Am 09.12.2010 um 05:57 schrieb Pete Crite:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running the latest LyX on Mac OS X. I've had the spellchecker work fine
> in the past, using aspell. I've just tried to spellcheck a new file, and
> strange things are happening. Quite frequently, words that are spelt
> correctly are
На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
spellchecker is not active.
If I see the from the
Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
spellchecker is not active.
If I see the from the
Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
spellchecker is not active.
If I see the from the
Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
>> I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
>> using the following commands:
>>
>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
>> make
>> sudo make install
>>
>> everything ok no errors, but when I run
On Nov 7, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
...Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy
checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the
character ú. Specifically, the
On Nov 7, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
...Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy
checking a document containing a Spanish name that includes the
character ú. Specifically, the
On Nov 7, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> ...Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>
>> Greetings LyX users,
>>
>> The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy
>> checking a document containing a Spanish
On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher
Am 07.11.2010 um 20:29 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt
On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher
Am 07.11.2010 um 20:29 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt
On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>
>> On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>>> On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28
Am 07.11.2010 um 20:29 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt
Am 05.11.2010 um 04:46 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>> On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM,
Am Friday 05 November 2010 04:46:11 schrieben Sie:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt
Am Friday 05 November 2010 04:46:11 schrieben Sie:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt
Am Friday 05 November 2010 04:46:11 schrieben Sie:
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> >
> > On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> >>> Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On 10/30/2010 02:53
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher
Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>>
>>> On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> Greetings LyX users,
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 03.11.2010 um 18:57 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>>>
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>
>> On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>>>
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
document containing a Spanish name that
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
document containing a Spanish name that
Am 02.11.2010 um 03:28 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>>
>>> Greetings LyX users,
>>>
>>> The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
>>> document containing a
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that
includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that
includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems
On 10/30/2010 02:53 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a document containing a Spanish name that
includes the character ú. Specifically, the name seems
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú.
Specifically, the name seems throw the checker pretty seriously off
Am 30.10.2010 um 09:53 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú.
Specifically, the name
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú.
Specifically, the name seems throw the checker pretty seriously off
Am 30.10.2010 um 09:53 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
Greetings LyX users,
The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú.
Specifically, the name
Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
> Greetings LyX users,
>
> The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
> document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú.
> Specifically, the name seems throw the checker pretty seriously off
Am 30.10.2010 um 09:53 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 29.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Christopher Menzel:
>
>> Greetings LyX users,
>>
>> The aspell-based spellchecker in LyX does not appear to be happy checking a
>> document containing a Spanish name that includes the character ú.
>> Specifically,
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlovemil_pavlovat mail.bg writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have changed a bit -- in the
Am 28.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have
Am 28.10.2010 um 16:57 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 28.10.2010 11:30, Stephan Witt написа:
Am 28.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
If I find the time I'll have a look.
But surely I won't install Linux Mint
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlovemil_pavlovat mail.bg writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have changed a bit -- in the
Am 28.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have
Am 28.10.2010 um 16:57 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 28.10.2010 11:30, Stephan Witt написа:
Am 28.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
If I find the time I'll have a look.
But surely I won't install Linux Mint
На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have changed a bit -- in the
Am 28.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
>> Emil Pavlov writes:
>>
>>> My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
>>> regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
>>>
>> The zipped document
Am 28.10.2010 um 16:57 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> На 28.10.2010 11:30, Stephan Witt написа:
>> Am 28.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
>>
>>
>>> На 28.10.2010 01:37, Paul Rubin написа:
>>>
Emil Pavlov writes:
>
>> If I find the time I'll have a look.
>>
>>
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
P.S. Uwe
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 23:05, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlovemil_pavlovat mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
I failed to reproduce it on the same platform (Mint 9/LyX 1.6.7).
hm, strange. I just got an answer from a friend of mine, who also
couldn't reproduce it. Now, what should I do?
Did
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have changed a bit -- in the image you provided
with your original post, the
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
P.S. Uwe
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 23:05, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlovemil_pavlovat mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
I failed to reproduce it on the same platform (Mint 9/LyX 1.6.7).
hm, strange. I just got an answer from a friend of mine, who also
couldn't reproduce it. Now, what should I do?
Did
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have changed a bit -- in the image you provided
with your original post, the
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
P.S. Uwe
Emil Pavlov mail.bg> writes:
>
> На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
> > Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> >
> >> I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
> >
> > regards
На 27.10.2010 23:05, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this
Emil Pavlov mail.bg> writes:
> >> I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
> >>
> > I failed to reproduce it on the same platform (Mint 9/LyX 1.6.7).
> >
> >
> hm, strange. I just got an answer from a friend of mine, who also
> couldn't reproduce it. Now, what should I do?
>
Did
Emil Pavlov mail.bg> writes:
> My friend has everything. I have zipped it and attached it. It happens
> regardless where the cursor is. Btw, I have check tex installed.
The zipped document appears to have changed a bit -- in the image you provided
with your original post, the source window
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
Hi!
I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
to work.
I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
system preferences/spelling/dictionaries and put all the dictionaries in the
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
Hi!
I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
to work.
I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
system preferences/spelling/dictionaries and put all the dictionaries in the
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
> to work.
>
> I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
> system preferences/spelling/dictionaries and put all the dictionaries
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
Hi!
I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
to work.
You're using which version?
I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
system preferences/spelling/dictionaries and put
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
Hi!
I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
to work.
You're using which version?
I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
system preferences/spelling/dictionaries and put
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
> to work.
You're using which version?
> I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
> system preferences/spelling/dictionaries
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Jaime A. Millan -
UCLj.quij...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Hi, I'm new using Lyx and Tex basis programs. Unfortunately when I'm trying
to use the spellchecker i found the following error:
The spellchecker could not be started
LyX: Failed to start ispell!
I just install
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Jaime A. Millan -
UCLj.quij...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Hi, I'm new using Lyx and Tex basis programs. Unfortunately when I'm trying
to use the spellchecker i found the following error:
The spellchecker could not be started
LyX: Failed to start ispell!
I just install
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Jaime A. Millan -
UCL wrote:
> Hi, I'm new using Lyx and Tex basis programs. Unfortunately when I'm trying
> to use the spellchecker i found the following error:
>
> The spellchecker could not be started
> LyX: Failed to start ispell!
>
> I just
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools - Prefeernces -
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools - Prefeernces -
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools - Prefeernces -
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools - Prefeernces -
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools -> Prefeernces ->
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools -> Prefeernces ->
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools - Prefeernces -
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools - Prefeernces -
Christian Bustamante wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using LyX on Windows XP and I'm trying to set up the spellchecker,
so I downloaded the spanish Open Office dictionary. This file is a
plain text one, so I changed the extension to pws (the requiered one
for LyX). Then I went to Tools -> Prefeernces ->
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
This is a bug.
Oh. Not a new feature of 1.6.2? :-)
The language has been set to latex, which I think needs to be done for
some reason, and of course the spellchecker isn't going to find that.
Cross-posting to devel
Thank you.
FWIW, I killed
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
This is a bug.
Oh. Not a new feature of 1.6.2? :-)
The language has been set to latex, which I think needs to be done for
some reason, and of course the spellchecker isn't going to find that.
Cross-posting to devel
Thank you.
FWIW, I killed
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, rgheck wrote:
This is a bug.
Oh. Not a new feature of 1.6.2? :-)
The language has been set to "latex", which I think needs to be done for
some reason, and of course the spellchecker isn't going to find that.
Cross-posting to devel
Thank you.
FWIW, I killed
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:52:09AM +1100, Typhoon wrote:
Yeah! While we're making formal objections to a project whose list we
first posted to today, I post the following formal objections:
* Make the tan background white so as to not clash with room
decoration
* The appalling printer
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:01:11 +0200
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:52:09AM +1100, Typhoon wrote:
Yeah! While we're making formal objections to a project whose
list we first posted to today, I post the following formal
objections:
* Make the tan
You should set the document language to British.
To jump into this thread, unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work.
color, analyze and defense all pass as being correctly spelt when the
language is set to British
Is there something else that needs to be done?
Thanks
Graham
TheOldFellow wrote:
However, that is really appalling. My language is called English. I
will just about stand up for English(UK), but British, never. What
about Gallic, Cornish and Welsh - three completely different British
languages?
In the German localization, we recently changed the
Maybe we should use this convention [i.e. Language (variety)] in
general.
Even though it doesn't solve any political issues, it's at least
easier to
find.
Definitely.
JMarc
You should set the document language to British.
To jump into this thread, unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work.
color, analyze and defense all pass as being correctly spelt when
the language is set to British
Is there something else that needs to be done?
Do you you have the British
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Graham Smith engaged keyboard and shared this with us
all:
--} You should set the document language to British.
--}
--} To jump into this thread, unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work.
--} color, analyze and defense all pass as being correctly spelt when the
--} language
Graham Smith wrote:
You should set the document language to British.
To jump into this thread, unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work.
color, analyze and defense all pass as being correctly spelt when the
language is set to British
Is there something else that needs to be done?
Do you
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:46:13 +0200
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:55:24 +0200
Joost Verburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote:
How do I set the spellchecker to English-English (i.e. as written in
England) instead of
201 - 300 of 552 matches
Mail list logo