There are four scripts attached with this email and one
compressed-format LyX document:
sortable.py, sortable_help.py -- a script for sorting tables in LyX, &
its help file
sortlist.py, sortlist_help.py -- a script for sorting lists in LyX, &
its help file
pLyXSorting(compressed).l
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I don't think change tracking works here, since the file is modified
> *externally* (the built-in feel, although pleasing, is pure illusion). My
>
I see. What about using the CLI: Can LyX compare two documents from
the command line, and the
On 28/11/2012 7:59 p.m., Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I've used the same trick (exporting to an alternatively named LyX format,
but retaining the lyx file extension) for a number of other tasks (e.g.
sorting lists, expanding abbreviations)
Quick
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I've used the same trick (exporting to an alternatively named LyX format,
> but retaining the lyx file extension) for a number of other tasks (e.g.
> sorting lists, expanding abbreviations)
>
Quick question: Would it be a good idea to turn T
On 28/11/2012 1:13 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I've attached a python script, tablesort.py, a module tablesort.module
containing a custom inset (suggested by Liviu Andronic), and an explanatory
document, SortingTablesInLyX.lyx detailing w
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I've attached a python script, tablesort.py, a module tablesort.module
> containing a custom inset (suggested by Liviu Andronic), and an explanatory
> document, SortingTablesInLyX.lyx detailing what goes where and how to use
> it. In this th
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>> - Section 2.1: After defining the 'Converter box', it would help to
>> note that next teh user has to click Add and Apply. (Personally I find
>> this handling confusing.)
>
> (Ah, you too type "teh" for "the".)
>
Oh, I stopped paying attent
On 25/09/2012 8:59 a.m., Liviu Andronic wrote:
Andrew
Your script and module are great, and this is a functionality that
deserves getting into base LyX. Maybe worth opening a bug report for
this.
OK.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I've attached a python script, tabl
Andrew
Your script and module are great, and this is a functionality that
deserves getting into base LyX. Maybe worth opening a bug report for
this.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I've attached a python script, tablesort.py, a module tablesort.module
> containing a cust
On 2003-05-28, 06:16 GMT, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Likewise I don't want a default 10 point typeface with 1.5
>> inch margins on each side, I want a title that's left-justified rather
>> than centered, and so on through many choices.
>
> The point is: You can do that, but it hurts a bit. So if you
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:34:20PM -0700, James Frye wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Same here. The default spacing follow good type setting style. Exposing
> > them to the casual user is likely to produce bad typesetting, so at least
> > my interest in making that accessi
On Mon, 26 May 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Same here. The default spacing follow good type setting style. Exposing
> them to the casual user is likely to produce bad typesetting, so at least
> my interest in making that accessible is limited.
I'd say instead that the default spacing &c follows r
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:32:57PM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
>
Hi Jean-Pierre,
I know that you made a question but I haven't seen it. I got only a
truncated message with quoted text...
This happens sometimes, and I don't know why... the only pattern I see
is that those message
* George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010604 20:02]:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:46, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > FWIW, a number of Python folk are interested in LyX -- both for personal
> > use (with python.cls etc.) and as a possible unofficial documenting tool.
> > Their official documenting tools
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:46, Allan Rae wrote:
> FWIW, a number of Python folk are interested in LyX -- both for personal
> use (with python.cls etc.) and as a possible unofficial documenting tool.
> Their official documenting tools are a couple of scripts and any text
> editor and they aren't ab
On Monday 28 May 2001 03:34, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Now, I see from a development point where it will be necessary to focus
> | on one or two languages for the initial implementation / testing. But,
> | as soon as that is done I think the supp
Okay, I sat back for a bit on this. I didn't want to flood you while you
were studying Baruch...
On Sunday 27 May 2001 01:21, Baruch Even wrote:
> I understand what you say, but you need to understand the side of the
> developers too.
Baruch, I assure you, I understand the developer's side be
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 15:04:55 -0500
> From: George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> LyX Users mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting ta
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
> > There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
>
> I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
The link above doesn't seem to work now, but the
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
--
George J. De Bruin
Check Out 0l0rin's New Age compositions at http://mp3.com/0l0rin
0l0rin's latest
> > > Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
> > > it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
> > > bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
> > > second language.
There's also Lua (www.lua.org),
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:09:14 +0100
>>From: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting tables?)
>>Mail-Followup-To: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>User
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Allan Rae a écrit :
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
> > it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
> > bad idea because no-one cares to type all th
Allan Rae a écrit :
> [...]
>
> Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
> it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
> bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
> second language.
What are the adva
I will change the english in the documentation (and the suggestion too, of
course)
When I have made the changes, I post it. The script self I will send it at you,
and
who ask me.
If someone want, I send the script (version 0.0.0fix1 :-) in the mailinglist
self.
Guenter Milde wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, 25 May 2001 08:54:50 +0200 wrote A.Gulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi folks,
> I send you my very little perlscript. If you think it is long, its not true.
> there are a only 30 codelines, the rest is documentation.
Hi Antonio,
thanks for that little script of yours- I like it and I like
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
[...]
[ Baruch wrote this bit ]
> > The implementation as I expect it to be, will not force you to use one
> > language over the other, only if you want the official scripts you'll
> > need the official language. There is a need however to make the
> >
George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Now, I see from a development point where it will be necessary to focus on
| one or two languages for the initial implementation / testing. But, as soon
| as that is done I think the support should be expanded to at least six or
| more languages t
I understand what you say, but you need to understand the side of the
developers too. If we do not decide that a single language is the
official language than any feature that is moved to the scripting
languages needs to be maintained in several languages, that's too much
work for us to do. We hav
On Saturday 26 May 2001 11:11, Baruch Even wrote:
> The need is for an "Official language" not necessarily a single one, but
> one that is expected to be available in most installations, possibly it
> will be available out of the box from packages. This is to make it
> possible to have a library
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:11:51PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> * George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010526 19:05]:
> > On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:17, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > > To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> > > discussion), what is the language of choice f
On Thursday 24 May 2001 07:01, Joao B. Oliveira wrote:
> Before choosing a language that will affect our (happy) LyX lives,
> what requirements are really being made on this language? I
The requirements are going to vary on a user by user basis. For example, I
see the examples you listed as be
* George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010526 19:05]:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:17, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> > To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> > discussion), what is the language of choice for such an embedded
> > scripting language is from your perspective?
>
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:17, Baruch Even wrote:
> To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> discussion), what is the language of choice for such an embedded
> scripting language is from your perspective?
>
> Several options that were raised (and I rememeber) include Ico
Just tried running it, but perl -d came out with "unrecognized character \xA0
at line 60" (which seems to be in the middle of a comment, so shouldn't
apply, unless perl only numbers lines with instructions - it's been so long I
can't remember).
Looks pretty nifty if I can make it work though,
"Joao B. Oliveira" wrote:
> Antonio wrote:
>>"Joao B. Oliveira" wrote:
>>> See? Does not look that bad, but an even better solution would be
>>> *other* feature: import .cvs files directly as tables.
>>I have a little perlscript that produce a floattable (or a simple table) in
>>lyx-format from a
> Other question: what about enlarging (if necessary) the language
> already used in the minibuffer?
I think it's a safe guess that the languange used in the minibuffer will be
replaced by the Chosen Scripting Language at some point of time...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz ..
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:17:08PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> > discussion), what is the language of choice for such an embedded
> > scripting language is from your perspective?
> >
> > Several options that were raised (and I
* Kathryn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010524 09:52]:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:17:08PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> > discussion), what is the language of choice for such an embedded
> > scripting language is from your perspec
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:17:08PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> discussion), what is the language of choice for such an embedded
> scripting language is from your perspective?
>
> Several options that were raised (and I rememeber) i
Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Allan Rae writes:
|
| On 23 May 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > What is .cvs?
|
| csv
|
| comma separated values
|
| Isn't .cvs the suffix for non-stable (development) versions of LyX?
| According to the LDN: `... all releases w
Everyone seems to be having the same problem... The server tried to send
the e-mails through a wormhole, eh?!
R
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LyX Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:09 PM
Subje
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 16:18, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 23-May-2001 Niklas Werner wrote:
> > this would allow for importing database-records as well, since dumping
> > them cvs-split is fairly easy.
> > I'd like to add that to the 2.0-wishlist!
>
> I already told here that this IS already possib
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 18:17, Allan Rae wrote:
> On 23 May 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > What is .cvs?
>
> csv
>
> comma separated values
Yup, that's what I meant. My tendency to reverse keys is one reason I never
got very far with Prel scripting ;-)
> Allan. (ARRae)
> Why is it takin
Allan Rae writes:
On 23 May 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What is .cvs?
csv
comma separated values
Isn't .cvs the suffix for non-stable (development) versions of LyX?
According to the LDN: `... all releases without a suffix are stable
releases.'[1] The development versions
* George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 18:12]:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2001 06:56, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> > Hopefully in the future we will have an embedded scripting language in LyX
> > and features like this one will be implementable with it. This will
> > satisfy the feature-bloat propone
* Joao B. Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 17:37]:
> > On Wednesday 23 May 2001 14:56, Baruch Even wrote:
> > > Hopefully in the future we will have an embedded scripting language in LyX
> > > and features like this one will be implementable with it. This will
> > > satisfy the feature-bloat p
* Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 17:37]:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2001 15:28, Baruch Even wrote:
> > * Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 15:25]:
> > > > See? Does not look that bad, but an even better solution would be
> > > > *other* feature: import .cvs files directly as tables. T
On 23 May 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What is .cvs?
csv
comma separated values
Allan. (ARRae)
Why is it taking so bloody long for my emails to get back from the mailing
list? I announced LDN almost half an hour ago and the emails still
haven't arrived!
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 06:56, Baruch Even wrote:
> Hopefully in the future we will have an embedded scripting language in LyX
> and features like this one will be implementable with it. This will
> satisfy the feature-bloat proponents and the feature-bloat opponents, you
> will be able to use s
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 04:54, Robin Turner wrote:
> front-end for 'nix hackers, little features like sortable lists will make a
> lot of difference. I'm not advocating feature-bloat (if I want that, I can
> download Star Office!) just a few bits and bobs to make life easier.
Of course, this i
Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 23 May 2001 15:28, Baruch Even wrote:
| > * Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 15:25]:
| > > > See? Does not look that bad, but an even better solution would be
| > > > *other* feature: import .cvs files directly as tables. This seems
> On Wednesday 23 May 2001 14:56, Baruch Even wrote:
> > Hopefully in the future we will have an embedded scripting language in LyX
> > and features like this one will be implementable with it. This will
> > satisfy the feature-bloat proponents and the feature-bloat opponents, you
> > will be able
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 15:28, Baruch Even wrote:
> * Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 15:25]:
> > > See? Does not look that bad, but an even better solution would be
> > > *other* feature: import .cvs files directly as tables. This seems a
> > > better solution, as data are produced in
On 23-May-2001 Niklas Werner wrote:
> this would allow for importing database-records as well, since dumping
> them cvs-split is fairly easy.
> I'd like to add that to the 2.0-wishlist!
I already told here that this IS already possible. Just select the tsv
(tab-separated-value) in f.ex. emacs a
* Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010523 15:25]:
> > See? Does not look that bad, but an even better solution would be
> > *other* feature: import .cvs files directly as tables. This seems a
> > better solution, as data are produced in your favorite spreadsheet,
> > exported as cvs and imported
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 14:56, Baruch Even wrote:
> Hopefully in the future we will have an embedded scripting language in LyX
> and features like this one will be implementable with it. This will
> satisfy the feature-bloat proponents and the feature-bloat opponents, you
> will be able to use su
keep forgetting to reply to the list ;-(, probably getting old...
Original Message
Betrifft: Re: sorting tables?
Datum: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:12:38 +0200
Von: Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organisation: WebCrew
An: "Joao B. Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hopefully in the future we will have an embedded scripting language in LyX
and features like this one will be implementable with it. This will
satisfy the feature-bloat proponents and the feature-bloat opponents, you
will be able to use such features if you want and you will be able to
disable the
>
> > If you have the data from some other application which allows
> > formatted printing, conditional predicates and sorting functions, this
> > kind of problem is readily solved by printing in a file the
> > latex or lyx code and the data as you want it
> > and inputting it in the document. It
On 22-May-2001 Dave Brown wrote:
> Is there any sort of Latex command that will automatically sort a table
>alphabetically
> by, say, the first column, leaving the header at the top? Barring this, is there any
> way to sort the table automatically or do I have to make sure I'm entering the data
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 10:12, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> >Is there any sort of Latex command that will automatically sort a table
>> alphabetically by, say, the first column, leaving the header at the top?
>> Barring this, is there any way to sort the table automatically or do I have
>> to m
>>X-Apparently-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From: "Dave Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "LyX Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: sorting tables?
>>Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:43:03 -0700
>>
>>Is there any sort of
de Lima-Lopes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU/Linux Registered User # 182240
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Dave Brown wrote:
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:43:03 -0700
> From: Dave Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: sorting tables?
>
> Is there any sort of
Is there any sort of Latex command that will
automatically sort a table alphabetically by, say, the first column, leaving the
header at the top? Barring this, is there any way to sort the table
automatically or do I have to make sure I'm entering the data in alphabetical
order?
Thanks for
65 matches
Mail list logo
