Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/07/10, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because the table dialog is

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/07/10, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because the table dialog is

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/07/10, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: >> 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables >> and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that >> automatically. Is that possible? > >I never had this

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables > > and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that > > automatically. Is that possible? > > I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because > the table

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/06/10, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/06/10, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/06/10, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: >> Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two >> table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as >> figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because

Strange table numbering

Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not particularly enlightening. S.

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not

Strange table numbering

Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not particularly enlightening. S.

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not

Strange table numbering

Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not particularly enlightening. S.

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

displayed in lyx. thanks Martina -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1315464.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

displayed in lyx. thanks Martina -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1315464.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

> Contents field in the pdf file stays empty while it is correctly displayed > in lyx. > > > thanks > Martina > > > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1315464.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

I've the same annoying problem. Was it solved? Yehya -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1140559.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

I've the same annoying problem. Was it solved? Yehya -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1140559.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

I've the same annoying problem. Was it solved? Yehya -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1140559.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Lyx's strange table numbering

Hi I use Lyx to write a document with a lot of tables. However, I have a very strange problem in lyx everything works fine but as soon as I create a pdf (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I

Lyx's strange table numbering

Hi I use Lyx to write a document with a lot of tables. However, I have a very strange problem in lyx everything works fine but as soon as I create a pdf (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I

Lyx's strange table numbering

Hi I use Lyx to write a document with a lot of tables. However, I have a very strange problem in lyx everything works fine but as soon as I create a pdf (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I

Re: Strange table numbering

Glenn Hutchings wrote: Is the longtable float numbering a bug? Is is sensible to put a longtable (designed for making tables span multiple pages) inside a float? Then again, how else can a longtable get a caption? a float can only be one page, otherwise it makes no sense for latex for

Re: Strange table numbering

Hi there! I found out the circumstances when table floats get numbered 1, 3, 5, 7, ... or 2, 4, 6, 8, ... I put longtables inside the floats, since doing that seemed to get the tables centred. (Having used LyX more now, I know that's not the way to do it -- you just set the paragraph

Re: Strange table numbering

Glenn Hutchings wrote: Is the longtable float numbering a bug? Is is sensible to put a longtable (designed for making tables span multiple pages) inside a float? Then again, how else can a longtable get a caption? a float can only be one page, otherwise it makes no sense for latex for

Re: Strange table numbering

Hi there! I found out the circumstances when table floats get numbered 1, 3, 5, 7, ... or 2, 4, 6, 8, ... I put longtables inside the floats, since doing that seemed to get the tables centred. (Having used LyX more now, I know that's not the way to do it -- you just set the paragraph

Re: Strange table numbering

Glenn Hutchings wrote: > > Is the longtable float numbering a bug? Is is sensible to > put a longtable (designed for making tables span multiple > pages) inside a float? Then again, how else can a longtable > get a caption? a float can only be one page, otherwise it makes no sense for latex

Strange table numbering

Hi there LyX fans. I have 4 tables in my doc, inside table floats. If I put the tables before the captions, I get tables numbered 1, 3, 5, 7. If I put them afterward, I get 2, 4, 6, 8. But the actual numbering I really want is 1, 2, 3, 4 (call me fussy or something). What's going on

Re: Strange table numbering

Glenn Hutchings wrote: I have 4 tables in my doc, inside table floats. If I put the tables before the captions, I get tables numbered 1, 3, 5, 7. If I put them afterward, I get 2, 4, 6, 8. But the actual numbering I really want is 1, 2, 3, 4 (call me fussy or something). What's going on

Strange table numbering

Hi there LyX fans. I have 4 tables in my doc, inside table floats. If I put the tables before the captions, I get tables numbered 1, 3, 5, 7. If I put them afterward, I get 2, 4, 6, 8. But the actual numbering I really want is 1, 2, 3, 4 (call me fussy or something). What's going on

Re: Strange table numbering

Glenn Hutchings wrote: I have 4 tables in my doc, inside table floats. If I put the tables before the captions, I get tables numbered 1, 3, 5, 7. If I put them afterward, I get 2, 4, 6, 8. But the actual numbering I really want is 1, 2, 3, 4 (call me fussy or something). What's going on

Strange table numbering

Hi there LyX fans. I have 4 tables in my doc, inside table floats. If I put the tables before the captions, I get tables numbered 1, 3, 5, 7. If I put them afterward, I get 2, 4, 6, 8. But the actual numbering I really want is 1, 2, 3, 4 (call me fussy or something). What's going on

Re: Strange table numbering

Glenn Hutchings wrote: > > I have 4 tables in my doc, inside table floats. If I put the > tables before the captions, I get tables numbered 1, 3, 5, 7. > If I put them afterward, I get 2, 4, 6, 8. But the actual > numbering I really want is 1, 2, 3, 4 (call me fussy or > something). What's