used
Sherriff, Martyn wrote:
Uwe, thanks for RC5.
Like Murat I cannot read earlier release files. I only have RC5 running on this
PC and when I try to open an RC4 file I get an error message that the file was
created in an earlier version and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
New files are O
On 28.02.2018 10:49, a...@andreashegenbart.de wrote:
The error "platex.exe not found" I received some weeks ago as well with
installing lyx 2.2.3
Hi Andreas,
Do you happen to use Avast Antivirus? At least that is what I expect my
problem came from. If you use it then my hunch is that Avast sc
Hi,
I just posted my program that creates test data in the form of large Lyx
books. Also posted there is a Vim script that converts a tab-defined outline
to Lyx headings. These programs are quick and dirty, but they worked for me.
They're at:
http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/lyx/
T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I add a picture in a float this picture may be set as top on a
> side. Unfortunately the caption has to be below the picture and is
> in the same style as the "normal" text, so it's sometimes difficult
> to see where to read further.
Hi, Philipp. In the past I've ad
> When I add a picture in a float this picture may be set as top on a side.
> Unfortunately the caption has to be below the picture and is in the same style
> as the "normal" text, so it's sometimes difficult to see where to read
> further.
The following will control the whitespace between the ca
On 27.04.04, Stephen Buonopane wrote:
>
> > When I add a picture in a float this picture may be set as top on a
> > side. Unfortunately the caption has to be below the picture and is in
> > the same style as the "normal" text, so it's sometimes difficult to
> > see where to read further.
If you u
! That means it is not stable enough for
a beta test release, so
expect crashes and inconsistencies. This preview release is build for
interested LyX users who want
to check out the new features of LyX.
The new features of LyX are listed here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX16
! THIS LYX VERSION
I have the problem you describe with the 1.6svn : I can't open files
saved with an other version of LyX, even the doc files.
Since I have Inkscape, I copied the three files you mentioned ... to no
avail.
Up to now, if I want to open files from the 1.6 but not from my version,
I must change the v
Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I have the problem you describe with the 1.6svn : I can't open files
saved with an other version of LyX, even the doc files.
Since I have Inkscape, I copied the three files you mentioned ... to no
avail.
Up to now, if I want to open files from the 1.6 but n
Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I have the problem you describe with the 1.6svn : I can't open files
saved with an other version of LyX, even the doc files.
Since I have Inkscape, I copied the three files you mentioned ... to no
avail.
Up to now, if I want to open files from the 1.6 but n
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I have the problem you describe with the 1.6svn : I can't open files
saved with an other version of LyX, even the doc files.
Since I have Inkscape, I copied the three files you mentioned ... to
no avail.
Up to now, if I want to open f
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
Here are the main comments I have as a user:
1- Like your previous package, your installer lacks 3 python files. It
prevents opening any previous format and consequently the documentation.
They are files required by Lyx2Lyx (they were not required in version
1.5): get
I wrote:
I uploaded an installer for the fifth release candidate of the upcoming
LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows.
The installer for this, version 4.11 used the new Python 2.6. Unfortunately I forgot to add some
Python files so that users without having Python installed weren't able to configure
101 - 200 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
