Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread G. Milde
On 31.01.05, Rich Shepard wrote: When I asked, the production editor replied that they wanted all files associated with the production of the book. Therefore, I'll send them everything in the /tmp/lyx_tmpdirNNN/lyx_tmpbufN/ directory, plus the original .eps files for the figures. IMHO,

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Georg Baum
G. Milde wrote: IMHO, sending a tmp-dir is not a very transparent solution. True, but IHMO the best one currently available. If the publishers have a working LaTeX installation, they will want the *.tex source(s) + all included files (*.eps, *.bib, *.bst, ...). No need for *.aux, *.bbl,

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-02-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Rich Shepard wrote: I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to tar (probably zip, actually) all the files

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread G. Milde
On 1.02.05, Georg Baum wrote: G. Milde wrote: IMHO, sending a tmp-dir is not a very transparent solution. True, but IHMO the best one currently available. I do not think so -- LyX has two kinds of latex export: internal (with some debugging stuff inserted) and human-readable

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Jean-Pierre Chretien
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:22:43 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED Just to provide closure, here's part of the instructions I received this morning from Springer's Electronic Technologies

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: Adding the \listfiles command in the preamble recalls (nearly) all what wad needed to buid up the document - *nearly* is what is stated in the Companion. J-P, I read the preamble to get the .sty files. The only ones I could not gather in the

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread G. Milde
On 31.01.05, Rich Shepard wrote: When I asked, the production editor replied that they wanted all files associated with the production of the book. Therefore, I'll send them everything in the /tmp/lyx_tmpdirNNN/lyx_tmpbufN/ directory, plus the original .eps files for the figures. IMHO,

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Georg Baum
G. Milde wrote: IMHO, sending a tmp-dir is not a very transparent solution. True, but IHMO the best one currently available. If the publishers have a working LaTeX installation, they will want the *.tex source(s) + all included files (*.eps, *.bib, *.bst, ...). No need for *.aux, *.bbl,

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-02-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Rich Shepard wrote: I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to tar (probably zip, actually) all the files

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread G. Milde
On 1.02.05, Georg Baum wrote: G. Milde wrote: IMHO, sending a tmp-dir is not a very transparent solution. True, but IHMO the best one currently available. I do not think so -- LyX has two kinds of latex export: internal (with some debugging stuff inserted) and human-readable

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Jean-Pierre Chretien
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:22:43 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED Just to provide closure, here's part of the instructions I received this morning from Springer's Electronic Technologies

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: Adding the \listfiles command in the preamble recalls (nearly) all what wad needed to buid up the document - *nearly* is what is stated in the Companion. J-P, I read the preamble to get the .sty files. The only ones I could not gather in the

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread G. Milde
On 31.01.05, Rich Shepard wrote: > When I asked, the production editor replied that they wanted all files > associated with the production of the book. Therefore, I'll send them > everything in the /tmp/lyx_tmpdirNNN/lyx_tmpbufN/ directory, plus the > original .eps files for the figures. IMHO,

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Georg Baum
G. Milde wrote: > IMHO, sending a tmp-dir is not a very transparent solution. True, but IHMO the best one currently available. > If the publishers have a working LaTeX installation, they will want the > *.tex source(s) + all included files (*.eps, *.bib, *.bst, ...). > > No need for *.aux,

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-02-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Rich Shepard wrote: I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to tar (probably zip, actually) all the files

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread G. Milde
On 1.02.05, Georg Baum wrote: > G. Milde wrote: > > > IMHO, sending a tmp-dir is not a very transparent solution. > > True, but IHMO the best one currently available. I do not think so -- LyX has two kinds of latex export: "internal" (with some debugging stuff inserted) and "human-readable"

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Jean-Pierre Chretien
>>Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:22:43 -0800 (PST) >>From: Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org >>Subject: Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED >> >> Just to provide closure, here's part of the instructions I received

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-02-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: Adding the \listfiles command in the preamble recalls (nearly) all what wad needed to buid up the document - *nearly* is what is stated in the Companion. J-P, I read the preamble to get the .sty files. The only ones I could not gather in the

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-01-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Do they really want dvi? Then this is correct. I would close all LyX instances, delete /tmp/lyx_tmpdir* and then open one LyX instance with the document to make sure that I'll get the right one. I am however not sure wether you'll need all lyx_tmpbuf

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-01-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Do they really want dvi? Then this is correct. I would close all LyX instances, delete /tmp/lyx_tmpdir* and then open one LyX instance with the document to make sure that I'll get the right one. I am however not sure wether you'll need all lyx_tmpbuf

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher -- RESOLVED

2005-01-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Do they really want dvi? Then this is correct. I would close all LyX instances, delete /tmp/lyx_tmpdir* and then open one LyX instance with the document to make sure that I'll get the right one. I am however not sure wether you'll need all lyx_tmpbuf

Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to tar (probably zip, actually) all the files in the most recent

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 17:56 schrieb Rich Shepard: I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Herbert Voss
Rich Shepard wrote: They don't need the LaTeX (.tex) file, but the .eps, .dvi, .toc, .lof etc. Is this correct? Or, have I missed something here. my publisher only needs the pdf, the dvi is senseless. Also toc and lof, when they cannot rum latex. Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Herbert Voss wrote: my publisher only needs the pdf, the dvi is senseless. Also toc and lof, when they cannot rum latex. Herbert, I will find out exactly which files they need. They have a TeXpert on staff, and encourage the use of LaTeX for document preparation, but I have

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Do they really want dvi? Then this is correct. I would close all LyX instances, delete /tmp/lyx_tmpdir* and then open one LyX instance with the document to make sure that I'll get the right one. I am however not sure wether you'll need all lyx_tmpbuf

Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to tar (probably zip, actually) all the files in the most recent

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 17:56 schrieb Rich Shepard: I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Herbert Voss
Rich Shepard wrote: They don't need the LaTeX (.tex) file, but the .eps, .dvi, .toc, .lof etc. Is this correct? Or, have I missed something here. my publisher only needs the pdf, the dvi is senseless. Also toc and lof, when they cannot rum latex. Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Herbert Voss wrote: my publisher only needs the pdf, the dvi is senseless. Also toc and lof, when they cannot rum latex. Herbert, I will find out exactly which files they need. They have a TeXpert on staff, and encourage the use of LaTeX for document preparation, but I have

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Do they really want dvi? Then this is correct. I would close all LyX instances, delete /tmp/lyx_tmpdir* and then open one LyX instance with the document to make sure that I'll get the right one. I am however not sure wether you'll need all lyx_tmpbuf

Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume that I need to tar (probably zip, actually) all the files in the most recent

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 17:56 schrieb Rich Shepard: >I'm almost ready to send the document back to the publisher with the > complete index, copyeditor's corrections made and anonymous reviewer's > comments addressed. Since I'm submitting it in camera-ready format, I assume > that I need

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Herbert Voss
Rich Shepard wrote: They don't need the LaTeX (.tex) file, but the .eps, .dvi, .toc, .lof etc. Is this correct? Or, have I missed something here. my publisher only needs the pdf, the dvi is senseless. Also toc and lof, when they cannot rum latex. Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Herbert Voss wrote: my publisher only needs the pdf, the dvi is senseless. Also toc and lof, when they cannot rum latex. Herbert, I will find out exactly which files they need. They have a TeXpert on staff, and encourage the use of LaTeX for document preparation, but I have

Re: Files Submitted to Publisher

2005-01-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Do they really want dvi? Then this is correct. I would close all LyX instances, delete /tmp/lyx_tmpdir* and then open one LyX instance with the document to make sure that I'll get the right one. I am however not sure wether you'll need all lyx_tmpbuf