Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Pierre Lescanne
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: > > "Pierre" == Pierre Lescanne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Pierre> I my case when I tried to start the spellchecker on a French > Pierre> (francais) document (french-gutenberg to be more precise). It > Pierre> just hangs and stays blocked for a while I

Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Pierre Lescanne wrote: > \documentclass[frenchb,dvips]{article} > I do not know why. I changed it to > \documentclass[french,dvips]{article} > without the "b" and now it works. frenchb.sty is -- beneath francais.sty and french.sty -- a valid babel file (I don't know the differences) So the

Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marc Levivier wrote: > I have also a problem with the spell checker of LyX 1.2.1. When I cliked > on the button : nothing (in "francais"). I changed things I don't > understand in language (options documents), language (preferences) and > language (for using an other language with the spell

Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Pierre Lescanne
Juergen Spitzmueller writes: > Pierre Lescanne wrote: > > \documentclass[frenchb,dvips]{article} > > I do not know why. I changed it to > > \documentclass[french,dvips]{article} > > without the "b" and now it works. > > frenchb.sty is -- beneath francais.sty and french.sty -- a valid

Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Pierre Lescanne wrote: > I would have been happy to have done as you suggested, but with > "frenchb", Preferences->Language->Spellchecker was locked and removing > the "b was the way I have found to unlock the process. The *preferences* dialog was locked? I cannot imagine that. Note that I do not

Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Pierre Lescanne
Juergen Spitzmueller writes: > Pierre Lescanne wrote: > > I would have been happy to have done as you suggested, but with > > "frenchb", Preferences->Language->Spellchecker was locked and removing > > the "b was the way I have found to unlock the process. > > The *preferences* dialog was

Re: SpellChecker

2002-11-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Pierre Lescanne wrote: > That is right there are three places where you can choose the > language, among them two for choosing the language of the > spellchecker. And as I pointed out above, only the field "use alternative language" is of interest. Jürgen.

Re: Spellchecker feature request

2002-08-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
George == George Richard Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: George I wasn't quite sure where to send this, so I thought I'd send George it here and ask at the same time. George I'd like to see a replace all option in the spell checker. George I'd find it useful to be able to replace all

Re: Spellchecker feature request

2002-08-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
George == George Richard Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: George I wasn't quite sure where to send this, so I thought I'd send George it here and ask at the same time. George I'd like to see a replace all option in the spell checker. George I'd find it useful to be able to replace all

Re: Spellchecker feature request

2002-08-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "George" == George Richard Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: George> I wasn't quite sure where to send this, so I thought I'd send George> it here and ask at the same time. George> I'd like to see a "replace all" option in the spell checker. George> I'd find it useful to be able to

Re: Spellchecker dies

2002-05-21 Thread thomas sch[nhoff
Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 20 May 2002 09:42 am, thomas sch[nhoff wrote: I searched my lyx list archives and found nothing about this except one post in German that I couldn't read. I could find nothing about this on the LyX website. Hi Thomas, I looked it up again, and only the menu items

Re: Spellchecker dies

2002-05-21 Thread thomas sch[nhoff
Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 20 May 2002 09:42 am, thomas sch[nhoff wrote: I searched my lyx list archives and found nothing about this except one post in German that I couldn't read. I could find nothing about this on the LyX website. Hi Thomas, I looked it up again, and only the menu items

Re: Spellchecker dies

2002-05-21 Thread thomas sch[nhoff
Steve Litt wrote: >On Monday 20 May 2002 09:42 am, thomas sch[nhoff wrote: > >>>I searched my lyx list archives and found nothing about this except one >>>post in German that I couldn't read. I could find nothing about this on >>>the LyX website. >>> > >Hi Thomas, > >I looked it up again, and

Re: Spellchecker dies

2002-05-20 Thread thomas sch[nhoff
Hello Steve, I had the same problem a long time ago, unfortunately I don't remember it very clear: As far as I remember I changed the spelling of language from german to deutsch in preferences dialog. After this, running Aspell were no problem anymore. I am not quite sure if this means

Re: Spellchecker dies

2002-05-20 Thread thomas sch[nhoff
Hello Steve, I had the same problem a long time ago, unfortunately I don't remember it very clear: As far as I remember I changed the spelling of language from german to deutsch in preferences dialog. After this, running Aspell were no problem anymore. I am not quite sure if this means

Re: Spellchecker dies

2002-05-20 Thread thomas sch[nhoff
Hello Steve, I had the same problem a long time ago, unfortunately I don't remember it very clear: As far as I remember I changed the spelling of language from "german" to "deutsch" in preferences dialog. After this, running Aspell were no problem anymore. I am not quite sure if this

Re: spellchecker

2001-08-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Thomas Schönhoff wrote: there is still some conmfusion about my spellchecker, when running spellchecking an error message occures that the ipell process has somewhat died, including a hint to usr/lib/ispell (which doesn't exist, its usr/lib/aspell, anyway) and a missing dictionary. So I

Re: spellchecker

2001-08-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Thomas Schönhoff wrote: there is still some conmfusion about my spellchecker, when running spellchecking an error message occures that the ipell process has somewhat died, including a hint to usr/lib/ispell (which doesn't exist, its usr/lib/aspell, anyway) and a missing dictionary. So I

Re: spellchecker

2001-08-03 Thread Herbert Voss
Thomas Schönhoff wrote: > > there is still some conmfusion about my spellchecker, when running > spellchecking an error message occures that the ipell process has > somewhat died, including a hint to usr/lib/ispell (which doesn't exist, > its usr/lib/aspell, anyway) and a missing dictionary. >

Re: Spellchecker composed words

2001-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jürgen Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused Jürgen by all the "Last" and "Real Last Calls" on the devel list ;-) Sorry about that. I'm wanting to release 1.1.6fix2 the next day for a long time, but I do not find

Re: Spellchecker composed words

2001-04-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
On Monday, 2. April 2001 11:55, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Jrgen" == Jrgen Spitzmller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jrgen Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused Jrgen by all the "Last" and "Real Last Calls" on the devel list ;-) Sorry about that. I'm wanting to

Re: Spellchecker composed words

2001-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jürgen Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused Jürgen by all the "Last" and "Real Last Calls" on the devel list ;-) Sorry about that. I'm wanting to release 1.1.6fix2 the next day for a long time, but I do not find

Re: Spellchecker composed words

2001-04-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
On Monday, 2. April 2001 11:55, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Jrgen" == Jrgen Spitzmller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jrgen Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused Jrgen by all the "Last" and "Real Last Calls" on the devel list ;-) Sorry about that. I'm wanting to

Re: Spellchecker & composed words

2001-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jürgen> Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused Jürgen> by all the "Last" and "Real Last Calls" on the devel list ;-) Sorry about that. I'm wanting to release 1.1.6fix2 the next day for a long time, but I do

Re: Spellchecker & composed words

2001-04-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
On Monday, 2. April 2001 11:55, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jürgen> Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit > confused Jürgen> by all the "Last" and "Real Last Calls" on the devel > list ;-) > > Sorry about

Re: Spellchecker composed words

2001-03-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
On Friday, 30. March 2001 12:02, Jrgen Spitzmller wrote: [1] Settings: - ispell; extra language: deutsch [german]; enable input encoding; allow composed words [!] - LyX 1.1.6fix2 -ispell version 3.1.20.197 Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused by all the "Last"

Re: Spellchecker composed words

2001-03-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
On Friday, 30. March 2001 12:02, Jrgen Spitzmller wrote: [1] Settings: - ispell; extra language: deutsch [german]; enable input encoding; allow composed words [!] - LyX 1.1.6fix2 -ispell version 3.1.20.197 Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused by all the "Last"

Re: Spellchecker & composed words

2001-03-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
On Friday, 30. March 2001 12:02, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > [1] Settings: > - ispell; extra language: deutsch [german]; enable input encoding; > allow composed words [!] > - LyX 1.1.6fix2 > -ispell version 3.1.20.197 Sorry, of course it's LyX 1.1.6fix1. I'm a little bit confused by all the

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-15 Thread Mark Hansel
Anyone can do this now doesn't need lyx to do it. One is not prevented from using lyx, obviously, but lyx will add steps. Do a spell check over the file ispell uses to add the words. For English, it is ".ispell_english". For obvious reasons, work on a copy of the file and change the name of

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-15 Thread Mark Hansel
Anyone can do this now doesn't need lyx to do it. One is not prevented from using lyx, obviously, but lyx will add steps. Do a spell check over the file ispell uses to add the words. For English, it is ".ispell_english". For obvious reasons, work on a copy of the file and change the name of

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-15 Thread Mark Hansel
Anyone can do this now doesn't need lyx to do it. One is not prevented from using lyx, obviously, but lyx will add steps. Do a spell check over the file ispell uses to add the words. For English, it is ".ispell_english". For obvious reasons, work on a copy of the file and change the name of

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Christopher" == Christopher Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christopher When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it Christopher consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the Christopher spellchecker would be nice. There have been plans like that in the past, but the spellchecker has

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread robin
Christopher Jones wrote: When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) Robin

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
robin wrote: Christopher Jones wrote: When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) why? Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://perce.de/lyx/

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread George De Bruin
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 17:28, you wrote: robin wrote: Christopher Jones wrote: When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) why? Well, think about correcting something like the

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Christopher Jones
I think in case two intended words are (mis)spelled in the same way. In that case, when the spellchecker bypasses you, you don't catch it. But I think that occurrence is rare. And you only fail to catch it when you don't proofread, in which case you deserve it. On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, you wrote:

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Christopher Jones
Annother feature would be the option to remove words you added to your dictionary. Because I am sloppy at 3.00 in the morning, I sometimes hit "add to dictionary" on a word that shouldn't be added. That word then keeps coming up in the list of suggestions, and it gets missed on subsequent

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Christopher" == Christopher Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christopher When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it Christopher consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the Christopher spellchecker would be nice. There have been plans like that in the past, but the spellchecker has

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread robin
Christopher Jones wrote: When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) Robin

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
robin wrote: Christopher Jones wrote: When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) why? Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://perce.de/lyx/

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread George De Bruin
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 17:28, you wrote: robin wrote: Christopher Jones wrote: When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) why? Well, think about correcting something like the

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Christopher Jones
I think in case two intended words are (mis)spelled in the same way. In that case, when the spellchecker bypasses you, you don't catch it. But I think that occurrence is rare. And you only fail to catch it when you don't proofread, in which case you deserve it. On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, you wrote:

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Christopher Jones
Annother feature would be the option to remove words you added to your dictionary. Because I am sloppy at 3.00 in the morning, I sometimes hit "add to dictionary" on a word that shouldn't be added. That word then keeps coming up in the list of suggestions, and it gets missed on subsequent

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Christopher" == Christopher Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Christopher> When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it Christopher> consistently wrong. A 'correct all' feature in the Christopher> spellchecker would be nice. There have been plans like that in the past, but the

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread robin
Christopher Jones wrote: > > When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct > all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. But dangerous ;-) Robin

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
robin wrote: > > Christopher Jones wrote: > > > > When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A 'correct > > all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. > > But dangerous ;-) why? Herbert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://perce.de/lyx/

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread George De Bruin
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 17:28, you wrote: > robin wrote: > > Christopher Jones wrote: > > > When I spell a word wrong, I tend to spell it consistently wrong. A > > > 'correct all' feature in the spellchecker would be nice. > > > > But dangerous ;-) > > why? Well, think about correcting

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Christopher Jones
I think in case two intended words are (mis)spelled in the same way. In that case, when the spellchecker bypasses you, you don't catch it. But I think that occurrence is rare. And you only fail to catch it when you don't proofread, in which case you deserve it. On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, you wrote: >

Re: spellchecker feature suggestion

2001-02-14 Thread Christopher Jones
Annother feature would be the option to remove words you added to your dictionary. Because I am sloppy at 3.00 in the morning, I sometimes hit "add to dictionary" on a word that shouldn't be added. That word then keeps coming up in the list of suggestions, and it gets missed on subsequent

Re: spellchecker

2000-10-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Matìj" == Matìj Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matìj Fortunately ispell is able and willing to work correctly with Matìj all this mess (which is really great, taking into account that Matìj it is really better than many commercial wordprocessors). Matìj However, sometime it asks for

Re: spellchecker

2000-10-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Matìj" == Matìj Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matìj Fortunately ispell is able and willing to work correctly with Matìj all this mess (which is really great, taking into account that Matìj it is really better than many commercial wordprocessors). Matìj However, sometime it asks for

Re: spellchecker

2000-10-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Matìj" == Matìj Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matìj> Fortunately ispell is able and willing to work correctly with Matìj> all this mess (which is really great, taking into account that Matìj> it is really better than many commercial wordprocessors). Matìj> However, sometime it asks for

<    1   2   3   4   5   6