On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:18:49AM +, mike wrote:
> On 08/05/2018 10:15, mike wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > So I have Cygwin installed with a working pdflatex. How do I install
> > LyX 2.3 /within /Cygwin so that I can use it within Cygwin? I run 32
> > bit Cygwin on a 64-bit Win 7 Pro
On 08/05/2018 10:15, mike wrote:
Hi
So I have Cygwin installed with a working pdflatex. How do I install
LyX 2.3 /within /Cygwin so that I can use it within Cygwin? I run 32
bit Cygwin on a 64-bit Win 7 Pro machine.
Thanks very much in advance for any help.
I ask because AFAIK there
Am 15.02.2018 um 16:39 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2018-02-15, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I use to start my lyx with
/src/lyx -dbg info
but I get apparently interferences, if I do this with 2.2.3 (in the
2.2.3 lyx folder) and 2.3.0beta1(in another folder), perhaps via the
.lyx stuff (??).
On 2018-02-15, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I use to start my lyx with
> /src/lyx -dbg info
> but I get apparently interferences, if I do this with 2.2.3 (in the
> 2.2.3 lyx folder) and 2.3.0beta1(in another folder), perhaps via the
> .lyx stuff (??).
> Therefore I would like to install 2.2.3
Am 09.03.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? And
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
Thanks, Liviu,
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>> > wrote:
>> Thanks, Liviu,
>> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
>> sid) in the repos? And
Am 09.03.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
Thanks, Liviu,
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? And does
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Thanks, Liviu,
>
> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or sid) in the
> repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already the bibtex related
> error reporting? These are the
Am 08.03.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
> engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> sorry, here we are:
>>
>> downloaded from
>>
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
sorry, here we are:
downloaded from
https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
> sorry, here we are:
>
> downloaded from
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
>
> Debian version:
> we$ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 3.16.0-4-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc
> version
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:03 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
I have downloaded lyx_2.2.2-1_amd64.deb but get this error:
Where did you download it from? For what distribution?
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> I have downloaded lyx_2.2.2-1_amd64.deb but get this error:
>
Where did you download it from? For what distribution?
Please give more information about your system.
Liviu
> Dependency is not satisfiable:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I am sorry that I can't help except perhaps with testing/writing the helps
(the advantage would be, that I always manage to do the wrong things if
the advices are not idiot-proof ...)
Testing and entering the results in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome is
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I am sorry that I can't help except perhaps with testing/writing the helps
(the advantage would be, that I always manage to do the wrong things if
the advices are not idiot-proof ...)
Testing and entering the results in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome is
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am sorry that I can't help except perhaps with testing/writing the helps
> (the advantage would be, that I always manage to do the wrong things if
> the advices are not idiot-proof ...)
Testing and entering the results in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:29:13 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
yes, I could and did. However, I have quite a lot of lyx files created by
the 2.1 version and was hoping the lyx2lyx would already contain the
conversion 2.1 to 2.0, so that I could run a batch. But, if I understand
correctly,
On 04 Mar 2013, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
/etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
I see
On 2013-03-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
You can copy the lyx2lyx script (or directory of scripts) from the
development version (2.1) to the stable one. Then, 2.0 will be able to
open 2.1 files with auto-conversion.
good to know!
converting larger documents with lyx2lyx takes quite some time!
Wolfgang
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file
in your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the
same), it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
which is a script: usage: %prog [options] [file]. Options are
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 20:09:38 schrieb Georg Baum:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
which is
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:29:13 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
yes, I could and did. However, I have quite a lot of lyx files created by
the 2.1 version and was hoping the lyx2lyx would already contain the
conversion 2.1 to 2.0, so that I could run a batch. But, if I understand
correctly,
On 04 Mar 2013, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
/etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
I see
On 2013-03-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
You can copy the lyx2lyx script (or directory of scripts) from the
development version (2.1) to the stable one. Then, 2.0 will be able to
open 2.1 files with auto-conversion.
good to know!
converting larger documents with lyx2lyx takes quite some time!
Wolfgang
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file
in your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the
same), it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
which is a script: usage: %prog [options] [file]. Options are
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 20:09:38 schrieb Georg Baum:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
which is
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>
> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
> format is
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:29:13 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> yes, I could and did. However, I have quite a lot of lyx files created by
> the 2.1 version and was hoping the lyx2lyx would already contain the
> conversion 2.1 to 2.0, so that I could run a batch. But, if I understand
>
On 04 Mar 2013, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
> /etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
>
On 2013-03-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1.
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
>
> You can copy the lyx2lyx script (or directory of scripts) from the
> development version (2.1) to the stable one. Then, 2.0 will be able to
> open 2.1 files with auto-conversion.
good to know!
converting larger documents with lyx2lyx takes quite some time!
Wolfgang
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file
> >> in your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the
> >> same), it is in
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
>>
>> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
>> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>> which is a script: "usage: %prog [options] [file]".
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 20:09:38 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> >> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
> >> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
/etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
I see the lyx 2.0.3-3
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 11:36:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is
an experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid
since squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Thanks, Jürgen.
What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
respect to funtionality of Lyx? --
4) make install
will install it. You can use make install-strip instead
if you want a smaller binary.
I never used make
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
Ignoring unknown flag `zipped=native' for format `dia'.
LyXRC.cpp (1130): Ignoring
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:05:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Thanks, Jürgen.
What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
respect to funtionality of Lyx? --
4) make install
will install it. You can use make
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
So configure and make suceeded?
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
So configure and make suceeded?
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
This is
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Now it works after following your advices. Two questions left:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
2013/3/4, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 19:56:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version,
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
Mind you, I compiled and installed lyx 2.0.5-1 in
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly evolving. Only the very last release of the 2.0.x series
will be
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
/etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
I see the lyx 2.0.3-3
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 11:36:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is
an experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid
since squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Thanks, Jürgen.
What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
respect to funtionality of Lyx? --
4) make install
will install it. You can use make install-strip instead
if you want a smaller binary.
I never used make
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
Ignoring unknown flag `zipped=native' for format `dia'.
LyXRC.cpp (1130): Ignoring
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:05:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Thanks, Jürgen.
What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
respect to funtionality of Lyx? --
4) make install
will install it. You can use make
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
So configure and make suceeded?
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx
So configure and make suceeded?
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
This is, what I get
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
This is
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Now it works after following your advices. Two questions left:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
2013/3/4, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 19:56:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
1-
former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version,
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
Mind you, I compiled and installed lyx 2.0.5-1 in
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly evolving. Only the very last release of the 2.0.x series
will be
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
> /etc/apt/sources.list squeeze to sid
> I see the lyx
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 11:36:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is
> > an experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid
> > since squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Thanks, Jürgen.
> What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
> respect to funtionality of Lyx? -->
>
> 4) make install
>will install it. You can use "make install-strip" instead
>if you want a smaller binary.
I never
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
Ignoring unknown flag `zipped=native' for format `dia'.
LyXRC.cpp (1130):
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:05:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Thanks, Jürgen.
> > What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
> > respect to funtionality of Lyx? -->
> >
> > 4) make install
> >
> >will install it. You can use
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> with
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
> [1] 15863
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> with
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
So configure and make suceeded?
> [1] 15863
>
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> > with
> > wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
>
> So configure and make
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
>> > with
>> >
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> >> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> >> > This
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> 1-
> former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
> lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Now it works after following your advices. Two questions left:
>
> 1-
> former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
> lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht
2013/3/4, Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>> I used to use lyx 2.1.0.svn but was several time reminded that this is an
>>
>> experimental version. I therefore decided to change to debian sid since
>> squeeze does not offer lyx 2.0.3-3. After changing in the
>>
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 19:56:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> wrote:
> > 1-
> >
> > former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> > Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren
> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
> your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
> it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
> filename filename should work.
>
Mind you, I compiled and installed lyx
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly evolving. Only the very last release of the 2.0.x series
will be
Waluyo Adi Siswanto was.uthm at gmail.com writes:
Is that possible to have lyx 2, while maintaining 1.6.10 in the machine.
Yes. LyX 2 will install into a different directory than 1.6.10, and will use a
different user directory, so I think there should be no collisions. I ran them
in parallel
Thanks Paul
Now I have both 1.6 and 2.0 versions in my Windows XP box.
Regards
Waluyo
On 9 July 2011 05:56, Paul Rubin ru...@msu.edu wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto was.uthm at gmail.com writes:
Is that possible to have lyx 2, while maintaining 1.6.10 in the machine.
Yes. LyX 2 will install
Waluyo Adi Siswanto was.uthm at gmail.com writes:
Is that possible to have lyx 2, while maintaining 1.6.10 in the machine.
Yes. LyX 2 will install into a different directory than 1.6.10, and will use a
different user directory, so I think there should be no collisions. I ran them
in parallel
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo