Re: Fractions below baseline in 2.3

2018-04-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 12/04/2018 à 23:13, Anders Host-Madsen a écrit : I attach two screen shots. At least in my opinion the \pi/2 is too low in the math input mode. This is on Mac. This may be a matter of spacing between the fraction bar and the character. One day I will try to understand the rules implemented

Re: Fractions below baseline in 2.3

2018-04-12 Thread Anders Host-Madsen
Yes, I can see it. The issue is that the \pi in math input mode is smaller than the \pi in latex, which makes it look unbalanced in math input mode. Probably nothing to do about that.

Re: Fractions below baseline in 2.3

2018-04-12 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 04/12/2018 05:13 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote: I attach two screen shots. At least in my opinion the \pi/2 is too low in the math input mode. This is on Mac.Inline image Inline image The dividing lines for the fractions both look pretty well centered to me. I think the issue may be that the

Re: Fractions below baseline in 2.3

2018-04-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 12/04/2018 à 21:21, Anders Host-Madsen a écrit : It seems to me that LyX 2.3 sets fractions slightly too low compared to the baseline when entering equations. Of course once they are typeset, they move to the correct position. But in the math input mode it's almost as though fractions are in

Re: Fractions below baseline in 2.3

2018-04-12 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 04/12/2018 03:21 PM, Anders Host-Madsen wrote: It seems to me that LyX 2.3 sets fractions slightly too low compared to the baseline when entering equations. Of course once they are typeset, they move to the correct position. But in the math input mode it's almost as though fractions are in s

Re: fractions in display style

2007-09-20 Thread Paul A. Rubin
pol wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: What document class? I just tried the article class, and fractions in display mode appeared (in the DVI) in display style. In fact, I tried \[\frac{a}{b}=\dfrac{a}{b}={\displaystyle \frac{a}{b}}\] (using LyX math insets, not ERT) and got a formula with three

Re: fractions in display style - math.bind

2007-09-20 Thread pol
Brian Kidd wrote: > the \dfrac command will give you a fraction in display style without > having to explicitly type \displaystyle. if you want fewer > keystrokes, then an alternative to setting the default fraction to be > in display style would be to create a custom bind for dfrac. > Thank you,

Re: fractions in display style

2007-09-20 Thread pol
Paul A. Rubin wrote: > What document class? I just tried the article class, and fractions in > display mode appeared (in the DVI) in display style. In fact, I tried > > \[\frac{a}{b}=\dfrac{a}{b}={\displaystyle \frac{a}{b}}\] > > (using LyX math insets, not ERT) and got a formula with three id

Re: fractions in display style

2007-09-19 Thread Paul A. Rubin
pol wrote: Fractions in equations in display mode are not in display style. The explicit command \displaystyle before the fraction has to be entered, to render the display style. Can you confirm that? How to set the fraction display style s default, when the math expression is in display mode?

Re: fractions in display style

2007-09-19 Thread Brian Kidd
the \dfrac command will give you a fraction in display style without having to explicitly type \displaystyle. if you want fewer keystrokes, then an alternative to setting the default fraction to be in display style would be to create a custom bind for dfrac. hope that helps, -brian On Sep

Re: Fractions

2005-04-08 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Matt Williams wrote: Dear List, I'm trying to insert a (logical) formula, of the form: a,b,c if a,b,c -> d - d I'm trying to do it using a fraction, but don't know how to get a double top line. Any ideas? Matt Lyx 1.3.5 on Linux fc3 In a math display environment, you can put a 4x1 array, p

Re: Fractions

2005-04-08 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
If you select fraction then in the top box of the fraction select matrix and choose a 2x1 matrix then you get two lines on the top of the fraction. I also chose a 1x1 matrix on the bottom so the format is the same. The only draw back is that the bottom of the fraction is not left aligned. See att

Re: Fractions in mathmode

2001-12-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Kent Kostuk wrote: > Here is what I am trying to do. I want to type (a+1)/(a+2) in a display > formula without having to use the mouse to select the fraction button in > the math panel. I was just looking for a quicker way to doing things. Am I > stuck with the math panel? open mathbox with

Re: Fractions in mathmode

2001-12-08 Thread Renaud MICHEL
Le Samedi 8 Décembre 2001 23:54, vous avez écrit : > Here is what I am trying to do. I want to type (a+1)/(a+2) in a display > formula without having to use the mouse to select the fraction button in > the math panel. I was just looking for a quicker way to doing things. Am I > stuck with the mat

Re: Fractions in mathmode

2001-12-08 Thread Kent Kostuk
Here is what I am trying to do. I want to type (a+1)/(a+2) in a display formula without having to use the mouse to select the fraction button in the math panel. I was just looking for a quicker way to doing things. Am I stuck with the math panel? Kent Kostuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fractions in mathmode

2001-12-08 Thread Remzi Seker
OOooops! Sorry! I thought it was the SUM! There is the button for fractions in the mathpanel (on the rop, second one from left). Have you considered using nicefrac? On Saturday 08 December 2001 14:19, Rem wrote: > click on the button under +- (on the right of the arrows) the first box is > sum

Re: Fractions in mathmode

2001-12-08 Thread Rem
click on the button under +- (on the right of the arrows) the first box is summation R - Original Message - From: "Kent Kostuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: Fractions in mathmode > Is there a quick keyboard equivalent to t

Re: Fractions

2001-11-13 Thread Egbert J.W. Boers
Op dinsdag 13 november 2001 13:46, schreef Herbert Voss: > "Egbert J.W. Boers" wrote: > > Is there a way to make fractures like 6/7 look like ¾? > http://www.lyx.org/help/mathmode.html#nicefrac Almost. Unfortunately it still uses the "slash" in stead of the "fraction" symbol -- and they are no

Re: Fractions

2001-11-13 Thread Herbert Voss
"Egbert J.W. Boers" wrote: > > Is there a way to make fractures like 6/7 look like ¾? -- http://www.lyx.org/help/mathmode.html#nicefrac HErbert